NYC Ryzen 9000 VPS FLASH SALE | 50% OFF | 2GB @ $3/mo | 4GB @ $6/mo | Unmetered BW

Fourplex · July 23

Fourplex Telecom LLC is built on unconventional, innovative thinking. Our team has over a decade of IT and networking experience with a focus on thinking outside the box. In short, Fourplex is designed to get things done.

We at Fourplex have a flash sale for our Ryzen 9000 plans.

Please also read our FAQs and Terms of Service.

Deal

We are giving:

VPS M and larger at 50% off recurring (starting at $3.00/mo)

Hurry, this promotion is only valid for the first 100 uses.

Ryzen VPS Plans

Plan	Cores	RAM	Storage	Regular Price	Promo Price	Order Link
VPS M	2 9900X	2GB	20GB NVMe	$6.00/mo	$3.00/mo	Order Now
VPS L	2 9900X	4GB	40GB NVMe	$12.00/mo	$6.00/mo	Order Now

We also have other plans. Use the coupon code CODE_C4a.

Note: the VPS S plan does not qualify for this promotion.

Node Specs

Ryzen 9000

AMD Ryzen 9900X - 12-core CPU
256GB (4x64GB) DDR5 RAM
2x4TB NVMe SSD (RAID 1)
10 Gigabit NIC

Datacenter Specs

Datacenter: Metanet NYC (Cogent/GTT upstream)
IPv4: 147.90.234.1
IPv6: 2602:f6f6:1::1

Why Fourplex?

Unmetered Bandwidth
10 Gigabit Network
NYC Location
Tor Exit-friendly
Excellent support

rpqu · July 23

First

vweiguang · July 23

2

mjjshow · July 23

3

gijia · July 23

High-performance VPS

Congratulations on your great sales!

tzuli · July 23

It seems odd that L is double the price for the exact same CPU and networking config

timmmy · July 23

Why Fourplex?

we are shady
we game the system by rigging our giveaways

https://lowendtalk.com/discussion/comment/4721648/#Comment_4721648

memok · July 23

yabs ?
and Storage VPS promotion ?

Fourplex · July 23

@memok said:
yabs ?
and Storage VPS promotion ?

At the moment, not on LET due to capacity issues.

EDIT: you can PM me and I can set you up for storage.

tanto · July 23

yabs ?

Fourplex · July 23

@tanto said:
yabs ?

YABS are (on VPS XL):

# ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
#              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
#                     v2026-07-03                    #
# https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
# ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
Thu Jul 23 09:36:02 AM EDT 2026
Basic System Information:
---------------------------------
Uptime     : 1 days, 22 hours, 31 minutes
Processor  : AMD Ryzen 9 9900X 12-Core Processor
CPU cores  : 4 @ 4391.728 MHz
AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
RAM        : 7.5 GiB
Swap       : 0.0 KiB
Disk       : 79.9 GiB
Distro     : Rocky Linux 10.1 (Red Quartz)
Kernel     : 6.12.0-124.55.1.el10_1.x86_64
VM Type    : KVM
IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ✔ Online
IPv6 Network Information:
---------------------------------
ISP        : Fourplex Telecom LLC
ASN        : AS27284 Fourplex Telecom LLC
Host       : Fourplex Telecom LLC
Location   : Secaucus, New Jersey (NJ)
Country    : United States
fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/vda2):
---------------------------------
Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
Read       | 409.59 MB/s  (99.9k) | 1.48 GB/s    (22.6k)
Write      | 410.67 MB/s (100.2k) | 1.49 GB/s    (22.7k)
Total      | 820.27 MB/s (200.2k) | 2.97 GB/s    (45.4k)
           |                      |
Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
Read       | 1.13 GB/s     (2.1k) | 566.28 MB/s    (540)
Write      | 1.19 GB/s     (2.2k) | 604.00 MB/s    (576)
Total      | 2.32 GB/s     (4.4k) | 1.17 GB/s     (1.1k)
iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
---------------------------------
Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
-----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 2.38 Gbits/sec  | 2.63 Gbits/sec  | 69.5 ms
Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 1.64 Gbits/sec  | 3.43 Gbits/sec  | 75.6 ms
Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 3.03 Gbits/sec  | 1.26 Gbits/sec  | 161 ms
Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 841 Mbits/sec   | 1.03 Gbits/sec  | 222 ms
Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 2.16 Gbits/sec  | 2.32 Gbits/sec  | 54.8 ms
Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 4.08 Gbits/sec  | 4.85 Gbits/sec  | 1.49 ms
Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 944 Mbits/sec   | 2.08 Gbits/sec  | 110 ms
iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
---------------------------------
Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
-----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 1.50 Gbits/sec  | 2.94 Gbits/sec  | 69.5 ms
Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 1.40 Gbits/sec  | 3.36 Gbits/sec  | 74.1 ms
Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 569 Mbits/sec   | 1.18 Gbits/sec  | 159 ms
Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 514 Mbits/sec   | 980 Mbits/sec   | --
Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 1.47 Gbits/sec  | 3.40 Gbits/sec  | 54.9 ms
Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 2.96 Gbits/sec  | 4.78 Gbits/sec  | 1.47 ms
Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 900 Mbits/sec   | 2.28 Gbits/sec  | 110 ms
Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
Test            | Value
                |
Single Core     | 2663
Multi Core      | 7511
Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/18801928
YABS completed in 11 min 46 sec

