Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


VPS Storage Indication - Page 2
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

VPS Storage Indication

2

Comments

  • Have you looked at https://www.lowendtalk.com/discussion/150416/our-big-storage-14-50-dedicated-is-back-limited-quantity

    Dallas is I think pretty decent network wise for Brazil?

  • raindog308raindog308 Administrator, Veteran

    huntercop said: If you are willing to stretch you budget, I have a 2TB dedi from Dacentec from $275/month. It comes back randomly so you should check their site daily.

    He was talking $10-20 and you mentioned $275. That's a goatse level of budget-stretching :-)

  • i hear @vapornode (tampa, FL) have a good connection to south america. maybe he have something fit your need.

    Thanked by 1vapornode
  • raindog308 said: He was talking $10-20 and you mentioned $275.

    I think it was a typo. Dacentec has a $25 server with those specs that shows up in stock now and then.

  • @ThyTe said:
    I have 100MB here, and everything works just fine.

    I am using client connection with 200mb, 300mb ... and I have the same result

    what is your internet provider / isp?
    it's residential connection or dedicated connection?

    because some provider easily give you 100mbps or 1gbps local connection but very slow to international connection

  • @willie said:

    raindog308 said: He was talking $10-20 and you mentioned $275.

    I think it was a typo. Dacentec has a $25 server with those specs that shows up in stock now and then.

    Maybe it's an yearly price?

  • @nullnothere said:
    Have you looked at https://www.lowendtalk.com/discussion/150416/our-big-storage-14-50-dedicated-is-back-limited-quantity

    Dallas is I think pretty decent network wise for Brazil?

    Any US network works much faster than Europe.

    But it is out of stock

  • Has anyone ever used Virmach? Is it good ?, but out of stock

  • @shell said:

    @ThyTe said:
    I have 100MB here, and everything works just fine.

    I am using client connection with 200mb, 300mb ... and I have the same result

    what is your internet provider / isp?
    it's residential connection or dedicated connection?

    because some provider easily give you 100mbps or 1gbps local connection but very slow to international connection

    100mb residential. But in other US VPS I have no problems

  • eai mano do brasil chama whats 66-99677 74-43

    @ThyTe said:

    @shell said:

    @ThyTe said:
    I have 100MB here, and everything works just fine.

    I am using client connection with 200mb, 300mb ... and I have the same result

    what is your internet provider / isp?
    it's residential connection or dedicated connection?

    because some provider easily give you 100mbps or 1gbps local connection but very slow to international connection

    100mb residential. But in other US VPS I have no problems

  • jackbjackb Member, Host Rep
    edited August 2018

    @ThyTe said:
    I need VPS Storage, which is not from EUROPA.

    Given Europa is in space I'm quite impressed you get 1MB/s.

    In all seriousness it sounds like your own network connectivity is the problem. Have you looked for storage vps solutions in your own country?

    Thanked by 1Aidan
  • @jackb said:

    @ThyTe said:
    I need VPS Storage, which is not from EUROPA.

    Given Europa is in space I'm quite impressed you get 1MB/s.

    In all seriousness it sounds like your own network connectivity is the problem. Have you looked for storage vps solutions in your own country?

    I'm finding it too bad. Here at BR 2TB is very expensive. I'm testing Virmach in the US. Recommend?

  • jackbjackb Member, Host Rep

    @ThyTe said:

    @jackb said:

    @ThyTe said:
    I need VPS Storage, which is not from EUROPA.

    Given Europa is in space I'm quite impressed you get 1MB/s.

    In all seriousness it sounds like your own network connectivity is the problem. Have you looked for storage vps solutions in your own country?

    I'm finding it too bad. Here at BR 2TB is very expensive. I'm testing Virmach in the US. Recommend?

    I have no experience with Virmach but I can say that typically Miami and with some routes, Spain or Portugal are good choices for BR.

  • You could try using HTTP in combination with Cloudflare to transfer encrypted files. That should speed it up quite a bit.

