Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Shells Virtual Desktop
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Server.net
CPLicense.net
VPS Server
Buy VPN
Vultr
VMs for AI
HostDare
HostDare
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
InterServer VPS
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Best VPN
High-Performance Bare Metal Server Solutions
Karvl.com
Server Mania Cloud Hosting
DataWagon Hosting
AlphaVPS Hosting
Evoxt.com
Clouvider
VPS Hosting with NVMe
Residential IPs in the US & 4G Mobile Proxies in EU & US with Unlimited Bandwidth
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
Rabisu - Hosting Solutions
Shells Virtual Desktop
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Internet — The End is Nigh

defaultdefault Veteran

The internet is dying. 57% of internet traffic is just bots. I don't agree with Cloudflare controlling a huge chunk of internet, but at least we get alarming reports like these. Bots generate more traffic than humans.

Article: PCMag
Social: Cloudflare Founder
Cloudflare report: radar

«1

Comments

  • Half of the IRL lobby are also illogical, braindead zombies whats the difference?

    Thanked by 1default
  • DPDP Administrator, The Domain Guy
  • barbarzabarbarza Member

    BEEP BEEP BOOP BOOP

    Thanked by 1default
  • barbarzabarbarza Member

    This was great

    Thanked by 2default analog
  • NeoonNeoon Community Contributor, Veteran

    @barbarza said:
    BEEP BEEP BOOP BOOP

    Please give coin, for next Kimsufi DEALS.
    We need 1000 coins.

    Thanked by 1default
  • I suppose we'll have a split, two webs instead of only one.

    One of those two webs will have only bots interacting with each other.

    The other web will have humans interacting with each other; and bots pretending to be humans and stealing from humans whatever they can find.

    Thanked by 1default
  • buggedoutbuggedout Member

    Thanked by 2default ehab
  • sarvhostsarvhost Member, Host Rep

    A dark future with AI

    Thanked by 1default
  • raindog308raindog308 Administrator, Veteran

    @default said: The internet is dying. 57% of internet traffic is just bots.

    So what?

    50% of all email sent is spam. That hasn't killed email.

    I think there is a logical fallacy here because it assumes that there is some kind of cap on Internet traffic. Looking at percentages is the wrong way to look at things. If there is $X exabytes of human activity and we add in exabytes and exabytes of bot traffic, that doesn't change the human activity. I don't think it's right to think that bot traffic is going to "crowd out" the humans, which is what's being implied when you look at it as a percentage.

  • @default said: 57% of internet traffic is just bots

    Soon every hair salon on the block will have their personal little army of bots posting comments, reviews, and inflating likes :/

    Thanked by 1default
  • stable_geniusstable_genius Member
    edited June 6

    The 80/20 rule of thumb states that the best 20% of contributions generate 80% of the value created.

    In the case of bot contribution to creation of knowledge a 99/1 (bot/human) rule will be far too generous, the contribution of bots to the creation of new knowledge will be closer to 0% than to a small fraction 1%, even when the proportion or their contributions is far in excess of 99%.

    Thanked by 3rpqu buggedout default
  • stable_geniusstable_genius Member
    edited June 6

    Too ugly to show.

    Thanked by 2buggedout default
  • NeoonNeoon Community Contributor, Veteran

    Instead of looking for a spike in Pizza consumption, we now gonna watch traffic graphs.
    Next drone attack, you gonna see a spike on the local IX.

    Thanked by 1default
  • netguynetguy Member

    Not today, we have time. ;)

    Thanked by 1default
  • Noah2002Noah2002 Member

    @default said: The internet is dying. 57% of internet traffic is just bots.

    Made by humans, Made for humans B)

    Thanked by 1default
  • LeviLevi Member

    The era of klankers.

    Thanked by 2default barbarza
  • FubukiboxFubukibox Member

    i hate bots to the point im blocking bot ASN like AWS/GCP/Azure and others

    Thanked by 2default rpqu
  • @default said:
    The internet is dying. 57% of internet traffic is just bots.

    Fuck, they've found the porn.

  • nikionikio Member

    Ah yes, "Dead Internet Theory". We have dismissed that claim.

    In all seriousness there is a huge conflation of terms here: everyone is a bot. You post content my political side does not like? You're a bot. You wrote a python script to pull down a paginated article (that some news outlets still do in 2026)? You're a bot. You're a Chinese LLM developer scraping for content? You're a bot. You're scalper hammering a ticket or collectibles website from 8 residential subnets? You're a bot.

    I remember there was a bit of an oopsie when a government emergency services notification account on X was rate-limited for being a bot - no shit it was a bot, the X account was reposting from the emergency alerts system that was also sending people text messages.

    Not all bots are created equal.

    Thanked by 1default
  • raindog308raindog308 Administrator, Veteran

    @nikio said: Not all bots are created equal.

    image

    But seriously...

    I miss the 1990s Internet. Even then there were bots spreading disinformation but it was a kinder, gentler place.

  • nikionikio Member

    At least websites in the 90s didn't load 50mb of jank javascript...!

    Thanked by 2tentor default
  • dbadudedbadude Member

    They are terminator agents searching for John Connor and Neo

    Thanked by 2default Saragoldfarb
  • @nikio said:
    At least websites in the 90s didn't load 50mb of jank javascript...!

    Not for lack of trying.

    Thanked by 2Saragoldfarb nikio
  • SaragoldfarbSaragoldfarb Member, Megathread Squad

    @TimboJones said:

    @default said:
    The internet is dying. 57% of internet traffic is just bots.

    Fuck, they've found the porn.

    Charity.bot.

    Thanked by 1default
  • SaragoldfarbSaragoldfarb Member, Megathread Squad

    @Saragoldfarb said:

    @TimboJones said:

    @default said:
    The internet is dying. 57% of internet traffic is just bots.

