New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
Proxmox vs Virtualizor for a new minimalist setup?
Mystral_Hosting
Member
in General
Hello LET,
I am currently weighing my options for managing a few nodes. Virtualizor seems to be the industry standard here for budget providers, but Proxmox has made huge leaps and I personally love its UI and native backup features.
For those of you running small to medium-sized operations, is Proxmox's lack of native WHMCS/Blesta billing integration (without third-party modules) a dealbreaker for you? Or is it worth the extra setup time compared to Virtualizor?
Thanks for the feedback!
Comments
Just take a look at https://lowendtalk.com/discussion/221964/which-vps-platform-do-you-guys-prefer-and-why#latest
Virtualizor is the best for when you want your customers to get a yearly dose of phishing and blackmail. The real debate is VirtFusion vs Proxmox
proxmox my beloved
Proxmox if you know what youre doing, Virtfusion if you just want it working without reading.
I dont recommend third party proxmox whmcs modules. But i dont like whmcs either way
For a small setup, I'd lean toward Proxmox if customer billing isn't the main priority. The backup and management features are appealing. But if you're selling VPS, billing integration and customer self-service probably matter more. VirtFusion seems worth comparing too.
So it is Proxmox+WHMCS/Blesta with a Proxmox module
OR
Virtfusion with WHMCS/Blesta
Am I right?