(Quote)

(Quote)

Yes, I see there was one DDoS attacker on your host doing an outbound attack, that's why the sending rate looks low in the test results, I think it would be different now.

(Quote)

* AS203363 (GB): 2x E5-2690v4, 50GB SSD, 3TB in+out with 160Gbps DDoS protection, £25 » €29.04/year (active offer)

If it is necessary to zero-route the IPs of individual customers due to attacks, that is perfectly fine, but as a hoster, it is not acceptable for all customers to go down due to a DDoS (Of course tha

* DDoS Protection (L3/L4)

expect to never get hit at all. It's not like DDoS is some super exotic and rare event after all.

he should use real anti ddos protection from day one, no matter the cost i think, this is so unnaceptable

ddos stop, and it wont stop right, wish i could, but then no popcorn time, why dont you take this as a challenge and finally accept the truth that you need real anti ddos?

He does not dismiss it. The problem is that he maybe in theory is familiar what is DDoS, but in practice he lacks knowledge to adapt to the situation.

Your "in-house filters" did nothing, you require sufficient bandwidth/transit capacity to be able to filter/tank DDoS Attacks larger than your current capacity, 3Gbps can be generate

you can make 10Gbit ddos easy these days so thats not any kind of protection but well its also costly so could kinda works... wish you luck!

By the end of the year, I must definitely reach 10Gbps considering that this offers both a kind of DDoS protection and increased customer satisfaction.

(Quote)

also when bigger ddos happens what do you do? still travel everytime 100km to fix that?

(Quote)

I've been an asshole, and I probly continue being one for memes, but I don't want this to fail on some script kiddie DDoS attack.

Well, good luck with that. There is no magic that'll suddenly make a local solution effective. A congested link is a congested link. DDoS is just very stupid and simple.

(Quote)