New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
Comments
Would rather have 30GB RAM and 512MB Disk :]
Same problem, except mine isn't coming back online even after I change it to IDE
As already mentioned, I took down the node to resolve an issue... As mantioned in the welcome email, you can not rely on uptime, as this was the exact purpose of the testing - to help me resolve the issues and all the problems
No it wasn't that, it's been offline for several hours and I can't get it to boot, made a ticket about it.
EDIT:
Oh the node is down right now? thought it was for only a few minutes, sorry haha
Apperantely it would not be for only 2 minutes. The server has problems with the VT, apperantely it can not start with intel VT enabled, meaning no KVM vm can start. Both solusvm and the DC are checking it out now.
Looks like a hardware issue. The virtualizor no longer detects intel VT, no matter it is enabled.
Edit2: CPU is beeing replaced.
This is at LSN. The CPU should be replaced soon and will see if this is the problem.
Couldnt really get you, but new hardware tends to fail from time to time as well.
13 more have been added, so order while they are in stock.
Hardware has been replaced, OS as well. Email was sent to everyone regarding this.
@LiquidHost
I will update you on my testing after sunday, have been working.
>
Great, thank you!
Well, the plan for 512 RAM would be around 7$. Maybe a little bit less of HDD.
Ping: http://pastie.org/4291494 (thanks to lowendping.nikki.us)
VMstat
Mem
total used free shared buffers cached Mem: 501 383 118 0 65 214 -/+ buffers/cache: 103 398 Swap: 979 0 979Running Debian 6.
I couldn't get IOPING to install, can anyone link me to a tutorial?
Please make sure that virtio is enabled
VirtIO enabled:
IOPS
Weird, gettign much better results at my test kvm:
http://i.imgur.com/mkttK.png
centos minimal
But still, the server seems to be under load, around 10 people started installation the past 1 hour.
@LiquidHost
Yeah I can imagine, also for some reason your WHMCS logs my IP as 50.57.214.11 for tickets and order creation, but that's not my IP, it's a IP over at RackSpace?
Yeah, didn't have time to fix it, will get it resolved this days, just to get some of the latest shit out of my head :P
Some update :
# # # # # # # ##### ###### # # #### # # # # ## # # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # # # # ## ##### ##### # # # # ###### # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # ## # # # # #### # # # # # ##### ###### # # #### # # Version 5.1.3 Based on the Byte Magazine Unix Benchmark Multi-CPU version Version 5 revisions by Ian Smith, Sunnyvale, CA, USA January 13, 2011 johantheghost at yahoo period com 1 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 x Double-Precision Whetstone 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 x Execl Throughput 1 2 3 1 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1 2 3 1 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1 2 3 1 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1 2 3 1 x Pipe Throughput 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 x Pipe-based Context Switching 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 x Process Creation 1 2 3 1 x System Call Overhead 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 1 2 3 1 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1 2 3 4 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 4 x Double-Precision Whetstone 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 4 x Execl Throughput 1 2 3 4 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1 2 3 4 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1 2 3 4 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1 2 3 4 x Pipe Throughput 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 4 x Pipe-based Context Switching 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 4 x Process Creation 1 2 3 4 x System Call Overhead 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 4 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 1 2 3 4 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1 2 3 ======================================================================== BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.3) System: us: GNU/Linux OS: GNU/Linux -- 2.6.32-5-686 -- #1 SMP Sun May 6 04:01:19 UTC 2012 Machine: i686 (unknown) Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8") CPU 0: QEMU Virtual CPU version 0.9.1 (6600.4 bogomips) x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET CPU 1: QEMU Virtual CPU version 0.9.1 (6600.4 bogomips) x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET CPU 2: QEMU Virtual CPU version 0.9.1 (6600.4 bogomips) x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET CPU 3: QEMU Virtual CPU version 0.9.1 (6600.4 bogomips) x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET 13:01:43 up 58 min, 1 user, load average: 0.00, 0.02, 0.00; runlevel 2 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Benchmark Run: Sat Jul 21 2012 13:01:43 - 13:29:53 4 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 23183241.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 3442.1 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 2078.9 lps (29.9 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1074884.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 298498.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 2656676.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 2338156.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 436489.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 5741.6 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 5859.2 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 3279.9 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 3880015.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 23183241.8 1986.6 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 3442.1 625.8 Execl Throughput 43.0 2078.9 483.5 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 1074884.8 2714.4 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 298498.5 1803.6 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 2656676.4 4580.5 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 2338156.4 1879.5 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 436489.7 1091.2 Process Creation 126.0 5741.6 455.7 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 5859.2 1381.9 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 3279.9 5466.5 System Call Overhead 15000.0 3880015.2 2586.7 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 1582.2 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Benchmark Run: Sat Jul 21 2012 13:29:53 - 13:58:09 4 CPUs in system; running 4 parallel copies of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 83107768.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 13366.6 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 24084.9 lps (29.9 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 928255.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 240795.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 3021466.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 8923255.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 1695350.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 85692.2 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 31461.6 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 4108.6 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 10917921.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 83107768.9 7121.5 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 13366.6 2430.3 Execl Throughput 43.0 24084.9 5601.1 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 928255.8 2344.1 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 240795.4 1455.0 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 3021466.7 5209.4 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 8923255.4 7173.0 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 1695350.8 4238.4 Process Creation 126.0 85692.2 6801.0 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 31461.6 7420.2 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 4108.6 6847.7 System Call Overhead 15000.0 10917921.4 7278.6 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 4749.3After enabling the virtio for Disk driver, still no improvement.
Note : I'm using Debian
^Thank you for the disk IO performance, however it does seem a little bit too slow. As I am getting around 160MB at the moment from centos minimal.
Also, 2 more KVM VPS are added and once they are out no more will be given out.
Maybe I have to try to change to CentOS. Will post the results after reinstall
Out of stock again and that was fast
If someone still not familiar with CentOS netinstall installation in a KVM, please refer to this tutorial :
http://www.lebstats.com/2012/07/22/tutorial-installing-centos-6-netinstall-in-a-kvm-vps.html
After installing to CentOS 6.3 netinstall 32bit , here is the IO :
Wondering why it's little slower when with Debian 6
@ErawanArifNugroho Maybe...virtio?
After enabling the virtio in Debian, I still get low result compared to CentOS
it should be more a ext3 / ext4 difference than a distribution difference.
centos 6 use ext4 while debian use ext3 by default. Try reinstalling debian and change the partitioning so to use ext4 instead of ext3...
Thank you sir
I will try it again tonight
is some VPS left for testing ??
A couple of days have left for the trial, so far the node is running stable, actually looks like that some of the VMs are in actual use (judging from the server load and usage of resources).