    Thanked by 1willie
  • Try find any provider with good connectivity to your network, and set up a reverse proxy to connect to you storage VPS, in case you can't find any storage vps within your budget in your country.

  • It seems to me at the end of the day that transit to BR from elsewhere is quite expensive, so not economical to use as storage access unless someone is somehow subsidizing it.

  • I'm using

    Hostens - Europe
    Virmach - USA

    The 2 are excellent, but Hostens seems more professional in their panel

    The difference is:

    Hostens - BR -> 280ms
    Virmach - BR -> 180ms

    This is making me think of moving everything to Virmach

  • But look at the CPU

    Hostens:
    model name: Intel (R) Xeon (R) CPU E5-2603 v4 @ 1.70GHz
    stepping: 1
    microcode: 184549418
    cpu MHz: 1698.027
    cache size: 15360 KB

    Virmach:
    model name: QEMU Virtual CPU version (cpu64-rhel6)
    stepping: 3
    microcode: 1
    cpu MHz: 2199.998
    cache size: 4096 KB

  • If you just want to save files or backup,why dont you consider about object store like online or ovh ....? You will have much more choices which are cheaper and more reliable

  • @ThyTe said:
    But look at the CPU

    Hostens:
    model name: Intel (R) Xeon (R) CPU E5-2603 v4 @ 1.70GHz
    stepping: 1
    microcode: 184549418
    cpu MHz: 1698.027
    cache size: 15360 KB

    Virmach:
    model name: QEMU Virtual CPU version (cpu64-rhel6)
    stepping: 3
    microcode: 1
    cpu MHz: 2199.998
    cache size: 4096 KB

    I used Virmach and they limit their resources way too much

  • Creling said: If you just want to save files or backup,why dont you consider about object store like online or ovh ....? You will have much more choices which are cheaper and more reliable

    Excellent, that's what I need.

    But 2TB in OVH or ONLINE.NET would be much more expensive than Hostens or Virmach

    Do you agree?

  • desfire said: I used Virmach and they limit their resources way too much

    >
    Oh really?

    In what way?

    Please tell me.

  • ThyTe said: Oh really?

    In what way?

    Please tell me.

    For example: iosp must < 80

  • ThyTe said: Excellent, that's what I need.

    But 2TB in OVH or ONLINE.NET would be much more expensive than Hostens or Virmach

    Do you agree?

    Well, it's hard to say. If you wont achieve and unachieve frequently, you can get 1TB with 2 EUR for online.net.

    Anyway, I think OS is more reliable than VPS.

  • Wtf is this @somewhatwindy person giving everyone free thanks in this thread? Let's join in and try get some :trollface:

  • backupdragon

  • Creling said: For example: iosp must < 80

    Did you compare with Hostens?

    How do I test?

  • Creling said: Well, it's hard to say. If you wont achieve and unachieve frequently, you can get 1TB with 2 EUR for online.net.

    Anyway, I think OS is more reliable than VPS.

    I use Veeam Backup for VMware copy.

  • Test IOPs

    Virmach - Storage 500GB
    Read: iops=5058
    Writ : iops=1668

    test: (g=0): rw=randrw, bs=4K-4K/4K-4K, ioengine=libaio, iodepth=64
    fio-2.0.9
    Starting 1 process
    **test: Laying out IO file(s) (1 file(s) / 1024MB)**
    Jobs: 1 (f=1): [m] [100.0% done] [19708K/6708K /s] [4927 /1677  iops] [eta 00m:00s]
    test: (groupid=0, jobs=1): err= 0: pid=1498: Thu Aug 23 13:04:45 2018
      read : io=788468KB, bw=20234KB/s, **iops=5058** , runt= 38968msec
      write: io=260108KB, bw=6674.1KB/s, **iops=1668** , runt= 38968msec
      cpu          : usr=4.85%, sys=21.96%, ctx=114752, majf=0, minf=23
      IO depths    : 1=0.1%, 2=0.1%, 4=0.1%, 8=0.1%, 16=0.1%, 32=0.1%, >=64=100.0%
         submit    : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
         complete  : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.1%, >=64=0.0%
         issued    : total=r=197117/w=65027/d=0, short=r=0/w=0/d=0
    
