Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Server.net
CPLicense.net
VPS Server
Buy VPN
Vultr
VMs for AI
HostDare
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
25% Recurring Discount on NVMe VPS
Try EnsoVPN - Reliable VPN - 1-Day Free Trial
InterServer VPS
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Best VPN
High-Performance Bare Metal Server Solutions
Karvl.com
Server Mania Cloud Hosting
DataWagon Hosting
AlphaVPS Hosting
Evoxt.com
Clouvider
VPS Hosting with NVMe
Residential IPs in the US & 4G Mobile Proxies in EU & US with Unlimited Bandwidth
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
Rabisu - Hosting Solutions
CloudLinux
Try EnsoVPN - Fast & Private VPN - 1-Day Free Trial
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

servaRICA FAT V3 Slices - Same VDS as normal V3 slices with double the ram starting from 5$/m

2»

Comments

  • sanvitsanvit Member

    @servarica_hani said:

    @Arirang said:
    Any plan to do private networking?

    we do it
    open a ticket but it will take few days to be done as we started making them in bulk 1 day of the week instead of when the request come

    Do you support private networking between V2 and V3 slices? And when (if ever) would you support jumbo frames?

  • servarica_haniservarica_hani Member, Patron Provider

    @sanvit said:

    @servarica_hani said:

    @Arirang said:
    Any plan to do private networking?

    we do it
    open a ticket but it will take few days to be done as we started making them in bulk 1 day of the week instead of when the request come

    Do you support private networking between V2 and V3 slices? And when (if ever) would you support jumbo frames?

    yes any vps or server we can do private network
    jumbo frames are enabled from the switched , but i see the team does not create the interface with them
    need to understand a bit the effect of it for customer vm before enabling it

  • fuqetfuqet Member

    Hi, would it be possible to migrate from v2 to v3? Thanks

  • DataRecoveryDataRecovery Member
    edited June 25

    @fuqet said:
    would it be possible to migrate from v2 to v3?

    https://lowendtalk.com/discussion/comment/4815132/#Comment_4815132

    Note that if you have an older V2 plan, it might be worth keeping, as the pricing has changed due to AI shortage.

  • Any updates about add-on hdd block storage?

  • hunohuno Member

    My V2 KVM FAT Slice 2 its down. Only me?

  • servarica_haniservarica_hani Member, Patron Provider

    @huno said:
    My V2 KVM FAT Slice 2 its down. Only me?

    Few of the V2 FAT servers went down while we were force to upgrade all nodes with very little planning due to the new security issues

    at the end we were forced to completely move the data to new servers as we couldnt fix the old servers and the downtime was few hours by then

    the process was extremely painful and took too long for those servers
    at the end all vms are up

    all of this happened while i was sick and I am the only one with access to here to give updates so couldnt do any updates

  • priestpriest Member

    Sorry about the illness.

    I am having fraudcheck issues trying to buy this. Incase you read this up sooner than the ticket, your assistance is needed.

  • user0990user0990 Member

    @servarica_hani Any plans to offer GPU instances (RTX 4090 / 5090) for rent — either hourly/daily or monthly billing? Would be interested if that's on the roadmap.

  • servarica_haniservarica_hani Member, Patron Provider

    @priest said:

    Sorry about the illness.

    I am having fraudcheck issues trying to buy this. Incase you read this up sooner than the ticket, your assistance is needed.

    send me a pm if it is not resolved

  • servarica_haniservarica_hani Member, Patron Provider

    @user0990 said:
    @servarica_hani Any plans to offer GPU instances (RTX 4090 / 5090) for rent — either hourly/daily or monthly billing? Would be interested if that's on the roadmap.

    yes but not soon
    soon we will offer new version of VPS with dedicated GPU
    mostly it will be initially P40 with 24GB Vram
    the plan will be based on KVM with nested virtualization and fast NVMe and AMD EPYC processor

    later depending on how it will be perceived will try to offer more GPU options based on same platform but all the GPUs will be on the cheaper side as those plans are monthly plans and the cost will go up significantly with newer GPUs

    Later (in few months ) will add hourly billing and with it we can add mid tier to even latest gen GPUs
    but this is depending on how the initial plans based on P40 will be perceived

    Thanks

  • @servarica_hani said:

    @user0990 said:
    @servarica_hani Any plans to offer GPU instances (RTX 4090 / 5090) for rent — either hourly/daily or monthly billing? Would be interested if that's on the roadmap.

    yes but not soon
    soon we will offer new version of VPS with dedicated GPU
    mostly it will be initially P40 with 24GB Vram
    the plan will be based on KVM with nested virtualization and fast NVMe and AMD EPYC processor

    later depending on how it will be perceived will try to offer more GPU options based on same platform but all the GPUs will be on the cheaper side as those plans are monthly plans and the cost will go up significantly with newer GPUs

    Later (in few months ) will add hourly billing and with it we can add mid tier to even latest gen GPUs
    but this is depending on how the initial plans based on P40 will be perceived

    Thanks

    Link to the P40?
    Whats the price

  • @johndeo983 said:

    @servarica_hani said:

    @user0990 said:
    @servarica_hani Any plans to offer GPU instances (RTX 4090 / 5090) for rent — either hourly/daily or monthly billing? Would be interested if that's on the roadmap.

    yes but not soon
    soon we will offer new version of VPS with dedicated GPU
    mostly it will be initially P40 with 24GB Vram
    the plan will be based on KVM with nested virtualization and fast NVMe and AMD EPYC processor

    later depending on how it will be perceived will try to offer more GPU options based on same platform but all the GPUs will be on the cheaper side as those plans are monthly plans and the cost will go up significantly with newer GPUs

    Later (in few months ) will add hourly billing and with it we can add mid tier to even latest gen GPUs
    but this is depending on how the initial plans based on P40 will be perceived

    Thanks

    Link to the P40?
    Whats the price

    It's Bee - $79/mo.
    (OOS at the moment)

    Thanked by 1tux
  • Done placing order
    Your Order Number is: 8518201736

  • @techroy23 said:
    Done placing order
    Your Order Number is: 8518201736

    [email protected]:~# curl -sL yabs.sh | bash -s -- -976
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2026-07-24                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Thu Jul 30 02:13:17 UTC 2026
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Uptime     : 0 days, 0 hours, 14 minutes
    Processor  : AMD EPYC 7663 56-Core Processor
    CPU cores  : 12 @ 1996.251 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
    RAM        : 11.7 GiB
    Disk       : 348.6 GiB
    Distro     : Ubuntu 24.04.4 LTS
    Kernel     : 7.1.5-x64v3-xanmod1
    VM Type    : KVM
    IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ❌ Offline
    
    IPv4 Network Information:
    ---------------------------------
    ISP        : Rica Web Services
    ASN        : AS26832 Rica Web Services
    Host       : Rica Web Services
    Location   : Montreal, Quebec (QC)
    Country    : Canada
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/sda1):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 246.96 MB/s  (60.2k) | 2.61 GB/s    (39.8k)
    Write      | 247.61 MB/s  (60.4k) | 2.62 GB/s    (40.0k)
    Total      | 494.58 MB/s (120.7k) | 5.23 GB/s    (79.9k)
               |                      |
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 3.76 GB/s     (7.1k) | 4.42 GB/s     (4.2k)
    Write      | 3.96 GB/s     (7.5k) | 4.71 GB/s     (4.4k)
    Total      | 7.72 GB/s    (14.7k) | 9.13 GB/s     (8.7k)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 244 Mbits/sec   | 248 Mbits/sec   | 111 ms
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 244 Mbits/sec   | 248 Mbits/sec   | 80.4 ms
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 226 Mbits/sec   | 236 Mbits/sec   | 467 ms
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 209 Mbits/sec   | 222 Mbits/sec   | 308 ms
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 243 Mbits/sec   | 249 Mbits/sec   | 71.1 ms
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 258 Mbits/sec   | 256 Mbits/sec   | 95.7 ms
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 235 Mbits/sec   | 244 Mbits/sec   | 138 ms
    
    Geekbench 4 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value
                    |
    Single Core     | 3827
    Multi Core      | 28508
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/19813458
    
    Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value
                    |
    Single Core     | 898
    Multi Core      | 7397
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/24489975
    
    Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value
                    |
    Single Core     | 1379
    Multi Core      | 7431
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/18865069
    
    Geekbench 7 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value
                    |
    Single Core     | 1327
    Multi Core      | 8885
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v7/cpu/59859
    
    
    Thanked by 2sliix servarica_hani
  • techroy23techroy23 Member

    @servarica_hani is the upstream down ? it seems i cant access the site This site can’t be reached clients.servarica.com took too long to respond. ERR_CONNECTION_TIMED_OUT

  • servarica_haniservarica_hani Member, Patron Provider

    @techroy23 said:
    @servarica_hani is the upstream down ? it seems i cant access the site This site can’t be reached clients.servarica.com took too long to respond. ERR_CONNECTION_TIMED_OUT

    no generic issue in the network
    see ms local to your machine
    can you try deleting the cookies and try again
    https://ping.pe/clients.servarica.com

  • techroy23techroy23 Member

    @servarica_hani said:

    @techroy23 said:
    @servarica_hani is the upstream down ? it seems i cant access the site This site can’t be reached clients.servarica.com took too long to respond. ERR_CONNECTION_TIMED_OUT

    no generic issue in the network
    see ms local to your machine
    can you try deleting the cookies and try again
    https://ping.pe/clients.servarica.com

    things i tried ...
    tried chrome/firefox/brave ... - no go.
    used incognito mode of those 3 - no go.
    used my mobile phone to visit clients.servarica.com - no go.

    also check https://status.servarica.com/ and it says Some systems down ... i dunno where to go.

  • techroy23techroy23 Member

    PS also getting this

    Connection failed. FlowSocketConnector: Could not connect to 38.X.X.X, port X. Result: connect(): Windows error 10060: A connection attempt failed because the connected party did not properly respond after a period of time, or established connection failed because connected host has failed to respond. Windows error 10060: A connection attempt failed because the connected party did not properly respond after a period of time, or established connection failed because connected host has failed to respond.

Sign In or Register to comment.