Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Sign In Register

Quick Links


Categories

In this Discussion

› › BuyVM NY & LU slices available - Page 3
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

BuyVM NY & LU slices available

135

Comments

  • NdhaNdha Member

    @jiggawattz said:

    She's no longer at BuyVM. Her menstrual cramping was making it difficult to work + she really wants to have a baby so she decided to stop working.

    Val is now doing support and he seems solid. Classy, real stand up guy.

    Actually, Aldryc is very good handle support if he can handle his anger management or in good mood..will miss him.

    Thanked by 2doughmanes MikeA
  • eva2000eva2000 Veteran

    @vimalware said:
    such SORCERY 

    openssl speed rsa2048
Doing 2048 bit private rsa's for 10s: 17550 2048 bit private RSA's in 9.82s
Doing 2048 bit public rsa's for 10s: 408919 2048 bit public RSA's in 9.84s
OpenSSL 1.0.2g  1 Mar 2016
---truncated----
                  sign    verify    sign/s verify/s
rsa 2048 bits 0.000560s 0.000024s   1787.2  41556.8

    which plan ? seems slower than BuyVM Las Vegas slices i tested benchmarks https://community.centminmod.com/posts/31998/

    -------------------------------------------
OpenSSL System Benchmark
-------------------------------------------

OpenSSL 1.0.1e-fips 11 Feb 2013
-------------------------------------------
openssl speed rsa4096 rsa2048 ecdsap256 sha256 sha1 md5 rc4 aes-256-cbc aes-128-cbc -multi 4
OpenSSL 1.0.1e-fips 11 Feb 2013
built on: Mon May  9 08:07:32 UTC 2016
options:bn(64,64) md2(int) rc4(16x,int) des(idx,cisc,16,int) aes(partial) idea(int) blowfish(idx)
compiler: gcc -fPIC -DOPENSSL_PIC -DZLIB -DOPENSSL_THREADS -D_REENTRANT -DDSO_DLFCN -DHAVE_DLFCN_H -DKRB5_MIT -m64 -DL_ENDIAN -DTERMIO -Wall -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector-strong --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -grecord-gcc-switches   -m64 -mtune=generic -Wa,--noexecstack -DPURIFY -DOPENSSL_IA32_SSE2 -DOPENSSL_BN_ASM_MONT -DOPENSSL_BN_ASM_MONT5 -DOPENSSL_BN_ASM_GF2m -DSHA1_ASM -DSHA256_ASM -DSHA512_ASM -DMD5_ASM -DAES_ASM -DVPAES_ASM -DBSAES_ASM -DWHIRLPOOL_ASM -DGHASH_ASM
md5             272612.39k   794328.45k  1764505.94k  2536169.13k  2911892.82k
sha1            255104.27k   748970.71k  1723500.46k  2670544.21k  3391935.83k
rc4            1728702.25k  2996274.15k  3515722.67k  3614601.90k  3657971.03k
aes-128 cbc     583728.90k   643416.00k   659272.96k  1422395.39k  1419632.64k
aes-256 cbc     429631.65k   461663.87k   466754.05k  1032340.82k  1041760.26k
sha256          229035.95k   512728.21k   907321.34k  1095692.63k  1155503.45k
                  sign    verify    sign/s verify/s
rsa 2048 bits 0.000260s 0.000008s   3843.4 129032.3
rsa 4096 bits 0.001959s 0.000029s    510.5  34935.2
                              sign    verify    sign/s verify/s
256 bit ecdsa (nistp256)   0.0000s   0.0001s  44946.7  11528.7
-------------------------------------------
openssl speed -evp aes256 -multi 4
OpenSSL 1.0.1e-fips 11 Feb 2013
built on: Mon May  9 08:07:32 UTC 2016
options:bn(64,64) md2(int) rc4(16x,int) des(idx,cisc,16,int) aes(partial) idea(int) blowfish(idx)
compiler: gcc -fPIC -DOPENSSL_PIC -DZLIB -DOPENSSL_THREADS -D_REENTRANT -DDSO_DLFCN -DHAVE_DLFCN_H -DKRB5_MIT -m64 -DL_ENDIAN -DTERMIO -Wall -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector-strong --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -grecord-gcc-switches   -m64 -mtune=generic -Wa,--noexecstack -DPURIFY -DOPENSSL_IA32_SSE2 -DOPENSSL_BN_ASM_MONT -DOPENSSL_BN_ASM_MONT5 -DOPENSSL_BN_ASM_GF2m -DSHA1_ASM -DSHA256_ASM -DSHA512_ASM -DMD5_ASM -DAES_ASM -DVPAES_ASM -DBSAES_ASM -DWHIRLPOOL_ASM -DGHASH_ASM
evp            2213882.18k  2332239.96k  2363880.79k  2369840.81k  2364973.06k
-------------------------------------------
openssl speed -evp aes128 -multi 4
OpenSSL 1.0.1e-fips 11 Feb 2013
built on: Mon May  9 08:07:32 UTC 2016
options:bn(64,64) md2(int) rc4(16x,int) des(idx,cisc,16,int) aes(partial) idea(int) blowfish(idx)
compiler: gcc -fPIC -DOPENSSL_PIC -DZLIB -DOPENSSL_THREADS -D_REENTRANT -DDSO_DLFCN -DHAVE_DLFCN_H -DKRB5_MIT -m64 -DL_ENDIAN -DTERMIO -Wall -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector-strong --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -grecord-gcc-switches   -m64 -mtune=generic -Wa,--noexecstack -DPURIFY -DOPENSSL_IA32_SSE2 -DOPENSSL_BN_ASM_MONT -DOPENSSL_BN_ASM_MONT5 -DOPENSSL_BN_ASM_GF2m -DSHA1_ASM -DSHA256_ASM -DSHA512_ASM -DMD5_ASM -DAES_ASM -DVPAES_ASM -DBSAES_ASM -DWHIRLPOOL_ASM -DGHASH_ASM
evp            3009811.64k  3229198.63k  3290298.28k  3303331.40k  3308882.60k