EDIT: Fix formatting, I did it on my phone.

cloromorpho · July 23

Ahh i see they are now unbanned and with patron provider tags...

Glws?

timmmy · July 23

@cloromorpho said:
Ahh i see they are now unbanned and with patron provider tags...

Glws?

sleazy providers such as @fourplex should be perma banned...but i think biloh bucks talks

taizi · July 23

can anyone remind me what happen of this provider?

timmmy · July 23

@taizi said:
can anyone remind me what happen of this provider?

let @fourplex tell us...and lets see if he will tell the truth

asen888 · July 23

Who can tell me about the stability of this service provider? I'm quite interested in their unlimited data plan

gbzret4d · July 23

@timmmy said:

@taizi said:
can anyone remind me what happen of this provider?

let @fourplex tell us...and lets see if he will tell the truth

@Fourplex what happened?

Fourplex · July 25

@gbzret4d said:

@timmmy said:

@taizi said:
can anyone remind me what happen of this provider?

let @fourplex tell us...and lets see if he will tell the truth

@Fourplex what happened?

When we were starting out, we massively mishandled our offer threads. This led to basically unsustainable offers for both us and customers. In fact, our old offers were never profitable.

We got customers who only used service us for 3 or 4 months and then left. IPv4 and PayPal fees meant a $3.50/mo VPS customer plus "credit boosts" (often being your bill times four) would never break even. It should've been obvious it was ripe for abuse.

It was probably the biggest mistake we made. And I'll admit: the ban was the correct thing at the time. The time away also helped us restructure our business model and reach profitability.

We have since substantially revamped our policies and business, which is partially why we're profitable. Yes, we noticed a discrepancy back in December. But by the time we tried to fix it the tag was suspended.

Now, we offer sustainable, high-quality services without gimmicky offers. This means no more "scammy" giveaways and "credit boosts" or bumping, only brutally honest VPS hosting.

EDIT: Fix typo.

forest · July 25

@Fourplex Do you have a local DNS recursive resolver on your node? Tor exits benefit significantly from that because they do not need to use a centralized upstream nameserver like Google DNS.

If you do, I'll buy a VPS M and run an exit on it.

Fourplex · July 25

@forest said:
@Fourplex Do you have a local DNS recursive resolver on your node? Tor exits benefit significantly from that because they do not need to use a centralized upstream nameserver like Google DNS.

If you do, I'll buy a VPS M and run an exit on it.

Unfortunately, we do not have a local DNS resolver.

However, I do recommend running a local DNS on your VPS for an exit relay. You can also forward to Hurricane Electric (74.82.42.42) if you don't want to use Google/Cloudflare.

forest · July 25

@Fourplex said: However, I do recommend running a local DNS on your VPS for an exit relay.

The problem is that many nameservers block Tor, so I'd need a separate IPv4 for that. If you ever do want to run a resolver, all you'd need is Unbound and something like this in /etc/unbound/unbound.conf:

server:
        outgoing-interface: <some clean IP>
        do-ip6: no
        rrset-cache-size: 256m
        msg-cache-size: 128m
        neg-cache-size: 32m
        cache-min-ttl: 300
        prefetch: yes
        prefetch-key: yes
        interface: 127.0.0.1
        interface: <the node's gateway IP>
        access-control: 127.0.0.1/32 allow
        access-control: <the node's gateway IP>/32 allow
        auto-trust-anchor-file: "/var/lib/unbound/root.key"

auth-zone:
        name: "."
        master: f.root-servers.net
        master: k.root-servers.net
        master: l.root-servers.net
        master: j.root-servers.net
        fallback-enabled: yes
        for-downstream: no
        for-upstream: yes
        zonefile: "/var/lib/unbound/root.zone"

Does your upstream operate its own DNS resolver (just one hop from your gateway to it)?

tzuli · July 25

@forest said:

The problem is that many nameservers block Tor, so I'd need a separate IPv4 for that.

