Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

I am looking for a 1TB + storage for my file hosting service.

2»

Comments

  • thethethethe Member

    @systemfreaks said:

    Thank you for the mention
    @thethe
    1 TB will cost you $4/m with 3x Egress included for free, we can also work a deal for unmetered traffic as your project grows

    Thank for reply. But i can't find 4$ on your site. I can see 8$ - https://www.systemfreaks.com/object-storage

  • @thethe said:

    @systemfreaks said:

    Thank you for the mention
    @thethe
    1 TB will cost you $4/m with 3x Egress included for free, we can also work a deal for unmetered traffic as your project grows

    Thank for reply. But i can't find 4$ on your site. I can see 8$ - https://www.systemfreaks.com/object-storage

    use the code let2026

  • @labze said:

    @ScrewedUp said:

    @labze said:

    @ScrewedUp said:

    @zejjnt said:

    @luckypenguin said:
    No matter what you do, don't get hostbrr. Sorry @labze
    25MB disk i/o at max. Some of the stuff I'm not gonna renew even for free.

    wat

    ``` |py-python:| ftpde1 in ~
    ○ → wget -qO- yabs.sh | bash -s -- -ignb

    ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ##

    Yet-Another-Bench-Script

    v2026-07-24

    https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script

    ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ##

    Fri Aug 28 06:20:48 AM CEST 2026

    Basic System Information:

    Uptime : 23 days, 7 hours, 0 minutes
    Processor : AMD EPYC 7443P 24-Core Processor
    CPU cores : 48 @ 3724.861 MHz
    AES-NI : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
    RAM : 251.5 GiB
    Swap : 976.0 MiB
    Disk : 658.3 TiB
    grep: /etc/os-release: No such file or directory
    Distro :
    Kernel : 6.1.0-49-amd64
    VM Type : NONE
    IPv4/IPv6 : ✔ Online / ✔ Online

    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/md124):

    Block Size 4k (IOPS) 64k (IOPS)
    Read 3.25 MB/s (795) 55.46 MB/s (846)
    Write 3.27 MB/s (800) 55.96 MB/s (853)
    Total 6.53 MB/s (1.5k) 111.42 MB/s (1.6k)
    Block Size 512k (IOPS) 1m (IOPS)
    ------ --- ---- ---- ----
    Read 314.05 MB/s (599) 355.80 MB/s (339)
    Write 330.74 MB/s (630) 379.50 MB/s (361)
    Total 644.79 MB/s (1.2k) 735.31 MB/s (700)

    YABS completed in 1 min 25 sec```

    The storage box YABS for me were all over the place unfortunately. Initially reported very slow, then a sudden increase, then a marginal increase to eventually steadying. It is however expected with cheap shared VPS plans. I can't speak for how over-provisioned Hostbrr is, only assume based on the small margins that they must be operating at that there is over-provisioning and expectation that not all users are filling the entire HDD capacity, nor continually utilizing it.

    I really don't know what you are doing using YABS on a storage box service :D

    What's the issue with YABS on a VPS with shared HDD pool? I typically always run it, to get an idea of uptime, speeds, consistency across time ranges I anticipate using it.

    The storage box is not a VPS. I don't know if you meant something else.

    You can run yabs and skip the CPU and network tests and test storage speed only as shown.

  • labzelabze Member, Patron Provider

    @TimboJones said:

    @labze said:

    @ScrewedUp said:

    @labze said:

    @ScrewedUp said:

    @zejjnt said:

    @luckypenguin said:
    No matter what you do, don't get hostbrr. Sorry @labze
    25MB disk i/o at max. Some of the stuff I'm not gonna renew even for free.

    wat

    ``` |py-python:| ftpde1 in ~
    ○ → wget -qO- yabs.sh | bash -s -- -ignb

    ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ##

    Yet-Another-Bench-Script

    v2026-07-24

    https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script

    ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ##

    Fri Aug 28 06:20:48 AM CEST 2026

    Basic System Information:

    Uptime : 23 days, 7 hours, 0 minutes
    Processor : AMD EPYC 7443P 24-Core Processor
    CPU cores : 48 @ 3724.861 MHz
    AES-NI : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
    RAM : 251.5 GiB
    Swap : 976.0 MiB
    Disk : 658.3 TiB
    grep: /etc/os-release: No such file or directory
    Distro :
    Kernel : 6.1.0-49-amd64
    VM Type : NONE
    IPv4/IPv6 : ✔ Online / ✔ Online

