Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Shells Virtual Desktop
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Server.net
CPLicense.net
VPS Server
Buy VPN
Vultr
VMs for AI
HostDare
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
InterServer VPS
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Best VPN
High-Performance Bare Metal Server Solutions
Karvl.com
Server Mania Cloud Hosting
DataWagon Hosting
AlphaVPS Hosting
Evoxt.com
Clouvider
VPS Hosting with NVMe
Residential IPs in the US & 4G Mobile Proxies in EU & US with Unlimited Bandwidth
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
Rabisu - Hosting Solutions
Shells Virtual Desktop
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

I find this interesting.

13»

Comments

  • @zed said:

    The Deepfake Nudes Crisis in Schools Is Much Worse Than You Thought

    https://www.wired.com/story/deepfake-nudify-schools-global-crisis/

    "Around the world, teenage boys are saving Instagram and Snapchat images of girls they know from school and using harmful “nudify” apps to create fake nude photos or videos of them. These deepfakes can quickly be shared across whole schools, leaving victims feeling humiliated, violated, hopeless, and scared the images will haunt them forever."

    I guess I'm naive (and old) but I had no idea this was a thing.
    Now having said that I feel foolish because OBVIOUSLY this would be happening, wow.

    When I was in school someone photoshopped one of the girls faces onto a nude picture. After it had been circulated throughout the school and beyond, she committed suicide.

    Thanked by 1Saragoldfarb
  • forestforest Member

    @barbarza said:

    @zed said:

    The Deepfake Nudes Crisis in Schools Is Much Worse Than You Thought

    https://www.wired.com/story/deepfake-nudify-schools-global-crisis/

    "Around the world, teenage boys are saving Instagram and Snapchat images of girls they know from school and using harmful “nudify” apps to create fake nude photos or videos of them. These deepfakes can quickly be shared across whole schools, leaving victims feeling humiliated, violated, hopeless, and scared the images will haunt them forever."

    I guess I'm naive (and old) but I had no idea this was a thing.
    Now having said that I feel foolish because OBVIOUSLY this would be happening, wow.

    When I was in school someone photoshopped one of the girls faces onto a nude picture. After it had been circulated throughout the school and beyond, she committed suicide.

    Yeah but it wasn't done with AI so no one is going to panic over it. /s

  • @rpqu said:

    @TimboJones said:

    @rpqu said:
    The statistics is conflated by several factors. Feminists always repeat the same statement over and over again to discourage prosecution of those who falsely accused someone of sexual assault, sexual harassment, and assault — implying it will discourage female from reporting the crime and getting justice which will result in undercounting.
    By this standard, it's contentious to claim the higher likelihood of victimization compared to male, as male has more tendency to not report these crimes, especially when the perpetrator is the opposite sex, which could counter-accuse and the court may feel the pressure from outside to prosecute the male.
    If the phrase as neutral as "You look beautiful" constitute a sexual harassment, I believe female would lead in numbers

    When was the last time you've done sexual harassment training from HR? Not recently, it appears.

    Why would HR sent me to sexual harassment training? I think I'm quite good at maintaining boundaries, and initiate or respond conversation properly. If I'm required to treat people like eggs shell, I don't think I would be able to do that.

    Well, I wouldn't be surprised if you did, since you you keep complaining like not being offensive takes effort on your behalf. But it's likely legally required now in some places. It is mandatory for all employees, not just people who received complaints and were sent to mandatory HR training.

    It's absurd to put sexual harassment or abuse label to the slightest inconvenience such as male gaze or temporary relapse in thought process which may occur mid conversation or small talk, as if it represents oneself values.

    That's my point. If you did watch one of these videos, you'd understand your hyperbole just makes you look more ignorant than aware.

  • @forest said:

    @TimboJones said: How big is the company you work for, how many people do you work in your office, and how many HR training sessions have you taken in the last two years? The fact that you don't think it's valuable to just go over what the acceptable behaviour is and make people aware of and responsible for their actions is surprising.

    Small, but I also work with people are are expected to have enough intelligence not to have to be told middle school-level etiquette. Either way, while something has to be done about sexual harassment, most HR-ordered sexual harassment training is really bad and, in some cases, actually counterproductive. That's probably because HR exists to protect the company from lawsuits, not to improve people's behavior.

