Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Looking for reliable uptime and network stability
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Looking for reliable uptime and network stability

Hello!

I have a Wordpress based website receiving some load peaks from time to time and Cloudlinux it's limiting the CPU frequently.

I'm looking for great system and network uptime, also fast support responses. What would you recommend? Which providers do you trust more? This time it doesn't matter the budget.

Want to know some specs? 2GB RAM and 35GB SSD probably. Unmanaged OVZ in USA.

«1

Comments

  • If you're peaking higher CPU use, I'd suggest addressing that before looking at a new host.

  • imokimok Member
    edited November 2017

    WSS said: If you're peaking higher CPU use, I'd suggest addressing that before looking at a new host.

    It's on shared hosting currently. Caching system it's working but I think the CPU limits on the host are too low.

    Also I'd like to have more options to backup everything with narrow intervals.

  • Linode or Digitalocean. These "cloud" based providers normally maintain a high uptime. Lightsail is also an option, though I haven't tried them yet.

  • @dedipromo said:
    Linode or Digitalocean. These "cloud" based providers normally maintain a high uptime. Lightsail is also an option, though I haven't tried them yet.

    A competitor of the website moved out from Linode because the network wasn't too good, but I can try.

    DigitalOcean it's and option.

    Hace you ever worked with Google Cloud?

  • You need some RamNode and/or SecureDragon... Great uptime, reliability, and support.

    Thanked by 2imok bersy
  • vfusevfuse Member, Host Rep

    If budget is not an issue I would look for a KVM vps instead of openvz. I've had a server with DO that had over 2 years uptime before I dropped it, very stable.

    Thanked by 1imok
  • SplitIceSplitIce Member, Host Rep

    @imok said:
    This time it doesn't matter the budget.

    If the lowest budget doesnt matter, spend a few more cents and go KVM/XEN not OVZ

    Thanked by 1imok
  • Thanks guys!

    Can you tell me how the uptime/reliability is related to the virtualization technology? Noob question.

    Thanked by 1Ole_Juul
  • @imok said:
    Can you tell me how the uptime/reliability is related to the virtualization technology? Noob question.

    Depends on how shitty the host is.

  • Ok, it could be KVM.

    Anyone using Vapornode? This is hard to believe:

  • NeoonNeoon Community Contributor, Veteran

    Keep in mind that these uptime percentages are relative to how often it gets checked and how many rechecks, timeout is configured.

    Thanked by 1imok
  • +1 vote for DO, Vultr, Linode & GCP.

  • imok said: Vapornode

    My one experience with VaporNode was poor. They had an emergency reboot of a host server (it happens, I get that) but my server was never restarted. My server was offline for more than 3 hours. I had to go into the control panel to start it.

    When I asked them why my server wasn't automatically restarted after the host server reboot, this was the answer -

    "To keep the server load down on boot up, we do not automatically start all the VPSs again by default."

    So know that if they do an unannounced reboot of the host, you have to go click a button to bring your box back online.

    Thanked by 2imok bersy
  • @vapornode that is not good :(

  • @imok We provide an option in our control panel to have your VPS started on boot automatically.

    Additionally, reboots are rare. There have been 0 in over a year.

    Our uptime page shows stats from 5 minute check intervals and is absolutely accurate.

    Let me know if you have any questions! We are more than willing to work with you.

    Thanked by 1bersy
  • Ordered a cloud package about an hour ago for testing :D

    I hope activation does not take too long.

  • @imok You should be good to go!

    Thanked by 1imok
  • Joined to the BuyVM club today :)

    But the smallest vm in this case.

    Thanked by 1Francisco
  • imok said: Can you tell me how the uptime/reliability is related to the virtualization technology? Noob question.

    I've had several OpenVZ VPS with RamNode for a couple of years. So far none of them have blinked.

    Thanked by 1imok
  • sinsin Member
    edited November 2017

    imok said: Ordered a cloud package about an hour ago for testing :D I hope activation does not take too long.

    I've been using a KVM VPS with @vapornode and they have been excellent so far so I'm sure you will be happy with the services :)

    Thanked by 2imok vapornode
  • MaouniqueMaounique Host Rep, Veteran

    Ole_Juul said: I've had several OpenVZ VPS with RamNode for a couple of years. So far none of them have blinked.

    OVZ can be unstable now and then. I mean, more unstable than Xen or KVM, we had 1k days plus on Xen uptime, but OVZ is usually up to 500, some even below a year. KVM is somewhere inbetween.

  • @Maounique said:

    Ole_Juul said: I've had several OpenVZ VPS with RamNode for a couple of years. So far none of them have blinked.

    OVZ can be unstable now and then. I mean, more unstable than Xen or KVM, we had 1k days plus on Xen uptime, but OVZ is usually up to 500, some even below a year. KVM is somewhere inbetween.