Couldn't you run unbound and proxy/PBR its requests through a "clean" IP?

If you want to avoid adding dependencies/complexity I would understand. But I'd think it might be worth it to have control over your own resolver (and local cache)

forest · July 25

@tzuli said: Couldn't you run unbound and proxy/PBR its requests through a "clean" IP?

Yep, but that would require buying an extra IPv4. I do that for some services (5 of them so far). I couldn't just use a regular proxy ten hops away because the point is to reduce the amount of exposure from unencrypted requests.

tzuli · July 25

@forest said:

@tzuli said: Couldn't you run unbound and proxy/PBR its requests through a "clean" IP?

Yep, but that would require buying an extra IPv4. I do that for some services (5 of them so far). I couldn't just use a regular proxy ten hops away because the point is to reduce the amount of exposure from unencrypted requests.

I was imagining something like an encrypted VPN to some clean IP and routing DNS through that tunnel. SNAT at the clean IP

It would increase latency, but for Tor I'm guessing that the majority of requests would be cached

Obviously requires another machine but maybe you already have one

forest · July 25

@tzuli said:

@forest said:

@tzuli said: Couldn't you run unbound and proxy/PBR its requests through a "clean" IP?

Yep, but that would require buying an extra IPv4. I do that for some services (5 of them so far). I couldn't just use a regular proxy ten hops away because the point is to reduce the amount of exposure from unencrypted requests.

I was imagining something like an encrypted VPN to some clean IP and routing DNS through that tunnel. SNAT at the clean IP

It would increase latency, but for Tor I'm guessing that the majority of requests would be cached

Obviously requires another machine but maybe you already have one

If I go that route, I could just run another resolver on one of my existing servers that does have a clean IP and set up a DoT server on it, but latency really is a problem, and surprisingly almost all lookups are cache misses due to the great variety of queries. It's pretty latency sensitive, especially when doing DNSSEC validation of a domain on the other side of the world.

tzuli · July 25

@forest said:

@tzuli said:

@forest said:

@tzuli said: Couldn't you run unbound and proxy/PBR its requests through a "clean" IP?

Yep, but that would require buying an extra IPv4. I do that for some services (5 of them so far). I couldn't just use a regular proxy ten hops away because the point is to reduce the amount of exposure from unencrypted requests.

I was imagining something like an encrypted VPN to some clean IP and routing DNS through that tunnel. SNAT at the clean IP

It would increase latency, but for Tor I'm guessing that the majority of requests would be cached

Obviously requires another machine but maybe you already have one

If I go that route, I could just run another resolver on one of my existing servers that does have a clean IP and set up a DoT server on it, but latency really is a problem, and surprisingly almost all lookups are cache misses due to the great variety of queries. It's pretty latency sensitive, especially when doing DNSSEC validation of a domain on the other side of the world.

Yeah I don't know why I suggested NAT instead of running another resolver. I wanted to correct myself but you were too quick 😄

Have you tested with your own resolver? Are you sure the majority are misses because of the actual uniqueness/TTL of domains rather than the cache's tuning?

forest · July 25

@tzuli said: Have you tested with your own resolver? Are you sure the majority are misses because of the actual uniqueness/TTL of domains rather than the cache's tuning?

I use my own resolver on 5 of my relays (they have a second, clean IPv4). I set the min TTL to 300 seconds and set the cache to 256 MiB (and the negative cache to 32 MiB, since there are lots of NXDOMAINs being returned). I also enable prefetch to renew popular lookups that are about to expire. Cache hit rate is always very low. It helps, but not a ton.

user0990 · July 25

Hi all,

Posting here because support has gone quiet on ticket #IJI-866882 — only my own outgoing messages are showing, no replies from their side for a while now.

Quick summary: purchased two VPS instances less than 24 hours ago, both had a connectivity issue specific to routing from Russian residential networks (confirmed via tcpdump — traffic reaches the server fine from other datacenters, including one in Moscow, but not from my home ISP). I asked them to either move one of the servers to a different subnet, or refund both since they couldn't be used for their intended purpose within the 24-hour window.

