Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Shells Virtual Desktop
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Server.net
CPLicense.net
VPS Server
Buy VPN
Vultr
VMs for AI
HostDare
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
InterServer VPS
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Best VPN
High-Performance Bare Metal Server Solutions
Karvl.com
Server Mania Cloud Hosting
DataWagon Hosting
AlphaVPS Hosting
Evoxt.com
Clouvider
VPS Hosting with NVMe
Residential IPs in the US & 4G Mobile Proxies in EU & US with Unlimited Bandwidth
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
Rabisu - Hosting Solutions
Shells Virtual Desktop
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

MXroute no longer seeks or welcomes traffic from lowendtalk.com

1242526272830»

Comments

  • Honestly.

    Jar is gone.
    The damage has already been done towards all three parties.
    There are details we will never know of or understand.
    Any form of moderation will either still not take place or well after (unless even more horribad stuff gets brought up).

    I dunno about you guys but I've made my thoughts clear and I know I can't contribute further. Rather sleep and focus more on my internal BGP setup than this thread unless something extremely substantial gets revealed that could mean my thoughts changed.

    Thanked by 1emgh
  • WyvernCoWyvernCo Member
    edited April 8

    @webbynet said:
    attention-seeking LET newbies

    I've been here two years and have way many more posts than you do on LET 🤣

    Thanked by 1Noct
  • forestforest Member

    @MaxTakeba said: The damage has already been done towards all three parties.

    Just so that others don't keep thinking that I have any vested interest here, a few minutes after the attack sale was created, I stopped being bothered by it and laughed it off. I don't consider myself to be a victim or to have suffered any damage, and I have no desire to try to get back at jar.

  • emghemgh Member, Megathread Squad

    @whynotlearn said:

    @emgh said: the issue is that when you spent 10 years of your wife building something

    Life, not wife xD, the whole meaning changes when you say wife @emgh

    I am laughing so hard right now.

    lol, fixed

    also honestly @jbiloh is a great role model for how to respond when people come after you, we all know I don't agree with him on a lot of stuff but damn he doesn't let bullshit get under his skin

  • webbynetwebbynet Member

    @WyvernCo said:

    @webbynet said:
    attention-seeking LET newbies

    I've been here two years and have way many more posts than you do on LET 🤣

    If having more posts means you understand the community, you'd know that dragging out drama just to try and 'cancel' someone is exactly what people mean by attention-seeking. But hey, enjoy the stats 🤣

  • @forest said:

    @MaxTakeba said: The damage has already been done towards all three parties.

    Just so that others don't keep thinking that I have any vested interest here, a few minutes after the attack sale was created, I stopped being bothered by it and laughed it off. I don't consider myself to be a victim or to have suffered any damage, and I have no desire to try to get back at jar.

    Whilst you had the least involvement. You're still involved and I still have my opinion on you and as you recall it ain't particularly positive.

    You're not escaping my extremely broad definition of damage here.

    Thanked by 2skorous 225thinker
  • ralfralf Member

    @forest said:

    @jwg29859 said:
    Can someone give me a tldr?

    WyvernCo and me got into an argument with jar.

    s/got into/started/;
    s/with/and relentlessly pursued/;

    WyvernCo posted a link to the argument in one of his threads.

    And then followed that up with another sustained attack there after Jar laughed it off and others defended him.

    Jar then created a flash sale titled "WyvernCo_and_forest_are_psychos".

    Which given the context wasn't actually a terrible assessment.

    WyvernCo reported that to Hetzner as a breach of their ToS.

    Which, it wasn't, let's not forget. And he actually demanded their entire account was immediately terminated, and tried to get the payment processor to suspend them at all.

    Thanked by 1skorous
  • emghemgh Member, Megathread Squad
    edited April 8

    @MaxTakeba said: Jar is gone.
    The damage has already been done towards all three parties.

    I think he'll be back

    Thanked by 1MaxTakeba
  • forestforest Member
    edited April 8

    @MaxTakeba said: Whilst you had the least involvement. You're still involved and I still have my opinion on you and as you recall it ain't particularly positive.

    Sure, but there's nothing I can do about that. A few people on a forum thinking that I have it out for jar does not damage me.

