Softlayer 2.85MB/sTokyo, Japan Linode 979KB/sSingapore Softlayer 938KB/sRotterdam, Netherlands id3.net 49.5MB/sHaarlem, Netherlands Leaseweb

Softlayer 17.0MB/sTokyo, Japan Linode 6.54MB/sSingapore Softlayer 5.88MB/sRotterdam, Netherlands id3.net 16.0MB/sHaarlem, Netherlands Leasew

RamNode, Linode or LiquidWeb (fully managed, 15 minutes response by ticket or immediate 24x7 by phone)

Tokyo, Japan Linode 3.97MB/s

Tokyo, Japan Linode 6.35MB/s

And by saying very overpriced/stuck in the past, you compare it with what? With some new or overselling hosters with stability issues on LET, or with price models like Linode, AWS, Azure etc.?

@godong, please note that for some stress test, our system will detect it as an 'abusive activity' (you'll be sent an email regarding that). So, before doint some test, it might be better for you to …

Tokyo, Japan Linode 3.32MB/s

OnVirt - 100mbit, Linode is out of OP's budget. Hetzner $13/m + $2/m for Plesk Web ADMIN. Leaseweb is viable option too, but disk space is 80GB.

IMHO, I would go for Linode at that price

Tokyo, Japan Linode 7.89MB/s

Tokyo, Japan Linode 9.95MB/s

Softlayer 46.2MB/sTokyo, Japan Linode 10.5MB/sSingapore Softlayer 7.42MB/sRotterdam, Netherlands id3.net 125KB/sHaarlem, Netherlands Leasewe

Tokyo, Japan Linode 8.95MB/s

I have been a linode user for some years, but linode's connection to here gets worse and worse these days. I tried the other big providers like QuadraNet and leaseweb, but seems sorry they don't accep

Tokyo, Japan Linode 5.17MB/s

Softlayer 704KB/sTokyo, Japan Linode 1.16MB/sSingapore Softlayer 840KB/sRotterdam, Netherlands id3.net 1.63MB/sHaarlem, Netherlands Leasewe

Tokyo, Japan Linode 13.3MB/s

>Tokyo, Japan Linode 11.9MB/s

Tokyo, Japan Linode 11.9MB/s