If you want to avoid adding dependencies/complexity I would understand. But I'd think it might be worth it to have control over your own resolver (and local cache)

There is more than a payment and an account. They need to validate your email,phone and identity. If that's how they wish to make the play store, that's perfectly acceptable.

Responding after 6 days is still considered normal. He described his wife adolescent/teenage nude photos when she was 10-13 YO and dating got posted. There's no indication that she was groomed or traf

The problem is that many nameservers block Tor, so I'd need a separate IPv4 for that. If you ever do want to run a resolver, all you'd need is Unbound and something like this in /etc/unbound/unbound.c

Well, I don't really give a fuck about AlexHost. I can't stop them anyway, but I won't ever give them even $1.

Are you looking for this for Google purposes? Some companies like Google hold their own private list of IP data, that nobody can force change.

Wake me up once you have your own ASN. There is bazillion Hetzner resellers already on the market.

And considering the specs you mention and the whole style i think its that brazilian vpsvault who mostly offer for cyber criminals - reselling takehost which is also a reseller of estoxy... right bro

It's all depending on the underlying hardware, rather than the name on its own.

you need to question everything and you can't blindly trust others.

And of course a client should be allowed to disable SSH on port 22, as I’ve said, they could have accomplished this at OS level or worst case server-level in VF from Admin.

We give customers full freedom and everyone can do whatever they want with their server and IP as long as they "own" it and it falls within the legality

This isn't meant to replace or beat YABS. I just wanted something that fits my own needs, like more detailed hardware detection and more iperf3 locations.

Yes, we also do backups on best-effort basis, but take it seriously. All backups of our VPS services a customer creates, are always distributed on 3 separate Backup servers with redundant disks. This

It's a really stressful situation for us, but we are working to do everything which is possible to minimize the customer impact.

Didn't Monero change the way the decoys are selected so malicious nodes could no longer influence them even when used with a light wallet? Even with a light wallet and a malicious node, you're (mostly

Well done, this is really good. Usually, providers do backup on best effort basis, so it is always good to have own backups.

Yes, thats true. But since we were informed of a possible service disruption beforehand, we ensured to create backups of all affected services. Unfortunately we didn't had the necessary capacities to

(Quote)

We are already in contact with the infrastructure provider and found a solution. There is no need to send a technician from our side, since there is no dispute between us and the party, which can prov