Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

123systems.net is down, both site and solus - UPDATE: Up again

jvnadrjvnadr Member
edited August 2014 in General

Seem that 123systems.net is down. This affects their client area, their website and solus access (https://srv01.123systems.net). Also, acquiring by CVPS has not resolve their issues with a lot of unstable and unusable boxes.

Thanked by 1GIANT_CRAB

Comments

  • It's up & down.

  • after the acquisition, things even get worse...

  • Did anyone open a ticket with ChicagoVPS regarding this? They may be able to fix it.

  • jvnadrjvnadr Member
    edited August 2014

    @mpkossen I didn't, but I think that having your main site down and the solus access also down, there is no need to be informed by a single client...

    Also, I already opened a ticket some days ago about a problematic vps and didn't still get a solution.

    P.S. My 2 vps with them, are also down... @CVPS_Chris

    Thanked by 2MannDude mpkossen
  • jvnadrjvnadr Member
    edited August 2014

    @serverian Hypocrisy? No, just informing that they are down for some hours. I still stand on what I said before

    jvnadr said: It depends on what you want to do with what expectations. If I want to run a production site or a dns server, I will buy IWstack, RAMnode, Inception Hosting, DR.Server and Crissic. For my primary backups I use VPSdime and Fliphost. For supporting purposes like secondary backups, cluster of restreamers, testing etc., I use CVPS, GVH and BlueVM. Their price fits those needs and do their job, most of the time. It's not all black and white.

    For 25$ yearly (something like 2$ p/m) 75GB HDD and 2.5RAM + 2.5swap with 2TB bandwidth, is fine for a non-critical use, even if their uptime is something like 95-96%...

  • @jvnadr said:
    serverian Hypocrisy? No, just informing that they are down for some hours. I still stand on what I said before

    For 25$ yearly (something like 2$ p/m) 75GB HDD and 2.5RAM + 2.5swap with 2TB bandwidth, is fine for a non-critical use, even if their uptime is something like 95-96%...

    Then please, for gods sake, stop opening threads when they go down. You know they go down and they will go down till the end of the time. Opening a thread about it and seeing it keep getting bumped is annoying after seeing you that you already know what's it all about anyway.

    Thanked by 2Mark_R k0nsl
  • jvnadrjvnadr Member
    edited August 2014

    I do not open threads for my problems with boxes (you can imagine that I have downtimes from those providers, I do not open threads here), I prefer open tickets to support. This is an exception, because this is not a downtime for my boxes. Their main website, their client area and their solus management is down, as of my 2 vps's in different nodes. That's why I opened the thread, not to bash Having all services, sites and management system down, I think is an issue that should be stated in this community.

  • @jvnadr said:
    I do not open threads for my problems with boxes (you can imagine that I have downtimes from those providers, I do not open threads here), I prefer open tickets to support. This is an exception, because this is not a downtime for my boxes. Their main website, their client area and their solus management is down, as of my 2 vps's in different nodes. That's why I opened the thread, not to bash Having all services, sites and management system down, I think is an issue that should be stated in this community.

    Sometimes, I feel we need to remind certain providers that the forum is called LowEndTalk, not LowEndQuality/LowEndHosting. I understand it's a cheap price, but uptime is crucial in any hosting scenario. It's like oxygen for servers.

  • Client area is still back. @MPKossen @Spirit you can close this thread now, before it turns to a bumping thread again...

    Pwner said: Sometimes, I feel we need to remind certain providers that the forum is called LowEndTalk, not LowEndQuality/LowEndHosting. I understand it's a cheap price, but uptime is crucial in any hosting scenario. It's like oxygen for servers.

    I agree, but the uptime or/and the speed/stability expectations are different for higher prices than cheapish boxes. I don't mind so to have some downtime to a box of 1$ p/m, I am happy that I can buy some boxes for testing, learning or secondary uses, purposes that I couldn't fulfill if there weren't those cheap prices... I can buy 4-5 cheap vps for those purposes but I cannot buy 4-5 vps of 7-10$ p/m, just for playing...

  • inb4:

    Spirit said:
    Please do not mention all the staff members, just Flag the post.

    Thanked by 1jvnadr
  • jvnadr said: before it turns to a bumping thread again...

    Bump

This discussion has been closed.