Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Genuine residential hosting outside the US (less common locations)

I’m looking to rent a small server or bare-metal device connected to an authentic residential broadband line outside the US, ideally in less commonly available locations.

To clarify: by "residential," I mean an actual physical connection on a local home ISP—not datacenter subnets classified as "ISP" in databases (IP2Location, MaxMind, etc.). I am only interested in dedicated hardware, not shared proxy pools, rotating IPs, or peer-to-peer proxy SDK networks.

Does anyone know of niche providers or local operators offering this setup? Firsthand experiences or recommendations would be appreciated.

If you have a lead, please share:

Country, city, and ISP name

Connection type (FTTH, cable, DSL) and whether it runs over true residential infrastructure

IP details (exclusive vs. shared, static vs. dynamic, and whether it sits behind CGNAT)

Hardware specs, remote access method, and out-of-band/recovery options

Pricing, setup fees, and bandwidth allowances

Whether the ISP’s terms of service allow inbound tunnels or lightweight hosting

Use case: This is strictly for personal remote development and legitimate testing—no bulk account generation, automated scraping, or traffic resale. I understand how IP reputation works and am not asking for an "unbannable" IP guarantee.

Smaller boutique providers and individual operators are welcome. Please describe the actual network topology rather than just posting an IP-checker screenshot.

Comments

  • My main priorities are a genuine residential connection and exclusive use of the public IP. Partial leads are welcome and you don’t need every detail above to suggest an option.

  • You may be more lucky, if you look into resi proxy rather than full VPS.

    Thanked by 2chatmurphy forest
  • @JohnFilch123 said:
    You may be more lucky, if you look into resi proxy rather than full VPS.

    Thanks. I’m also open to running the compute on a machine and tunneling traffic through a dedicated residential gateway, as long as the egress IP is 100% dedicated to me and not part of a shared pool.

    I’m relatively new to this space, so I’m open to suggestions, corrections, or alternative setups I might not have considered.

  • What kind of traffic and bandwidth requirements are you looking at?

  • I am only interested in dedicated hardware, not shared proxy pools, rotating IPs, or peer-to-peer proxy SDK networks.

    Do you actually need permanent IP or just 'longer-lasting than a single request'?

  • This needs to be banned on LET. Nothing good to come of it and violating what terms of use OP is abusing.

    Thanked by 1tzuli
  • s0n1cs0n1c Member

    @TimboJones said:
    This needs to be banned on LET. Nothing good to come of it and violating what terms of use OP is abusing.

    hes probably gonna use it for claude or some ai provider since theyre banned in china. who cares if he violates their tos, they'll probably ban him anyways.

  • @s0n1c said:

    @TimboJones said:
    This needs to be banned on LET. Nothing good to come of it and violating what terms of use OP is abusing.

    hes probably gonna use it for claude or some ai provider since theyre banned in china. who cares if he violates their tos, they'll probably ban him anyways.

    That's the best case. The worst cases are much, much worse.

  • forestforest Member
    edited 1:57AM

    @TimboJones said:

    @s0n1c said:

    @TimboJones said:
    This needs to be banned on LET. Nothing good to come of it and violating what terms of use OP is abusing.

    hes probably gonna use it for claude or some ai provider since theyre banned in china. who cares if he violates their tos, they'll probably ban him anyways.

    That's the best case. The worst cases are much, much worse.

    The worst case for anything is going to be worse than the likely case, even for something as benign as having a VPS. After all, most people don't need one. Realistically, most people who want a few residential proxies just need to get around shitty (and sometimes politically-motivated) geoblocks. But OP hasn't told us the use-case, so we shouldn't jump to conclusions.

    When residential proxies are sold with a clean provenance, LET allows it. The reason for extra scrutiny isn't because LET is afraid that someone will watch Netflix outside of a supported country, but that people will start selling IPs from botnets.

    Thanked by 2s0n1c rpqu
  • s0n1cs0n1c Member
    edited 3:28AM

    @TimboJones said:

    @s0n1c said:

    @TimboJones said:
    This needs to be banned on LET. Nothing good to come of it and violating what terms of use OP is abusing.

    hes probably gonna use it for claude or some ai provider since theyre banned in china. who cares if he violates their tos, they'll probably ban him anyways.

    That's the best case. The worst cases are much, much worse.

    cant you say the same for vps's and dedis tho?

    cause with ur logic, we should also ban vps's/dedis off LET because people can host csam, copyrighted content or other illegal stuff.

    Thanked by 1forest
Sign In or Register to comment.