Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


New SoYouStart 2018 Prices - Page 3
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

New SoYouStart 2018 Prices

1356728

Comments

  • sinsin Member
    [email protected]:~# wget -O /dev/null http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test
    --2018-06-11 16:16:28--  http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test
    Resolving cachefly.cachefly.net (cachefly.cachefly.net)... 205.234.175.175
    Connecting to cachefly.cachefly.net (cachefly.cachefly.net)|205.234.175.175|:80... connected.
    HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
    Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/octet-stream]
    Saving to: ‘/dev/null’
    
    /dev/null                               100%[===============================================================================>] 100.00M   118MB/s    in 0.8s    
    
    2018-06-11 16:16:29 (118 MB/s) - ‘/dev/null’ saved [104857600/104857600]
    
    Thanked by 1mosan7763
  • @sin said:
    /dev/null 100%[===============================================================================>] 100.00M 118MB/s in 0.8s

    2018-06-11 16:16:29 (118 MB/s) - ‘/dev/null’ saved [104857600/104857600]

    how is the outgoing bw? just wondering if they limit connections that leave the OVH network.

  • sinsin Member

    @mosan7763 said:

    @sin said:
    /dev/null 100%[===============================================================================>] 100.00M 118MB/s in 0.8s

    2018-06-11 16:16:29 (118 MB/s) - ‘/dev/null’ saved [104857600/104857600]

    how is the outgoing bw? just wondering if they limit connections that leave the OVH network.

    [email protected]:~# speedtest-cli
    Retrieving speedtest.net configuration...
    Retrieving speedtest.net server list...
    Testing from OVH Hosting (54.39.62.160)...
    Selecting best server based on latency...
    Hosted by Fibrenoire Internet (Montreal, QC) [0.63 km]: 4.668 ms
    Testing download speed........................................
    Download: 507.13 Mbit/s
    Testing upload speed..................................................
    Upload: 126.55 Mbit/s
    

    Gonna try more locations

    Thanked by 1mosan7763
  • FalzoFalzo Member

    @Ponury_Typ said:
    ^ Nope, according to this thread on polish forum: https://forum.rootnode.pl/topic/606-ostrzeżenie-transfer-na-serwerze-sys/

    Speed is locked at 5mbps outside sys/ovh internal network.

    [ID] Interval       Transfer     Bandwidth
    [  5]  0.0- 1.0 sec   640 KBytes  5.24 Mbits/sec
    [  5]  1.0- 2.0 sec   640 KBytes  5.24 Mbits/sec
    [  5]  2.0- 3.0 sec   512 KBytes  4.19 Mbits/sec
    [  5]  3.0- 4.0 sec   512 KBytes  4.19 Mbits/sec
    [  5]  4.0- 5.0 sec   640 KBytes  5.24 Mbits/sec
    [  5]  5.0- 6.0 sec   512 KBytes  4.19 Mbits/sec
    [  5]  6.0- 7.0 sec   640 KBytes  5.24 Mbits/sec
    [  5]  7.0- 8.0 sec   512 KBytes  4.19 Mbits/sec
    [  5]  8.0- 9.0 sec   512 KBytes  4.19 Mbits/sec
    [  5]  9.0-10.0 sec   640 KBytes  5.24 Mbits/sec
    [  5]  0.0-10.1 sec  5.62 MBytes  4.65 Mbits/sec 
    

    I think that's BS, no mention of source/destination and such. just some iperf numbers, not even the command that has been run.

    bench from @sin above also suggests otherwise. if the connection is not 250Mbps as advertised I definitely drop it. should be able to at least burst to it within europe, won't wait days if I ever need to recover some GB ... but I'll checl and see in a few anyway.

    Thanked by 1Aidan
  • rm_rm_ Member
    edited June 2018

    @sin (and @Falzo) try

    iperf3 -c iperf.online.net -p 5200

    use any value between 5200 and 5209 if one says it's busy.

    From the speedtest you ran, it seems yours is in Canada. Maybe only FR ones are affected?