    Thanked by 1whynotlearn
  • @emgh said:

    @MaxTakeba said: Jar is gone.
    The damage has already been done towards all three parties.

    I think he'll be back

    More optimistic than me.
    Delighted if proven wrong and Jar does come back.

    Thanked by 2emgh skorous
  • forestforest Member
    edited April 8

    @ralf said: s/with/and relentlessly pursued/;

    We have different definitions of "relentlessly pursue". I consider following someone, who was throwing punches back, mind you, into one thread to be anything but relentless pursuit.

    Thanked by 1WyvernCo
  • allthemtingsallthemtings Member, Megathread Squad

    @emgh said:
    anyway my point is that from both sides it's just ego's fueling everything right now

    credits to @forest who I think stepped back somewhat, I would still advice you though to not participate in mxroute discussions in regards to offer threads etc, maybe if you really need to, a singular comment if someone is asking for a review is fine, any more is just begging for the drama again

    everything's way too infected for something good to come out of that anyway

    I honestly can see this from both wyvern's and jar's pont of view

    of course when you see someone trying to get you intro trouble at work it's triggering, but let's not pretend it started like that, it was constantly one-upping at every level until then, but I can see why he reacted by further spreading the word on mxroute

    as to jar I honestly think that he overreacted as well, a lot, he should have just responded with a single comment, maybe ask his wife or a friend to read it and make sure it's professional and then just not entertain it anymore, the issue is that when you spent 10 years of your life building something, if people talk down on that it's triggering, when people repeatedly do it, you have to have a great amount of self control to not respond like jar did - it's not easy

    and that's why companies use public relations people, because it's damn hard to not get lost seeing people try to damage the reputation of what you built, and it can easily lead to you damaging it even more by responding

    it's not wyvern's or forest's fault that jar did respond the way he did either, they didn't force him to react, he did that, and so I'm not defending that


    didn't really read through the above and I probably would have worded stuff better, but this is where I'm at and it's also why I don't think anyone is innocent here

    thanks @emgh thats why i choose you for professional legal representation

    Thanked by 2emgh forest
  • @MaxTakeba said: Whilst you had the least involvement. You're still involved and I still have my opinion on you and as you recall it ain't particularly positive.

    You're not escaping my extremely broad definition of damage here.

    You can have your opinion of forest and that can be fine but I am not sure what you think how he should respond to you saying "I don't have a positive opinion on you"

    He has tried to be respectful and actually agrees with you. You are free to have your opinion on him but I feel like its just continuing the discussion for the sake of discussion my friend if we just continue this circle discussion

    Good luck with your bgp thing that you were doing! Keep me updated and have a nice day!

  • WyvernCoWyvernCo Member

    @ralf said: WyvernCo reported that to Hetzner as a breach of their ToS.
    Which, it wasn't, let's not forget.

    8.2. The Customer is obligated not to publish any content that infringes on the rights of third parties or otherwise violates applicable law. This includes in particular, but is not limited to, pornographic or obscene material, extremist content or content that offends common decency, gambling, material that could seriously endanger the morals of children or young people or violate the rights of third parties (copyrights, name rights, trademark rights and data protection rights). This also includes the publication of defamatory content, insults or disparagement of persons or groups of persons.

    https://www.hetzner.com/legal/terms-and-conditions/

  • forestforest Member
    edited April 8

    @whynotlearn said: You can have your opinion of forest and that can be fine but I am not sure what you think how he should respond to you saying "I don't have a positive opinion on you"

    It started because, when I was brand new to LET, I was very wishy-washy in the VeloxMedia thread because I didn't want a rather expensive VPS to be terminated and was thrown head-first into first-class drama. Thankfully the VPS is still running, but apparently it hurt my reputation in some people's view.

  • ralfralf Member

    @WyvernCo said:

    @MannDude said: is it widely seen as illegal to post a promo code with someone's online forum username

    I could argue about it being a violation of my publicity rights, but that's not even required here since Hetzner doesn't allow their service to be used for insults, defamation, or derogatory statements. Profitting off of insulting someone else -- especially in the context of selling a direct product that includes their name -- is a very risky endeavor, and you cannot fault the upstream providers for not wanting to be involved in that.