    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/md124):

    Block Size 4k (IOPS) 64k (IOPS)
    Read 3.25 MB/s (795) 55.46 MB/s (846)
    Write 3.27 MB/s (800) 55.96 MB/s (853)
    Total 6.53 MB/s (1.5k) 111.42 MB/s (1.6k)
    Block Size 512k (IOPS) 1m (IOPS)
    ------ --- ---- ---- ----
    Read 314.05 MB/s (599) 355.80 MB/s (339)
    Write 330.74 MB/s (630) 379.50 MB/s (361)
    Total 644.79 MB/s (1.2k) 735.31 MB/s (700)

    YABS completed in 1 min 25 sec```

    The storage box YABS for me were all over the place unfortunately. Initially reported very slow, then a sudden increase, then a marginal increase to eventually steadying. It is however expected with cheap shared VPS plans. I can't speak for how over-provisioned Hostbrr is, only assume based on the small margins that they must be operating at that there is over-provisioning and expectation that not all users are filling the entire HDD capacity, nor continually utilizing it.

    I really don't know what you are doing using YABS on a storage box service :D

    What's the issue with YABS on a VPS with shared HDD pool? I typically always run it, to get an idea of uptime, speeds, consistency across time ranges I anticipate using it.

    The storage box is not a VPS. I don't know if you meant something else.

    You can run yabs and skip the CPU and network tests and test storage speed only as shown.

    Sure, it still doesn't still make sense though - if you ask me.

    If I have a storage service, what I would care about if I get satisfactory real world speeds.

    It's a primarily private service, so testing network between global destinations tells you nothing about how well the network works for you. YABS also only benchmarks disk speeds up to 1 M files, which means that the file sizes that 98% of people upload aren't tested.

    More importantly, like the majority of shared services like this, there are LVE limits. Running YABS will quickly trigger a throttle that'll degrade the results.

    It may just be me that feel that way though. I haven't ever considered benchmarking a cloud storage solution. I'd base my conclusion on my real experience with it.

    Thanked by 1zejjnt
  • @labze Can you give me some insight into how much your normal VPS plans are oversold? Storagebox is obviously much more oversold so I don’t really care about that.

  • NetDynamics24NetDynamics24 Member, Host Rep

    Thanks for the mention!

    @thethe You can use the code LET50% for lifetime recurring 50% discount on annual plans:
    https://netdynamics24.com/backup-services.php

  • zejjntzejjnt Member

    @labze said:

    @TimboJones said:

    @labze said:

    @ScrewedUp said:

    @labze said:

    @ScrewedUp said:

    @zejjnt said:

    @luckypenguin said:
    No matter what you do, don't get hostbrr. Sorry @labze
    25MB disk i/o at max. Some of the stuff I'm not gonna renew even for free.

    wat

    ``` |py-python:| ftpde1 in ~
    ○ → wget -qO- yabs.sh | bash -s -- -ignb

    ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ##

    Yet-Another-Bench-Script

    v2026-07-24

    https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script

    ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ##

    Fri Aug 28 06:20:48 AM CEST 2026

    Basic System Information:

    Uptime : 23 days, 7 hours, 0 minutes
    Processor : AMD EPYC 7443P 24-Core Processor
    CPU cores : 48 @ 3724.861 MHz
    AES-NI : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
    RAM : 251.5 GiB
    Swap : 976.0 MiB
    Disk : 658.3 TiB
    grep: /etc/os-release: No such file or directory
    Distro :
    Kernel : 6.1.0-49-amd64
    VM Type : NONE
    IPv4/IPv6 : ✔ Online / ✔ Online

    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/md124):

    Block Size 4k (IOPS) 64k (IOPS)
    Read 3.25 MB/s (795) 55.46 MB/s (846)
    Write 3.27 MB/s (800) 55.96 MB/s (853)
    Total 6.53 MB/s (1.5k) 111.42 MB/s (1.6k)
    Block Size 512k (IOPS) 1m (IOPS)
    ------ --- ---- ---- ----
    Read 314.05 MB/s (599) 355.80 MB/s (339)
    Write 330.74 MB/s (630) 379.50 MB/s (361)
    Total 644.79 MB/s (1.2k) 735.31 MB/s (700)

    YABS completed in 1 min 25 sec```

    The storage box YABS for me were all over the place unfortunately. Initially reported very slow, then a sudden increase, then a marginal increase to eventually steadying. It is however expected with cheap shared VPS plans. I can't speak for how over-provisioned Hostbrr is, only assume based on the small margins that they must be operating at that there is over-provisioning and expectation that not all users are filling the entire HDD capacity, nor continually utilizing it.

