Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

From $9 per year - Los Angeles Unmanaged VPS - PupaVPS

PupaVPS is offering high performance VPS starting at $9/yr.

Datacenter Location: Los Angeles, US.
Network Provider: GTT, Zayo, Cogent, China Unicom, China Telecom
Looking glass: http://lg-lax.pupavps.com/

========================================
VZ128 Plan
RAM: 128MB
VSwap: 128MB
CPU: 1 Core
HDD: 7GB RAID10
Bandwidth: 500GB
IP Address: 1 IP Address
$9/yr for life
[ORDER LINK] Coupon: SAVEMONEY

VZ256 Plan
RAM: 256MB
VSwap: 256MB
CPU: 1 Core
HDD: 15GB RAID10
Bandwidth: 1000GB
IP Address: 1 IP Address
$1.78/mo for life
[ORDER LINK] Coupon: SAVEMONEY

VZ512 Plan
RAM: 512MB
VSwap: 512MB
CPU: 2 Core
HDD: 30GB RAID10
Bandwidth: 2000GB
IP Address: 2 IP Addresses
$3.57/mo for life
[ORDER LINK] Coupon: PUPA40

VZ1024 Plan
RAM: 1GB
VSwap: 1GB
CPU: 4 Core
HDD: 45GB RAID10
Bandwidth: 3000GB
IP Address: 4 IP Addresses
$6.57/mo for life
[ORDER LINK] Coupon: PUPA40

We are also offering 1-day trial plan. Why not have a try?

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or mail info [at] pupavps.com.

Comments

  • Looking Glass Down = =

  • NyrNyr Community Contributor, Veteran

    @pupavps said:

    Datacenter Location: Los Angeles, US.
    Network Provider: GTT, Zayo, Cogent, China Unicom, China Telecom

    Do you think your customers are stupid?

    http://bgp.he.net/AS15003

  • China provider peering is private. Same goes for QuadraNet CU transit.

  • nullnull said: China provider peering is private. Same goes for QuadraNet CU transit.

    Is the China Telecom private peering via GTT?

    traceroute to www.chinatelecom.com.cn (211.100.35.132), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets 1 108.62.39.90.rdns.as15003.net (108.62.39.90) 0.029 ms 0.009 ms 0.008 ms 2 v3500.er01.lax.as15003.net (23.80.6.137) 0.249 ms 0.238 ms 0.227 ms 3 69.31.114.133 (69.31.114.133) 0.320 ms 0.315 ms 0.338 ms 4 ae2-50g.ar1.lax2.us.as4436.gtt.net (69.31.124.85) 2.332 ms * 5.038 ms 5 ip-69-31-124-30.gtt.net (69.31.124.30) 3.077 ms 3.070 ms ip-69-31-124-26.gtt.net (69.31.124.26) 3.060 ms 6 202.97.49.29 (202.97.49.29) 1.417 ms 4.489 ms 4.474 ms 7 202.97.58.125 (202.97.58.125) 255.278 ms 257.420 ms 257.407 ms 8 202.97.53.233 (202.97.53.233) 253.561 ms 253.556 ms 253.581 ms 9 202.97.53.85 (202.97.53.85) 255.114 ms 254.607 ms 254.593 ms 10 180.149.128.182 (180.149.128.182) 255.907 ms * * 11 220.181.16.6 (220.181.16.6) 253.529 ms 253.573 ms 253.610 ms 12 211.100.2.197 (211.100.2.197) 372.148 ms * 211.100.2.193 (211.100.2.193) 263.486 ms 13 * * * 14 * * * -- Traceroute timed out --

  • @concerto49 said:


    traceroute to 61.139.2.69 (61.139.2.69), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
    1 108.62.39.90.rdns.as15003.net (108.62.39.90) 0.027 ms 0.009 ms 0.008 ms
    2 v3500.er01.lax.as15003.net (23.80.6.137) 0.255 ms 0.230 ms 0.217 ms
    3 218.30.54.185 (218.30.54.185) 0.566 ms 0.559 ms 0.594 ms
    4 202.97.52.245 (202.97.52.245) 5.043 ms 5.038 ms 5.025 ms
    5 202.97.52.161 (202.97.52.161) 269.584 ms 269.577 ms 269.568 ms
    6 202.97.60.81 (202.97.60.81) 266.959 ms 266.926 ms 266.963 ms
    7 202.97.35.197 (202.97.35.197) 260.690 ms 202.97.33.169 (202.97.33.169) 271.169 ms 202.97.35.241 (202.97.35.241) 271.443 ms
    8 202.97.45.42 (202.97.45.42) 313.146 ms 313.122 ms 313.121 ms
    9 * * *
    10 61.139.113.58 (61.139.113.58) 307.554 ms 307.381 ms 307.538 ms
    11 ns.sc.cninfo.net (61.139.2.69) 305.939 ms 307.773 ms 307.138 ms

  • concerto49concerto49 Member
    edited September 2014

    nullnull said: traceroute to 61.139.2.69 (61.139.2.69), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets

    1 108.62.39.90.rdns.as15003.net (108.62.39.90) 0.027 ms 0.009 ms 0.008 ms
    2 v3500.er01.lax.as15003.net (23.80.6.137) 0.255 ms 0.230 ms 0.217 ms
    3 218.30.54.185 (218.30.54.185) 0.566 ms 0.559 ms 0.594 ms
    4 202.97.52.245 (202.97.52.245) 5.043 ms 5.038 ms 5.025 ms
    5 202.97.52.161 (202.97.52.161) 269.584 ms 269.577 ms 269.568 ms
    6 202.97.60.81 (202.97.60.81) 266.959 ms 266.926 ms 266.963 ms
    7 202.97.35.197 (202.97.35.197) 260.690 ms 202.97.33.169 (202.97.33.169) 271.169 ms 202.97.35.241 (202.97.35.241) 271.443 ms
    8 202.97.45.42 (202.97.45.42) 313.146 ms 313.122 ms 313.121 ms
    9 * * *
    10 61.139.113.58 (61.139.113.58) 307.554 ms 307.381 ms 307.538 ms
    11 ns.sc.cninfo.net (61.139.2.69) 305.939 ms 307.773 ms 307.138 ms

    So is it CT or not?

  • nullnullnullnull Member
    edited September 2014

    @concerto49 said:

    61.139.2.69 is China Telecom Sichuan Province Public DNS

    http://bgp.he.net/ip/61.139.2.69

    And 202.97.x.x is China Telecom Backbone.

    concerto49 said: So is it CT or not?

    Yes. And the conclusion is that it is only a partial peering ?

  • 202.106.196.115 is China Unicom Beijing Province Public DNS.Good speed:)

  • Thanks @nullnull. @Nyr, test from China then you'll see China Telecom connection. The routing optimization to China is a complex work, sometimes outgoing may change to ensure stability. We are using ubiquityhosting LA datacenter, you can confirm peer info with them.

  • Hi,Most Chinese people will use this web test.

    http://www.webkaka.com/Tracert.aspx

    http://www.webkaka.com/Ping.aspx

    I tell you What is the optimal line。

    test this IP:192.126.113.1 or 162.212.180.1

Sign In or Register to comment.