  • @Falzo said:

    @Ponury_Typ said:
    ^ Nope, according to this thread on polish forum: https://forum.rootnode.pl/topic/606-ostrzeżenie-transfer-na-serwerze-sys/

    Speed is locked at 5mbps outside sys/ovh internal network.

    [ID] Interval       Transfer     Bandwidth
    [  5]  0.0- 1.0 sec   640 KBytes  5.24 Mbits/sec
    [  5]  1.0- 2.0 sec   640 KBytes  5.24 Mbits/sec
    [  5]  2.0- 3.0 sec   512 KBytes  4.19 Mbits/sec
    [  5]  3.0- 4.0 sec   512 KBytes  4.19 Mbits/sec
    [  5]  4.0- 5.0 sec   640 KBytes  5.24 Mbits/sec
    [  5]  5.0- 6.0 sec   512 KBytes  4.19 Mbits/sec
    [  5]  6.0- 7.0 sec   640 KBytes  5.24 Mbits/sec
    [  5]  7.0- 8.0 sec   512 KBytes  4.19 Mbits/sec
    [  5]  8.0- 9.0 sec   512 KBytes  4.19 Mbits/sec
    [  5]  9.0-10.0 sec   640 KBytes  5.24 Mbits/sec
    [  5]  0.0-10.1 sec  5.62 MBytes  4.65 Mbits/sec 
    

    I think that's BS, no mention of source/destination and such. just some iperf numbers, not even the command that has been run.

    bench from @sin above also suggests otherwise. if the connection is not 250Mbps as advertised I definitely drop it. should be able to at least burst to it within europe, won't wait days if I ever need to recover some GB ... but I'll checl and see in a few anyway.

    I hope that You are right, because those look like nice backup rsync servers.

  • sinsin Member

    rm_ said: use any value between 5200 and 5209 if one says it's busy.

    From the speedtest you ran, it seems yours is in Canada. Maybe only FR ones are affected?

    That's weird, I'm getting around 100-150Mbits uploading to various servers but when I tried your online.net link it shows this:

    [email protected]:~# iperf3 -c iperf.online.net -p 5201
    Connecting to host iperf.online.net, port 5201
    [  4] local 54.39.62.160 port 32878 connected to 62.210.18.40 port 5201
    [ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bandwidth       Retr  Cwnd
    [  4]   0.00-1.00   sec   608 KBytes  4.96 Mbits/sec    0    106 KBytes       
    [  4]   1.00-2.00   sec   634 KBytes  5.19 Mbits/sec    0    106 KBytes       
    [  4]   2.00-3.01   sec   543 KBytes  4.43 Mbits/sec    0    106 KBytes       
    [  4]   3.01-4.00   sec   549 KBytes  4.53 Mbits/sec    0    106 KBytes       
    [  4]   4.00-5.00   sec   543 KBytes  4.44 Mbits/sec    0    106 KBytes       
    [  4]   5.00-6.01   sec   543 KBytes  4.44 Mbits/sec    0    106 KBytes       
    [  4]   6.01-7.01   sec   634 KBytes  5.18 Mbits/sec    0    106 KBytes       
    [  4]   7.01-8.00   sec   551 KBytes  4.55 Mbits/sec    0    106 KBytes       
    [  4]   8.00-9.01   sec   546 KBytes  4.46 Mbits/sec    0    106 KBytes       
    [  4]   9.01-10.01  sec   549 KBytes  4.48 Mbits/sec    0    106 KBytes
    
    [email protected]:~# speedtest-cli --server 1993
    Retrieving speedtest.net configuration...
    Retrieving speedtest.net server list...
    Testing from OVH Hosting (54.39.62.160)...
    Hosted by Ebox (Montreal, QC) [0.63 km]: 4.702 ms
    Testing download speed........................................
    Download: 572.53 Mbit/s
    Testing upload speed..................................................
    Upload: 137.33 Mbit/s
    
  • sinsin Member

    Just got 61.8MB/s downloading a 512MB file from my SYS ARM to my Ramnode NY VPS

    Thanked by 1mosan7763
  • @sin said:
    Just got 61.8MB/s downloading a 512MB file from my SYS ARM to my Ramnode NY VPS

    could you test aria2/rtorrent too and download the most recent ubuntu/debian iso over bitttorrent. nothing dodgy just want the numbers.

