(Quote)

DC, US Softlayer 4.12MB/sTokyo, Japan Linode 15.5MB/sSingapore Softlayer 33.5MB/sRotterdam, Netherlands id3.net 1.20MB/sHaarlem, Netherlands Leaseweb 1.19MB/sDisk Sp

US Softlayer 4.64MB/s Tokyo, Japan Linode 7.61MB/s Singapore Softlayer 9.58MB/s Rotterdam, Netherlands id3.net 5.38MB/s Haarlem, Netherlands Leaseweb

As a Linode user, it was rough watching this happen.

Linode was just very lazy networking wise, I remember wondering why they had their own ASN but only used it in a handful of EU locations.

Download speed from Linode, Tokyo, JP: 12.9MB/s

Tokyo, Japan Linode 13.7MB/s

Tokyo, Japan Linode 12.1MB/s

Even if he was doing it strictly from Vultr or Linode (DOs direct competitors), his ban was inevitable.

Linode, Tokyo, JP 106.187.96.148 978KB/s

There has been a lot of issues on Linode's infrastructure like this. Just under-dimensioned crazily.

who were getting knocked out because of Linode on a holiday.

However like I said Linode are too often on the back foot reacting to things than planning for what is really the inevitable for all providers at some point.

But it's good that they recognize that bottleneck and are taking steps to change it. I've always loved Linode myself and I'm directly avoiding the comparison to DO because it's totally possible to wor

(Quote)

I always see you praising Linode, are you part of them?

I have been a fan of Linode for a lot of years, March 10th 2008 to be precise. This situation however lost them some good customers to DigitalOcean over this. The ability to move a snapshot to a dif

https://blog.linode.com/2016/01/29/christmas-ddos-retrospective/

(Quote)

DC, US Softlayer 3.26MB/s Tokyo, Japan Linode 8.21MB/s Singapore Softlayer 6.61MB/s Rotterdam, Netherlands id3.net 109MB/sHaarlem, Netherlands Leaseweb 102MB/s Disk