Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Sign In Register

Quick Links


Categories

In this Discussion

› › Hetzner cloud recent speed tests
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Hetzner cloud recent speed tests

ckissickissi Member
in Requests

Anybody can provide recent Hetzner cloud speed tests (network, HDD)?
I wonder if its worth to use it for US traffic. I read there were some routing issues and slow transfer speeds to the US locations.

«1

Comments

  • williewillie Member

    I'll run a test later but I've used Hetzner for years and they've always been slow to US locations.

  • ckissickissi Member
    edited April 2018

    @willie said:
    I'll run a test later but I've used Hetzner for years and they've always been slow to US locations.

    Thanks, not a good news for me. I like them as a company because of great service and support, unfortunately, no DC in the US.

  • UnixfyUnixfy Member

    I have CX11 Nürnberg and CX11 Falkenstein benches. They are from 29th January 2018.

  • williewillie Member

    Those benches only have download speed, not upload, ISTM.

  • ckissickissi Member

    @karatekidmonkey said:
    I have CX11 Nürnberg and CX11 Falkenstein benches. They are from 29th January 2018.

    Thanks. It's interesting why IPv4 to Atlanta is slow on both instances while the IPv6 is Ok.

  • UnixfyUnixfy Member
    edited April 2018

    willie said: Those benches only have download speed, not upload, ISTM.

    The Speedtest.net and ServerScope.io results have some upload benchmarks.

    ckissi said: Thanks. It's interesting why IPv4 to Atlanta is slow on both instances while the IPv6 is Ok.

    IPv4 to Atlanta is at Coloat while IPv6 to Atlanta is Linode. In my experience, Coloat has always been super slow, I have seen as low as ~500KB/s for machines in the US.

    Thanked by 1willie
  • williewillie Member
    edited April 2018

    karatekidmonkey said:

    The Speedtest.net and ServerScope.io results have some upload benchmarks.

    Hmm, interesting, but I don't see any US destinations. European destinations do work great.

    ckissi said: IPv4 to Atlanta

    Unless I missed something there is no measurement to Atlanta. The "Atlanta" entry in Unixbench is a download from Atlanta. The opposite direction is likely to be slower.

  • UnixfyUnixfy Member

    willie said: Hmm, interesting, but I don't see any US destinations. European destinations do work great.

    Whoops, that is my mistake :P

    I will go spin up a few Hetzner Cloud servers and get US locations benched.

    willie said: Unless I missed something there is no measurement to Atlanta. The "Atlanta" entry in Unixbench is a download from Atlanta. The opposite direction is likely to be slower.

    That's correct, both entries for Atlanta in the FreeVPS Bench are downloads from there - not uploads.

  • williewillie Member

    I have a Hetzner server at Falkenstein and Kimsufis at Roubaix and BHS. Hetzner to US is bad enough that if I want to do a big transfer, I sometimes do Hetzner->Roubaix->BHS->US destination.

  • ckissickissi Member

    @karatekidmonkey said:
    I will go spin up a few Hetzner Cloud servers and get US locations benched.

    Thanks, I would appreciate this.

  • UnixfyUnixfy Member

    I did some benchmarks in a box at Nürnberg.

    Speedtest.net to Speedtest.net at NYC, NY: http://www.speedtest.net/result/7264514632.png

    Speedtest.net to Quadranet at Los Angeles, CA: http://www.speedtest.net/result/7264515504.png

    Speedtest.net to CTL at Seattle, WA: http://www.speedtest.net/result/7264517863.png

    Speedtest.net to GigeNET at Ashburn, VA: http://www.speedtest.net/result/7264519682.png

    Speedtest.net to Tzulo at Chicago, IL: http://www.speedtest.net/result/7264520479.png

    Overall, not amazing. If you have some other locations / scripts you'd like me to use, that's no problem.

  • williewillie Member

    Those speeds are far in excess of anything I've ever gotten to any US/Canada destination. My usual one is BuyVM Las Vegas but the same thing happens with others including OVH BHS.

  • ckissickissi Member

    Thanks, hmmm. LA only 40mbps, that's really slow. Also, pings are quite high to the US. 223ms to NY which is the east coast is very high I think.

  • williewillie Member

    ckissi said: Also, pings are quite high to the US. 223ms to NY which is the east coast is very high I think.

    Yeah it varies but I usually get more like 140ms to west coast. Something is weird with that test.

  • UnixfyUnixfy Member

    willie said: Yeah it varies but I usually get more like 140ms to west coast. Something is weird with that test.