    So you've watched many recently and speaking from experience or from TV tropes?

    I work at a company where everyone is college educated, multicultural, respectful and very intelligent and in top 10 places to work, etc. That doesn't mean an hour or two every year to remind people how to deal with issues before they become so stressful you need to quit or prevent you from doing your job isn't a very good return on time.

  • SaragoldfarbSaragoldfarb Member, Megathread Squad

    @TimboJones said:

    @forest said:

    @TimboJones said: How big is the company you work for, how many people do you work in your office, and how many HR training sessions have you taken in the last two years? The fact that you don't think it's valuable to just go over what the acceptable behaviour is and make people aware of and responsible for their actions is surprising.

    Small, but I also work with people are are expected to have enough intelligence not to have to be told middle school-level etiquette. Either way, while something has to be done about sexual harassment, most HR-ordered sexual harassment training is really bad and, in some cases, actually counterproductive. That's probably because HR exists to protect the company from lawsuits, not to improve people's behavior.

    So you've watched many recently and speaking from experience or from TV tropes?

    I work at a company where everyone is college educated, multicultural, respectful and very intelligent and in top 10 places to work, etc. That doesn't mean an hour or two every year to remind people how to deal with issues before they become so stressful you need to quit or prevent you from doing your job isn't a very good return on time.

    Training isn't bad at all. They should invite some victims on those trainings, which is hard , so people get a good picture of what it does to victims.

    It stays with you forever. It messes up lives. Some able to cope better than others, but it stays with you forever .

    Thanked by 1TimboJones
  • forestforest Member

    @Saragoldfarb said: Training isn't bad at all. They should invite some victims on those trainings

    Exactly, but HR training is about covering the company's ass legally, not about reducing offenses. The training should be made by people who understand sexism and not by mindless HR drones.

    The last sexual harassment training I had, which was just a shitty online course we all had to do, was so laughably horrible that I would not be surprised if it made things worse in the long run. It was clearly made by someone trying to check off boxes and nothing more, and it was clearly directed at men only (which is ironic considering we all had to do it).

    Thanked by 1Saragoldfarb
  • SaragoldfarbSaragoldfarb Member, Megathread Squad

    @forest said:

    @Saragoldfarb said: Training isn't bad at all. They should invite some victims on those trainings

    Exactly, but HR training is about covering the company's ass legally, not about reducing offenses. The training should be made by people who understand sexism and not by mindless HR drones.

    The last sexual harassment training I had, which was just a shitty online course we all had to do, was so laughably horrible that I would not be surprised if it made things worse in the long run. It was clearly made by someone trying to check off boxes and nothing more, and it was clearly directed at men only (which is ironic considering we all had to do it).

    Yeah, I agree. Especially in the corporate world there's a lot of room for improvement.

    Thanked by 1forest
  • forestforest Member
    edited April 19

    @Saragoldfarb said:

    @forest said:

    @Saragoldfarb said: Training isn't bad at all. They should invite some victims on those trainings

    Exactly, but HR training is about covering the company's ass legally, not about reducing offenses. The training should be made by people who understand sexism and not by mindless HR drones.

    The last sexual harassment training I had, which was just a shitty online course we all had to do, was so laughably horrible that I would not be surprised if it made things worse in the long run. It was clearly made by someone trying to check off boxes and nothing more, and it was clearly directed at men only (which is ironic considering we all had to do it).

    Yeah, I agree. Especially in the corporate world there's a lot of room for improvement.

    There are even studies showing that some of the HR training has harmful effects while not even addressing issues. I hope that evidence-based training will start to be used before it turns into more of a joke than it already is.

    It's one of the billion reasons why HR sucks.

    Thanked by 1Saragoldfarb
  • rpqurpqu Member
    edited April 20

    @TimboJones said:

    @rpqu said:

    @TimboJones said:

    @rpqu said:
    The statistics is conflated by several factors. Feminists always repeat the same statement over and over again to discourage prosecution of those who falsely accused someone of sexual assault, sexual harassment, and assault — implying it will discourage female from reporting the crime and getting justice which will result in undercounting.
    By this standard, it's contentious to claim the higher likelihood of victimization compared to male, as male has more tendency to not report these crimes, especially when the perpetrator is the opposite sex, which could counter-accuse and the court may feel the pressure from outside to prosecute the male.
    If the phrase as neutral as "You look beautiful" constitute a sexual harassment, I believe female would lead in numbers

    When was the last time you've done sexual harassment training from HR? Not recently, it appears.