  • sinsin Member
    edited June 2018

    Hrrmmm this is weird, one moment I will get really fast upload speeds (above the 250Mbps SYS limit) and then I'll wget something else (over tcp from my ARM server to another server) and it'll be low. I'll have to play around with it some.

  • @sin said:

    @mosan7763 said:
    how's the bench.sh output of those little servers?

    Here ya go ($5.99 BHS one):

    Benchmark started on Mon Jun 11 16:13:31 CEST 2018
    Full benchmark log: /root/bench.log
    
    System Info
    -----------
    Processor : ARMv7 Processor rev 1 (v7l)
    CPU Cores : 2
    Frequency :  MHz
    Memory        : 2019 MB
    Swap      :  MB
    Uptime        : 23 min,
    
    OS        : Ubuntu 16.04 LTS
    Arch      : armv7l (32 Bit)
    Kernel        : 4.9.58-armada375
    Hostname  : sys-arm
    
    
    Speedtest (IPv4 only)
    ---------------------
    Your public IPv4 is x.x.x.x
    
    Location      Provider    Speed
    CDN           Cachefly    71.3MB/s
    
    Atlanta, GA, US       Coloat      30.0MB/s 
    Dallas, TX, US        Softlayer   31.0MB/s 
    Seattle, WA, US       Softlayer   18.3MB/s 
    San Jose, CA, US  Softlayer   18.8MB/s 
    Washington, DC, US    Softlayer   38.3MB/s 
    
    Tokyo, Japan      Linode      4.36MB/s 
    Singapore         Softlayer   6.01MB/s 
    
    Rotterdam, Netherlands    id3.net     6.77MB/s
    Haarlem, Netherlands  Leaseweb    24.9MB/s 
    
    
    Disk Speed
    ----------
    I/O (1st run) : 175 MB/s
    I/O (2nd run) : 171 MB/s
    I/O (3rd run) : 173 MB/s
    Average I/O   : 173 MB/s
    

    Seems that BHS ones is not capped at 250Mbps.

  • sinsin Member

    mtsbatalha said: Seems that BHS ones is not capped at 250Mbps.

    I believe SYS isn't capped for download, just upload I think?

  • huckenhucken Member

    @mtsbatalha said:
    Seems that BHS ones is not capped at 250Mbps.

    only outgoing is capped at 250Mbps at SyS, incoming is no cap 1Gbps

  • DouteiDoutei Member

    @sin said:
    Hrrmmm this is weird, one moment I will get really fast upload speeds (above the 250Mbps SYS limit) and then I'll wget something else (over tcp from my ARM server to another server) and it'll be low. I'll have to play around with it some.

    Could you test the CPU too?

    curl -LsO git.io/bench.sh; chmod +x bench.sh && ./bench.sh -a share

    @mtsbatalha said:
    Seems that BHS ones is not capped at 250Mbps.

    Download speed is not capped on SYS, the upload speed is.

  • Additional IPs not available for ARM servers, despite being on SYS.

