New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
Comments
Edis will soon be offering VPS servers located in Dubai (UAE).
@William
For anything in that area probably Germany would be the best / fastest.
I think you should do some research by yourself. From which route Qatar or connects is important. France, England, Italy is a good choice and best probable one. However,
submarinecablemap.com/
France is best location
India?
May be some reliable providers from Turkey.
Try from Saudi Arabia, some have low prices
Is there any specific basis for your assumption that it won't go "Qatar -> Frankfurt/Amsterdam/London -> that other country"? Or were you simply clueless about how networking goes in these underdeveloped regions, and just giving "advice" looking at a geographic map? Yeah, thought so.
@rm_ Guess they looking for some regional based provider..
thanks all for your answers.
i check submarine cable map that the direct link is FRANCE
surely EU countries are my first hunting ground
QATAR
http://www.submarinecablemap.com/#/landing-point/doha-qatar
EU
http://www.submarinecablemap.com/#/submarine-cable/asia-africa-europe-1-aae-1
does determining the best provider is to TEST for the following:
======
lets me START with PING
FRANCE
sorry / didnt find a reliable enough provider
NETHERLANDS
Pinging 174.137.191.6 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 174.137.191.6: bytes=32 time=282ms TTL=54
Reply from 174.137.191.6: bytes=32 time=172ms TTL=54
Reply from 174.137.191.6: bytes=32 time=150ms TTL=54
Reply from 174.137.191.6: bytes=32 time=213ms TTL=54
Ping statistics for 174.137.191.6:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 150ms, Maximum = 282ms, Average = 204ms
ROMANIA
Pinging 188.240.51.132 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 188.240.51.132: bytes=32 time=196ms TTL=52
Reply from 188.240.51.132: bytes=32 time=199ms TTL=52
Reply from 188.240.51.132: bytes=32 time=206ms TTL=52
Reply from 188.240.51.132: bytes=32 time=200ms TTL=52
Ping statistics for 188.240.51.132:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 196ms, Maximum = 206ms, Average = 200ms
LONDON
Pinging 185.42.220.13 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 185.42.220.13: bytes=32 time=149ms TTL=50
Reply from 185.42.220.13: bytes=32 time=158ms TTL=50
Reply from 185.42.220.13: bytes=32 time=145ms TTL=50
Reply from 185.42.220.13: bytes=32 time=151ms TTL=50
Ping statistics for 185.42.220.13:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 145ms, Maximum = 158ms, Average = 150ms
==========
any suggestions?
to be fair saudi networks aint bad. but qatar is probably better.