Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Core 2 Duo E6400 as a server CPU?

zhuanyizhuanyi Member
edited July 2012 in General

How would the performance be? I am not too sure what is the equivalent of this CPU to say the i5/i7 family or the Xeon family. Is it going to be a decent Windows remote desktop workstation? Thanks.

Comments

  • KuJoeKuJoe Member, Host Rep

    For personal use you should be fine. Rule of thumb for me is never use consumer hardware in an enterprise setting. ;)

  • No money and no time to start a successful online business like SecureDargon (and perhaps no knowledge as well) :p

    So here is my noob question, what exactly is this E6400 CPU (or this family of CPU in general), is it like a generation before or after the i3 and i5 stuff came out or it is just a cheaper equivalent of them?

    @KuJoe said: For personal use you should be fine. Rule of thumb for me is never use consumer hardware in an enterprise setting. ;)

  • @zhuanyi said: So here is my noob question, what exactly is this E6400 CPU (or this family of CPU in general), is it like a generation before or after the i3 and i5 stuff came out or it is just a cheaper equivalent of them?

    Linkety link

    Q3'06. Fairly old.

    Thanked by 1zhuanyi
  • @ElliotJ said: Q3'06. Fairly old.

    How does it compare to, say, the new Intel Atom CPUs then? About the same?

  • TaylorTaylor Member
    edited July 2012

    @zhuanyi said: How does it compare to, say, the new Intel Atom CPUs then? About the same?

    >

    The power from a older chip is typically more, so I would try and go newer.

    Thanked by 1zhuanyi
  • @Taylor said: The power from a older chip is typically more, so I would try and go newer.

    But performance-wise?

  • jamsonjamson Member

    @zhuanyi said: But performance-wise?

    http://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu_list.php

    The Core 2 Duo would be better.

    (I know the benchmark test isn't 100% accurate, but it's still a rough guide...)

  • DamianDamian Member

    Performance-wise, it'll be fine for a Windows remote desktop workstation.

    Will it be remote desktop over the internet?

    Thanked by 1zhuanyi
  • AmfyAmfy Member

    The CPU isn't the newest, but for the most stuff in the private area it's more than enough. CPU should be 2-3x like an Atom. And of course remember, that for many application the i/o is an important thing to recognize, too, so the decicated will be faster than a vps even if the vps has a better cpu, since it has dedicated i/o.
    On dedicated servers you should always know that you have dedicated performance!

    Thanked by 1zhuanyi
  • @Damian said: Will it be remote desktop over the internet?

    Yes, the DC is more than 1000km away from me....
    The thing is, I have some data scraping program that I need to run on Windows (written in VB.NET and C#.NET) and send to the MS-SQL DB that is sitting on the same machine, the data scraped, on average, would be just around 1000 rows a day to start with, with more to come afterwards....

    Do you think this machine could handle that?

  • DamianDamian Member

    Yeah, that'll be more RAM-dependent than CPU-dependent. How much ram will this system have? Since it's a desktop processor, standard RAM will be cheaper, so I'd recommend at least 4gb.

  • It comes with 2GB of RAM and 1 400GB hard drive, it is a project for fun, data will be pulled from a spreadsheet I have sitting on my own laptop and I will be the only user for it.

  • HalfEatenPieHalfEatenPie Veteran
    edited July 2012

    I don't know what we're talking about so I'm just going to agree with this and say the following generic lines:

    GoDaddy is the evil empire!

    Hostgator should get better security!

    I think all the regular hosting companies here are awesome!

  • @HalfEatenPie said: I don't know what we're talking about so I'm just going to agree with this and say the following generic lines:

    ??? HalfEatenPie is in robot mode?

    Thanked by 2Amfy HalfEatenPie
  • Slow CPU you can find a lot better CPU models in the same price range.

  • rds100rds100 Member

    If you got it for free - it's good. If you need to pay for it - tell us what will you pay, and maybe we can point you to better options.

  • @zhuanyi said: ??? HalfEatenPie is in robot mode?

    10 what are you talking about?
    20 Go to 10

  • not free, but very cheap, 30 bucks a month, DC is in Dallas.

    @rds100 said: If you got it for free - it's good. If you need to pay for it - tell us what will you pay, and maybe we can point you to better options.

  • That's a dead loop???

    @HalfEatenPie said: 10 what are you talking about?

    20 Go to 10

  • rds100rds100 Member

    For $30 you could probably find a decent VPS that will suit your application, and would have more reliability (RAID vs a single drive). Granted getting a VPS with 400GB space would be hard, but you probably don't need all that space anyway.

  • AlexBarakovAlexBarakov Patron Provider, Veteran

    Not going to be a killer performance-wise, but should be better than the cheapest atoms out there.

    I had one c2d 2140 sitting at home, overclocked at 100% (from 1.6GHz to 3.19GHz), working 24/7 for 2 years :D

  • @LiquidHost said: I had one c2d 2140 sitting at home, overclocked at 100% (from 1.6GHz to 3.19GHz), working 24/7 for 2 years :D

    You make me want to fiddle with my old desktop again.

  • @zhuanyi said: That's a dead loop???

    Don't question the PIE!

    .

    .

    .

    .

    Possibly...

Sign In or Register to comment.