    I really don't know what you are doing using YABS on a storage box service :D

    What's the issue with YABS on a VPS with shared HDD pool? I typically always run it, to get an idea of uptime, speeds, consistency across time ranges I anticipate using it.

    The storage box is not a VPS. I don't know if you meant something else.

    You can run yabs and skip the CPU and network tests and test storage speed only as shown.

    Sure, it still doesn't still make sense though - if you ask me.

    If I have a storage service, what I would care about if I get satisfactory real world speeds.

    It's a primarily private service, so testing network between global destinations tells you nothing about how well the network works for you. YABS also only benchmarks disk speeds up to 1 M files, which means that the file sizes that 98% of people upload aren't tested.

    More importantly, like the majority of shared services like this, there are LVE limits. Running YABS will quickly trigger a throttle that'll degrade the results.

    It may just be me that feel that way though. I haven't ever considered benchmarking a cloud storage solution. I'd base my conclusion on my real experience with it.

    In this case I just did it because I saw a claim that I knew was bullshit and since I remember the yabs command line switches it was just the fastest way to dispute with data in a format that forum members are used to interpreting. Personally I've never had issues with speeds in that regard.

    Also it's what we do here, you know that ;D

    @meowwcc said:
    @labze Can you give me some insight into how much your normal VPS plans are oversold? Storagebox is obviously much more oversold so I don’t really care about that.

    If you're not just interested in storage speeds I have two EPYC rigs that have never slowed down for me if that's anything to go by.

  • labzelabze Member, Patron Provider

    @meowwcc said:
    @labze Can you give me some insight into how much your normal VPS plans are oversold? Storagebox is obviously much more oversold so I don’t really care about that.

    What a loaded question.

    I'm not sure what you base the obviously oversold statement on. The storage box services as a whole is probrably the hosts that is least utilised. For most, it's just a backup and forget kind of service.

    Just to give a example. ftpde1 which is considered full has an average of 15% CPU usage and under 20% RAM usage.

    DirectAdmin exposes server load to all accounts so it's always possible to check as a client if the system is struggling.

    Thanked by 2edrebe zejjnt
  • systemfreakssystemfreaks Member, Patron Provider

    @thethe said:

    @systemfreaks said:

    Thank you for the mention
    @thethe
    1 TB will cost you $4/m with 3x Egress included for free, we can also work a deal for unmetered traffic as your project grows

    Thank for reply. But i can't find 4$ on your site. I can see 8$ - https://www.systemfreaks.com/object-storage

    https://manager.systemfreaks.com/order/config/index/S3-Compatible-Object-storage/?group_id=38&pricing_id=3643&coupon=let2026

    Or use promo code LET2026. The discount is ongoing and also applies to future upgrades.

  • @labze said: What a loaded question.

    I'm not sure what you base the obviously oversold statement on. The storage box services as a whole is probrably the hosts that is least utilised. For most, it's just a backup and forget kind of service.

    Just to give a example. ftpde1 which is considered full has an average of 15% CPU usage and under 20% RAM usage.

    DirectAdmin exposes server load to all accounts so it's always possible to check as a client if the system is struggling.

    I was just curious, as I wanted to place a few vps orders
    Plus, over-provisioning storage space is done by every company, hard to find people having problem with that

  • systemfreakssystemfreaks Member, Patron Provider

    @meowwcc said:

    @labze said: What a loaded question.

    I'm not sure what you base the obviously oversold statement on. The storage box services as a whole is probrably the hosts that is least utilised. For most, it's just a backup and forget kind of service.

    Just to give a example. ftpde1 which is considered full has an average of 15% CPU usage and under 20% RAM usage.