    That's a problem with Speedtest I guess. Some of the hosts have really awful networks which can result in odd speeds/pings.

  • nonissuenonissue Member

    I've been running casual tests over my residential IP in Western Canada over the last few years, and I've noticed it get much better in the last 6-12 months. Not sure if that's translated to an improvement elsewhere in Canada / US, but it's definitely better than it was for me.

  • ckissickissi Member

    @willie said:
    Yeah it varies but I usually get more like 140ms to west coast. Something is weird with that test.

    Actually, 140ms is not that bad. I'm just worrying about the big difference in transfer speed to different US locations. Maybe routing issues?

  • ckissickissi Member

    @karatekidmonkey said:
    I did some benchmarks in a box at Nürnberg.

    Speedtest.net to Speedtest.net at NYC, NY: http://www.speedtest.net/result/7264514632.png

    Speedtest.net to Quadranet at Los Angeles, CA: http://www.speedtest.net/result/7264515504.png

    Speedtest.net to CTL at Seattle, WA: http://www.speedtest.net/result/7264517863.png

    Speedtest.net to GigeNET at Ashburn, VA: http://www.speedtest.net/result/7264519682.png

    Speedtest.net to Tzulo at Chicago, IL: http://www.speedtest.net/result/7264520479.png

    Overall, not amazing. If you have some other locations / scripts you'd like me to use, that's no problem.

    Thanks! Can you please do the tests once again so we can compare? eg. transfer from/to Seattle is extremely slow according to the results (28mbps)

  • dev_vpsdev_vps Member

    For Chicago location
    http://www.speedtest.net/result/7266823497

  • ckissickissi Member

    @dev_vps said:
    For Chicago location
    http://www.speedtest.net/result/7266823497

    Wow, that's a very good result I think, even the ping is quite good. What cloud instance is this?

  • dev_vpsdev_vps Member
    edited April 2018

    From Seattle location:

    http://www.speedtest.net/result/7266876562

    The upload speed is very poor.

    .

  • dev_vpsdev_vps Member
    edited April 2018

    @ckissi said:

    @dev_vps said:
    For Chicago location
    http://www.speedtest.net/result/7266823497

    Wow, that's a very good result I think, even the ping is quite good.
    What cloud instance is this?

    >

    Helsinki

    CX-21

    € 4.90/month

  • ckissickissi Member
    edited April 2018

    @dev_vps said:
    From Seattle location:

    http://www.speedtest.net/result/7266876562

    The upload speed is very poor.

    >
    2.33mbps!! that's extreme number. There must be some routing issue. It would be interesting to traceroute to that IP in Seattle.
    Can you provide me with the Speedtest ID of that test server? I would test it with some of my US located servers. Maybe the test server is simply overloaded on downstream.

  • UnixfyUnixfy Member

    ckissi said: 2.33mbps!! that's extreme number. There must be some routing issue. It would be interesting to traceroute to that IP in Seattle. Can you provide me with the Speedtest ID of that test server? I would test it with some of my US located servers. Maybe the test server is simply overloaded on downstream.

    Doing a quick lookup of Speedtest.net servers owned by Ookla in Chicago gives me server IDs 10670 and 10923.

    Hetzner doesn't have great routing to most of the US, especially Hetzner's Finland location (which routes everything to the US through Frankfurt). It does depend on your location and ISP though, because I get better pings to Helsinki than to my dedi in Nürnberg.

  • HarborVPSHarborVPS Member

    I live in Canada, used there services a couple years ago - Connection to Canada was horrid. 275ms pings. Never looked back.

  • dragon1993dragon1993 Member

    Nuremberg to Hungary

    Hosted by ISIS-COM Ltd (Szombathely) [686.53 km]: 48.084 ms
Download: 142.14 Mbit/s
Upload: 163.47 Mbit/s

Hosted by Remicro Kft. - Microweb Internet (Szombathely) [686.53 km]: 41.276 ms
Download: 235.87 Mbit/s
Upload: 55.03 Mbit/s

Hosted by ZNET Telekom Zrt. (Gyor) [712.50 km]: 33.245 ms
Download: 357.96 Mbit/s
Upload: 856.66 Mbit/s

Hosted by Tarr Ltd. (Zalaegerszeg) [729.02 km]: 48.919 ms
Download: 669.37 Mbit/s
Upload: 223.48 Mbit/s

Hosted by ZNET Telekom Zrt. (Zalaegerszeg) [729.02 km]: 28.545 ms
Download: 563.19 Mbit/s
Upload: 310.10 Mbit/s

