(Quote)

Windows templates are very nice, however the network isn't configured automatically on Windows08/12, so you need to connect via VNC and enter IP/Gateway/DNS in IPv4 network settings. The problem is th

to point the domain at your backend server ip. (dns should be pointing at your front-end nginx server)

We will use DNS round-robin system for the two main mail servers so that, if one of them is down, clients will eventually connect to the other one.

VestaCP also offers DNS clustering IMO, though haven't tried it myself. Its a very easy interface to operate

I'm looking for a budget-friendly service provider who can offer short a class ipv4 address for my alternative dns root project.

* Reverse DNS

@DalComp that I already have, but I want to have another server for hosting personal stuff without using cPanel but keep all the DNS together so I don't have to use different NS's

It's really easier if you just use another server, install cPanel DNS Only, and cluster it with your original cPanel server. Add/edit/remove zones from your original cPanel server and it will be synce

If needed I have a few empty servers that I can use only to manage DNS. The main goal is to keep all DNS together.

Basically, I have 2 servers, 1 with cPanel and another with CentOS Web Panel and I want to be the cPanel server handling with the DNS of both servers. Both use BIND.

We will also setup NixStats in our DNS servers as soon as we configure those, for instant rDNS.

Of course. Real men use real DNS. None of that rDNS thing.

I have a vps with them and it is working well, very stable, but I asked to setup rdns for me beacuse I can't do it manually and they answered: "you must use real dns"(?!?!?!?) and no

Webserver, email, team chat, git, dns, testing and monitoring

(Quote)

ACL's for the most common protocols at the time (DNS AMP & NTP AMP)? It's still slamming away at their port so it isn't like 'theyre protecting their network'. Maybe they're protecting their

(Quote)

etc. NTP floods were just cresting & DNS AMP floods. Of course it'll be the same attacking IP's and the likes when it's the same type of attack.

Maybe i'm not remembering the 1gbit and was thinking based on the PPS. I do know we had 10gbit burst since we had many people get hit with floods in the 5 - 7Gbit range on DNS reflection.