Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Sign In Register

Quick Links


Shells Virtual Desktop
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Server.net
CPLicense.net
VPS Server
Buy VPN
Vultr
VMs for AI
HostDare
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
InterServer VPS
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Best VPN
High-Performance Bare Metal Server Solutions
Karvl.com
Server Mania Cloud Hosting
DataWagon Hosting
AlphaVPS Hosting
Evoxt.com
Clouvider
VPS Hosting with NVMe
Residential IPs in the US & 4G Mobile Proxies in EU & US with Unlimited Bandwidth
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
Rabisu - Hosting Solutions
Shells Virtual Desktop

Categories

In this Discussion

Home › Requests
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

netherlands VPS/VDS w/ LOWEST ping to Telegram

coopplayercoopplayer Member
in Requests

got a need to build MTProto proxy in Telegram for users using it in Russia where Telegram is strictly getting blocked. It must have:

  • the lowest ping to TG DC 2/ DC 4
  • would be great if unmetered but ok if >15tb
  • fitting in budget of $35/month
  • working REALLY fast

Comments

  • conceptconcept Member
    edited May 8

    @onidel @oloke @RoyaleHosting
    Ping to Telegram Amsterdam

    PING 149.154.167.91 (149.154.167.91) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 149.154.167.91: icmp_seq=1 ttl=52 time=1.06 ms
64 bytes from 149.154.167.91: icmp_seq=2 ttl=52 time=1.09 ms
64 bytes from 149.154.167.91: icmp_seq=3 ttl=52 time=1.05 ms
64 bytes from 149.154.167.91: icmp_seq=4 ttl=52 time=1.10 ms

--- 149.154.167.91 ping statistics ---
4 packets transmitted, 4 received, 0% packet loss, time 3004ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 1.054/1.076/1.096/0.019 ms
    Thanked by 1oloke
  • emghemgh Member, Megathread Squad

    if the purpose is to relay messages for chatting you won't notice 5 vs. 50ms ping

    Thanked by 8oloke sillycat 384_cz minitor rm_ zejjnt Ed_Chd tentor
  • DataRecoveryDataRecovery Member

    @coopplayer said: the lowest ping to TG DC 2/ DC 4

    IMO, this isn't necessary.

    Since you're launching a proxy, the best bet is probably something optimized for the lowest latency both to the DC and your users.
    Hence probably some location between, but unsure where exactly. Needs to be tested.

    So I'd check ping to 149.154.167.50 and 149.154.167.91 from the provider and from some users to that provider.

    P.S.
    Also IIRC, DC4 is for users from western and southern europe.

    Thanked by 2zejjnt tentor
  • aluyaluy Member, Patron Provider

    PING 149.154.167.91 (149.154.167.91) 56(84) bytes of data.
    64 bytes from 149.154.167.91: icmp_seq=1 ttl=52 time=0.831 ms
    64 bytes from 149.154.167.91: icmp_seq=2 ttl=52 time=0.856 ms
    64 bytes from 149.154.167.91: icmp_seq=3 ttl=52 time=0.758 ms
    64 bytes from 149.154.167.91: icmp_seq=4 ttl=52 time=0.755 ms
    64 bytes from 149.154.167.91: icmp_seq=5 ttl=52 time=0.766 ms

    --- 149.154.167.91 ping statistics ---
    5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 1216ms
    rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.755/0.793/0.856/0.041 ms

    wirh us in the netherlands :) can check at aluy.net/looking-glass

    Thanked by 4forest rpqu skimply153 cainyxues
  • olokeoloke Member, Host Rep

    @concept said:
    @onidel @oloke @RoyaleHosting
    Ping to Telegram Amsterdam

    PING 149.154.167.91 (149.154.167.91) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 149.154.167.91: icmp_seq=1 ttl=52 time=1.06 ms
64 bytes from 149.154.167.91: icmp_seq=2 ttl=52 time=1.09 ms
64 bytes from 149.154.167.91: icmp_seq=3 ttl=52 time=1.05 ms
64 bytes from 149.154.167.91: icmp_seq=4 ttl=52 time=1.10 ms

--- 149.154.167.91 ping statistics ---
4 packets transmitted, 4 received, 0% packet loss, time 3004ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 1.054/1.076/1.096/0.019 ms

    Thanks for the mention @concept !

