(Quote)

(Quote)

(Quote)

Anyway, I find it fascinating how some low-end providers go with major IRC networks which are a magnet for DDoS. It is like the low-end providers want to dream big and are looking for trouble.

(Quote)

// This makes me wonder if this DDOS has anything to do with AMS issues - they they closed/kicked someone that is now taking revenge? Or they changed routing, someone ("someone") app

What reputation? The one I've seen flowing down the drain last couple of weeks? The major part of that reputation being destroyed is not the fact that things go wrong though. It's the way HostSailor t

The irony: https://hostsailor.com/blog/things-to-consider-while-choosing-ddos-protection has a nice Loading... on the page~

(Quote)

(Quote)

(Quote)

This is the result of a large, distributed DDoS attack specifically targeting multiple IP ranges across our network. The attack is affecting several locations simultaneously, which is why customers m

(Quote)

It would appear the node CPU is really overloaded*, which could confirm a DDoS. But how/why this coincides with BGP withdrawal on IPv4, no idea.

Our public rates are viewable at https://terabit.io/ddos-protection. I offered a DM if you'd like a quote so we can see your use case and determine if we can give you a deal based on your use case.

I only hope providers have very good DDoS protection when they get this kind of courage. (Image)

they host undernet? mamma mia. even though i never support piracy and illegal stuff i will personally make them an irc filter and give them an excellent deal on ddos mit in ams

I hope this does not have something to do with the fact that this low-end provider accepted linking to popular IRC networks which can become a magnet for DDoS sometimes. For example: @HostSailor has a

* IPv4 + IPv6 /64, DDoS Protection

(Quote)