    Why would HR sent me to sexual harassment training? I think I'm quite good at maintaining boundaries, and initiate or respond conversation properly. If I'm required to treat people like eggs shell, I don't think I would be able to do that.

    Well, I wouldn't be surprised if you did, since you you keep complaining like not being offensive takes effort on your behalf. But it's likely legally required now in some places. It is mandatory for all employees, not just people who received complaints and were sent to mandatory HR training.

    Yes, navigating personal quirks, complexities and not being offensive took efforts. These falls under emotional labor. Although, men and women have different emphasis.

    It's absurd to put sexual harassment or abuse label to the slightest inconvenience such as male gaze or temporary relapse in thought process which may occur mid conversation or small talk, as if it represents oneself values.

    That's my point. If you did watch one of these videos, you'd understand your hyperbole just makes you look more ignorant than aware.

    I'm sorry if my statements led to wrong conclusion. I'm just following the same logic or mechanicsm the subset of society use to put demands.

    @forest said:

    @Saragoldfarb said:

    @forest said:

    @Saragoldfarb said: Training isn't bad at all. They should invite some victims on those trainings

    Exactly, but HR training is about covering the company's ass legally, not about reducing offenses. The training should be made by people who understand sexism and not by mindless HR drones.

    The last sexual harassment training I had, which was just a shitty online course we all had to do, was so laughably horrible that I would not be surprised if it made things worse in the long run. It was clearly made by someone trying to check off boxes and nothing more, and it was clearly directed at men only (which is ironic considering we all had to do it).

    Yeah, I agree. Especially in the corporate world there's a lot of room for improvement.

    There are even studies showing that some of the HR training has harmful effects while not even addressing issues. I hope that evidence-based training will start to be used before it turns into more of a joke than it already is.

    It's one of the billion reasons why HR sucks.

    It's because HR is trying to cover their butts. They're often stuck between the upper management and the rest of the company. For example, one of my friend managed a branch with 50-100 workers as HR. She has lost count of the times she’s had to bridge the gap between the HQ and staffs resentful of policies that has immediate effect.

  • TimboJonesTimboJones Member
    edited April 20

    @forest said:

    @Saragoldfarb said: Training isn't bad at all. They should invite some victims on those trainings

    Exactly, but HR training is about covering the company's ass legally, not about reducing offenses. The training should be made by people who understand sexism and not by mindless HR drones.

    The videos are not made by HR. At least not any videos I've watched. There are dedicated companies with actors that have consultants that ensure there's a quality program in place and lawyers to make sure they meet or exceed legal requirements.

    The videos are all about ensuring employees have healthy work environments. There are policies that companies are required to have, by law.

    The last sexual harassment training I had, which was just a shitty online course we all had to do, was so laughably horrible that I would not be surprised if it made things worse in the long run. It was clearly made by someone trying to check off boxes and nothing more, and it was clearly directed at men only (which is ironic considering we all had to do it).

    What country was this or what company made the program? Did you provide that feedback in the survey afterwards?

    I wouldn't conflate poor HR departments with HR training effectiveness on its own. HR departments are not equal.

  • zedzed Member

    Top MAGA influencer revealed to be AI — created by a guy in India who made a mint off lonely men online

    https://nypost.com/2026/04/21/us-news/top-maga-influencer-emily-hart-revealed-to-be-ai-created-by-a-guy-in-india/

    "A comely MAGA influencer who racked up millions of followers with patriotic content of her posing in a bikini while ice fishing, drinking Coors Light and shooting guns has been unmasked — as an Indian man who put himself through med school on the proceeds of his trickery."

  • zedzed Member

    We found a stable Firefox identifier linking all your private Tor identities

    https://fingerprint.com/blog/firefox-tor-indexeddb-privacy-vulnerability/

    "The issue allows websites to derive a unique, deterministic, and stable process-lifetime identifier from the order of entries returned by IndexedDB, even in contexts where users expect stronger isolation."