    Jar should not have done the attack sale, full stop. No buts, no caveats -- simply he should not have done it, and he has to own the consequences for doing it. Instead he kept doubling down, and people like you are enabling this behavior by coming to his defense.

    And you should have stopped your harassment well before the point that made him feel that you were exhibiting psychotic behaviour.

    This was a fight that you started, you don't get a special pass when you pick on someone who fights back.

    @MannDude said: I think your offense to your username being used in a coupon code is grossly over exaggerated.

    I think you are just trying to rile me up so I get banned. I have some choice words about you and your insinuations about me.

    I hope as many people as possible see your takes here, and they treat your business appropriately.

    Wow, we really are starting to see a pattern here: you don't like someone's opinion, so you think you can try to whip it into a PR storm to destroy their business.

    Thanked by 2skorous borkedascii
  • forestforest Member
    edited April 8

    @ralf said: And you should have stopped your harassment well before the point that made him feel that you were exhibiting psychotic behaviour.

    At this point, you've been criticizing WyvernCo far more harshly and persistently than he was criticizing jar, and for far longer. By your own logic, doesn't that mean you're engaging in sustained harassment?

    If WyvernCo then used his company to publicize a product called "ralf_is_a_gullible_bastard", wouldn't you feel angry at that, especially if you tried to contact mods and they did nothing?

    No one is 100% in the right here, but you're treating Wyvern as if he's this psychopathic monster who followed jar while he desperately tried to flee these relentless, brutal, and unprovoked attacks.

  • emghemgh Member, Megathread Squad

    @allthemtings said:

    @emgh said:
    anyway my point is that from both sides it's just ego's fueling everything right now

    credits to @forest who I think stepped back somewhat, I would still advice you though to not participate in mxroute discussions in regards to offer threads etc, maybe if you really need to, a singular comment if someone is asking for a review is fine, any more is just begging for the drama again

    everything's way too infected for something good to come out of that anyway

    I honestly can see this from both wyvern's and jar's pont of view

    of course when you see someone trying to get you intro trouble at work it's triggering, but let's not pretend it started like that, it was constantly one-upping at every level until then, but I can see why he reacted by further spreading the word on mxroute

    as to jar I honestly think that he overreacted as well, a lot, he should have just responded with a single comment, maybe ask his wife or a friend to read it and make sure it's professional and then just not entertain it anymore, the issue is that when you spent 10 years of your life building something, if people talk down on that it's triggering, when people repeatedly do it, you have to have a great amount of self control to not respond like jar did - it's not easy

    and that's why companies use public relations people, because it's damn hard to not get lost seeing people try to damage the reputation of what you built, and it can easily lead to you damaging it even more by responding

    it's not wyvern's or forest's fault that jar did respond the way he did either, they didn't force him to react, he did that, and so I'm not defending that


    didn't really read through the above and I probably would have worded stuff better, but this is where I'm at and it's also why I don't think anyone is innocent here

    thanks @emgh thats why i choose you for professional legal representation

    thanks

  • WyvernCoWyvernCo Member

    @ralf said: And you should have stopped your harassment well before the point that made him feel that you were exhibiting psychotic behaviour.

    No, criticism in a discussion forum in the relevant threads does NOT constitute harassment. This is a hill I'll die on. I know you are determined to make me into the bad guy for criticizing your hero, but he did shitty things and I was well within my rights to criticize him for it in the two threads where I did so.

  • whynotlearnwhynotlearn Member
    edited April 8

    As a provider/business, what are some lessons that they can learn: @emgh suggests having a PR representative who can be cool-headed (iirc), I suppose I feel the same. All of this drama could've been prevented if jar had some cool-headed PR

    Does anyone else have some genuine business lessons to learn from all of this, I would like to learn something new/meaningful from this conflict/drama hopefully.

  • emghemgh Member, Megathread Squad

    @WyvernCo said: I was well within my rights to

    do you see how you both use this as justification and that that's also why this got to where we're at and why it can't stop until one of you decides that it isn't worth it?

