Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Shells Virtual Desktop
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Server.net
CPLicense.net
VPS Server
Buy VPN
Vultr
VMs for AI
HostDare
HostDare
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
25% Recurring Discount on NVMe VPS
InterServer VPS
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Best VPN
High-Performance Bare Metal Server Solutions
Karvl.com
Server Mania Cloud Hosting
DataWagon Hosting
AlphaVPS Hosting
Evoxt.com
Clouvider
VPS Hosting with NVMe
Residential IPs in the US & 4G Mobile Proxies in EU & US with Unlimited Bandwidth
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
Rabisu - Hosting Solutions
CloudLinux
Shells Virtual Desktop
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Quick VPS check scripts: hardware + network + Geekbench

sayyikusayyiku Member

Hey guys 👋

I built a tiny open-source toolkit for quick VPS / server checks. No install, no daemon, run it and you’re done.


What’s inside

  • SICK — hardware overview (CPU, RAM, disks, NICs, etc.)
  • NETS — public iperf3 send/recv samples
  • CPUX — Geekbench 5 / 6 / 7 CPU scores in the terminal
  • menu — pick one of the above interactively

Previews (terminal output)

SICK
piLg2p2kiOocxco5eKzmOreYxcZMbAw0.webp

NETS
NETS preview

CPUX
CPUX preview


Try it

Menu:

curl -sL https://ba.sh/menu | bash

Or run each tool directly:

curl -sL https://ba.sh/sick | bash
curl -sL https://ba.sh/nets | bash
curl -sL https://ba.sh/cpux | bash

Same stuff on the site if you prefer: https://catbash.net/


A note on NETS

For network tests I reuse a bunch of public iperf3 endpoints from various providers (shared nodes — sometimes busy, sometimes fail, that’s normal).

If anyone has more / better / more stable public iperf3 targets to share, I’d love to add them. PRs and tips welcome.


What’s next

Planning a disk I/O test script next, same “one curl and go” style.

Repo again: https://github.com/Yuri-NagaSaki/SICK

Feedback is very welcome — thanks for reading.

Comments

  • rpqurpqu Member

    First

  • bash: line 1: syntax error near unexpected token `newline'
    bash: line 1: `<!DOCTYPE html>'
    

    ur cpux script

  • forestforest Member

    Is it vibe-coded slop?

    What makes it better than YABS beyond displaying a little bit more information about hardware?

  • rpqurpqu Member

    @forest said:
    Is it vibe-coded slop?

    What makes it better than YABS beyond displaying a little bit more information about hardware?

    Can you make better version @forest ? I'm itching to put my IO test... But nobody want to wait half a day for YABS like test

    Thanked by 1ssssteveson
  • forestforest Member

    @rpqu said:

    @forest said:
    Is it vibe-coded slop?

    What makes it better than YABS beyond displaying a little bit more information about hardware?

    Can you make better version @forest ? I'm itching to put my IO test... But nobody want to wait half a day for YABS like test

    Depends on what you want. It's a pretty simple script.

    Btw, YABS just uses existing, 3rd party utilities. If you want to test I/O, check out fio.

  • looks fine <3

  • LeviLevi Member

    The age of TUI :-/ ehhh...

  • @Protocol903 said:

    bash: line 1: syntax error near unexpected token `newline'
    bash: line 1: `<!DOCTYPE html>'
    

    ur cpux script

    yeah skip the ba.sh domain and directly use https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Yuri-NagaSaki/SICK/main/cpux.sh for example

  • routes3eroutes3e Member

    SICK

  • sayyikusayyiku Member
    edited 10:47AM

    @Protocol903 said:

    bash: line 1: syntax error near unexpected token `newline'
    bash: line 1: `<!DOCTYPE html>'
    

    ur cpux script

    I use s.ee to shorten url.

    They do have some limits.

  • sayyikusayyiku Member

    @forest said:
    Is it vibe-coded slop?

    What makes it better than YABS beyond displaying a little bit more information about hardware?

    Not really. YABS hasn't seen much maintenance for a long time, and the Geekbench result display has been broken since Geekbench put the result pages behind Cloudflare.

    I actually like YABS a lot and have used it for years.

    This isn't meant to replace or beat YABS. I just wanted something that fits my own needs, like more detailed hardware detection and more iperf3 locations.

    Thanked by 1forest
  • rpqurpqu Member

    @forest said:

    @rpqu said:

    @forest said:
    Is it vibe-coded slop?

    What makes it better than YABS beyond displaying a little bit more information about hardware?

    Can you make better version @forest ? I'm itching to put my IO test... But nobody want to wait half a day for YABS like test

    Depends on what you want. It's a pretty simple script.

    Btw, YABS just uses existing, 3rd party utilities. If you want to test I/O, check out fio.

    I understand the fio. But, I don't know much about CPU flags

  • forestforest Member
    edited 11:14AM

    @rpqu said:

    @forest said:

    @rpqu said:

    @forest said:
    Is it vibe-coded slop?

    What makes it better than YABS beyond displaying a little bit more information about hardware?

    Can you make better version @forest ? I'm itching to put my IO test... But nobody want to wait half a day for YABS like test

    Depends on what you want. It's a pretty simple script.

    Btw, YABS just uses existing, 3rd party utilities. If you want to test I/O, check out fio.

    I understand the fio. But, I don't know much about CPU flags

    Like you're curious to have YABS that gives more information than just "nested virtualization" and "AES-NI"?

    It would be easy enough for it to display some other useful info that comes from CPUID, like highest level of SIMD (SSE4, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, etc.), current microarchitectural vulnerabilities and whether they're mitigated or not, and the presence of security features like SMAP.

Sign In or Register to comment.