  • zedzed Member

    https://anchor.host/godaddy-gave-a-domain-to-a-stranger-without-any-documentation/

    A GoDaddy employee transferred a 27-year-old domain out of a paying customer’s account with no validation. With zero documentation submitted by the recipient. When the customer disputed with legitimate documentation, every submission was met with “We will respond in 48 to 72 hours.” After four days, GoDaddy claimed the domain belonged to someone else and the case was closed. The fix came from the recipient of the mistake, not from GoDaddy despite 9.6 hours of phone conversations.

  • slowserversslowservers Member, Host Rep

    @zed said:

    Backblaze has quietly stopped backing up your data

    https://rareese.com/posts/backblaze/

    "TLDR: Despite claiming to backup all your data, Backblaze quietly stopped backing up OneDrive and Dropbox folders - along with potentially many other things."

    https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47762864

    This is hugely disappointing. I've been quite fond of Backblaze for a long time because of their transparency and drive stats. This is the exact opposite.

    That said, "unlimited" backup was always a stupid idea, and is a good way to shoot yourselves in the foot as a company. Of course it has to be limited (or billed by the byte) at some point.

    But this change should have been communicated very explicitly and not rolled out over night. Of course there would've been outrage over that as well, but at least less trust would've been broken.

    On another note, this is one reason I am against "too cheap." If your margins are razor thin, you're going to fail at some point or another. Reasonable margins can protect both the client and the business. Of course not every client needs such protections and I get why people seek bottom dollar. And paying top dollar is no guarantee, but paying bottom dollar is almost always going to result in bottom dollar performance at one point or another.

    @zed said:

    The Deepfake Nudes Crisis in Schools Is Much Worse Than You Thought

    https://www.wired.com/story/deepfake-nudify-schools-global-crisis/

    "Around the world, teenage boys are saving Instagram and Snapchat images of girls they know from school and using harmful “nudify” apps to create fake nude photos or videos of them. These deepfakes can quickly be shared across whole schools, leaving victims feeling humiliated, violated, hopeless, and scared the images will haunt them forever."

    I guess I'm naive (and old) but I had no idea this was a thing.
    Now having said that I feel foolish because OBVIOUSLY this would be happening, wow.

    This is horrible on so many levels. "AI" has helped bring us to the point where we must always doubt if we are seeing something real or not -- on a massive scale. It's extremely unhealthy.

    We're quite particular to not publicly share pictures of our kids and this is just another reason for us to not do that. Heck, my wife and I don't have pictures on any platforms, either.

    Obviously this is terrible from the boys deciding to do this, it's also terrible that they are enabled to do it so easily. It's terrible that people make apps for this purpose as well. The girls who have this done to them must feel horrible. I hope that more of them choose to make their lives more private though, and not use social media. This of course could happen even despite that, perhaps through yearbooks or other school pictures. I hope that when it happens, it's dealt with strongly and switfly.

    Thanked by 1TrikeLike
  • forestforest Member

    @zed said: process-lifetime identifier

    Nothingburger, then. Tor browser has never claimed to have extremely strong cross-tab isolation. Solving that is still an open problem, which is why you're supposed to close and re-open the browser if you want a new identity.

    Thanked by 1TrikeLike
  • LeviLevi Member

    @zed said:
    Rather enjoyed this, think I found a new daily read.

    The Subprime AI Crisis Is Here

    https://www.wheresyoured.at/the-subprime-ai-crisis-is-here/

    That vomit from Zitron :) . There is Karpathy which is fanatic of LLM and there is Zitron, which profits from deep hatred towards LLM.

  • ailiceailice Member

    Backblaze has quietly stopped backing up your data

    Ok, but where refugee deal?

  • LeviLevi Member

    @ailice said:

    Backblaze has quietly stopped backing up your data

    Ok, but where refugee deal?

    Ask aws for a deal.