    Run status group 0 (all jobs):
       READ: io=788468KB, aggrb=20233KB/s, minb=20233KB/s, maxb=20233KB/s, mint=38968msec, maxt=38968msec
      WRITE: io=260108KB, aggrb=6674KB/s, minb=6674KB/s, maxb=6674KB/s, mint=38968msec, maxt=38968msec
    
    Disk stats (read/write):
      vda: ios=195441/64465, merge=0/2, ticks=2265836/141134, in_queue=2409480, util=99.89%
    

    Hostens - Storage 2TB
    Read: iops=198
    Writ : iops=66

    test: (g=0): rw=randrw, bs=4K-4K/4K-4K, ioengine=libaio, iodepth=64
    fio-2.0.9
    Starting 1 process
    test: Laying out IO file(s) (1 file(s) / 1024MB)
    Jobs: 1 (f=1): [m] [100.0% done] [828K/264K /s] [207 /66  iops] [eta 00m:00s]
    test: (groupid=0, jobs=1): err= 0: pid=1186: Thu Aug 23 13:14:14 2018
      read : io=785724KB, bw=814596 B/s, iops=198 , runt=987706msec
      write: io=262852KB, bw=272510 B/s, iops=66 , runt=987706msec
      cpu          : usr=0.21%, sys=0.85%, ctx=197123, majf=0, minf=22
      IO depths    : 1=0.1%, 2=0.1%, 4=0.1%, 8=0.1%, 16=0.1%, 32=0.1%, >=64=100.0%
         submit    : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
         complete  : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.1%, >=64=0.0%
         issued    : total=r=196431/w=65713/d=0, short=r=0/w=0/d=0
    
    Run status group 0 (all jobs):
       READ: io=785724KB, aggrb=795KB/s, minb=795KB/s, maxb=795KB/s, mint=987706msec, maxt=987706msec
      WRITE: io=262852KB, aggrb=266KB/s, minb=266KB/s, maxb=266KB/s, mint=987706msec, maxt=987706msec
    
  • Virmach
    ping virmach-server-bufallo

    Disparando virmach_bufallo [virmach_bufallo] com 32 bytes de dados:
    Resposta de virmach_bufallo: bytes=32 tempo=172ms TTL=49
    Resposta de virmach_bufallo: bytes=32 tempo=171ms TTL=49
    Resposta de virmach_bufallo: bytes=32 tempo=172ms TTL=49
    Resposta de virmach_bufallo: bytes=32 tempo=173ms TTL=49
    
    Estatísticas do Ping para virmach_bufallo:
        Pacotes: Enviados = 4, Recebidos = 4, Perdidos = 0 (0% de
                 perda),
    Aproximar um número redondo de vezes em milissegundos:
        Mínimo = 171ms, Máximo = 173ms, Média = 172ms
    

    Hostens
    ping hostens-server-europe

    Disparando hostens_europe [hostens_europe] com 32 bytes de dados:
    Resposta de hostens_europe: bytes=32 tempo=279ms TTL=52
    Resposta de hostens_europe: bytes=32 tempo=279ms TTL=52
    Resposta de hostens_europe: bytes=32 tempo=277ms TTL=52
    Resposta de hostens_europe: bytes=32 tempo=276ms TTL=52
    
    Estatísticas do Ping para hostens_europe:
        Pacotes: Enviados = 4, Recebidos = 4, Perdidos = 0 (0% de
                 perda),
    Aproximar um número redondo de vezes em milissegundos:
        Mínimo = 276ms, Máximo = 279ms, Média = 277ms
    
Sign In or Register to comment.