New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
Providerservice 512MB 10GB 500GB XENPV Benchmark
ErawanArifNugroho
Member
Another benchmark from me 
This time, it's for the providerservice with 512MB XEN
512 MB RAM 1 CPU Core 10 GB Hard drive (RAID 10) 500 MB monthly transfer volume Contract term: 6 months
Freevps.sh :
# wget freevps.us/downloads/bench.sh -O - -o /dev/null|bash CPU model : Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3550 CPU @ 3.30GHz Number of cores : 1 CPU frequency : 3292.522 MHz Total amount of ram : 501 MB Total amount of swap : 63 MB System uptime : 1:57, Download speed from CacheFly: 10.3MB/s Download speed from Linode, Atlanta GA: 2.34MB/s Download speed from Linode, Dallas, TX: 3.22MB/s Download speed from Linode, Tokyo, JP: 3.82MB/s Download speed from Linode, London, UK: 10.3MB/s Download speed from Leaseweb, Haarlem, NL: 8.58MB/s Download speed from Softlayer, Singapore: 2.24MB/s Download speed from Softlayer, Seattle, WA: 5.95MB/s Download speed from Softlayer, San Jose, CA: 242KB/s Download speed from Softlayer, Washington, DC: 6.68MB/s I/O speed : 53.5 MB/s
CPU Info :
# cat /proc/cpuinfo processor : 0 vendor_id : GenuineIntel cpu family : 6 model : 58 model name : Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3550 CPU @ 3.30GHz stepping : 9 cpu MHz : 3292.522 cache size : 6144 KB fdiv_bug : no hlt_bug : no f00f_bug : no coma_bug : no fpu : yes fpu_exception : yes cpuid level : 10 wp : yes flags : fpu tsc msr pae cx8 cmov pat clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss nx constant_tsc up pni pclmulqdq vmx ssse3 sse4_1 sse4_2 popcnt aes avx hypervisor tpr_shadow vnmi flexpriority ept vpid bogomips : 6585.04 clflush size : 64 cache_alignment : 64 address sizes : 36 bits physical, 48 bits virtual power management:
Comments
Download Speed :
**
*
IO Test
IOPING :
UnixBench :
# # # # # # # ##### ###### # # #### # # # # ## # # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # # # # ## ##### ##### # # # # ###### # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # ## # # # # #### # # # # # ##### ###### # # #### # # Version 5.1.3 Based on the Byte Magazine Unix Benchmark Multi-CPU version Version 5 revisions by Ian Smith, Sunnyvale, CA, USA January 13, 2011 johantheghost at yahoo period com 1 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 x Double-Precision Whetstone 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 x Execl Throughput 1 2 3 1 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1 2 3 1 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1 2 3 1 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1 2 3 1 x Pipe Throughput 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 x Pipe-based Context Switching 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 x Process Creation 1 2 3 1 x System Call Overhead 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 1 2 3 1 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1 2 3 ======================================================================== BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.3) System: v01.26967.vpscontrol.net: GNU/Linux OS: GNU/Linux -- 2.6.32-5-686-bigmem -- #1 SMP Sun May 6 04:39:05 UTC 2012 Machine: i686 (unknown) Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8") CPU 0: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3550 CPU @ 3.30GHz (6585.0 bogomips) MMX, Physical Address Ext, Intel virtualization 10:34:35 up 3:21, 1 user, load average: 0.00, 0.02, 0.00; runlevel 2 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Benchmark Run: Fri Jul 06 2012 10:34:35 - 11:02:46 1 CPU in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 21669597.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 3213.3 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 2695.0 lps (29.9 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 438529.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 116957.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1364504.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 671961.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 92037.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 4825.7 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 4777.5 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 621.0 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 656426.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 21669597.5 1856.9 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 3213.3 584.2 Execl Throughput 43.0 2695.0 626.7 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 438529.4 1107.4 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 116957.0 706.7 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1364504.8 2352.6 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 671961.8 540.2 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 92037.1 230.1 Process Creation 126.0 4825.7 383.0 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 4777.5 1126.8 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 621.0 1035.1 System Call Overhead 15000.0 656426.0 437.6 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 747.5Invoice and VPS Account are created manually.
IPv6 are free, and if we want to have IPv6, we have to ask it by sending email.
doesn't look very strong at all
Not that fancy hardware but still pretty nice deal considering the price.
So they let a open door for price increases!
How is IPv6 running with these servers? I've just ordered one but after IPv6 was set up my server went apeshit
Not quite as good here.
Download speed from Linode, Atlanta GA: 1.65MB/s
Download speed from Linode, Dallas, TX: 1.39MB/s
Download speed from Linode, Tokyo, JP: 518KB/s
Download speed from Linode, London, UK: 8.80MB/s
Download speed from Leaseweb, Haarlem, NL: 8.71MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, Singapore: 546KB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, Seattle, WA: 1.07MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, San Jose, CA: 264KB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, Washington, DC: 1.49MB/s
I/O speed : 167 MB/s
Update: Seems like this was an error with their Debian template. Their support has been amazing fast in fixing it
aria2c results using linode
More than enough bandwidth IMHO.
I don't know why everybody want steady 100 mbps or even gbit connections when you don't need it.
@yomero, some people do.
Yes, SOME. Most people doesn't. And if you pull that insane amounts of traffic, surely you can afford in a better infraestructure.
Well it's always nice to be able to burst to gigabit when doing an apt-get upgrade (or yum upgrade).
Also i was planning on using this for VPNing but with 100mbit i can't max out my internet connection
Anyway its still a great offer for the price. I just wonder if the 100mbit limitation is artificial or due to old switches/routers.
@yomero has a point
remember people this is download speed you're seeing
1mbps dl should be enough for 99.99% of the people here
dl speed will be typically much more than up speed for servers due to symetric lines and the nature of server applications.
In the meanwhile most countries have < 10mbps connections
Yeah i know that, less then a year ago i only had a 1mbps connection which i had so share with 4 people. I guess in this particular case it really depends on what you intend to do with the server. 100 mbit will be fine for running a website, but you'll need 1gbit e.g. for streaming
even if you're streaming, what you need is upload speed
unless you're trying to create dropbox no2
most users will want to download from your server, not vice versa
some graphs from a from a vps hosting a high traffic site
Thats what i've tried to point out:
Sorry i ment "much more", not "much less". Its corrected now.