Running your own is more expensive though, but also way more fun and you have more control.

I don't follow phones all that closely but from my impression there's at least a bunch that would be unlockable. Chroots are kinda laughable when it comes to hosting anyways. Drivers should be usually

Things like your own country anniversary of some shit and your personal birthday also happen every year mother bucket.

(Quote)

How about $599 and you own the server?

I can't imagine why they decided to do this. Probably their operational costs with their own TLD will remain the same. Maybe I'm wrong but I not experienced lot of abuses (for example: phishing) from

They are unsafe to keep plugged in 24/7 for months with the battery still inside, and in modern ones it would be a hassle to remove, and regardless, they are not designed to even turn on without one,

Understood.

Are your eyes not working? I told you, why aren't you looking? It's my fault that you can't connect to 1GB? I have so many US servers in my hands and none of them have issues. What benefit did he give

This is LET. Be very careful when it comes to trusting a provider with anything serious around here. Many bots have registered in this place nowadays, watching, ready for snatching offers and for repo

Work orders are not tickets. You're simply disparaging the work of a provider without wishing to cooperate on something that, considering you're writing from China, will be very much your own issue.

I fail to see where TCP was mentioned.

I don't need troubleshooting. From the start, I tried discussing with them, even asked them for a week, but it was useless. Later, the chain breaks happened every day, and they didn't handle it, which

I stopped reading after like the second paragraph where you did nothing but repeat your last post. Skimming the remainder i don't see anything that points towards actual trouble shooting, so thanks fo

To clarify: I am not claiming that every HTTP 502 by itself must be the provider's fault. I understand this is an unmanaged dedicated server, and services running inside the OS are normally my respons

Spoofing won't manage to complete a TCP handshake since the response packets would need to come back to the party, which sent the request, and they won't if the sender is... well... spoofed.

My guess: someone used IP spoofing (which DartNode has not blocked) to harm the network or simply take revenge on the provider for their frustrations by doing DDoS. A client (and likely others too) ha

And you're totally right. That's where I would draw the line as well. It was not directed at you tbh.

For the record, I have no particular need for DartNode's services. their Orlando POP was very interesting for my personal projects, but I would never have said a word if issue resolution was just slo

(Quote)