looking for high ram vps or request for Berohost high ram deal

mans_xd · June 14

Hi, long time no see

i would like to take any Berohost deal with high ram +20G ram on monthly plan ( only)

if i didn't get i would like to get from other provider as well

1: location: anywhere in germany or other eu

my requirements are:
2: +20G ram
3: 6-4 vcore
I would like it Amd EYPC milan, no need for any more modern cpu, i don't need that much performance +1200-1600 single core

4: storage 50G is sufficient
5: 1G port or any higher shared one
5Tb bandwidth in+out or

just note: my main use os is windows server if provider doesn't support, i can install it my self

can you verify if you have tos against install windows server in your servers? ( i have faced that before so i asked here too)

i wouldn't even hit + 40% of cpu in peak time, only focus in high ram

😆 budget: never mind it please offer something cheap but not too so we don't get deadpool

beanman109 · June 14

glws

TimboJones · June 14

Step 1. Go to Berohost website
Step 2. Order desired package.

mans_xd · June 14

@TimboJones said:
Step 1. Go to Berohost website
Step 2. Order desired package.

step 3. read the thread
step 4. so poor that i'm looking for one of last two deals
step 5. sleep

concept · June 14

@PacketsDecreaser
EPYC Special M
3 EPYC Cores
20GB Ram
100GB SSD
30TB BW
€8.00/m

https://lowendtalk.com/discussion/216579/epyc-and-storage-vps-frankfurt-equinix-fr7-10gbps-20gb-ram-for-8/p1

Maybe they can add in an extra core to make it 4.

mans_xd · 8:51AM

up

mans_xd · 8:53AM

other europe country are welcome 😆

tushaar · 9:23AM

You may want to contact @labze. If they have spare resources available on one of their older nodes, they might be able to arrange a VPS plan that fits your budget.

@layer7 is also a good option. They currently offer 4C / 24GB RAM / 120GB NVMe for €8.07/month.

You can also reach out to @gatewaysentryllc regarding a custom VPS/VDS plan. They are usually open to discussing custom configurations.

You can also try @bero-host. Andreas is very helpful and may be able to arrange something if you're willing to pre-pay annually.

mans_xd · 9:46AM

@tushaar said:
You may want to contact @labze. If they have spare resources available on one of their older nodes, they might be able to arrange a VPS plan that fits your budget.

i just request a refund from hostbrr i get Ridiculous benchmark on the vps and it's take 40m to run yabs without iperf3

6 vCore AMD EPYC 9004 CPU
12 GB DDR5 ECC RAM
120 GB NVMe SSD Storage
10000 GB Bandwidth @ 10 Gbps
```
root@unfit-guest:~# curl -sL yabs.sh | bash -s -- -i

## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ##

Yet-Another-Bench-Script

v2026-05-11

https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script

## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ##

Mon Jun 15 09:26:28 BST 2026

Basic System Information:

Uptime : 0 days, 0 hours, 23 minutes
Processor : AMD EPYC 9534 64-Core Processor
CPU cores : 6 @ 2446.322 MHz
AES-NI : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
RAM : 11.6 GiB
Swap : 0.0 KiB
Disk : 116.2 GiB
Distro : Ubuntu 24.04.4 LTS
Kernel : 6.8.0-35-generic
VM Type : KVM
IPv4/IPv6 : ✔ Online / ❌ Offline

IPv4 Network Information:

ISP : Philip Fjaera trading as PFWeb Solutions
ASN : AS214902 Philip Fjaera trading as PFWeb Solutions
Host : noezIplease
Location : Bad Soden am Taunus, Hesse (HE)
Country : Germany

fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/sda1):

Block Size	4k (IOPS)	64k (IOPS)
Read	10.09 MB/s (2.5k)	227.08 MB/s (3.5k)
Write	10.13 MB/s (2.5k)	228.27 MB/s (3.5k)
Total	20.23 MB/s (5.0k)	455.35 MB/s (7.1k)

Block Size	512k (IOPS)	1m (IOPS)
------	--- ----	---- ----
Read	267.95 MB/s (523)	629.71 MB/s (614)
Write	282.19 MB/s (551)	671.65 MB/s (655)
Total	550.14 MB/s (1.0k)	1.30 GB/s (1.2k)

Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:

```

@tushaar said:
@layer7 is also a good option. They currently offer 4C / 24GB RAM / 120GB NVMe for €8.07/month.

i'm currently consider layer7 already a customer

@tushaar said:
You can also reach out to @gatewaysentryllc regarding a custom VPS/VDS plan. They are usually open to discussing custom configurations.

low traffic and high cost of extra bandwidth and high performance vps isn't what I need i would could look for older gen to save some costs

@tushaar said:

You can also try @bero-host. Andreas is very helpful and may be able to arrange something if you're willing to pre-pay annually.

thanks for reminder me to do that, i have already done that before but it didn't get to my mind at all

gatewaysentryllc · 1:32PM

@tushaar said:
You may want to contact @labze. If they have spare resources available on one of their older nodes, they might be able to arrange a VPS plan that fits your budget.

