Let's find the dirtiest VPS IP on LowEndTalk

Comments

• slowservers Member, Host Rep

  August 19

  142.249.45.101 gets a 99, which seems fair as the block has no abuse history on abuseipdb.
• TimboJones Member

  August 19

  Practically speaking, IP risk assessments only have any impact if the VPS is sending mail directly from the VPS?
• MallocVoidstar Member

  August 19

  @TimboJones said:
  Practically speaking, IP risk assessments only have any impact if the VPS is sending mail directly from the VPS?

  If you use a VPS as a proxy/VPN it also matters, you'll hit more captchas. Maybe blocks too but usually the blocks I see just target datacenter IPs in general/are geoblocks, not high-risk IPs.
• aluy Member, Patron Provider

  August 19

  

  Thanked by 5nghialele deafcon forest tzuli rpqu
• nghialele Member

  August 19

  @aluy said:
  

  LMAO

  Thanked by 2yangqq753 forest
• mikec Member

  2:18AM edited 2:21AM

  @itzsenu said:
  nice tool. Working perfectly. one of the latest highest thread IP is 94% good.
  "This IP was reported 446,161 times. Confidence of Abuse is 100%:"

  So what's the database that the Artificial Intelligence selected?

  Is this VPN?
  
• yangqq753 Member

  5:56AM

  @mikec said:

  @itzsenu said:
  nice tool. Working perfectly. one of the latest highest thread IP is 94% good.
  "This IP was reported 446,161 times. Confidence of Abuse is 100%:"

  So what's the database that the Artificial Intelligence selected?

  Is this VPN?
  

  No — that one looks like a public proxy (PUB) rather than a VPN.

  The more important part is SPAM/SCANNER + fraud score 99. That's exactly the kind of reputation/threat signal NetRiskScan currently needs better coverage for.

  I've added this IP to my regression tests. Thanks for the example.