Clueless Online.net support

Comments

• Nyr Community Contributor, Veteran

  September 2014 edited September 2014

  rm_ said: How do you check that this is the case? I feel this is still not fixed for some ranges, e.g. 195.154.107.*

  My case, "fixed" (look at the authority section):

  [Nyr@nyr-macbook:~]$ dig -x 195.154.117.186 @ns.ripe.net
  
  ; <<>> DiG 9.8.3-P1 <<>> -x 195.154.117.186 @ns.ripe.net
  ;; global options: +cmd
  ;; Got answer:
  ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 48067
  ;; flags: qr rd; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 2, ADDITIONAL: 0
  ;; WARNING: recursion requested but not available
  
  ;; QUESTION SECTION:
  ;186.117.154.195.in-addr.arpa.  IN  PTR
  
  ;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
  117.154.195.in-addr.arpa. 3600  IN  NS  nsa.online.net.
  117.154.195.in-addr.arpa. 3600  IN  NS  nsb.online.net.
  
  ;; Query time: 83 msec
  ;; SERVER: 193.0.9.6#53(193.0.9.6)
  ;; WHEN: Mon Sep 29 16:58:22 2014
  ;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 92
  >
  

  Your subnet, not fixed:

  [Nyr@nyr-macbook:~]$ dig -x 195.154.107.0 @nsa.online.net | grep status
  ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 2328
  [Nyr@nyr-macbook:~]$ dig -x 195.154.107.0 @ns.ripe.net | grep status
  ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NXDOMAIN, id: 6620
  >
  

  Wish you luck with the support guys...

  Thanked by 1rm_
• rm_ IPv6 Advocate, Veteran

  September 2014 edited September 2014

  Even funnier for one of "my" ranges:

   ;; AUTHORITY SECTION:  
  114.154.195.in-addr.arpa. 3600  IN  NS  ns.omnix.net.

  As they say, "you what mate".
• Nyr Community Contributor, Veteran

  September 2014

  @rm_ said:

  Their rDNS delegations are a complete mess.
• wych Member

  September 2014

  @Nyr said:
  Their rDNS delegations are a complete mess.

  Delegate to your own cluster
• Nyr Community Contributor, Veteran

  September 2014

  wych said: Delegate to your own cluster

  Not possible.
• wych Member

  September 2014

  @Nyr said:
  Not possible.

  Sure? Could have sworn I had set this up on a /27 with them.
• Nyr Community Contributor, Veteran

  September 2014 edited September 2014

  wych said: Sure? Could have sworn I had set this up on a /27 with them.

  I don't think they can/will do it for a /32. Anyway their own delegations should be fixed, there is no excuse for keeping them outdated and non-working.
• wych Member

  September 2014

  @Nyr said:
  I don't think they can/will do it for a /32. Anyway they own delegations should be fixed, there is no excuse for keeping them outdated and non-working.

  Probably not for a /32 no; it may be worth adding this to @kcaj's post on the forum and then it can get taken care of.
• J1021 Member

  September 2014

  wych said: Probably not for a /32 no; it may be worth adding this to @kcaj's post on the forum and then it can get taken care of.

  I haven't posted on the forum but I'll see if I can alert some staffer again.
• wych Member

  September 2014

  @kcaj said:
  I haven't posted on the forum but I'll see if I can alert some staffer again.

  Sorry, thought you posted on their forum or something...

  • goes back to under a rock for a few days *
• mikmak Member

  September 2014

  all issues with 195.154. range should be fixed now

  Thanked by 1Nyr