@layer7 is also a good option. They currently offer 4C / 24GB RAM / 120GB NVMe for €8.07/month.

You can also reach out to @gatewaysentryllc regarding a custom VPS/VDS plan. They are usually open to discussing custom configurations.

You can also try @bero-host. Andreas is very helpful and may be able to arrange something if you're willing to pre-pay annually.

Thank you for bump.

Protocol903 · 3:03PM

@mans_xd said: Full Test | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/18361822

OUCH. I used to have a 16G4C chicken from them a while ago and man this is really bad. They used to be good, infact best back in the day.

That said, storage box is still solid 10/10.

labze · 3:35PM

@Protocol903 said:

@mans_xd said: Full Test | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/18361822

OUCH. I used to have a 16G4C chicken from them a while ago and man this is really bad. They used to be good, infact best back in the day.

That said, storage box is still solid 10/10.

Can't really say much about the benchmark, it is a moments picture.

The person wanted the service canceled without further investigation so it was canceled. It is not the expected performance and initial tests does not replicate this.

mans_xd · 3:38PM

@labze said:

@Protocol903 said:

@mans_xd said: Full Test | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/18361822

OUCH. I used to have a 16G4C chicken from them a while ago and man this is really bad. They used to be good, infact best back in the day.

That said, storage box is still solid 10/10.

Can't really say much about the benchmark, it is a moments picture.

The person wanted the service canceled without further investigation so it was canceled. It is not the expected performance and initial tests does not replicate this.

can't really say much i said no fix and refund only so my comment not full honest comment

but first impression is a bit better for me
thanks anyway

sillycat · 8:00PM

@labze said:

@Protocol903 said:

@mans_xd said: Full Test | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/18361822

OUCH. I used to have a 16G4C chicken from them a while ago and man this is really bad. They used to be good, infact best back in the day.

That said, storage box is still solid 10/10.

Can't really say much about the benchmark, it is a moments picture.

The person wanted the service canceled without further investigation so it was canceled. It is not the expected performance and initial tests does not replicate this.

I took 6 pictures, 1 picture looked good. I'm a photographer now.

mans_xd · 8:00PM

@sillycat said:

@labze said:

@Protocol903 said:

@mans_xd said: Full Test | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/18361822

OUCH. I used to have a 16G4C chicken from them a while ago and man this is really bad. They used to be good, infact best back in the day.

That said, storage box is still solid 10/10.

Can't really say much about the benchmark, it is a moments picture.

The person wanted the service canceled without further investigation so it was canceled. It is not the expected performance and initial tests does not replicate this.

I took 6 pictures, 1 picture looked good. I'm a photographer now.

silly cat is being silly

TimboJones · 8:54PM

@mans_xd said:

@labze said:

@Protocol903 said:

@mans_xd said: Full Test | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/18361822

OUCH. I used to have a 16G4C chicken from them a while ago and man this is really bad. They used to be good, infact best back in the day.

That said, storage box is still solid 10/10.

Can't really say much about the benchmark, it is a moments picture.

The person wanted the service canceled without further investigation so it was canceled. It is not the expected performance and initial tests does not replicate this.

can't really say much i said no fix and refund only so my comment not full honest comment

but first impression is a bit better for me
thanks anyway

The problem is that the issue is clearly with the yabs script, not the server. Happens on my home VPS' of late.

https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script/issues/124

So it's good for Hostbrr you got refunded, you're not an admin and you'll drain support resources.

mans_xd · 9:10PM

@TimboJones said:

@mans_xd said:

@labze said:

@Protocol903 said:

@mans_xd said: Full Test | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/18361822

OUCH. I used to have a 16G4C chicken from them a while ago and man this is really bad. They used to be good, infact best back in the day.

That said, storage box is still solid 10/10.