    DirectAdmin exposes server load to all accounts so it's always possible to check as a client if the system is struggling.

    I was just curious, as I wanted to place a few vps orders
    Plus, over-provisioning storage space is done by every company, hard to find people having problem with that

    I don't think over provisioning storage is a good idea

  • forestforest Member
    edited August 29

    @labze said: What a loaded question.

    I'm not sure what you base the obviously oversold statement on. The storage box services as a whole is probrably the hosts that is least utilised. For most, it's just a backup and forget kind of service.

    I don't think that's a loaded question. Virtually all nodes, except those intended for VDSes, will have some overselling, and careful, controlled overselling is a resource optimization, not a bad thing.

    A 1.2x vCPU overselling ratio is really good for example and you'll see virtually no CPU steal, whereas a 4x vCPU overselling ratio is something you'll only see on ServerHost or VPS.TC's most crowded nodes.

    Thanked by 2meowwcc zejjnt
  • forestforest Member

    @systemfreaks said:

    @meowwcc said:

    @labze said: What a loaded question.

    I'm not sure what you base the obviously oversold statement on. The storage box services as a whole is probrably the hosts that is least utilised. For most, it's just a backup and forget kind of service.

    Just to give a example. ftpde1 which is considered full has an average of 15% CPU usage and under 20% RAM usage.

    DirectAdmin exposes server load to all accounts so it's always possible to check as a client if the system is struggling.

    I was just curious, as I wanted to place a few vps orders
    Plus, over-provisioning storage space is done by every company, hard to find people having problem with that

    I don't think over provisioning storage is a good idea

    If you overprovision storage space, you'll have ample time to notice when the storage space is getting full and you'll have more than enough warning to add a disk or two to the array.

    It's not like doing the same with RAM (where you'll run into CPU ballooning) or doing it too much with CPU (where you can get unexpected steal).

    Thanked by 1zejjnt
  • @labze said:

    @meowwcc said:
    @labze Can you give me some insight into how much your normal VPS plans are oversold? Storagebox is obviously much more oversold so I don’t really care about that.

    What a loaded question.

    I'm not sure what you base the obviously oversold statement on. The storage box services as a whole is probrably the hosts that is least utilised. For most, it's just a backup and forget kind of service.

    Just to give a example. ftpde1 which is considered full has an average of 15% CPU usage and under 20% RAM usage.

    DirectAdmin exposes server load to all accounts so it's always possible to check as a client if the system is struggling.

    @luckypenguin said:
    No matter what you do, don't get hostbrr. Sorry @labze
    25MB disk i/o at max. Some of the stuff I'm not gonna renew even for free.

    And you find this satisfying?

  • thethethethe Member

    @systemfreaks said:

    @thethe said:

    @systemfreaks said:

    Thank you for the mention
    @thethe
    1 TB will cost you $4/m with 3x Egress included for free, we can also work a deal for unmetered traffic as your project grows

    Thank for reply. But i can't find 4$ on your site. I can see 8$ - https://www.systemfreaks.com/object-storage

    https://manager.systemfreaks.com/order/config/index/S3-Compatible-Object-storage/?group_id=38&pricing_id=3643&coupon=let2026

    Or use promo code LET2026. The discount is ongoing and also applies to future upgrades.

    Bro, i don't know how, but its showing 500 gb with coupon code, not a 1TB.
    Also before to order, will be great to talk with you. Do you have telegram?
    Or may be PM?

  • systemfreakssystemfreaks Member, Patron Provider

    @thethe said:

    @systemfreaks said:

    @thethe said:

    @systemfreaks said:

    Thank you for the mention
    @thethe
    1 TB will cost you $4/m with 3x Egress included for free, we can also work a deal for unmetered traffic as your project grows

    Thank for reply. But i can't find 4$ on your site. I can see 8$ - https://www.systemfreaks.com/object-storage

    https://manager.systemfreaks.com/order/config/index/S3-Compatible-Object-storage/?group_id=38&pricing_id=3643&coupon=let2026

    Or use promo code LET2026. The discount is ongoing and also applies to future upgrades.

    Bro, i don't know how, but its showing 500 gb with coupon code, not a 1TB.
    Also before to order, will be great to talk with you. Do you have telegram?
    Or may be PM?

