American labor is bad, because Indian labour is cheap is the type of argument you are having.

(Quote)

(Quote)

But you should ask yourself if it matters. It's no more than $5 for a 1core/1GB virtual machine in the (non AWS) cloud these days. Kubernetes options are nearly as cheap too. As long as you can horizo

So we'll be bringing a Toronto DC online at the end of the month, so if central Canada works I could definitely do colo for $50. Usually we do a /29 of Ipv4 but I could probably squeeze it to a /28.

We run a tight ship. We own and colo our hardware, and own our IP ranges.

Just searched around, seems you guy provide this cheap service for a long time!

(Quote)

There are cheaper offers on LET from other providers you’re right, but most “super cheap vps” offers aren’t in the UK, as per your example above.

(Quote)

As I said above, our plans are competitive vs other UK providers. They are specials (in my opinion), they’re cheaper than our website price and they have their own LET order links.

In my opinion these are not "specials" because you can find easily super cheap vps like this specs you offered here.

I'm looking for a colo provider with the following requirements:

(Quote)

It's dirt cheap, yes, but I expect better level of at least communication than what has been (or lack of) provided.

I've just answered your ticket, from our point of view there is nearly no difference between First Colo and maincubes (but slightly packet loss over both routes way beyond our networks).

And this is the "good route" via First Colo:

Like @sanvit said, you can always host rainloop on a cheap server by yourself and point webmail.example.com to the server. From my experience, clients are more interested in the crossbox web client (

HostNamaste: A Reliable Indian Hosting Company You Can Trust.

The only MTR we received about this "issue" shows - compared with First Colo - an identical route to the destination, besides the fact that it doesn't get routed via DE-CIX but the o