    and

    -------------------------------------------
Centmin Mod Nginx static LibreSSL Benchmark
-------------------------------------------

LibreSSL 2.3.4
-------------------------------------------
openssl speed rsa4096 rsa2048 ecdsap256 sha256 sha1 md5 rc4 aes-256-cbc aes-128-cbc -multi 4
LibreSSL 2.3.4
built on: date not available
options:bn(64,64) rc4(16x,int) des(idx,cisc,16,int) aes(partial) idea(int) blowfish(idx)
compiler: information not available
md5             334280.94k   926241.32k  1894686.46k  2598320.47k  2919718.91k
sha1            383808.02k  1023387.97k  2018725.55k  2796502.70k  3269561.00k
rc4            1690092.23k  3015561.94k  3483957.42k  3489181.70k  3621888.00k
aes-128 cbc     575861.01k   639012.76k   655853.57k  1420897.96k  1427210.24k
aes-256 cbc     431612.49k   459783.59k   467359.23k  1032773.29k  1044269.74k
sha256          246399.34k   529172.42k   902619.90k  1100705.45k  1145615.70k
                  sign    verify    sign/s verify/s
rsa 2048 bits 0.000254s 0.000008s   3937.1 126008.1
rsa 4096 bits 0.001806s 0.000029s    553.8  34336.6
                              sign    verify    sign/s verify/s
256 bit ecdsa (nistp256)   0.0000s   0.0001s  39703.0  10198.3
-------------------------------------------
openssl speed -evp aes256 -multi 4
LibreSSL 2.3.4
built on: date not available
options:bn(64,64) rc4(16x,int) des(idx,cisc,16,int) aes(partial) idea(int) blowfish(idx)
compiler: information not available
evp            2217418.07k  2332082.65k  2364198.57k  2373658.97k  2363372.89k
-------------------------------------------
openssl speed -evp aes128 -multi 4
LibreSSL 2.3.4
built on: date not available
options:bn(64,64) rc4(16x,int) des(idx,cisc,16,int) aes(partial) idea(int) blowfish(idx)
compiler: information not available
evp            2990683.05k  3143018.47k  3229117.44k  3304288.94k  3308145.32k
  • FranciscoFrancisco Top Host, Host Rep, Veteran

