Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

[Caliber Node] $10/year a few small apps, without babysitting a VPS!

13»

Comments

  • mikeimikei Veteran

    Favourite App: Snikket Chat
    INV-000109 LA
    Interesting Service! Amazing offer! Thanks!

    Thanked by 1CaliberNode
  • CaliberNodeCaliberNode Member, Patron Provider
    edited August 18

    @Saroot said:
    INV-000107 but unpaid yet. Trying to see if I can pay using Paypal like you said in the post. Now I only see pay by card. Any chance for Paypal? Hoping to get an app running soon!

    Unfortunately we had to disable PayPal temporarily due to integration issues and webhoook problems. We are actively trying to sort that issue out.

    We do not actively store any credit card data and we also do not have reccuring automated charges. If you'd like to use stripe just know stripe handles all of that our platform never sees your credit card information.

  • Favorite app: Blinko
    INV-000053

    Thanked by 1CaliberNode
  • CaliberNodeCaliberNode Member, Patron Provider

    @mikei said:
    Favourite App: Snikket Chat
    INV-000109 LA
    Interesting Service! Amazing offer! Thanks!

    Additional memory has been added

    Thanked by 1mikei
  • INV-000113
    Interesting Service, Thanks for the offer

    Thanked by 1CaliberNode
  • CaliberNodeCaliberNode Member, Patron Provider

    @surihost said:
    INV-000113
    Interesting Service, Thanks for the offer

    Thank you for giving us a try!

    Additional memory added.

  • @dedicados said:
    INV-000111
    PAID

    fav app pterodactyl

    @CaliberNode

  • Favorite app: Syncthing
    INV-000047

  • forestforest Member

    You should add Tor (middle relays, bridges, and Snowflake, but not exits of course).

  • CaliberNodeCaliberNode Member, Patron Provider

    @forest said:
    You should add Tor (middle relays, bridges, and Snowflake, but not exits of course).

    Thanks for the suggestion and agreed, exits are a hard no for us too.

    We actually looked into the others: middle relays and bridges need a publicly reachable raw port that our managed app platform doesn't expose, and a Snowflake proxy running inside our app containers only comes up as a "restricted" NAT proxy, so it'd be a half-strength contribution at best.

    We are currently working on a workaround for apps that need a raw port however we aren't to that point yet hopefully once we are this will be supported.

    Thanked by 1forest
  • forestforest Member

    @CaliberNode said:

    @forest said:
    You should add Tor (middle relays, bridges, and Snowflake, but not exits of course).

    Thanks for the suggestion and agreed, exits are a hard no for us too.

    We actually looked into the others: middle relays and bridges need a publicly reachable raw port that our managed app platform doesn't expose, and a Snowflake proxy running inside our app containers only comes up as a "restricted" NAT proxy, so it'd be a half-strength contribution at best.

    We are currently working on a workaround for apps that need a raw port however we aren't to that point yet hopefully once we are this will be supported.

    What about I2P? It generally wants an exposed port, but I think it can work without. I2P is an anonymity network similar to Tor, but without exits. The i2pd package (the C++ implementation) is best for routers (the I2P name for relays).

  • CaliberNodeCaliberNode Member, Patron Provider

    @forest said:

    @CaliberNode said:

    @forest said:
    You should add Tor (middle relays, bridges, and Snowflake, but not exits of course).

    Thanks for the suggestion and agreed, exits are a hard no for us too.

    We actually looked into the others: middle relays and bridges need a publicly reachable raw port that our managed app platform doesn't expose, and a Snowflake proxy running inside our app containers only comes up as a "restricted" NAT proxy, so it'd be a half-strength contribution at best.

    We are currently working on a workaround for apps that need a raw port however we aren't to that point yet hopefully once we are this will be supported.

    What about I2P? It generally wants an exposed port, but I think it can work without. I2P is an anonymity network similar to Tor, but without exits. The i2pd package (the C++ implementation) is best for routers (the I2P name for relays).

    Same conclusion as the relays, though I think. And you're right it can run without an open port, but then it comes up firewalled and only pulls weight as a limited router. Our managed platform can't give it the inbound reachability a full router wants (published ports are locked to our proxy, and we don't expose UDP at all), so it'd land in the same half-strength spot as Snowflake. I'll have to test it to see but that's what I'm thinking already.

  • CaliberNodeCaliberNode Member, Patron Provider

    @stupidgenius said:
    Favorite app: Syncthing
    INV-000047

    Additional memory added

    Thanked by 1stupidgenius
  • @CaliberNode said: Additional memory added

    Thanks, you read my mind!

Sign In or Register to comment.