    Thanked by 1alexanderras
  • uhuuhu Member

    Sheesh...
    Everyone has made their points.
    No one is going to change anyone's opinion.
    The damage has been done.

    Let it lie.....

    Thanked by 1forest
  • ralfralf Member

    @forest said:

    @MannDude said: My only major concern was I legit was going to drop MXR

    If you do, it should be because jar is willing to attack others who have business with him for petty reasons and because he cancels customers for equally petty reasons. Whether or not he snoops is not something that has been proven yet.

    Guilty before proven innocent?

    There hasn't been a single incident that would give any credence to the accusations you are making about him. You don't have any basis in fact for them, but you continue to keep reposting this baseless accusation to try to discredit him. Why?

    @MannDude said: Edit: I'm not defending jar either. I've said time and time again the trust pilot review was insanely stupid. I'm sure he knows that now and regrets doing that in his response to prior escalation.

    Given that he's doubling down on Reddit and other forums, I really doubt it.

    He's doubling down on Reddit? Really? That post was started by your vindictive buddy @WyvernCo and from what I can see, there is only has a single comment from jar. The only person doubling down is @WyvernCo, who, let's not forget, was the person who started this whole conflict.

    Thanked by 1skorous
  • forestforest Member
    edited April 8

    @ralf said: Guilty before proven innocent?

    Isn't that exactly what you are doing by making assertions about his state of mind? You've already decided that you know who is in the right, and are acting as if any disagreement is intentional provocation.

    @ralf said: your vindictive buddy

    You aren't arguing in good faith. I'm going to disengage.

    Thanked by 1WyvernCo
  • ObelousObelous Member

    @ralf said: Which, it wasn't, let's not forget. And he actually demanded their entire account was immediately terminated, and tried to get the payment processor to suspend them at all.

    Honestly, I don't really care that much about that. He can make whatever demands he wants, it doesn't really mean anything.

    I don't know the full context of the aftermath, but if they took action, then they determined that it was, in fact, a violation of their terms of service in some way.

    If they didn't take action, then... so what? Nothing happened.

  • WyvernCoWyvernCo Member

    @emgh said:

    @WyvernCo said: I was well within my rights to

    do you see how you both use this as justification and that that's also why this got to where we're at and why it can't stop until one of you decides that it isn't worth it?

    Yes and no.

    I do recognize the infinite escalation of two hard-headed people colliding with one another.

    However, I also think it was Jar that repeatedly crossed the red lines of indefensible behavior (attack sale, doxxing, firing attempt). Meanwhile, I have complete confidence that my actions were ethical and justified and Jar had every opportunity to avoid them by not engaging in scummy behaviors like those.

  • ralfralf Member

    @WyvernCo said:
    Based on some other comments here and on reddit, I think Jar is used to bullying people and having them back down.

    Coming from you, that is a bit rich.

    I have some great counter claims (publicity rights, libel/defamation, etc).

    Publicity rights? Nobody even knows who TF you are (given that you say the information shared earlier wasn't you), how can you claim that?

    And if you go down the libel/defamation route, not only will it be costly for legal fees, you can expect all the posts from you that were removed would be resurfaced by subpoena, and then people would actually be able to see what led to him to make that claim.

    Jar also has a lot more to lose than I do, so it'd be a fantastically dumb fight for him to pick.

    But the evidence shows that everything he's done has been retaliatory. If you don't want a fight, it's very simple - just stop stirring the shit and get on with your life.

    I am not going to escalate this to court first though, if he wants that fight, he's going to have to instigate it.

    So why do you keep pushing him to the point where he might feel that's the only way to get you to stop harassing him?

    I will not be silenced by his threats.

    What threats?

    Thanked by 1skorous
  • DPDP Administrator, The Domain Guy

    What's done is done, and what needed to be said has already been said, and yes, we're just going in circles.

    In my personal opinion, if both parties feel their actions were justified, that's their choice - they are responsible for the outcomes/consequences that follow.

    As for the rest of us, I'm sure we all have our own take on what went down, so let's just take a breather to cool off and stop using this to pick on one another, exploit our disagreements and fuel further arguments.

    Sorry.

This discussion has been closed.