All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
How about we (don't) disrupt the ObjectStorage? Announcing > Buckets.Ninja <
servers_guru
Member, Patron Provider
Hello Let!
We are very excited to launch buckets.ninja, a no kyc s3 object storage.
Same philosophy as servers.guru same team, and same company.
Pricing is as follow (prepaid):
more details here: https://buckets.ninja/pricing
I'm posting here first as a sort of soft launch before officially starting to communicate about it.
We have also taken this opportunity to launch a separate billing platform under our company name : moula.world
Bringing both products under one umbrella and straightening our billing security / implementation (as it's now its own platform).
Right now servers.guru still has his own duplicate billing section but it will be stripped once we are sure that everything is working as intended.
You can already login to buckets.ninja with your servers.guru account and use your wallet credit there as well!
Everything is unified, and we are looking to have more kyc free and privacy respecting services in the future with always silly tld 
I'd like to gather any kind of feedback you guys might have, before we start officially communicating.
Feel free to let me know how non disruptive we are!
Thank you for reading
Comments
So since you don't plan to disrupt object storage, i assume you don't plan on distributing pirated software either?
Okay but what is pricing and such, or we suppose to visit website & collect information on our own?
It's €7.99 / TB / month · 1 TB egress included per TB committed
no, that would be too disruptif
You're right, i've added the pricing to the post. Sorry i was thinking more about gathering feedback that actual sales.
Charging for transactions, ewwww
CSAM. Project is dead before even started. GL & HF.
That's definitely a concern. But this is also gonna be the exact same approach we have had with servers.guru for the past 5 years.
We have a no tolerance policy and we have dealt with our fair share of csam reports.
Appropriate actions have always been taken.
Yet another s3
$9/1TB way overpriced for a dead project
Whats you selling point? Bitcoin? Ignore DMCA?
MEGA cheaper and accept crypto, so why this exists
Thank you for the feedback.
We are not positioning as a "low end object storage".
We have a history of providing products for privacy minded people and that is a new addition.
As well as offering a unified wallet and account system for our different products.
We also plan on being sustainable.
One thing is for sure, is that it is certainly not a "dead project".
What is the durability?
So I guess same incompetence of not having IPv6 right?
right on point
Ipv6 have nothing to do with "incompetence".
Thank you for the feedback though.
We'll check, that was the whole point of starting this thread. Figuring out the rough edges.
Also 5m TTL as incompetence is a stretch...
What advantages does this have over Backblaze B2, which has been around for years and has a proven track record? B2 is $6.99/TB, includes up to 3x the stored amount in free egress, and even supports IPv6.
Monero and in general crypto accepted, no kyc. And integration into our existing services (vps, webhosting, dedicated servers) with shared billing platform and shared wallet balance.
And we've also been here for years in the privacy hosting side of things
Does MEGA do real object storage? I thought it was just a file host.
Yea its separate s3 compatible endpoint that isnt "browser e2ee" like the filelocker portion
@servers_guru Do you have any plans on PAYG or lower plan? I would love some prepay balance 10-100GB for backups.. but no plans on needing much egress or 1TB+
Thank you for the suggestion. Not at the moment, that's a bit difficult to price for small commit like that. But I'll keep that in mind
By the way, where is that disruptor bozzo?
probably busy disrupting.
Right here, just an hour ago: https://lowendtalk.com/discussion/comment/4849718/#Comment_4849718
I swear, his site was so flashy it disrupted my monitor worse than unicorn vomit.