  • gatewaysentryllcgatewaysentryllc Member, Patron Provider
    edited May 8

    Hello @coopplayer

    PING 149.154.167.91 (149.154.167.91) 56(84) bytes of data.
    64 bytes from 149.154.167.91: icmp_seq=1 ttl=55 time=0.472 ms
    64 bytes from 149.154.167.91: icmp_seq=2 ttl=55 time=0.458 ms
    64 bytes from 149.154.167.91: icmp_seq=3 ttl=55 time=0.461 ms
    64 bytes from 149.154.167.91: icmp_seq=4 ttl=55 time=0.462 ms
    64 bytes from 149.154.167.91: icmp_seq=5 ttl=55 time=0.428 ms
    64 bytes from 149.154.167.91: icmp_seq=6 ttl=55 time=0.425 ms
    64 bytes from 149.154.167.91: icmp_seq=7 ttl=55 time=0.443 ms
    64 bytes from 149.154.167.91: icmp_seq=8 ttl=55 time=0.444 ms
    64 bytes from 149.154.167.91: icmp_seq=9 ttl=55 time=0.408 ms
    64 bytes from 149.154.167.91: icmp_seq=10 ttl=55 time=0.416 ms
    64 bytes from 149.154.167.91: icmp_seq=11 ttl=55 time=0.450 ms
    64 bytes from 149.154.167.91: icmp_seq=12 ttl=55 time=0.384 ms
    64 bytes from 149.154.167.91: icmp_seq=13 ttl=55 time=0.417 ms
    64 bytes from 149.154.167.91: icmp_seq=14 ttl=55 time=0.422 ms
    64 bytes from 149.154.167.91: icmp_seq=15 ttl=55 time=0.455 ms
    64 bytes from 149.154.167.91: icmp_seq=16 ttl=55 time=0.437 ms
    64 bytes from 149.154.167.91: icmp_seq=17 ttl=55 time=0.428 ms
    64 bytes from 149.154.167.91: icmp_seq=18 ttl=55 time=0.428 ms
    64 bytes from 149.154.167.91: icmp_seq=19 ttl=55 time=0.479 ms
    64 bytes from 149.154.167.91: icmp_seq=20 ttl=55 time=0.446 ms
    64 bytes from 149.154.167.91: icmp_seq=21 ttl=55 time=0.463 ms
    64 bytes from 149.154.167.91: icmp_seq=22 ttl=55 time=0.453 ms
    64 bytes from 149.154.167.91: icmp_seq=23 ttl=55 time=0.401 ms
    64 bytes from 149.154.167.91: icmp_seq=24 ttl=55 time=0.445 ms
    64 bytes from 149.154.167.91: icmp_seq=25 ttl=55 time=0.434 ms
    64 bytes from 149.154.167.91: icmp_seq=26 ttl=55 time=0.437 ms
    64 bytes from 149.154.167.91: icmp_seq=27 ttl=55 time=0.415 ms
    64 bytes from 149.154.167.91: icmp_seq=28 ttl=55 time=0.402 ms
    64 bytes from 149.154.167.91: icmp_seq=29 ttl=55 time=0.462 ms
    64 bytes from 149.154.167.91: icmp_seq=30 ttl=55 time=0.424 ms
    64 bytes from 149.154.167.91: icmp_seq=31 ttl=55 time=0.406 ms
    64 bytes from 149.154.167.91: icmp_seq=32 ttl=55 time=0.448 ms
    64 bytes from 149.154.167.91: icmp_seq=33 ttl=55 time=0.454 ms
    64 bytes from 149.154.167.91: icmp_seq=34 ttl=55 time=0.451 ms
    ^C
    --- 149.154.167.91 ping statistics ---
    34 packets transmitted, 34 received, 0% packet loss, time 33816ms
    rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.384/0.437/0.479/0.022 ms

    If you're interested feel free to reachout!

