(Quote)

(Quote)

That way you would have reduced the number of cheap plans due to market crisis, but not reduce the number of clients. This would have also helped identify who uses bots on LET and has many cheap plan

(Quote)

There was a time when I considered HOST-C one of the best providers. Not anymore, not after this. Even if HOST-C comes with great deals in future, I won't order. I would dare to assume that such compa

B2B is much easier to manage. The rules are clear, the prices paid are substantially higher, and when it comes to abuse, B2B is a walk in the park compared with what cheap promotional offers can attra

(Quote)

(Quote)

(Quote)

At the new prices I don't think that matters too much, I don't think the point is to keep the cheap LET clientele

(Quote)

whats up with these posts, you need postcount for something?

Massivegrid: was one of those "its cheap, why not" purchases that quickly self-explained the why-not (Image)

Also, open to cheap dedicated servers, given they have 10Gbps port + 100TB transfer for <$100/mon.

The price should be fair from beginning. The host is to blame for it, but as always, cheap and fast money beföre thinking and then loosing more because lost clients.

(Quote)

(Quote)

1cpu + 1GB ram is enough with 20GB ssd. yearly cheap plan

With no hate to host-c, that how things will go when provider has most clients on bullshit cheap plans (especially with how good of service he provides). At some point they must see a profit and I don

(Quote)