Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Shells Virtual Desktop
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Server.net
CPLicense.net
VPS Server
Buy VPN
Vultr
VMs for AI
HostDare
HostDare
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
InterServer VPS
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Best VPN
High-Performance Bare Metal Server Solutions
Karvl.com
Server Mania Cloud Hosting
DataWagon Hosting
AlphaVPS Hosting
Evoxt.com
Clouvider
VPS Hosting with NVMe
Residential IPs in the US & 4G Mobile Proxies in EU & US with Unlimited Bandwidth
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
Rabisu - Hosting Solutions
Shells Virtual Desktop
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

VSCode Remote Development extension

noamannoaman Member

I wanted to do development on the remote machines and vscode-server or SSHFS/NFS wasn't just good enough and fast enough so I ended up writing this. The main sluggishness was search text in files which is a feature that I use alot in my development workflow.

https://github.com/noamanahmed/vscode-remote-server-project

The daemon is written in python and a vscode extension. You can download the vscode extension from the releases and then just follow the instructions to connect to the server.

You can also spawn a new terminal and it would proxy it using RPC over websockets.

The only thing pending from this is that claude,codex and other AI vscode extensions spawn there own shell and cannot run commands on the remote server using the terminal which I have created.

It's alpine/debian both compatible.

Looking forward to your suggestions.

Comments

  • Isn't this exactly what remote explorer is for?

    Thanked by 1Peppery9
  • edited June 12

    Why not just use some remote desktop solution? At least to me that seems to be more straight forward then trying to proxy a single application to a remote host.

    Thanked by 1PolyAnthi
  • SplitIceSplitIce Member, Host Rep

    code-server also works well if you want to run the whole VSCode including extensions remotely.

    Thanked by 1plumberg
  • plumbergplumberg Veteran, Megathread Squad

    @SplitIce said:
    code-server also works well if you want to run the whole VSCode including extensions remotely.

    +1000000 for code-server

    Its 🐐

    Thanked by 1buggedout
  • SplitIceSplitIce Member, Host Rep

    @plumberg said:

    @SplitIce said:
    code-server also works well if you want to run the whole VSCode including extensions remotely.

    +1000000 for code-server

    Its 🐐

    My only problem with code-server is that I get chrome breakpoint exceptions on a seemingly increasing basis recently. Not sure if its a new version bug or a chrome bug or what. If it wasnt for that it would be perfect.

    Thanked by 1plumberg
  • BlaZeBlaZe Member, Host Rep

    I use code-server for this exact purpose. Coding from anywhere ;)

    Thanked by 1plumberg
  • plumbergplumberg Veteran, Megathread Squad

    @SplitIce said:

    @plumberg said:

    @SplitIce said:
    code-server also works well if you want to run the whole VSCode including extensions remotely.

    +1000000 for code-server

    Its 🐐

    My only problem with code-server is that I get chrome breakpoint exceptions on a seemingly increasing basis recently. Not sure if its a new version bug or a chrome bug or what. If it wasnt for that it would be perfect.

    I do mainly API stuff and leave frontal to AI... so could be a recent issue? I know they are super active and if you raise an issue it could be solved soon.

  • noamannoaman Member

    Guys who are using code server should try search text in files over the whole code base and you would definitely feel the difference.

  • noamannoaman Member

    @totally_not_banned said:
    Why not just use some remote desktop solution? At least to me that seems to be more straight forward then trying to proxy a single application to a remote host.

    We don't need the complete mirroring TBH only the operations.

    Its just waste of resources.

  • @noaman said:

    @totally_not_banned said:
    Why not just use some remote desktop solution? At least to me that seems to be more straight forward then trying to proxy a single application to a remote host.

    We don't need the complete mirroring TBH only the operations.

    Its just waste of resources.

    Maybe but using your time to figure something out that could also just be completely straight forward could be a waste of resources too ;)

Sign In or Register to comment.