    @eva2000 said:

    @vimalware said:
    such SORCERY 

    openssl speed rsa2048
Doing 2048 bit private rsa's for 10s: 17550 2048 bit private RSA's in 9.82s
Doing 2048 bit public rsa's for 10s: 408919 2048 bit public RSA's in 9.84s
OpenSSL 1.0.2g  1 Mar 2016
---truncated----
                  sign    verify    sign/s verify/s
rsa 2048 bits 0.000560s 0.000024s   1787.2  41556.8

    which plan ? seems slower than BuyVM Las Vegas slices i tested benchmarks https://community.centminmod.com/posts/31998/

    LibreSSL 2.3.4
built on: date not available
options:bn(64,64) rc4(16x,int) des(idx,cisc,16,int) aes(partial) idea(int) blowfish(idx)
compiler: information not available
evp            2990683.05k  3143018.47k  3229117.44k  3304288.94k  3308145.32k

    The LU & NY nodes are 1241v3's so it's possible they have better instruction sets in regards to crypto. I honestly didn't check into that, I just wanted a 3.5Ghz CPU and it benched the same range as the 1270.

    Francisco

    Thanked by 1vimalware
  • eva2000eva2000 Veteran
    edited February 2017

    Francisco said: The LU & NY nodes are 1241v3's so it's possible they have better instruction sets in regards to crypto. I honestly didn't check into that, I just wanted a 3.5Ghz CPU and it benched the same range as the 1270.

    oh that might explain things as E3/E5 v5 has hugh performance improvements compared to E3/E5 v1,v2 and v3 up to 50% to 85+ % better based on benchmarks

    though depends on the what you're using OpenSSL and LibreSSL version wise https://community.centminmod.com/threads/openssl-1-0-1e-1-0-2k-1-1-0e-vs-libressl-2-4-5-2-5-1-benchmarks.10463/

    edit: oh forgot you're using E3-1270v3 not E3-1270v5 in Las Vegas heh so difference shouldn't be that much for E3-1270v3 vs E3-1241v3

  • FranciscoFrancisco Top Host, Host Rep, Veteran

    eva2000 said: edit: oh forgot you're using E3-1270v3 not E3-1270v5 in Las Vegas heh so difference shouldn't be that much for E3-1270v3 vs E3-1241v3

    The 1241 is a refresh though so it's very much possible they brought some of those improvements back. I'm talking 1000% out of my ass though :)

    Good numbers though!

    Francisco

    Thanked by 1vimalware
  • williewillie Member

    William said: Newer E3/E5 have better cryptography/hashing extensions

    Those wouldn't affect an RSA benchmark, which is pure arithmetic. I downloaded OpenSSL 1.1.0e from openssl.org and get about the same speed as the slice got, i.e. much faster than what the 1.0.1t installed from the Debian repo. At first glance the build options appear about the same but I don't think the 1.1.0e implementation can be that much better. So I'm still not sure what's going on, but at least this narrows it to the software.

    Thanked by 1Francisco
  • ucxoucxo Member

    LU 1 GB benchmark (what do you mean with "don't you have anything better to do on a Saturday evening?"?):

    -------------------------
 nench.sh benchmark
 2017-02-25 12:22:21 UTC
-------------------------

Processor:    Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1241 v3 @ 3.50GHz
CPU cores:    1
Frequency:    3500.016 MHz
RAM:          1.0G
Swap:         871M
Kernel:       Linux 3.16.0-4-amd64 x86_64