Can't really say much about the benchmark, it is a moments picture.

The person wanted the service canceled without further investigation so it was canceled. It is not the expected performance and initial tests does not replicate this.

can't really say much i said no fix and refund only so my comment not full honest comment

but first impression is a bit better for me
thanks anyway

So it's good for Hostbrr you got refunded, you're not an admin and you'll drain support resources.

lmafo i'm not that kidoo i didn't test only on linux but with windows and user experience with me wasn't what i expected from the space so i request a normal refund within 3hours

not to mention i have service from hostbrr back in 2023 and in my last thread i say only good words about them

don't be silly i also checked yabs github to see any problems after that test and in issues there a couple of people take about GB6 and score problem and find alternative etc, i don't see any technical issues report for last days

not to mention i also have anther vps from other provider and run the same test and complete it within 5minutes

i don't blam hostbrr or said anything rather than i don't get first good impression didn't even post anything until someone recommended it

here is a my ticket 2 years ago in same situation

the only one wasted his time is you actually i won't even bother to typ all this comment if i didn't finish my finals

TimboJones · 10:03PM

@mans_xd said:

@TimboJones said:

@mans_xd said:

@labze said:

@Protocol903 said:

@mans_xd said: Full Test | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/18361822

OUCH. I used to have a 16G4C chicken from them a while ago and man this is really bad. They used to be good, infact best back in the day.

That said, storage box is still solid 10/10.

Can't really say much about the benchmark, it is a moments picture.

The person wanted the service canceled without further investigation so it was canceled. It is not the expected performance and initial tests does not replicate this.

can't really say much i said no fix and refund only so my comment not full honest comment

but first impression is a bit better for me
thanks anyway

So it's good for Hostbrr you got refunded, you're not an admin and you'll drain support resources.

lmafo i'm not that kidoo i didn't test only on linux but with windows and user experience with me wasn't what i expected from the space so i request a normal refund within 3hours

not to mention i have service from hostbrr back in 2023 and in my last thread i say only good words about them

don't be silly i also checked yabs github to see any problems after that test and in issues there a couple of people take about GB6 and score problem and find alternative etc, i don't see any technical issues report for last days

not to mention i also have anther vps from other provider and run the same test and complete it within 5minutes

i don't blam hostbrr or said anything rather than i don't get first good impression didn't even post anything until someone recommended it

here is a my ticket 2 years ago in same situation

the only one wasted his time is you actually i won't even bother to typ all this comment if i didn't finish my finals

That's a lot of words to lie about doing additional troubleshooting. But whatever, provider gains in the end.

mans_xd · 10:23PM

@TimboJones said:

@mans_xd said:

@TimboJones said:

@mans_xd said:

@labze said:

@Protocol903 said:

@mans_xd said: Full Test | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/18361822

OUCH. I used to have a 16G4C chicken from them a while ago and man this is really bad. They used to be good, infact best back in the day.

That said, storage box is still solid 10/10.

Can't really say much about the benchmark, it is a moments picture.

The person wanted the service canceled without further investigation so it was canceled. It is not the expected performance and initial tests does not replicate this.

can't really say much i said no fix and refund only so my comment not full honest comment

but first impression is a bit better for me
thanks anyway

So it's good for Hostbrr you got refunded, you're not an admin and you'll drain support resources.

lmafo i'm not that kidoo i didn't test only on linux but with windows and user experience with me wasn't what i expected from the space so i request a normal refund within 3hours

not to mention i have service from hostbrr back in 2023 and in my last thread i say only good words about them

don't be silly i also checked yabs github to see any problems after that test and in issues there a couple of people take about GB6 and score problem and find alternative etc, i don't see any technical issues report for last days

not to mention i also have anther vps from other provider and run the same test and complete it within 5minutes

i don't blam hostbrr or said anything rather than i don't get first good impression didn't even post anything until someone recommended it

here is a my ticket 2 years ago in same situation

the only one wasted his time is you actually i won't even bother to typ all this comment if i didn't finish my finals

That's a lot of words to lie about doing additional troubleshooting. But whatever, provider gains in the end.

body i feel so retarded for you, i didn't waste any time of provider it was two comments after testing i request refund and one reply that service cancled and refunded

like any provider give 24-72h money back and nothing more

and still you dont even know what's going on and still claim that i lie, even labze said the same i say

TimboJones · 10:28PM

@mans_xd said:

@TimboJones said:

@mans_xd said:

@TimboJones said:

@mans_xd said:

@labze said:

@Protocol903 said:

@mans_xd said: Full Test | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/18361822

OUCH. I used to have a 16G4C chicken from them a while ago and man this is really bad. They used to be good, infact best back in the day.

