(Quote)

(Quote)

* provider believes he is talking to the person who paid

(Quote)

(Quote)

He must have done it to increase his chances in a PayPal dispute, right? Doesn’t that essentially amount to admitting that he was at fault in the process?

If you haven't read ToS you still are responsible for following it. You could've asked provider to fix the page to let you read it, but instead you made a gamble and lost

This also brings back my earlier question: if the ToS being inaccessible has no impact, then why did the provider go to the Wayback Machine to have those archives removed?

Then don't complain when you violate the ToS in question

I checked the ToS page before the purchase and found it unavailable. In a normal customer-provider relationship, it is reasonable to expect the provider to make their own terms accessible, especially

I care about ToS to a reasonable extent, but that does not mean I am expected to know every term from every provider. Especially when the provider made an obvious mistake on the main page, it is unrea

(Image)

They do not respond to the form on their own website at all.

How about, everyone gets their own dedi.

Just wondering how much these recent discoveries and patches affect government agencies that rely on stockpiles of undisclosed vulnerabilities.

Then, I pointed out that your ToS page is offline for long time.

Of course I will report your PayPal account to prevent similar fraud happening to other providers.

Only if you have a look at any screenshot, you may see emails from both billing and control panel. That simply proved that I have access to both site right?

When someone threaten me with "input your IP and email into MaxMind and Fraudrecords" first, then says I threaten you open to the public?

I do symphatize with your situation, you are clearly being scammed. But you making a poor decision to purchase an account rather than buying a service transfer is not something I should be held accoun