Hosted by Mikrotti AiR-NET (Keszthely) [756.86 km]: 47.594 ms
Download: 86.46 Mbit/s
Upload: 60.85 Mbit/s

Hosted by ZNET Telekom Zrt. (Nagykanizsa) [768.03 km]: 32.769 ms
Download: 815.55 Mbit/s
Upload: 899.32 Mbit/s

Hosted by Datatrans Internet Kft (Szekesfehervar) [791.11 km]: 29.972 ms
Download: 524.91 Mbit/s
Upload: 224.79 Mbit/s

Hosted by Vodafone Hungary Ltd. (Budapest) [809.58 km]: 154.431 ms
Download: 836.91 Mbit/s
Upload: 551.54 Mbit/s

Hosted by Magyar Telekom Plc. (Budapest) [809.58 km]: 34.377 ms
Download: 361.77 Mbit/s
Upload: 359.68 Mbit/s

Hosted by Telenor Hungary (Budapest) [809.58 km]: 31.911 ms
Download: 820.82 Mbit/s
Upload: 443.36 Mbit/s

Hosted by Antenna Hungária Zrt. (Budapest) [809.58 km]: 35.605 ms
Download: 790.55 Mbit/s
Upload: 471.25 Mbit/s

Hosted by SzerverPlex.HU Kft (Budapest) [809.58 km]: 165.328 ms
Download: 194.93 Mbit/s
Upload: 234.08 Mbit/s

Hosted by ATW Internet Kft. (Budapest) [809.58 km]: 34.043 ms
Download: 284.22 Mbit/s
Upload: 632.24 Mbit/s

Hosted by Digi Kft (Dunaujvaros) [835.85 km]: 47.2 ms
Download: 639.37 Mbit/s
Upload: 462.19 Mbit/s

Hosted by ZNET Telekom Zrt. (Pecs) [864.69 km]: 37.569 ms
Download: 1041.91 Mbit/s
Upload: 745.59 Mbit/s

Hosted by Tarr ltd. (Szekszard) [868.91 km]: 28.065 ms
Download: 751.01 Mbit/s
Upload: 375.32 Mbit/s

Hosted by Opticon Kft. (Kecskemet) [887.53 km]: 36.487 ms
Download: 494.58 Mbit/s
Upload: 803.32 Mbit/s

Hosted by TvNetTel (Szentes) [939.04 km]: 47.038 ms
Download: 316.87 Mbit/s
Upload: 256.86 Mbit/s

Hosted by Giganet Internet Kft (Nyiregyhaza) [955.18 km]: 43.474 ms
Download: 257.40 Mbit/s
Upload: 177.00 Mbit/s

Hosted by SzemerNet (Szeged) [959.77 km]: 34.268 ms
Download: 294.31 Mbit/s
Upload: 154.56 Mbit/s

Hosted by InterNet-X Magyarorszag Kft. (Bekescsaba) [988.45 km]: 41.754 ms
Download: 530.14 Mbit/s
Upload: 334.86 Mbit/s
    Thanked by 2Aidan that_guy
  • ckissickissi Member

    Ping from Hetzner (Nuremberg 1 DC 3) to Buyvm VPS located in New York 84ms! Tried also Buyvm to Hetzner (just for sure). The same 84ms. That's really good I think.

    I've used speedtest to measure speed in different locations and the upload is between 25mbps - 250mbps. Those 25mbps are probably caused by test server as I've got quite good results also for SF locations (over 180mbps).

  • realbusinessrealbusiness Member

    I have just deployed another EUR4.90 plan, if you need any tests, let me know. Work starts on it tomorrow.

  • stakedstaked Member
    edited June 2018

    Here are my results from CX11 in NRG, HEL, and FSN.

    https://hastebin.com/asevogifol.scala

  • stakedstaked Member

    `Falkenstein fsn1-dc8

    Running bandwidth benchmark...
    Got : CDN77 Chicago, US (http://793343545.r.cdn77.net/design/swf/testfile100.bin)
    Got 86.2MB/s : Cachefly (http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test)
    Got 10.6MB/s : OVH, Montreal, Canada (http://proof.ovh.ca/files/100Mio.dat)
    Got 17.5MB/s : Linode, Atlanta, GA, USA (http://speedtest.atlanta.linode.com/100MB-atlanta.bin)
    Got 15.5MB/s : Linode, Dallas, TX, USA (http://speedtest.dallas.linode.com/100MB-dallas.bin)
    Got 11.4MB/s : Softlayer, Seattle, WA, USA (http://speedtest.sea01.softlayer.com/downloads/test100.zip)
    Got 9.02MB/s : Softlayer, S Jose,CA, USA (http://speedtest.sjc01.softlayer.com/downloads/test100.zip)
    Got 4.04MB/s : Softlayer, Wash, DC, USA (http://speedtest.wdc01.softlayer.com/downloads/test100.zip)
    Got 17.8MB/s : Leaseweb, Manassas, VA, USA (http://mirror.us.leaseweb.net/speedtest/100mb.bin)
    Got 83.2MB/s : OVH, Paris, France (http://proof.ovh.net/files/100Mio.dat)
    Got 79.2MB/s : Linode, London, UK (http://speedtest.london.linode.com/100MB-london.bin)
    Got 61.5MB/s : SmartDC, Rotterdam, NL (http://mirror.i3d.net/100mb.bin)
    Got : Hetzner, Nuernberg, DE (http://hetzner.de/100MB.iso)
    Got : iiNet, Perth, WA, AUS (http://ftp.iinet.net.au/test100MB.dat)
    Got 82.6MB/s : Leaseweb, Haarlem, NL (http://mirror.nl.leaseweb.net/speedtest/100mb.bin)
    Downloading and running speedtest.net CLI
    python: can't open file 'speedtest_cli.py': [Errno 2] No such file or directory
    rm: cannot remove 'speedtest_cli.py': No such file or directory
    Running traceroute...
    Traceroute (cachefly.cachefly.net): ./foo.sh: line 42: traceroute: command not found
    Running ping benchmark...
    Pings (cachefly.cachefly.net): PING vip1.g5.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175) 56(84) bytes of data.
    64 bytes from vip1.G-anycast1.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=4.94 ms
    64 bytes from vip1.G-anycast1.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=5.00 ms
    64 bytes from vip1.G-anycast1.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=5.06 ms
    64 bytes from vip1.G-anycast1.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=5.04 ms
    64 bytes from vip1.G-anycast1.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=5.02 ms
    64 bytes from vip1.G-anycast1.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175): icmp_seq=6 ttl=57 time=5.03 ms
    64 bytes from vip1.G-anycast1.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175): icmp_seq=7 ttl=57 time=5.06 ms
    64 bytes from vip1.G-anycast1.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175): icmp_seq=8 ttl=57 time=5.06 ms
    64 bytes from vip1.G-anycast1.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175): icmp_seq=9 ttl=57 time=5.05 ms
    64 bytes from vip1.G-anycast1.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175): icmp_seq=10 ttl=57 time=5.03 ms

    --- vip1.g5.cachefly.net ping statistics ---
    10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9011ms
    rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 4.944/5.032/5.067/0.096 ms

    Finland hel1-dc2

    Running bandwidth benchmark...
    Got : CDN77 Chicago, US (http://793343545.r.cdn77.net/design/swf/testfile100.bin)
    Got 83.7MB/s : Cachefly (http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test)
    Got 6.40MB/s : OVH, Montreal, Canada (http://proof.ovh.ca/files/100Mio.dat)
    Got 16.0MB/s : Linode, Atlanta, GA, USA (http://speedtest.atlanta.linode.com/100MB-atlanta.bin)
    Got 13.8MB/s : Linode, Dallas, TX, USA (http://speedtest.dallas.linode.com/100MB-dallas.bin)
    Got 7.55MB/s : Softlayer, Seattle, WA, USA (http://speedtest.sea01.softlayer.com/downloads/test100.zip)
    Got 7.72MB/s : Softlayer, S Jose,CA, USA (http://speedtest.sjc01.softlayer.com/downloads/test100.zip)
    Got 1.94MB/s : Softlayer, Wash, DC, USA (http://speedtest.wdc01.softlayer.com/downloads/test100.zip)
    Got 15.7MB/s : Leaseweb, Manassas, VA, USA (http://mirror.us.leaseweb.net/speedtest/100mb.bin)
    Got 64.4MB/s : OVH, Paris, France (http://proof.ovh.net/files/100Mio.dat)
    Got 56.3MB/s : Linode, London, UK (http://speedtest.london.linode.com/100MB-london.bin)
    Got 42.6MB/s : SmartDC, Rotterdam, NL (http://mirror.i3d.net/100mb.bin)
    Got : Hetzner, Nuernberg, DE (http://hetzner.de/100MB.iso)
    Got : iiNet, Perth, WA, AUS (http://ftp.iinet.net.au/test100MB.dat)
    Got 67.0MB/s : Leaseweb, Haarlem, NL (http://mirror.nl.leaseweb.net/speedtest/100mb.bin)
    Downloading and running speedtest.net CLI
    python: can't open file 'speedtest_cli.py': [Errno 2] No such file or directory
    rm: cannot remove 'speedtest_cli.py': No such file or directory
    Running traceroute...
    Traceroute (cachefly.cachefly.net): ./foo.sh: line 42: traceroute: command not found
    Running ping benchmark...
    Pings (cachefly.cachefly.net): PING vip1.g5.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175) 56(84) bytes of data.
    64 bytes from vip1.G-anycast1.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175): icmp_seq=1 ttl=56 time=26.7 ms
    64 bytes from vip1.G-anycast1.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175): icmp_seq=2 ttl=56 time=27.0 ms
    64 bytes from vip1.G-anycast1.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175): icmp_seq=3 ttl=56 time=26.9 ms
    64 bytes from vip1.G-anycast1.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175): icmp_seq=4 ttl=56 time=27.0 ms
    64 bytes from vip1.G-anycast1.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175): icmp_seq=5 ttl=56 time=26.9 ms
    64 bytes from vip1.G-anycast1.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175): icmp_seq=6 ttl=56 time=27.0 ms
    64 bytes from vip1.G-anycast1.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175): icmp_seq=7 ttl=56 time=26.8 ms
    64 bytes from vip1.G-anycast1.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175): icmp_seq=8 ttl=56 time=26.9 ms
    64 bytes from vip1.G-anycast1.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175): icmp_seq=9 ttl=56 time=26.9 ms
    64 bytes from vip1.G-anycast1.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175): icmp_seq=10 ttl=56 time=26.9 ms

    --- vip1.g5.cachefly.net ping statistics ---
    10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9013ms
    rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 26.731/26.937/27.095/0.230 ms

    Running bandwidth benchmark...
    Got : CDN77 Chicago, US (http://793343545.r.cdn77.net/design/swf/testfile100.bin)
    Got 86.2MB/s : Cachefly (http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test)
    Got 10.6MB/s : OVH, Montreal, Canada (http://proof.ovh.ca/files/100Mio.dat)
    Got 17.5MB/s : Linode, Atlanta, GA, USA (http://speedtest.atlanta.linode.com/100MB-atlanta.bin)
    Got 15.5MB/s : Linode, Dallas, TX, USA (http://speedtest.dallas.linode.com/100MB-dallas.bin)
    Got 11.4MB/s : Softlayer, Seattle, WA, USA (http://speedtest.sea01.softlayer.com/downloads/test100.zip)
    Got 9.02MB/s : Softlayer, S Jose,CA, USA (http://speedtest.sjc01.softlayer.com/downloads/test100.zip)
    Got 4.04MB/s : Softlayer, Wash, DC, USA (http://speedtest.wdc01.softlayer.com/downloads/test100.zip)
    Got 17.8MB/s : Leaseweb, Manassas, VA, USA (http://mirror.us.leaseweb.net/speedtest/100mb.bin)
    Got 83.2MB/s : OVH, Paris, France (http://proof.ovh.net/files/100Mio.dat)
    Got 79.2MB/s : Linode, London, UK (http://speedtest.london.linode.com/100MB-london.bin)
    Got 61.5MB/s : SmartDC, Rotterdam, NL (http://mirror.i3d.net/100mb.bin)
    Got : Hetzner, Nuernberg, DE (http://hetzner.de/100MB.iso)
    Got : iiNet, Perth, WA, AUS (http://ftp.iinet.net.au/test100MB.dat)
    Got 82.6MB/s : Leaseweb, Haarlem, NL (http://mirror.nl.leaseweb.net/speedtest/100mb.bin)
    Downloading and running speedtest.net CLI
    python: can't open file 'speedtest_cli.py': [Errno 2] No such file or directory
    rm: cannot remove 'speedtest_cli.py': No such file or directory
    Running traceroute...
    Traceroute (cachefly.cachefly.net): ./foo.sh: line 42: traceroute: command not found
    Running ping benchmark...
    Pings (cachefly.cachefly.net): PING vip1.g5.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175) 56(84) bytes of data.
    64 bytes from vip1.G-anycast1.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=4.94 ms
    64 bytes from vip1.G-anycast1.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=5.00 ms
    64 bytes from vip1.G-anycast1.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=5.06 ms
    64 bytes from vip1.G-anycast1.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=5.04 ms
    64 bytes from vip1.G-anycast1.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=5.02 ms
    64 bytes from vip1.G-anycast1.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175): icmp_seq=6 ttl=57 time=5.03 ms
    64 bytes from vip1.G-anycast1.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175): icmp_seq=7 ttl=57 time=5.06 ms
    64 bytes from vip1.G-anycast1.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175): icmp_seq=8 ttl=57 time=5.06 ms
    64 bytes from vip1.G-anycast1.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175): icmp_seq=9 ttl=57 time=5.05 ms
    64 bytes from vip1.G-anycast1.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175): icmp_seq=10 ttl=57 time=5.03 ms

    --- vip1.g5.cachefly.net ping statistics ---
    10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9011ms
    rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 4.944/5.032/5.067/0.096 ms

    Nuremberg nbg1-dc3

    Running bandwidth benchmark...
    Got : CDN77 Chicago, US (http://793343545.r.cdn77.net/design/swf/testfile100.bin)
    Got 83.7MB/s : Cachefly (http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test)
    Got 6.40MB/s : OVH, Montreal, Canada (http://proof.ovh.ca/files/100Mio.dat)
    Got 16.0MB/s : Linode, Atlanta, GA, USA (http://speedtest.atlanta.linode.com/100MB-atlanta.bin)
    Got 13.8MB/s : Linode, Dallas, TX, USA (http://speedtest.dallas.linode.com/100MB-dallas.bin)
    Got 7.55MB/s : Softlayer, Seattle, WA, USA (http://speedtest.sea01.softlayer.com/downloads/test100.zip)
    Got 7.72MB/s : Softlayer, S Jose,CA, USA (http://speedtest.sjc01.softlayer.com/downloads/test100.zip)
    Got 1.94MB/s : Softlayer, Wash, DC, USA (http://speedtest.wdc01.softlayer.com/downloads/test100.zip)
    Got 15.7MB/s : Leaseweb, Manassas, VA, USA (http://mirror.us.leaseweb.net/speedtest/100mb.bin)
    Got 64.4MB/s : OVH, Paris, France (http://proof.ovh.net/files/100Mio.dat)
    Got 56.3MB/s : Linode, London, UK (http://speedtest.london.linode.com/100MB-london.bin)
    Got 42.6MB/s : SmartDC, Rotterdam, NL (http://mirror.i3d.net/100mb.bin)
    Got : Hetzner, Nuernberg, DE (http://hetzner.de/100MB.iso)
    Got : iiNet, Perth, WA, AUS (http://ftp.iinet.net.au/test100MB.dat)
    Got 67.0MB/s : Leaseweb, Haarlem, NL (http://mirror.nl.leaseweb.net/speedtest/100mb.bin)
    Downloading and running speedtest.net CLI
    python: can't open file 'speedtest_cli.py': [Errno 2] No such file or directory
    rm: cannot remove 'speedtest_cli.py': No such file or directory
    Running traceroute...
    Traceroute (cachefly.cachefly.net): ./foo.sh: line 42: traceroute: command not found
    Running ping benchmark...
    Pings (cachefly.cachefly.net): PING vip1.g5.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175) 56(84) bytes of data.
    64 bytes from vip1.G-anycast1.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175): icmp_seq=1 ttl=56 time=26.7 ms
    64 bytes from vip1.G-anycast1.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175): icmp_seq=2 ttl=56 time=27.0 ms
    64 bytes from vip1.G-anycast1.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175): icmp_seq=3 ttl=56 time=26.9 ms
    64 bytes from vip1.G-anycast1.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175): icmp_seq=4 ttl=56 time=27.0 ms
    64 bytes from vip1.G-anycast1.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175): icmp_seq=5 ttl=56 time=26.9 ms
    64 bytes from vip1.G-anycast1.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175): icmp_seq=6 ttl=56 time=27.0 ms
    64 bytes from vip1.G-anycast1.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175): icmp_seq=7 ttl=56 time=26.8 ms
    64 bytes from vip1.G-anycast1.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175): icmp_seq=8 ttl=56 time=26.9 ms
    64 bytes from vip1.G-anycast1.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175): icmp_seq=9 ttl=56 time=26.9 ms
    64 bytes from vip1.G-anycast1.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175): icmp_seq=10 ttl=56 time=26.9 ms

    --- vip1.g5.cachefly.net ping statistics ---
    10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9013ms
    rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 26.731/26.937/27.095/0.230 ms
    `

Sign In or Register to comment.