New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.
Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Quick Links
Categories
In this Discussion
- 2008-2021 © LowEndBox & LowEndTalk. Privacy Policy. Powered by Vanilla.
Back to Top | LowEndTalk | LowEndBox | Dark Theme Config | Advertise
Comments
You can even after much less than 12 days.
Adding to fraud record is a shitty move too, but only if you asked for a refund before and the host didn't own it.
Yes I was added in the fraud record even after closing the dispute on PayPal whereby the issue has been resolved with the vendor.
Nothing wrong with raising a Paypal dispute if you've tried to work things out with a provider and given them a reasonable amount of time to figure things out.
Name and shame.
12 days no delivery and took dispute to resolve? I'd guess that no one takes their fraudrecord report seriously. I ignore fraudrecord reports constantly based on who filed them.
Hi, do you think it is possible to give any less specific information, or was this designed to be a 2 line rant that everyone ignores?
If it was not supposed to be a rant then my guess is that it was delivered, you forgot your root password and refused to reset it yourself, considered that none delivery so you filed a 'received damaged goods claim'?
Am I close?
It amazes me some of the crap on FR. I can think of one provider whose name begins with D who has a record for just about everyone 'paid invoice a day late' 'opened more than 1 ticket each month' 'used nearly all of his bandwidth allocation'.
I used to post those as a public shaming exercise to try and get hosts to stop doing that sort of crap, it was designed to weed about actual service abusers and fraudsters, not to let everyone know how that particular transaction went.
I soon gave up and when I concluded that you cant change stupid.
>
Jesus.
Full name please so people can avoid a provider that shames users who actually use the resources they bought.
If only it was just 1 name
MAGNUS, DID I WIN? DID I WIN?? OMG
Just use a process of Delimination.
No.
Delete my answer then, if there is a limit for one error only.
I saw one so bad the other day from a host that I had to let the customer know so they knew to ask for it to be removed, it was so stupid.
Is a cheap nat vps.
Ranting?...Nope.. Even if I am, it couldn't be worst than the provider which placed customers under fraud record despite the dispute being closed and settled at paypal?
You working for the company?
Yeah. @AnthonySmith works for #5/hr coding PHP.
Oh I see.
Btw I found this by chance over at wht.
This place is good.
I guess you point it out correctly.
Have nice day mate
haha that was taken as literal!
No I run Inception Hosting Ltd, have done for 7 years, I was simply commenting that it is amazing how many people come here to complain without giving any detail at all.
In most cases this results in the OP making a complete fool of themselves, not saying that will happen here, but that is how it usually goes.
So about those details...
Which company?
Screenshots of the inactive VPS showing 'pending' in the billing system?
Fraudrecord link?
How did you open the dispute, i.e. what category?
What were the hosts responses?
I ask this because it is about the only things that will validate your thread and in my experience it is usually the people who don't want to volunteer the truth that are in the wrong.
Or feel free to ignore all of this......
I like pie.
I am not at all embarass for not providing the more details than it is needed.
In any case I am not expecting any responses from your company. Or such incidents are pretty common in your company as well? If it is I will take note.. Once beaten twice shy.
Bit rude to do that isn't it? Not sure why you're assuming that his company's often having fraud issues, when he was simply requesting information that proves what you said, and to raise awareness for the rest of us to that particular company.
No, I actually make a point of shaming other hosts for using it incorrectly.
OK I will answer the main question in the same manner as you then.
You can.
Hosts can also add you to fraudrecord if you do.
I don't know who you bought from but I run LES which includes DeepNet/Inception/RansomIT/MSP so there is no chance you bought from one of those hosts as they all make it very clear that support is only given via the forum, there are no LES forum posts that match this issue.
It is not i-83 because you said they resolved your issue in another thread, the other NAT host started selling less than 12 days ago, so I have no idea who this could be.
The devil is in the details which is why they are not being shared and seem to be on the attack rather than being human.
/thread because context is apparently overrated.
Bitten*
@AnthonySmith is trying to help other forum members. May I know what's stopping you from sharing your provider name and relevant screenshots?
@VortexMagnus You seem to be a respected provider, but have you ever threatened anyone with a fraud record?
Somebody should nuke FraudRecord with a big lawsuit, assuming you are being added without any justification that falls under Fraud.
I think it's a problem with providers who add customers into FraudRecord for outlandish reasons whilst I do agree that FraudRecord should have some mechanism to prevent legitimate customers from being added.
May be a check for reason of adding periodically would help.
FraudRecord is a pain in the arse.
I have a listing from 3 years ago. I've bought from about 200 hosting providers since. One refused me service this week, based on what he saw of the old listing (which is inaccurate).
I applied to have the listing removed 2 days ago and not a peep. There isn't even a formal system for getting things removed, and they allude to the fact they confer with the listing creator (what's the incentive for them to remove anything?)
Wouldn't go as far as a lawsuit, but if it happens a few more times I'd certainly get a solicitor to send a friendly email over to them.
I think fraud record can be great, the problem is there is no accountability built in to it and very little process.
I think it has had its day, I might look in to getting an alternative made with an actual appeal system and a notification system for 'logged' accounts.
you need to use common sense to use fraudrecord or any other methods of verification of order, some reports are true and genuine, we do report true fraud as some of our new "customer" tried to use 3 - 4 different credit cards and due to the issue that the cards have been reported stolen different banks decline all attempts.