I explicitly asked them not to delete or reprovision the second server until we agreed on a resolution. It's now been closed/cancelled anyway, without a reply.

Not asking for public drama — just hoping someone from Fourplex sees this and picks the ticket back up. At this point I'd take either a refund or account credit, just need someone to actually respond.

Ticket: #IJI-866882

Thanks.

Fourplex · July 25

@user0990 said:
Hi all,

Posting here because support has gone quiet on ticket #IJI-866882 — only my own outgoing messages are showing, no replies from their side for a while now.

Quick summary: purchased two VPS instances less than 24 hours ago, both had a connectivity issue specific to routing from Russian residential networks (confirmed via tcpdump — traffic reaches the server fine from other datacenters, including one in Moscow, but not from my home ISP). I asked them to either move one of the servers to a different subnet, or refund both since they couldn't be used for their intended purpose within the 24-hour window.

I explicitly asked them not to delete or reprovision the second server until we agreed on a resolution. It's now been closed/cancelled anyway, without a reply.

Not asking for public drama — just hoping someone from Fourplex sees this and picks the ticket back up. At this point I'd take either a refund or account credit, just need someone to actually respond.

Ticket: #IJI-866882

Thanks.

I have changed your IP address. It's just that being a small business, we operate on EST/EDT daytime hours.

zed · July 25

@Fourplex said:

@gbzret4d said:

@timmmy said:

@taizi said:
can anyone remind me what happen of this provider?

let @fourplex tell us...and lets see if he will tell the truth

@Fourplex what happened?

When we were starting out, we massively mishandled our offer threads. This led to basically unsustainable offers for both us and customers. In fact, our old offers were never profitable.

We got customers who only used service us for 3 or 4 months and then left. IPv4 and PayPal fees meant a $3.50/mo VPS customer plus "credit boosts" (often being your bill times four) would never break even. It should've been obvious it was ripe for abuse.

It was probably the biggest mistake we made. And I'll admit: the ban was the correct thing at the time. The time away also helped us restructure our business model and reach profitability.

We have since substantially revamped our policies and business, which is partially why we're profitable. Yes, we noticed a discrepancy back in December. But by the time we tried to fix it the tag was suspended.

Now, we offer sustainable, high-quality services without gimmicky offers. This means no more "scammy" giveaways and "credit boosts" or bumping, only brutally honest VPS hosting.

EDIT: Fix typo.

i thought you lost your tag for winning your own giveaways?

timmmy · July 25

@zed said:

@Fourplex said:

@gbzret4d said:

@timmmy said:

@taizi said:
can anyone remind me what happen of this provider?

let @fourplex tell us...and lets see if he will tell the truth

@Fourplex what happened?

When we were starting out, we massively mishandled our offer threads. This led to basically unsustainable offers for both us and customers. In fact, our old offers were never profitable.

We got customers who only used service us for 3 or 4 months and then left. IPv4 and PayPal fees meant a $3.50/mo VPS customer plus "credit boosts" (often being your bill times four) would never break even. It should've been obvious it was ripe for abuse.

It was probably the biggest mistake we made. And I'll admit: the ban was the correct thing at the time. The time away also helped us restructure our business model and reach profitability.

We have since substantially revamped our policies and business, which is partially why we're profitable. Yes, we noticed a discrepancy back in December. But by the time we tried to fix it the tag was suspended.

Now, we offer sustainable, high-quality services without gimmicky offers. This means no more "scammy" giveaways and "credit boosts" or bumping, only brutally honest VPS hosting.

EDIT: Fix typo.

i thought you lost your tag for winning your own giveaways?

he admitted before and deleted it...but people already saw what he wrote...and no one should trust a provider with this behavior

Howdy, Stranger!

Categories

In this Discussion

NYC Ryzen 9000 VPS FLASH SALE | 50% OFF | 2GB @ $3/mo | 4GB @ $6/mo | Unmetered BW

Deal

Ryzen VPS Plans

Node Specs

Ryzen 9000

Datacenter Specs

Why Fourplex?

Comments

Howdy, Stranger!

Quick Links

Categories

In this Discussion

NYC Ryzen 9000 VPS FLASH SALE | 50% OFF | 2GB @ $3/mo | 4GB @ $6/mo | Unmetered BW

Deal

Ryzen VPS Plans

Node Specs

Ryzen 9000

Datacenter Specs

Why Fourplex?

Comments