Disks:
vda  20G  HDD

CPU: SHA256-hashing 500 MB
    2.271 seconds
CPU: bzip2-compressing 500 MB
    3.832 seconds
CPU: AES-encrypting 500 MB
    1.039 seconds

ioping: seek rate
    min/avg/max/mdev = 15.4 us / 19.4 us / 306.6 us / 2.98 us
ioping: sequential speed
    generated 45.9 k requests in 5.00 s, 11.2 GiB, 9.18 k iops, 2.24 GiB/s

dd test
    1st run:    587 MB/s
    2nd run:    674 MB/s
    3rd run:    622 MB/s
    average:    627 MB/s

IPv4 speedtests
    your IPv4:    104.244.73.*

    Cachefly CDN:         106MB/s
    Leaseweb (NL):        100MB/s
    Softlayer DAL (US):   10.7MB/s
    Online.net (FR):      67.6MB/s
    OVH BHS (CA):         15.4MB/s

IPv6 speedtests
    your IPv6:    2605:6400:30:*

    Leaseweb (NL):        80.2MB/s
    Softlayer DAL (US):   13.1MB/s
    Online.net (FR):      69.3MB/s
    OVH BHS (CA):         14.7MB/s
-------------------------
    Thanked by 2bersy vimalware
  • quickquick Member

    FYI the geo location of the lu slices are in US

  • ucxoucxo Member

    By the way, host node's time is wonky in LU:

    Universal time: Sat 2017-02-25 20:35:34 UTC
RTC time: Sat 2017-02-25 12:35:33
  • jiggawattjiggawatt Member

    @quick said:
    FYI the geo location of the lu slices are in US

    Geolocation is 3rd party data and not controlled by the host. Usually derived from the public WHOIS. You can do a traceroute to verify that it's in LU.

    Thanked by 1doughmanes
  • quickquick Member

    @jiggawattz said:

    @quick said:
    FYI the geo location of the lu slices are in US

    Geolocation is 3rd party data and not controlled by the host. Usually derived from the public WHOIS. You can do a traceroute to verify that it's in LU.

    this should not sound like a complaining, I was just saying..

  • jiggawattjiggawatt Member

    It's all good - I don't think anyone thought you were complaining. In general, BuyVM isn't a host to complain about.

    Thanked by 2quick vimalware
  • quickquick Member

    @jiggawattz said:
    It's all good - I don't think anyone thought you were complaining. In general, BuyVM isn't a host to complain about.

    yes I am using it as a pi-hole and everything runs super fast :)

    Thanked by 1tszilassi
  • FranciscoFrancisco Top Host, Host Rep, Veteran

    @ucxo said:
    By the way, host node's time is wonky in LU:

    >

    Universal time: Sat 2017-02-25 20:35:34 UTC
RTC time: Sat 2017-02-25 12:35:33

    >

    Noted, let me run a mass ntpdate, it seems I missed it in my provisioning script!

    Francisco

  • fourzerofourfourzerofour Member

    @willie said:

    Francisco said: @Hxxx said: @Francisco , still choopa?

    No.

    Interesting. https://buyvm.net/new-jersey-datacenter/ :

    Our New Jersey location is located in the new Dupont Fabros facility in Piscataway. This location allows us to directly connect to all major backbones via NYIIX and enables us to deliver outstanding network performance to the entire North American East Coast as well as to many parts of South America.

    It's double wrong, QTS purchased the Piscataway facility from Dupont last year

    Thanked by 1Francisco
  • FredQcFredQc Member

    Well, I can push 110MB/s to my OVH box from their NJ location. Network seems very solid.

    Thanked by 3Francisco inthecloudblog vimalware
  • FranciscoFrancisco Top Host, Host Rep, Veteran

    @FredQc said:
    Well, I can push 110MB/s to my OVH box from their NJ location. Network seems very solid.

    Awesome :)

    Francisco

  • raindog308raindog308 Administrator, Veteran

    Hey @Francisco - no more discounts for yearly purchase? I think it used to be buy for 12 months, pay for 10.

