New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
Comments
You need to provide more context.
Can you provide test IP for both locations?
Are you looking for vps in one of the locations or both?
What is your spec requirements and budget?
What part of New York? New York City? Buff? Staten? NJ?
-7ms has been archived using a quirk in the space-time-continuum.
This ^^
We plan on deploying orbital laser connectivity,
Connecting users from US to China within 10MS, cost per 1Gbps is 5Million USD, 72 year contract.
Possibel
https://www.marketsmedia.com/chicago-to-new-york-link-edges-closer-to-speed-of-light/
Okay let me explain myself I saw this:
https://www.zayo.com/wp-content/uploads/NY-Chicago-Route-Overview.pdf
I already have a VPS at 165 Halsey St, Newark, NJ 07102
IP: 146.19.172.5
I was wondering is there was a possibility for me to buy any Chicago VPS to get those 14ms I am not really sure what I am doing I am asking because I don't really know.
Sorry if it seems like I'm dumb I'm just tryna understand.
No its not possible to achieve that latency because that is direct connection between zayo routers on each side. Testing from a vps will give you more latency because it has to go through your provider router/switch and hypervisor. Even if Chicago vps provider has zayo as upstream, there is no guarantee it will use them. It looks like the best you will get is 17 ms.
Running Globalping against every Chicago server shows 17ms absolutely lowest for reference @Danilo , you won't get lower than 17ms from NJ<>CHI
I would still recommend orbital laser connectivity.
TNAhosting is 17-18ms away from your ip, and they are located in Chicago. I think that is best you could ask.
https://lowendtalk.com/discussion/216595/let-ryzen-vps-back-in-stock-from-7-year-limited-stock#latest
It's about 17.7ms from hosthatch and 18ms from tnahosting. These are likely the lowest figures you'll see.
That'll be as low as you get, won't go lower than that for now
Mmmmm why someone needs 14ms and not happy for 17-18ms?
what website is this
A macro scale discontinuity actually, you only need to create a tiny space-time disruption at some point and then amplify it to get a full fracture, the next step is to make it grow to macro scale.
The real problem is that you have to do it very fast or it will not work. Working at planck time scale is very tricky and few people are able to do it well, I know only a few who can do it.
Interesting. I guess from now on i'll put my shitposts up for peer review first. I'm simply way to much of a responsible to person to be putting out such inaccuracies - even if it's by accident.
https://lg.gsl.tools - amazing tool
Similar cables (Spread1 running from NYC<->CHI) cost $90,000 per 100G, and they don't sell 10G on that path.
How to find similar thing for Europe? It is just curiosity
How to find what?
Fiber between 2 DC and cost for 10G for example if is offered. Which website are you using to find it out?
That is the kind of thing you have to ask a provider for, no website to really find it easily.
Thanks anyway
Find a provider that has Zayo in the mix.
Its no guarantee that you will get the route.
Only if you get something that is singlehomed to Zayo.
Best I see is 17-18ms here.
Columbus or Cleveland will get you 14ms to your test IP.
I run low latency proxies, the lower the better. Also I don't know why people are making fun of me even though what I was looking for actually exists (with proof) and was just wondering if it would be possible literally in the post saying I was trying to understand how this worked.
Kinda cringe if you ask me. But this a solved issue now, have a great day whoever actually helped, and not such a great day to the others!
You will find a lot of providers mention things like this for PR.
This is done often in the market with dark fiber companies we have noticed over the years. However if they have an extra splice or two come up now it's 14.2ms then 14.3ms etc.
Most of those are directly from their end points as well which means once it goes from their racks to another provider even in the same DC you're talking another 2-4ms which is why you see the 17-18ms is more realistic real world times.
If it has to go another route or via another provider as someone else mentioned it could add to this for you.
Some might make fun of what you are asking. We see this quite a bit in people wanting Oregon to get closer latency to AWS which often times Seattle ends up getting a better connection vs being in the same city as AWS as a lot of the networks end up going back to Seattle from Oregon still.
I heard using fusion light optical fiber cables, you can go twice the speed of light (using subspace), hence it would only take 7-8ms to go from Chicago to New York. (Jk sorry this is not 2126 yet)
I don't think anyone was making fun of you really, just having a bit of fun with the topic. Do you know why such a high speed link exists between those two locations? A ton of money has been spent in the past 20 (30?) years trying to get the fastest link between Chicago and NY so that you can take information gained from the Chicago Mercantile Exchange and act on it on the NYSE as quickly as possible. There are some interesting podcasts out there about the competition. I mention all of that just to illustrate that your mentioned locations are pretty unique.