    You can send a ticket or a dm here, you can adjust the space during order from 500 gb to 70 TB

    Thanked by 1zejjnt
  • @thethe said: Bro, i don't know how, but its showing 500 gb with coupon code, not a 1TB.

    Just drag the slider on the order page?

  • @labze said:

    @TimboJones said:

    @labze said:

    @ScrewedUp said:

    @labze said:

    @ScrewedUp said:

    @zejjnt said:

    @luckypenguin said:
    No matter what you do, don't get hostbrr. Sorry @labze
    25MB disk i/o at max. Some of the stuff I'm not gonna renew even for free.

    wat

    ``` |py-python:| ftpde1 in ~
    ○ → wget -qO- yabs.sh | bash -s -- -ignb

    ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ##

    Yet-Another-Bench-Script

    v2026-07-24

    https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script

    ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ##

    Fri Aug 28 06:20:48 AM CEST 2026

    Basic System Information:

    Uptime : 23 days, 7 hours, 0 minutes
    Processor : AMD EPYC 7443P 24-Core Processor
    CPU cores : 48 @ 3724.861 MHz
    AES-NI : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
    RAM : 251.5 GiB
    Swap : 976.0 MiB
    Disk : 658.3 TiB
    grep: /etc/os-release: No such file or directory
    Distro :
    Kernel : 6.1.0-49-amd64
    VM Type : NONE
    IPv4/IPv6 : ✔ Online / ✔ Online

    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/md124):

    Block Size 4k (IOPS) 64k (IOPS)
    Read 3.25 MB/s (795) 55.46 MB/s (846)
    Write 3.27 MB/s (800) 55.96 MB/s (853)
    Total 6.53 MB/s (1.5k) 111.42 MB/s (1.6k)
    Block Size 512k (IOPS) 1m (IOPS)
    ------ --- ---- ---- ----
    Read 314.05 MB/s (599) 355.80 MB/s (339)
    Write 330.74 MB/s (630) 379.50 MB/s (361)
    Total 644.79 MB/s (1.2k) 735.31 MB/s (700)

    YABS completed in 1 min 25 sec```

    The storage box YABS for me were all over the place unfortunately. Initially reported very slow, then a sudden increase, then a marginal increase to eventually steadying. It is however expected with cheap shared VPS plans. I can't speak for how over-provisioned Hostbrr is, only assume based on the small margins that they must be operating at that there is over-provisioning and expectation that not all users are filling the entire HDD capacity, nor continually utilizing it.

    I really don't know what you are doing using YABS on a storage box service :D

    What's the issue with YABS on a VPS with shared HDD pool? I typically always run it, to get an idea of uptime, speeds, consistency across time ranges I anticipate using it.

    The storage box is not a VPS. I don't know if you meant something else.

    You can run yabs and skip the CPU and network tests and test storage speed only as shown.

    Sure, it still doesn't still make sense though - if you ask me.

    If I have a storage service, what I would care about if I get satisfactory real world speeds.

    It's a primarily private service, so testing network between global destinations tells you nothing about how well the network works for you. YABS also only benchmarks disk speeds up to 1 M files, which means that the file sizes that 98% of people upload aren't tested.

    More importantly, like the majority of shared services like this, there are LVE limits. Running YABS will quickly trigger a throttle that'll degrade the results.

    It may just be me that feel that way though. I haven't ever considered benchmarking a cloud storage solution. I'd base my conclusion on my real experience with it.

    It's basic troubleshooting for when real world performance is noticeably shit. Knowing whether there's a network or storage bottleneck is useful data.

    What limit will be triggered and throttled? Given large transfers take many times longer to finish, this is important to know.

  • emily_loasemily_loas Member
    edited August 30

    You could check some of the smaller European storage providers. They often have 1TB+ HDD plans with SSD caching for less than S3 storage. Just check the bandwidth and whether you can add more storage later.

  • webontopwebontop Member, Host Rep

    @thethe said:

    Prices pretty cool. More info please. Where they are registered, how about discs etc?
    Did you use them for a long time?

    Any reviews of them?

    Synclyz web site has all info or ask the AI. Or you can inbox me.

Sign In or Register to comment.