That said, storage box is still solid 10/10.

Can't really say much about the benchmark, it is a moments picture.

The person wanted the service canceled without further investigation so it was canceled. It is not the expected performance and initial tests does not replicate this.

can't really say much i said no fix and refund only so my comment not full honest comment

but first impression is a bit better for me
thanks anyway

So it's good for Hostbrr you got refunded, you're not an admin and you'll drain support resources.

lmafo i'm not that kidoo i didn't test only on linux but with windows and user experience with me wasn't what i expected from the space so i request a normal refund within 3hours

not to mention i have service from hostbrr back in 2023 and in my last thread i say only good words about them

don't be silly i also checked yabs github to see any problems after that test and in issues there a couple of people take about GB6 and score problem and find alternative etc, i don't see any technical issues report for last days

not to mention i also have anther vps from other provider and run the same test and complete it within 5minutes

i don't blam hostbrr or said anything rather than i don't get first good impression didn't even post anything until someone recommended it

here is a my ticket 2 years ago in same situation

the only one wasted his time is you actually i won't even bother to typ all this comment if i didn't finish my finals

That's a lot of words to lie about doing additional troubleshooting. But whatever, provider gains in the end.

body i feel so retarded for you, i didn't waste any time of provider it was two comments after testing i request refund and one reply that service cancled and refunded

like any provider give 24-72h money back and nothing more

and still you dont even know what's going on and still claim that i lie, even labze said the same i say

He didn't, you moron. He said:

initial tests does not replicate this.

He explicitly disagreed and didn't argue with you because you were a waste of time.

mans_xd · 10:32PM

@TimboJones said:

@mans_xd said:

@TimboJones said:

@mans_xd said:

@TimboJones said:

@mans_xd said:

@labze said:

@Protocol903 said:

@mans_xd said: Full Test | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/18361822

OUCH. I used to have a 16G4C chicken from them a while ago and man this is really bad. They used to be good, infact best back in the day.

That said, storage box is still solid 10/10.

Can't really say much about the benchmark, it is a moments picture.

The person wanted the service canceled without further investigation so it was canceled. It is not the expected performance and initial tests does not replicate this.

can't really say much i said no fix and refund only so my comment not full honest comment

but first impression is a bit better for me
thanks anyway

So it's good for Hostbrr you got refunded, you're not an admin and you'll drain support resources.

lmafo i'm not that kidoo i didn't test only on linux but with windows and user experience with me wasn't what i expected from the space so i request a normal refund within 3hours

not to mention i have service from hostbrr back in 2023 and in my last thread i say only good words about them

don't be silly i also checked yabs github to see any problems after that test and in issues there a couple of people take about GB6 and score problem and find alternative etc, i don't see any technical issues report for last days

not to mention i also have anther vps from other provider and run the same test and complete it within 5minutes

i don't blam hostbrr or said anything rather than i don't get first good impression didn't even post anything until someone recommended it

here is a my ticket 2 years ago in same situation

the only one wasted his time is you actually i won't even bother to typ all this comment if i didn't finish my finals

That's a lot of words to lie about doing additional troubleshooting. But whatever, provider gains in the end.

body i feel so retarded for you, i didn't waste any time of provider it was two comments after testing i request refund and one reply that service cancled and refunded

like any provider give 24-72h money back and nothing more

and still you dont even know what's going on and still claim that i lie, even labze said the same i say

He didn't, you moron. He said:

initial tests does not replicate this.

He explicitly disagreed and didn't argue with you because you were a waste of time.

body i request a refund of course he wouldn't argue 😆

Howdy, Stranger!

Categories

In this Discussion

looking for high ram vps or request for Berohost high ram deal

Comments

## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ##

Yet-Another-Bench-Script

v2026-05-11

https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script

## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ##

Basic System Information:

IPv4 Network Information:

fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/sda1):

fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/sda1):

Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:

Howdy, Stranger!

Quick Links

Categories

In this Discussion

looking for high ram vps or request for Berohost high ram deal

Comments

## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ##

Yet-Another-Bench-Script

v2026-05-11

https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script

## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ##

Basic System Information:

IPv4 Network Information:

fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/sda1):

fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/sda1):

Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test: