All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
Dedicated server share: Dual E5-2690v4, 128 GB, 2 x 960 GB SSD, 10G, Ashburn, VA USA NetBSD-current!
Friendly greetings!
Traditional shell accounts! VPSes!
Make your own VPSes from the command line!
Super fast bare metal performance!
See what's happening on your Node!
What's new?
No one here expressed interest in sharing this fine server when it was doing a great job running self-compiled FreeBSD-16.0-CURRENT.
Now, NetBSD-current has been installed! ![]()
To me, NetBSD-current seems really peaceful! In many ways!
NetBSD seems still very much the same, but steadily improved, from thirty-ish years ago when I first became an occasional NetBSD user. For quite a while, back in the old days, I ran NetBSD-current on IBM z50 laptops as well as on my x86 desktop.
Why NetBSD-current instead of a stable release?
Over the years, NetBSD-current seems stable and dependable. I have compiled NetBSD-current thousands of times. NetBSD-current just seems to work reliably.
I do remember once, my modem stopped working. I emailed the developer who had a recent commit. and got a fix in about twenty minutes. That fast reply was very helpful!
The few NetBSD developers I have met do seem especially interested in NetBSD-current. So, if I want to ask a question, the NetBSD-current context might help my question pique developer interest.
Of course, I'm certainly not a NetBSD expert. I'm more of a clueless™ user. So I do have many questions to ask!
Besides being peaceful, versatile, and well supported, NetBSD also is lots of fun!
I think I might stay with NetBSD for a while, and also stay with this nice QuickPacket server,
If you want to share NetBSD and this nice server with me, please feel free to post here!
Best wishes!
Tom
Specifications
2 x E5-2690v4 (28 cores / 56 threads)
128 GB DDR4 ECC RAM
2 x 960 GB SSD
1 x IPv4, more available
1 x IPv6/64 and 1 x IPv6/48 HE Tunnelbroker.net
250TB at 10G
NetBSD-current
Ashburn, VA USA
Pricing
The server is rented from QuickPacket for $85/month.
It would be great if server neighbors contributed something toward the monthly rental.
How to Get Shell Access
Please post in this thread! Some optional questions you might want to discuss:
What are you working on?
Do you have a website?
Do you have a source code repository?
What do you want to run on our server?
How much server resources might you use?
How extensively do you want to fund our server's $85/month cost?
Do Paypal and Zelle work for you?
Terms of Service
Free and open source software only.
White hat only.
For computer education and fun!
Not for commercial use.
No service level agreement.
Warnings!
Ephemeral. Could disappear at any moment!
Clueless™ Administrator!
More Information
qp# sh tour
Thu Aug 20 01:46:47 UTC 2026
1:46AM up 1:34, 1 user, load averages: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
kern.version = NetBSD 11.99.7 (GENERIC) #0: Wed Aug 19 09:28:39 UTC 2026
[email protected]:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC
[ 1.000004] cpu55: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2690 v4 @ 2.60GHz, id 0x406f1
load averages: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00; up 0+01:35:00 01:46:48
23 processes: 22 sleeping, 1 on CPU
CPU states: 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 0.0% system, 0.0% interrupt, 100% idle
Memory: 299M Act, 19M Wired, 17M Exec, 271M File, 122G Free
Swap: 128G Total, 128G Free / Pools: 632M Used / Network:
Filesystem Size Used Avail %Cap Mounted on
/dev/wd1a 754G 2.2G 715G 1% /
media: Ethernet 10Gbase-T full-duplex
qp#
Anyone want to try guessing the commands in "tour"? ![]()

Comments
The moment you mentioned BSD, you don't need to describe the age or how long ago you started. That name a lone is sticked to oldies. Sounds like many of us are still active despite the age and new era.
BSD is still lovely and stable regardless of adaptation rate worldwide.
Out of curiosity, why NetBSD rather than OpenBSD?
Was thinking same. Isn't OpenBsd most secure? I have 2 VPs running OpenBsd