New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
Comments
Have you looked at https://www.lowendtalk.com/discussion/150416/our-big-storage-14-50-dedicated-is-back-limited-quantity
Dallas is I think pretty decent network wise for Brazil?
He was talking $10-20 and you mentioned $275. That's a goatse level of budget-stretching :-)
i hear @vapornode (tampa, FL) have a good connection to south america. maybe he have something fit your need.
I think it was a typo. Dacentec has a $25 server with those specs that shows up in stock now and then.
what is your internet provider / isp?
it's residential connection or dedicated connection?
because some provider easily give you 100mbps or 1gbps local connection but very slow to international connection
Maybe it's an yearly price?
Any US network works much faster than Europe.
But it is out of stock
Has anyone ever used Virmach? Is it good ?, but out of stock
100mb residential. But in other US VPS I have no problems
eai mano do brasil chama whats 66-99677 74-43
Given Europa is in space I'm quite impressed you get 1MB/s.
In all seriousness it sounds like your own network connectivity is the problem. Have you looked for storage vps solutions in your own country?
I'm finding it too bad. Here at BR 2TB is very expensive. I'm testing Virmach in the US. Recommend?
I have no experience with Virmach but I can say that typically Miami and with some routes, Spain or Portugal are good choices for BR.
You could try using HTTP in combination with Cloudflare to transfer encrypted files. That should speed it up quite a bit.
Try find any provider with good connectivity to your network, and set up a reverse proxy to connect to you storage VPS, in case you can't find any storage vps within your budget in your country.
It seems to me at the end of the day that transit to BR from elsewhere is quite expensive, so not economical to use as storage access unless someone is somehow subsidizing it.
I'm using
Hostens - Europe
Virmach - USA
The 2 are excellent, but Hostens seems more professional in their panel
The difference is:
Hostens - BR -> 280ms
Virmach - BR -> 180ms
This is making me think of moving everything to Virmach
But look at the CPU
Hostens:
model name: Intel (R) Xeon (R) CPU E5-2603 v4 @ 1.70GHz
stepping: 1
microcode: 184549418
cpu MHz: 1698.027
cache size: 15360 KB
Virmach:
model name: QEMU Virtual CPU version (cpu64-rhel6)
stepping: 3
microcode: 1
cpu MHz: 2199.998
cache size: 4096 KB
If you just want to save files or backup,why dont you consider about object store like online or ovh ....? You will have much more choices which are cheaper and more reliable
I used Virmach and they limit their resources way too much
Excellent, that's what I need.
But 2TB in OVH or ONLINE.NET would be much more expensive than Hostens or Virmach
Do you agree?
>
Oh really?
In what way?
Please tell me.
For example: iosp must < 80
Well, it's hard to say. If you wont achieve and unachieve frequently, you can get 1TB with 2 EUR for online.net.
Anyway, I think OS is more reliable than VPS.
Wtf is this @somewhatwindy person giving everyone free thanks in this thread? Let's join in and try get some
backupdragon
Did you compare with Hostens?
How do I test?
I use Veeam Backup for VMware copy.
Test IOPs
Virmach - Storage 500GB
Read: iops=5058
Writ : iops=1668
Hostens - Storage 2TB
Read: iops=198
Writ : iops=66
Virmach
ping virmach-server-bufallo
Hostens
ping hostens-server-europe