Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Tiktalik - Anyone used them?

I signed up and bought 5 PLN (~$1.60 USD) worth of credits (that's the minimum amount), I have not even created a instance yet, but what do you guys think of them?

They offer:

Tiktalik VPS Standard

>

0.011 PLN(~0.0032 USD) A hour, or 8 PLN (~$2.56 USD)
1 gig ram
2 cpu cores
20 GB Disk space
2 TB Bandwidth

Has anyone heard of them? I found them on google while I was searching for per hour vps servers.

Comments

  • Looks legit..Polish IP? Nice prices :)

  • linuxglobelinuxglobe Member
    edited August 2014

    I'm interested also, if anybody tried this service,if are they legit...

  • CPU model : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU L5639 @ 2.13GHz
    Number of cores : 2
    CPU frequency : 2133.450 MHz
    Total amount of ram : 998 MB
    Total amount of swap : 0 MB
    System uptime : 11:09,
    Download speed from CacheFly: 11.2MB/s
    Download speed from Coloat, Atlanta GA: 1.44MB/s
    Download speed from Softlayer, Dallas, TX: 2.49MB/s
    Download speed from Linode, Tokyo, JP: 1.41MB/s
    Download speed from i3d.net, Rotterdam, NL: 3.49MB/s
    Download speed from Leaseweb, Haarlem, NL: 4.07MB/s
    ^[[CDownload speed from Softlayer, Singapore: 1.02MB/s
    Download speed from Softlayer, Seattle, WA: 2.22MB/s
    Download speed from Softlayer, San Jose, CA: 2.18MB/s
    Download speed from Softlayer, Washington, DC: 1.44MB/s
    I/O speed : 85.9 MB/s

  • StevieStevie Member
    edited August 2014

    @fitvpn - wow the download speeds are pretty bad, but the I/O seems decent.

    Have you used there support? if so does it take long for them to respond?
    Do you know whats there bandwidth overage fee?

    -- Oh it seems you just signed up recently, (just saw your first post on this thread)

  • So far, for that prices performance is fine, guess for better they have Pro.. :)

  • jvnadrjvnadr Member
    edited August 2014

    Just bought 5 PLN. I created an instance, it seem not too speedy in access with ssh, but here are the results of some primary benchs:

    dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync
    16384+0 records in
    16384+0 records out
    1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 28.9404 s, 37.1 MB/s
    

    cat /proc/cpuinfo
    processor : 0
    vendor_id : GenuineIntel
    cpu family : 6
    model : 44
    model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU L5639 @ 2.13GHz
    stepping : 2
    cpu MHz : 2133.462
    cache size : 12288 KB
    fpu : yes
    fpu_exception : yes
    cpuid level : 11
    wp : yes
    flags : fpu de tsc msr pae cx8 sep cmov pat clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht syscall nx lm rep_good aperfmperf unfair_spinlock pni pclmulqdq ssse3 cx16 sse4_1 sse4_2 popcnt aes hypervisor lahf_lm ida arat epb dts
    bogomips : 4266.92
    clflush size : 64
    cache_alignment : 64
    address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
    power management:

    processor : 1
    vendor_id : GenuineIntel
    cpu family : 6
    model : 44
    model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU L5639 @ 2.13GHz
    stepping : 2
    cpu MHz : 2133.462
    cache size : 12288 KB
    fpu : yes
    fpu_exception : yes
    cpuid level : 11
    wp : yes
    flags : fpu de tsc msr pae cx8 sep cmov pat clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht syscall nx lm rep_good aperfmperf unfair_spinlock pni pclmulqdq ssse3 cx16 sse4_1 sse4_2 popcnt aes hypervisor lahf_lm ida arat epb dts
    bogomips : 4266.92
    clflush size : 64
    cache_alignment : 64
    address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
    power management:

    http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test
    Resolving cachefly.cachefly.net... xxx.xxx.xxx.133
    Connecting to cachefly.cachefly.net|xxx.xxx.xxx.133|:80... connected.
    HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
    Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/octet-stream]
    Saving to: “100mb.test”
    100%[===================================================================>] 104,857,600 2.02M/s   in 26s
    2014-08-17 00:15:14 (3.91 MB/s) - “100mb.test” saved [104857600/104857600]
    

    I/m running a full benchmark now and I;ll post results here

    P.S. It's XEN pv

  • Wow, worst benchmark ever! A cyrix 4x86 would had better results!

    System Benchmarks Index Score 81.5

    This is the whole post from serverbear:

    serverbear.com/benchmark/2014/08/16/PwkVxhAUDvIDFzEb

  • RamiRami Member

    Anyone have test IP??

  • @Rami - Ping their site and you will got test IP..

  • RamiRami Member

    @fitvpn said:
    Rami - Ping their site and you will got test IP..

    Thanks, I found an IP

Sign In or Register to comment.