Was with Linode for about 4 years (till 2014) and was very impressed, but switched to Online.net for a dedicated comp for the same price. I've looked at Ramnode, DO, and Vultr a couple of times but be

205.234.175.175 109MB/sLinode, Tokyo, JP 106.187.96.148 10.9MB/sLinode, Singapore, SG 139.162.23.4 4.92MB/sLinode, London, UK

Linode|Vultr -> DO -> RamNode-> Amazon

From my experience Vultr -> RamNode/Linode -> Digital Ocean

DigitalOcean best snapshot system, reduced servers there down to use 1 VPS now due to slow system performance compared to Linode

Linode has a good collection also. Am using both helps.

Vulter, Linode, and Digital Ocean are backed by some more money so they are more likely to last (according to somebody from LET).

DO -> Linode->Vultr ->RamNode-> Amazon???

and why

(Quote)

Linode, Tokyo, JP 106.187.96.148 6.90MB/s

(Quote)

Or else, if you can set it up for a few hours to keep costs on ~20$, try a cloud provider like AWS or Linode

I have confirmed my templates for KVM w/VirtIO-ISCSI are working without issue on Linode as long as your server is deployed on one of their KVM nodes. You can confirm you are on a KVM node by checking

The standard trustworthy providers for that are DigitalOcean, Vultr, and Linode; others with excellent reviews on LET include LunaNode, iwStack, and VMHaus. Apologies to any others that may have slipp

Pricing will hopefully match Vultr/Linode, or better.

Node Name IPv4 address Download Speed CacheFly 205.234.175.175 11.0MB/s Vultr, Tokyo, JP 108.61.201.151 5.48MB/s Linode, Tokyo, JP 106.187.96.148

than 2.0ghz+ from digital ocean or 2.4ghz+ from Linode.

However, your billing support and restrictions is lacking severely and I would rate it 1/10, the worst I have encountered. If it wasn't for your superb pricing and product you are offering I wouldn't

Tokyo, Japan Linode 9.65MB/s