  • zedzed Member

    Can Someone Please Explain Whether Cloudflare Blackmailed Canonical?

    https://www.flyingpenguin.com/can-someone-please-explain-whether-cloudflare-blackmailed-canonical/

    Cloudflare fronts attackers for free and bills the victims for relief.

    https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48098537

  • TrikeLikeTrikeLike Member

    @zed said:
    Top MAGA influencer revealed to be AI — created by a guy in India who made a mint off lonely men online

    It was a beautiful day when the first useful Twitter update in years let you see region of account creations and it revealed that so many "American" political commentators suspiciously all made their accounts in LatAm or India. Really loved seeing them all scrambling for a day to explain why and beg the devs to hide it again. This reveal is my favorite: https://nitter.privacyredirect.com/mrjeffu/status/1992413787375161490

  • zedzed Member

    @zed said:
    Can Someone Please Explain Whether Cloudflare Blackmailed Canonical?

    https://www.flyingpenguin.com/can-someone-please-explain-whether-cloudflare-blackmailed-canonical/

    Cloudflare fronts attackers for free and bills the victims for relief.

    https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48098537

    It's obviously not actually blackmail, he's playing fast and loose with words to make his point.. but it's pretty silly this is the state of affairs.

  • edited May 12

    @TrikeLike said:

    @zed said:
    Top MAGA influencer revealed to be AI — created by a guy in India who made a mint off lonely men online

    It was a beautiful day when the first useful Twitter update in years let you see region of account creations and it revealed that so many "American" political commentators suspiciously all made their accounts in LatAm or India. Really loved seeing them all scrambling for a day to explain why and beg the devs to hide it again. This reveal is my favorite: https://nitter.privacyredirect.com/mrjeffu/status/1992413787375161490

    Twitter (+ clones) is and always will be a shithole. Not so much because the technology or the idea behind short message blogging is bad but because the overwhelming majority of users are bound the be morons. Displaying country of registration is not going to change much about that besides people thinking of becoming Twitter-famous sticking [country-X-proxy/VPN] in front of what they are already using.

    As long as people don't apply critical thinking to the stuff they are reading while maybe even willingly confining themselves to echo chambers all those funky gimmicks will be pointless. This starts with the fact that services like Twitter are - outside a very specific usage pattern - just massive attentions drains with very little possible gain for the actual user or in general.

    Thanked by 1TrikeLike
  • rpqurpqu Member

    @totally_not_banned said:

    @TrikeLike said:

    @zed said:
    Top MAGA influencer revealed to be AI — created by a guy in India who made a mint off lonely men online

    It was a beautiful day when the first useful Twitter update in years let you see region of account creations and it revealed that so many "American" political commentators suspiciously all made their accounts in LatAm or India. Really loved seeing them all scrambling for a day to explain why and beg the devs to hide it again. This reveal is my favorite: https://nitter.privacyredirect.com/mrjeffu/status/1992413787375161490

    the technology or the idea behind short message blogging is bad but because the overwhelming majority of users are bound the be morons.

    Most people are morons.

  • @zed said:

    @zed said:
    Can Someone Please Explain Whether Cloudflare Blackmailed Canonical?

    https://www.flyingpenguin.com/can-someone-please-explain-whether-cloudflare-blackmailed-canonical/

    Cloudflare fronts attackers for free and bills the victims for relief.

    https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48098537

    It's obviously not actually blackmail, he's playing fast and loose with words to make his point.. but it's pretty silly this is the state of affairs.

    Does he know this? I don't understand how "writers" are not embarrassed by their very public faceplants and immediately fix their fuckups.

    Also, he asked a fucking question in a title which is always no (the exception being that time they asked "is the answer to a question in a title always no?" ).

  • zedzed Member

    Mullvad exit IPs as a fingerprinting vector

    https://tmctmt.com/posts/mullvad-exit-ips-as-a-fingerprinting-vector/

    obligatory hn discussion https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48143880 includes a response from a Mullvadeer (I made that up, Mullvadoon? Mullvadista?)

    "As for mitigation, we are already testing a patch of the unintended behavior on a subset of our infrastructure. If any of you try to reproduce the blog post's findings you may get confusing results throughout the day."

  • zedzed Member

    @TimboJones said:

    @zed said:

    @zed said:
    Can Someone Please Explain Whether Cloudflare Blackmailed Canonical?

    https://www.flyingpenguin.com/can-someone-please-explain-whether-cloudflare-blackmailed-canonical/

    Cloudflare fronts attackers for free and bills the victims for relief.

    https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48098537

    It's obviously not actually blackmail, he's playing fast and loose with words to make his point.. but it's pretty silly this is the state of affairs.

    Does he know this? I don't understand how "writers" are not embarrassed by their very public faceplants and immediately fix their fuckups.

    I just assumed tbh, it was obvious to me shrug!

Sign In or Register to comment.