    I hadn't realized you were no longer doing OpenVZ...bummer. Please promise us you'll never get rid of the famous BuyVM 128!

    Francisco said: for all intense and purposes Aldryic doesn't work here

    Where the hell is our drama? Don't bogart the drama!

    Thanked by 1doughmanes
  • williewillie Member
    edited February 2017

    willie said: OpenSSL 1.1.0e from openssl.org and get about the same speed as the slice got

    Note, that was on an E3-1230v3 (Haswell). I also tried it later on an i7-3770 (Ivy Bridge) and 1.1.0e got similar speed to 1.0.1t, i.e. quite a lot slower than the E3 or the slice. So maybe there's some Haswell hardware improvements or SSE extensions that 1.1.0e is using when they're available. Anyway these things are just stupendously fast. RSA key agreement is almost a non-issue in connection setup speed now, even on the slower box.

    Thanked by 1vimalware
  • FranciscoFrancisco Top Host, Host Rep, Veteran

    @raindog308 said:
    Hey @Francisco - no more discounts for yearly purchase? I think it used to be buy for 12 months, pay for 10.

    I hadn't realized you were no longer doing OpenVZ...bummer. Please promise us you'll never get rid of the famous BuyVM 128!

    Francisco said: for all intense and purposes Aldryic doesn't work here

    Where the hell is our drama? Don't bogart the drama!

    The 128's are here to stay :) Yearly discount is gone for the time being.

    As for Aldryic, he's not been doing support/billing for I dunno....5+ months? August or so.

    Francisco

    Thanked by 1inthecloudblog
  • bohdansbohdans Member
    edited February 2017

    Need to update you slices page:

    Where are your servers located?
    BuyVM currently offers Dedicated KVM Slice Servers in Las Vegas, Nevada. Future
    expansion is planned for a second US location and also Europe.

  • inthecloudbloginthecloudblog Member

    Francisco said: As for Aldryic, he's not been doing support/billing for I dunno....5+ months? August or so.

    >

    Is his liver KO of too much vodka?

  • williclarkamwilliclarkam Member
    edited February 2017

    @quick said:
    FYI the geo location of the lu slices are in US

    Does this have any effect, when the slices in LU are used as VPN server?

  • FranciscoFrancisco Top Host, Host Rep, Veteran

    @williclarkam said:

    @quick said:
    FYI the geo location of the lu slices are in US

    Does this have any effect, when the slices in LU are used as VPN server?
    @williclarkam said:

    @quick said:
    FYI the geo location of the lu slices are in US

    Does this have any effect, when the slices in LU are used as VPN server?

    For now it might show as USA.

    Workin' on it.

    Francisco

    Thanked by 1williclarkam
  • budi1413budi1413 Member
    edited February 2017

    @francisco I need debian 8 template for os installation. :(

  • FranciscoFrancisco Top Host, Host Rep, Veteran

    @budi1413 said:
    @francisco I need debian 8 template for os installation. :(

    Can you do an ISO install for now and I'll try to have templates for tomorrow?

    Francisco

  • budi1413budi1413 Member

    @Francisco said:

    @budi1413 said:
    @francisco I need debian 8 template for os installation. :(

    Can you do an ISO install for now and I'll try to have templates for tomorrow?

    Francisco

    I can wait. Now i'm just too lazy. :p

  • busbrbusbr Member

    @Francisco how long's the provision queue like?

  • FranciscoFrancisco Top Host, Host Rep, Veteran

    @busbr said:
    @Francisco how long's the provision queue like?

    It'll be a few hours, sorry :( We don't have auto provisioning enabled right now but we hope to have that in place sometime this week.

    Francisco

  • emdademdad Member

    @Francisco said:

    @busbr said:
    @Francisco how long's the provision queue like?

    It'll be a few hours, sorry :( We don't have auto provisioning enabled right now but we hope to have that in place sometime this week.

    Francisco

    really? how come mine was provisioned in 4 minutes? :O

    Although, it was 12 hours ago.

Sign In or Register to comment.