    Fuck, they've found the porn.

    Charity.bot.

    Fuck me... If you get it you'll get it.

    Thanked by 1default
  • jure12jure12 Member
    edited June 7

    I think this is misleading. People use the internet more than ever. What has really changed is that AI has caused a massive increase in bot traffic. That doesn't mean the internet is dying.. it means bots are becoming a larger share of overall traffic. Am I right?

    Thanked by 1default
  • rcy026rcy026 Member

    @raindog308 said:

    @default said: The internet is dying. 57% of internet traffic is just bots.

    So what?

    50% of all email sent is spam. That hasn't killed email.

    I think there is a logical fallacy here because it assumes that there is some kind of cap on Internet traffic. Looking at percentages is the wrong way to look at things. If there is $X exabytes of human activity and we add in exabytes and exabytes of bot traffic, that doesn't change the human activity. I don't think it's right to think that bot traffic is going to "crowd out" the humans, which is what's being implied when you look at it as a percentage.

    I totally agree here.
    Also, one must keep in mind that the bot traffic is generated for a reason. Sure, a big part is just bots, spam and malware, background noise. But I suspect a big part of it is AI, webcrawlers and searchengines scraping the net, which if you think one step further is just another interface for humans accessing the internet. The classical way of accessing the internet by typing a URL into a browser is no longer the only way we access the internet, we might just as well talk to an AI and get the information that way. It's a different interface, but the source of information is still the same.
    If we insist on looking at percentages only it gets kind of skewed if we do not take into account that a big part of the bot traffic is actually generated by human interaction, in one way or another.

    Also, I wonder how they classify bots. If I order something online it might generate a bunch of api calls between manufacturer, seller and shipping. Are those api calls classified as bot traffic or human traffic? One single "human" interaction with a website might generate dozens of api calls, if you count api calls and similar as bot traffic that would skew the statistics enormously.

    Thanked by 2Noct default
  • defaultdefault Veteran

    @rcy026 said:

    @raindog308 said:

    @default said: The internet is dying. 57% of internet traffic is just bots.

    So what?

    50% of all email sent is spam. That hasn't killed email.

    I think there is a logical fallacy here because it assumes that there is some kind of cap on Internet traffic. Looking at percentages is the wrong way to look at things. If there is $X exabytes of human activity and we add in exabytes and exabytes of bot traffic, that doesn't change the human activity. I don't think it's right to think that bot traffic is going to "crowd out" the humans, which is what's being implied when you look at it as a percentage.

    The classical way of accessing the internet by typing a URL into a browser is no longer the only way we access the internet, we might just as well talk to an AI and get the information that way. It's a different interface, but the source of information is still the same.
    If we insist on looking at percentages only it gets kind of skewed if we do not take into account that a big part of the bot traffic is actually generated by human interaction, in one way or another.

    So... there is no point in having an information website anymore if only AI visits it and you get mostly just bots? Why would anyone try to gain visitors and present some information online?

    Thanked by 1Noct
  • dbadudedbadude Member

    @default said:

    @rcy026 said:

    @raindog308 said:

    @default said: The internet is dying. 57% of internet traffic is just bots.

    So what?

    50% of all email sent is spam. That hasn't killed email.

    I think there is a logical fallacy here because it assumes that there is some kind of cap on Internet traffic. Looking at percentages is the wrong way to look at things. If there is $X exabytes of human activity and we add in exabytes and exabytes of bot traffic, that doesn't change the human activity. I don't think it's right to think that bot traffic is going to "crowd out" the humans, which is what's being implied when you look at it as a percentage.

    The classical way of accessing the internet by typing a URL into a browser is no longer the only way we access the internet, we might just as well talk to an AI and get the information that way. It's a different interface, but the source of information is still the same.
    If we insist on looking at percentages only it gets kind of skewed if we do not take into account that a big part of the bot traffic is actually generated by human interaction, in one way or another.

    So... there is no point in having an information website anymore if only AI visits it and you get mostly just bots? Why would anyone try to gain visitors and present some information online?

    Interesting point. I see a future in spamming the bots with misinformation. how can that be illigal as a bot is not a human.

    Thanked by 2Noct default
  • rpqurpqu Member

    @default said:

    @rcy026 said:

    @raindog308 said:

    @default said: The internet is dying. 57% of internet traffic is just bots.

    So what?

    50% of all email sent is spam. That hasn't killed email.

    I think there is a logical fallacy here because it assumes that there is some kind of cap on Internet traffic. Looking at percentages is the wrong way to look at things. If there is $X exabytes of human activity and we add in exabytes and exabytes of bot traffic, that doesn't change the human activity. I don't think it's right to think that bot traffic is going to "crowd out" the humans, which is what's being implied when you look at it as a percentage.

    The classical way of accessing the internet by typing a URL into a browser is no longer the only way we access the internet, we might just as well talk to an AI and get the information that way. It's a different interface, but the source of information is still the same.
    If we insist on looking at percentages only it gets kind of skewed if we do not take into account that a big part of the bot traffic is actually generated by human interaction, in one way or another.

    So... there is no point in having an information website anymore if only AI visits it and you get mostly just bots? Why would anyone try to gain visitors and present some information online?

    Large part of the internet is SEO garbage. On their death, nothing of value was lost because it's just copy-paste crap they obtain from another SEO garbage. And I blame Sundar Pichai for lobotomizing google search and safeguards that allows shitty website to flourish the first page, even allowing, what was it? phising website I guess.
    There's those that gain money from ads, from selling stuff, and other reason.
    For the first type, they will cease to exist. Perhaps they should get a real job

Sign In or Register to comment.