  • FalzoFalzo Member
    edited June 2018

    here we go:

    # smartctl -a /dev/sda
    smartctl 6.6 2016-05-31 r4324 [armv7l-linux-4.9.58-armada375] (local build)
    Copyright (C) 2002-16, Bruce Allen, Christian Franke, www.smartmontools.org
    
    === START OF INFORMATION SECTION ===
    Device Model:     HGST HUS726040ALA610
    Serial Number:    K4GM1GYB
    LU WWN Device Id: 5 000cca 25dc8a89d
    Firmware Version: A5GNT907
    User Capacity:    4,000,787,030,016 bytes [4.00 TB]
    Sector Size:      512 bytes logical/physical
    Rotation Rate:    7200 rpm
    Form Factor:      3.5 inches
    Device is:        Not in smartctl database [for details use: -P showall]
    ATA Version is:   ACS-2, ATA8-ACS T13/1699-D revision 4
    SATA Version is:  SATA 3.1, 6.0 Gb/s (current: 3.0 Gb/s)
    Local Time is:    Mon Jun 11 16:56:33 2018 CEST
    SMART support is: Available - device has SMART capability.
    SMART support is: Enabled
    
    === START OF READ SMART DATA SECTION ===
    SMART overall-health self-assessment test result: PASSED
    
    SMART Attributes Data Structure revision number: 16
    Vendor Specific SMART Attributes with Thresholds:
    ID# ATTRIBUTE_NAME          FLAG     VALUE WORST THRESH TYPE      UPDATED  WHEN_FAILED RAW_VALUE
      1 Raw_Read_Error_Rate     0x000b   100   100   016    Pre-fail  Always       -       0
      2 Throughput_Performance  0x0005   136   136   054    Pre-fail  Offline      -       108
      3 Spin_Up_Time            0x0007   100   100   024    Pre-fail  Always       -       0
      4 Start_Stop_Count        0x0012   100   100   000    Old_age   Always       -       6
      5 Reallocated_Sector_Ct   0x0033   100   100   005    Pre-fail  Always       -       0
      7 Seek_Error_Rate         0x000b   100   100   067    Pre-fail  Always       -       0
      8 Seek_Time_Performance   0x0005   128   128   020    Pre-fail  Offline      -       18
      9 Power_On_Hours          0x0012   100   100   000    Old_age   Always       -       1728
     10 Spin_Retry_Count        0x0013   100   100   060    Pre-fail  Always       -       0
     12 Power_Cycle_Count       0x0032   100   100   000    Old_age   Always       -       6
    192 Power-Off_Retract_Count 0x0032   100   100   000    Old_age   Always       -       78
    193 Load_Cycle_Count        0x0012   100   100   000    Old_age   Always       -       78
    194 Temperature_Celsius     0x0002   146   146   000    Old_age   Always       -       41 (Min/Max 17/47)
    196 Reallocated_Event_Count 0x0032   100   100   000    Old_age   Always       -       0
    197 Current_Pending_Sector  0x0022   100   100   000    Old_age   Always       -       0
    198 Offline_Uncorrectable   0x0008   100   100   000    Old_age   Offline      -       0
    199 UDMA_CRC_Error_Count    0x000a   200   200   000    Old_age   Always       -       0
    
    SMART Error Log Version: 1
    No Errors Logged
    
    SMART Self-test log structure revision number 1
    Num  Test_Description    Status                  Remaining  LifeTime(hours)  LBA_of_first_error
    # 1  Short offline       Completed without error       00%         1         -
    # 2  Short offline       Completed without error       00%         0         -
    # 3  Short offline       Completed without error       00%         0         -
    

    nice fresh disk.

    and then there is this:

    # iperf3 -c iperf.online.net -p 5200  
     
    Connecting to host iperf.online.net, port 5200
    [  4] local 55.66.77.88 port 55486 connected to 62.210.18.40 port 5200
    [ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bandwidth       Retr  Cwnd
    [  4]   0.00-1.01   sec   628 KBytes  5.11 Mbits/sec    0   22.6 KBytes       
    [  4]   1.01-2.00   sec   560 KBytes  4.61 Mbits/sec    0   22.6 KBytes       
    [  4]   2.00-3.00   sec   566 KBytes  4.62 Mbits/sec    0   22.6 KBytes       
    [  4]   3.00-4.00   sec   566 KBytes  4.65 Mbits/sec    0   22.6 KBytes       
    [  4]   4.00-5.00   sec   566 KBytes  4.62 Mbits/sec    0   22.6 KBytes       
    [  4]   5.00-6.01   sec   566 KBytes  4.62 Mbits/sec    0   22.6 KBytes       
    [  4]   6.01-7.00   sec   554 KBytes  4.56 Mbits/sec    0   22.6 KBytes       
    [  4]   7.00-8.00   sec   566 KBytes  4.63 Mbits/sec    0   22.6 KBytes       
    [  4]   8.00-9.00   sec   566 KBytes  4.62 Mbits/sec    0   22.6 KBytes       
    [  4]   9.00-10.00  sec   560 KBytes  4.61 Mbits/sec    0   22.6 KBytes       
    - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
    [ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bandwidth       Retr
    [  4]   0.00-10.00  sec  5.56 MBytes  4.67 Mbits/sec    0             sender
    [  4]   0.00-10.00  sec  5.51 MBytes  4.62 Mbits/sec                  receiver
    

    so indeed the results that have been posted on that polish board.

    BUT, let's add multiple connections:

    # iperf3 -c iperf.online.net -p 5200 -P 4
    [ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bandwidth       Retr
    [  4]   0.00-10.00  sec  5.58 MBytes  4.68 Mbits/sec    0             sender
    [  4]   0.00-10.00  sec  5.52 MBytes  4.63 Mbits/sec                  receiver
    [  6]   0.00-10.00  sec  5.58 MBytes  4.68 Mbits/sec    0             sender
    [  6]   0.00-10.00  sec  5.52 MBytes  4.63 Mbits/sec                  receiver
    [  8]   0.00-10.00  sec  5.58 MBytes  4.68 Mbits/sec    0             sender
    [  8]   0.00-10.00  sec  5.52 MBytes  4.63 Mbits/sec                  receiver
    [ 10]   0.00-10.00  sec  1.70 GBytes  1.46 Gbits/sec    0             sender
    [ 10]   0.00-10.00  sec  1.70 GBytes  1.46 Gbits/sec                  receiver
    [SUM]   0.00-10.00  sec  1.72 GBytes  1.47 Gbits/sec    0             sender
    [SUM]   0.00-10.00  sec  1.72 GBytes  1.47 Gbits/sec                  receiver
    

    so wtf? ...

    other iperf servers show something similar. seems like there is some traffic shaping happening on outgoing connections?
    I am going to do some real world tests later with ssh/wget.

    geekbench sadly does not work on ARM but the cpu seems a bit sluggish while doing tasks like decompressing or compiling, but hey - it's only about storage ;-)

    PS: french location

  • sinsin Member
    edited June 2018

    Falzo said: seems like there is some traffic shaping happening on outgoing connections?

    Mine was going really fast for uploads and then dropped hard, then for a couple of uploads it'll be back to normal speed, and then goes right back to low speeds. I'm not sure what's going on...going to try it again a little later.

    Got a drive with only 1621 poweron hours though :)

    What I really want is a E3-SSD-1-16 or E3-SAT-1-16 though :( just waiting on those new prices...

  • NeoonNeoon Member

    added SYS to metadedi, well SYS delivered, storage prices from Hetzner undercut by 1EUR.

    Thanked by 2mtsbatalha Falzo
  • FalzoFalzo Member

    download speeds look good to me:

    # bash serverbench.sh
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    CPU model            : ARMv7 Processor rev 1 (v7l)
    Number of cores      : 2
    CPU frequency        :  MHz
    Total amount of ram  : 2019 MB
    Total amount of swap : 2046 MB
    System uptime        : 0days, 1:25:22
    Load average         : 0.83, 0.72, 0.74
    OS                   : Debian GNU/Linux 9
    Arch                 : armv7l (32 Bit)
    Kernel               : 4.9.58-armada375
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    Node Name           IPv4 address        Download Speed
    CacheFly            205.234.175.175     27.5MB/s
    Vultr, Tokyo, JP        108.61.201.151      5.26MB/s
    Linode, Tokyo, JP       106.187.96.148      4.05MB/s
    DO, Bangalore, IN       139.59.80.215       5.03MB/s
    Softlayer, Chennai, IN      169.38.65.84        4.93MB/s
    Vultr, Singapore, SG        45.32.100.168       5.24MB/s
    DO, Singapore, SG       159.89.192.182      2.10MB/s
    Linode, Singapore, SG       139.162.23.4        2.00MB/s
    Softlayer, Singapore, SG    119.81.28.170       4.93MB/s
    Leaseweb, Singapore, SG     103.254.153.18      7.02MB/s
    Softlayer, HongKong, CN     119.81.130.170      5.47MB/s
    Leaseweb, HongKong, CN      43.249.36.49        5.71MB/s
    Vultr, Sydney, AUS      108.61.212.117      5.11MB/s
    Softlayer, Sydney, AUS      168.1.1.212     2.08MB/s
    Softlayer, Melbourne, AUS   168.1.65.244        3.67MB/s
    Tele2, Gothenberg, SE       90.130.74.151       3.44MB/s
    Tele2, Kista, SE        90.130.74.149       10.5MB/s
    Softlayer, Milan, IT        159.122.128.84      13.1MB/s
    Prometeus, Milan, IT        37.247.53.10        37.7MB/s
    Tele2, Riga, LV     90.130.74.113       6.05MB/s
    Tele2, Vilnius, LT      90.130.74.117       7.43MB/s
    Server.LU, Luxembourg, LU   94.242.192.2        44.7MB/s
    Tele2, Frankfurt, DE        90.130.74.155       11.2MB/s
    Vultr, Frankfurt, DE        108.61.210.117      5.76MB/s
    Linode, Frankfurt, DE       139.162.130.8       25.8MB/s
    Softlayer, Frankfurt, DE    159.122.69.4        7.35MB/s
    Leaseweb, Frankfurt, DE     37.58.58.140        22.2MB/s
    DO, Frankfurt, DE       46.101.218.147      19.4MB/s
    Vultr, Paris, FR        108.61.209.127      5.89MB/s
    OVH, Gravelines, FR     5.196.90.200        65.4MB/s
    OVH, Strasbourg, FR     5.135.128.81        15.3MB/s
    OVH, Roubaix, FR        188.165.12.106      52.5MB/s
    Online.Net, Paris, FR       62.210.18.40        36.0MB/s
    Tele2, Amsterdam, NL        90.130.74.153       15.4MB/s
    Vultr, Amsterdam, NL        108.61.198.102      5.57MB/s
    DO 2, Amsterdam, NL     188.226.175.227     54.1MB/s
    DO 3, Amsterdam, NL     178.62.216.76       37.4MB/s
    Leaseweb, Amsterdam, NL     5.79.108.33     48.3MB/s
    i3d, Amsterdam, NL      213.163.76.200      36.2MB/s
    Vultr, London, UK       108.61.196.101      6.00MB/s
    DO, London, UK      46.101.44.214       22.5MB/s
    Linode, London, UK      176.58.107.39       29.7MB/s
    Softlayer, London, UK       5.10.97.132     57.7MB/s
    Softlayer, Mexico, MX       169.57.4.116        4.48MB/s
    Softlayer, Brazil, BR       169.57.128.148      3.37MB/s
    DO 1, NYC, USA      165.227.194.167     7.37MB/s
    DO 2, NYC, USA      192.241.184.88      5.97MB/s
    DO 3, NYC, USA      174.138.51.137      4.23MB/s
    Vultr, New Jersey, USA      108.61.149.182      5.51MB/s
    Linode, Newark, USA     50.116.57.237       6.39MB/s
    Vultr, Illinois, USA        107.191.51.12       5.74MB/s
    Vultr, Atlanta, USA     108.61.193.166      5.68MB/s
    Linode, Atlanta, USA        50.116.39.117       9.74MB/s
    Vultr, Miami, USA       104.156.244.232     5.77MB/s
    Vultr, Washington, USA      108.61.194.105      5.57MB/s
    Softlayer, Seattle, USA     67.228.112.250      3.73MB/s
    Leaseweb, Washington, USA   207.244.94.80       7.94MB/s
    Vultr, Dallas, USA      108.61.224.175      5.49MB/s
    Linode, Dallas, USA     50.116.25.154       4.36MB/s
    Softlayer, Dallas, USA      173.192.68.18       10.9MB/s
    Leaseweb, Dallas, USA       209.58.153.1        5.84MB/s
    Vultr, Los Angeles, USA     108.61.219.200      5.53MB/s
    DO, San Francisco, USA      165.227.29.84       3.56MB/s
    DO, San Francisco, USA      107.170.223.15      13.5MB/s
    Linode, Fremont, USA        50.116.14.9     1.90MB/s
    Leaseweb, San Francisco, USA    209.58.135.187      6.68MB/s
    DO, Toronto, CA     159.203.57.38       5.33MB/s
    OVH, Beauharnois, CA        192.99.19.165       2.77MB/s
    EastLink, Canada, CA        24.222.0.194        2.27MB/s
    Softlayer, Montreal, CA     169.54.124.180      6.97MB/s
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    I/O speed(1st run) : 169 MB/s
    I/O speed(2nd run) : 168 MB/s
    I/O speed(3rd run) : 165 MB/s
    Average I/O speed  : 167.333 MB/s
    

    at least for europe that's easily 250Mbps and more

  • sinsin Member

    Falzo said: download speeds look good to me:

    Yup, I'm gonna try the upload speeds again later on and see if it's fixed. Every now and then my upload speeds will shoot up to normal speed. If the upload speeds would stay normal I would be loving this little box because 2TB for cheap is sweet.

  • Just out of curiosity, can one of you post /proc/cpuinfo for these ARM CPU's?

    Also, it'll be nice to get one of those standard benches that lists out the usual suspects of sha256 hashing (500MB), bzip2 compression (500MB) and openssl aes encryption (500MB) and what is the BogoMIPS on these.

    AFAIK there's no "native" AES support on these (but the N2800's worked fine for backups and they too don't have AES support) and considering that these machines are 1Gbps download/250Mbps upload it's definitely better for backups than the KS Atoms (barring the fact that these are non-x86 + 32 bit only cpus).

    I'm very tempted to try them out.

  • sinsin Member

    @nullnothere said:
    Just out of curiosity, can one of you post /proc/cpuinfo for these ARM CPU's?

    Also, it'll be nice to get one of those standard benches that lists out the usual suspects of sha256 hashing (500MB), bzip2 compression (500MB) and openssl aes encryption (500MB) and what is the BogoMIPS on these.

    AFAIK there's no "native" AES support on these (but the N2800's worked fine for backups and they too don't have AES support) and considering that these machines are 1Gbps download/250Mbps upload it's definitely better for backups than the KS Atoms (barring the fact that these are non-x86 + 32 bit only cpus).

    I'm very tempted to try them out.

    cat /proc/cpuinfo
    processor   : 0
    model name  : ARMv7 Processor rev 1 (v7l)
    BogoMIPS    : 50.00
    Features    : half thumb fastmult vfp edsp thumbee neon vfpv3 tls vfpd32 
    CPU implementer : 0x41
    CPU architecture: 7
    CPU variant : 0x4
    CPU part    : 0xc09
    CPU revision    : 1
    
    processor   : 1
    model name  : ARMv7 Processor rev 1 (v7l)
    BogoMIPS    : 50.00
    Features    : half thumb fastmult vfp edsp thumbee neon vfpv3 tls vfpd32 
    CPU implementer : 0x41
    CPU architecture: 7
    CPU variant : 0x4
    CPU part    : 0xc09
    CPU revision    : 1
    
    Hardware    : Marvell Armada 375 (Device Tree)
    Revision    : 0000
    Serial      : 0000000000000000
    
    Thanked by 1nullnothere
  • FalzoFalzo Member
    edited June 2018

    outgoing they obviously have some weird per connection-limiting in place. I put up a test-file and tried pulling it via wget to a hetzner box:

    # wget http://193.72.x.x/dummy
    --2018-06-11 17:58:07--  http://193.70.x.x/dummy
    Connecting to 193.70.x.x:80... connected.
    HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
    Length: 437447214 (417M) [application/octet-stream]
    Saving to: ‘dummy’
    
    dummy                                          17%[================>                                                                                 ]  75.08M   564KB/s    eta 10m 26s^
    

    indeed limited to 5Mbit/s !!

    now let's do the same with axel and 10 connections:

    # axel -n 10 http://193.70.x.x/dummy
    ...
    Connection 3 finished
            ,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,. .......... .......... ..........  [36114.5KB/s]
    [ 99%]  .......... .......... .......... .......... ..........  [36087.8KB/s]
    [ 99%]  .....
    Connection 0 finished
            ,,,,,..... .......... .......... .......... ...
    Connection 5 finished
            ,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,, ,,,.......  [36055.2KB/s]
    [100%]  .......... .......... .......... .......... .
    Connection 7 finished
            ,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,, ,.....
    Connection 8 finished
            ,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,....  [35998.5KB/s]
    [100%]  ..
    Connection 2 finished
    
    Downloaded 417.2 Megabyte in 11 seconds. (35878.07 KB/s)
    

    ahem.

    obviously a weird strategy on limiting per connection, but somehow not every connection - can't tell how their traffic shaping works or determines when to limit or not.

    for once I'll keep the box. that storage is really cheap to drop off things I probably never gonna need again. I am going to only store bigger backup archives (multiple GB) , which I can retrieve via axel or similar like shown above quite speedy if I ever need something again ;-)

    Thanked by 1vimalware
  • ooh nice. Ovh's Rent-a-Hitachi drive.

  • rm_rm_ Member

    @Falzo @sin try over IPv6 ;)

  • FalzoFalzo Member

    @rm_ said:
    @Falzo @sin try over IPv6 ;)

    their pre-config on debian 9 works like a charm:

    # ping6 ipv6.google.com
    connect: Network is unreachable
    
  • NeoonNeoon Member
    edited June 2018

    Ovh SoYouStart #SYS Coming next days:

    - same as today: first 16 IPv4 0e/mo - 16+ IPv4: 1e/mo (was 2e/mo)

    - minimum HDD: 4x 2TB (was 2x 2TB)

    - minimum SSD: 2x 480GB (was 2x 240GB)

    So the offers posted above are invalid?

    Whats even the source ?

    Thanked by 1jaypeesmith
  • DouteiDoutei Member

    @Neoon said:
    Ovh SoYouStart #SYS Coming next days:

    - same as today: first 16 IPv4 0e/mo - 16+ IPv4: 1e/mo (was 2e/mo)

    - minimum HDD: 4x 2TB (was 2x 2TB)

    - minimum SSD: 2x 480GB (was 2x 240GB)

    So the offers posted above are invalid?

    Whats even the source ?

    That could be new configs.

    The source actually was their API, I found new product codes on their API a few days ago.

    I was looking for old prices of Opteron, but since it's not available on their website anymore I went to check.ovh and checkservers.ovh if they still have old servers listed. Apparently checkservers.ovh has the new prices listed too, so I just picked their website as source.

    There are another 3 new product codes on their API, 1804sysgame04, 1804sysgame05 and 1804sysgame06. They could be the new game servers.

  • rm_rm_ Member
    edited June 2018

    Falzo said: their pre-config on debian 9 works like a charm

    Well that's beside the point, get it working then try speedtests. What is interesting here is if the weird speed shaping applies over IPv6 too. My guess is that it likely doesn't.

    Thanked by 1Shot2
  • Shot2Shot2 Member

    These new "storage" offers make the KS1/2/3 look quite dull...

Sign In or Register to comment.