    Where'd you come up with these metrics? Left butt cheek, or right butt cheek?

    wss@ns3%uptime&&uname -srm
     11:26:45 up 317 days, 21:11,  1 user,  load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
    Linux 2.6.32-042stab120.6 x86_64
    
    Thanked by 1mikho
  • MaouniqueMaounique Host Rep, Veteran

    An average of the nodes I see everyday. I dont see how your example invalidates my:

    Maounique said: OVZ is usually up to 500

    317<500 so?

  • @Maounique said:
    An average of the nodes I see everyday. I dont see how your example invalidates my:

    Maounique said: OVZ is usually up to 500

    317<500 so?

    The fact that the load is at zero is what I was noting- which explains the uptime. It really has more to do with how oversold OVZs generally are. My VPS sitting at Tragic are quite happy to have a handful of processes running as a backup NS/MX, and downtime has been nonexistent as it isn't oversold.

    Overall, most OVZ based hosting is as stable as the users are limited to their allocated space/network/CPU.

  • HarambeHarambe Member, Host Rep

    Ramnode OVZ

     12:08:36 up 1210 days,  2:50,  1 user,  load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
    Thanked by 3mikho bersy imok
  • @WSS said:
    If you're peaking higher CPU use, I'd suggest addressing that before looking at a new host.

    You were right. Changed WP Super Cache and Cloudflare, and configured W3 Total Cache and BunnyCDN. The website is flying now in the same server.

    Now what do I do with my new services? Lol

  • ..porn?

  • MaouniqueMaounique Host Rep, Veteran
    edited November 2017

    WSS said: The fact that the load is at zero is what I was noting- which explains the uptime.

    Well, I agree idle servers are perhaps the most stable in the world, however, most of our customers do like to use them (what other providers consider abuse) we allow 100% CPU and even more as there is enough capacity in reserve especially on Biz/Pro plans.
    Since we have a lot of people using the resources, a 24 threads server (OVerZold, since we are at it), looks like this:

    top - 09:34:10 up 518 days, 17:54,  1 user,  load average: 7.05, 6.80, 6.73
    Tasks: 2129 total,   4 running, 2112 sleeping,   3 stopped,  10 zombie
    Cpu(s): 11.7%us,  3.6%sy,  4.1%ni, 79.3%id,  0.1%wa,  0.0%hi,  1.1%si,  0.0%st
    Mem:  148396928k total, 145945448k used,  2451480k free,  2215448k buffers
    Swap:  4194300k total,     6928k used,  4187372k free, 95314812k cached
    
    [root@pm65overzold ~]# free -m
                 total       used       free     shared    buffers     cached
    Mem:        144918     142727       2191        383       2163      93082
    -/+ buffers/cache:      47481      97437
    Swap:         4095          6       4089
    
    processor       : 23
    vendor_id       : GenuineIntel
    cpu family      : 6
    model           : 44
    model name      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU           X5650  @ 2.67GHz
    stepping        : 2
    microcode       : 19
    cpu MHz         : 2666.962
    cache size      : 12288 KB
    physical id     : 1
    siblings        : 12
    core id         : 10
    cpu cores       : 6
    apicid          : 53
    initial apicid  : 53
    fpu             : yes
    fpu_exception   : yes
    cpuid level     : 11
    wp              : yes
    flags           : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall nx pdpe1gb rdtscp lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good xtopology nonstop_tsc aperfmperf pni dtes64 monitor ds_cpl vmx smx est tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr pdcm pcid dca sse4_1 sse4_2 popcnt lahf_lm ida arat epb dtherm tpr_shadow vnmi flexpriority ept vpid
    bogomips        : 5333.20
    clflush size    : 64
    cache_alignment : 64
    address sizes   : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
    power management:
    

    Most load, up to 12-15, appears in the evening though, when the minecraft kids start their thing.

  • @Maounique said:
    when the minecraft kids start their thing.

    Damn those cheeky Minecraft kids!

  • @Maounique said:

    top - 09:34:10 up 518 days, 17:54,  1 user,  load average: 7.05, 6.80, 6.73
    > Tasks: 2129 total,   4 running, 2112 sleeping,   3 stopped,  10 zombie
    > Cpu(s): 11.7%us,  3.6%sy,  4.1%ni, 79.3%id,  0.1%wa,  0.0%hi,  1.1%si,  0.0%st
    > Mem:  148396928k total, 145945448k used,  2451480k free,  2215448k buffers
    > Swap:  4194300k total,     6928k used,  4187372k free, 95314812k cached
    > 

    More than enough memory at this load and very little iowait. Looks fine to me!

Sign In or Register to comment.