  • RoyaleHostingRoyaleHosting Member, Patron Provider
    edited May 9

    @concept said:
    @onidel @oloke @RoyaleHosting
    Ping to Telegram Amsterdam

    PING 149.154.167.91 (149.154.167.91) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 149.154.167.91: icmp_seq=1 ttl=52 time=1.06 ms
64 bytes from 149.154.167.91: icmp_seq=2 ttl=52 time=1.09 ms
64 bytes from 149.154.167.91: icmp_seq=3 ttl=52 time=1.05 ms
64 bytes from 149.154.167.91: icmp_seq=4 ttl=52 time=1.10 ms

--- 149.154.167.91 ping statistics ---
4 packets transmitted, 4 received, 0% packet loss, time 3004ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 1.054/1.076/1.096/0.019 ms

    Thank you for the mention! :) the latency has also improved a bit since:

    root@ams01:~# ping 149.154.167.91
    PING 149.154.167.91 (149.154.167.91) 56(84) bytes of data.
    64 bytes from 149.154.167.91: icmp_seq=1 ttl=55 time=0.762 ms
    64 bytes from 149.154.167.91: icmp_seq=2 ttl=55 time=0.778 ms
    64 bytes from 149.154.167.91: icmp_seq=3 ttl=55 time=0.756 ms
    64 bytes from 149.154.167.91: icmp_seq=4 ttl=55 time=0.765 ms
    64 bytes from 149.154.167.91: icmp_seq=5 ttl=55 time=0.781 ms
    64 bytes from 149.154.167.91: icmp_seq=6 ttl=55 time=0.767 ms
    64 bytes from 149.154.167.91: icmp_seq=7 ttl=55 time=0.758 ms
    64 bytes from 149.154.167.91: icmp_seq=8 ttl=55 time=0.793 ms
    ^C
    --- 149.154.167.91 ping statistics ---
    8 packets transmitted, 8 received, 0% packet loss, time 7156ms
    rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.756/0.770/0.793/0.012 ms
    root@ams01:~#

    Thanked by 1oloke
  • MannDudeMannDude Patron Provider, Veteran
    edited May 9 
    PING 149.154.167.91 (149.154.167.91) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 149.154.167.91: icmp_seq=1 ttl=55 time=0.633 ms
64 bytes from 149.154.167.91: icmp_seq=2 ttl=55 time=0.679 ms
64 bytes from 149.154.167.91: icmp_seq=3 ttl=55 time=0.780 ms
64 bytes from 149.154.167.91: icmp_seq=4 ttl=55 time=0.626 ms

--- 149.154.167.91 ping statistics ---
4 packets transmitted, 4 received, 0% packet loss, time 3055ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.626/0.679/0.780/0.061 ms

    Test: https://am-nl-eu.lg.as40663.net/

    Come holla at me if you need a VM in NL.

    Thanked by 1Frameworks
  • minitorminitor Member

    Let me give you an advise. For telegram find a VM that has lowest ping to Russia. Doesn't really matter if the ping is not so low to telegram dc2. Many users will use VoIP numbers and that includes dc1~dc5 all around the world
    I know Russian numbers will be registered to dc2 but find something with the lowest ping to Russia and let telegram CDN do the rest

    Thanked by 1MikeA
  • networknetwork Member

    @emgh said:
    if the purpose is to relay messages for chatting you won't notice 5 vs. 50ms ping

    What if I'm streaming Doom at 60 fps with one frame = one message?

    Thanked by 3emgh sillycat Ed_Chd
  • VPSLAYERVPSLAYER Member, Patron Provider

    Hello we offer vps hosting in amsterdam:

    PING 149.154.167.91 (149.154.167.91) 56(84) bytes of data.
    64 bytes from 149.154.167.91: icmp_seq=1 ttl=54 time=0.637 ms
    64 bytes from 149.154.167.91: icmp_seq=2 ttl=54 time=0.659 ms
    64 bytes from 149.154.167.91: icmp_seq=3 ttl=54 time=0.640 ms
    64 bytes from 149.154.167.91: icmp_seq=4 ttl=54 time=0.631 ms

    --- 149.154.167.91 ping statistics ---
    4 packets transmitted, 4 received, 0% packet loss, time 3089ms
    rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.631/0.641/0.659/0.010 ms

    https://lg-nl.vpslayer.net/

  • coopplayercoopplayer Member

    @network said:

    @emgh said:
    if the purpose is to relay messages for chatting you won't notice 5 vs. 50ms ping

    What if I'm streaming Doom at 60 fps with one frame = one message?

    thoughts of the pure genius🙏🏻

Sign In or Register to comment.