All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
Question about German providers operating as sole traders
Just posting this to seek clarification.
As far as I understand the Wikipedia article on sole traders in Germany, a German provider who operates as such can choose whether or not to register with the national company register.
If they do, they receive the status of "e.K.", have to comply with the German Commercial Code (HGB) and they appear on the national company register.
If they don't, they only need to register at their local trade office (Gewerbeamt), comply with the German Civil Code (BGB) and not the HGB, and they don't appear on the national company register.
A couple of questions:
1) What are the implications of not being registered as an e.K. as far as German business regulations go? It seems like you can't file for bankruptcy if your business becomes insolvent and both your professional and private assets can be seized. That sounds risky for both the provider who in the worst case can end up being homeless, and their customers because they won't be able to be refunded in case of a deadpool.
2) Do you still need to comply with GDPR if you're not registered as an e.K.?
3) How do dispute resolutions with EU customers if you're not registered as an e.K.?
Tagging some German providers here because they know what they're talking about: @aluy @hypernex @SKRIME
TIA!
Comments
1: Yes, you are right about that one. It's a risk many (must) take, as it doesn't doesn't have as many requirements like 25000€ for a GmbH or even a notary. The downside is that a sole trader (Einzelunternehmer) is liable with his own money / assets. That said, this doesn't have to be bad for the customer. This means that even when the "business" goes bankrupt, you can still get the money back from the individual itself.
2: Yes, even if it's a sole trader. They must follow EU and German laws, it's still a form of business, even if not registered to the company register.
I think 3 was added as I wrote.
To add to 1, a sole trader (Einzelunternehmer) can still file for an "Insolvenzverfahren". Everything he earns will get to his creditors, except a bare minimum, with a time limit of a few years, he then will be debt free, even if he didn't pay back everything yet.
3: I don't know what is up to date now, but before 2025 ODR was available even for sole trader
I do not live in Germany anymore, but I have some experience in running businesses in Germany so I do have some insight although it might be outdated so please verify the information first if you are going to use it.
In Germany you can do business as either a "Einzelunternehmen", "Eingetragener Kaufmann" or a "GmbH".
GmbH is a limited liability company, equivalent to a LLC in the US or a Ltd in the UK.
An Einzelunternehmen is basically a private person doing business. You are privately responsible for liabilities, you do not have to have a registered office and the accounting is not very strict. Einzelunternehmen is not a separate legal entity, the company and the owner is legally one and the same.
An Eingetragener Kaufmann has limited liability, a registered office and manager is required, and it has to be registered with the "Handelsregister", kind of a register for companies. It has stricter accounting rules and pay higher taxes than a Einzelunternehmen.
I think (but don't quote me on this) that if a Einzelunternehmen reaches a certain size or a certain turnover, it can be forced by the authorities to be classified as a Eingetragener Kaufmann instead.
Both a Einzelunternehmen and a Eingetragener Kaufmann has to comply with GDPR if they have European citizens as customers and use the customers information commercially.
Sounds like what in the US is called a self-proprietorship.
Except that in the US anyone can start doing business as a self-proprietor without registering as a business or really any other requirements.
Yeah not being e.K. just means you’re basically a sole trader with full personal liability your private assets are on the line either way, registration mostly changes bookkeeping + legal obligations, not that risk.
Hey, thanks for the tag. Most of it has already been covered by @NotFoundException and @rcy026, so just a few additions from my side as someone running SKRIME as an Einzelunternehmen (and disclaimer upfront, I am not a lawyer):
One important correction: e.K. does not give you limited liability. An e.K. is still fully personally liable with private assets, just like a non-registered Einzelunternehmen. The only real differences are that you are listed in the Handelsregister and fall under HGB instead of BGB, which mainly means stricter bookkeeping (double-entry, balance sheet) and some commercial law specifics. Limited liability only kicks in with GmbH or UG.
You can register as e.K. voluntarily at any time, and you are forced to once the business reaches a certain size.
On point 3, small update: the EU ODR platform was actually shut down in mid-2025, so that link is gone. The general info duties under VSBG and the usual B2C rules still apply the same way regardless of e.K. status.
Hope that helps.
Basically whether a soletrader (Einzelunternehmer) is registered as an e.K. or not mostly affects accounting rules and being listed in the commercial register. Personal liability stays the same, so both your private and business assets can be touched if things go wrong. You can still go through an official insolvency process, and after a certain time, you can become debt free.
GDPR still applies even if you’re not an e.K., as long as you handle EU customers data.
For disputes with EU customers, normal consumer protection rules apply the old ODR platform has been gone since 2025, but the rules still stand.
In short: e.K. = stricter accounting and commercial register listing. otherwise, not much changes when it comes to liability, data rules, or customer rights.
Thank you @hypernex @SKRIME @rcy026 @NotFoundException for taking the time to explain those details, that makes things clearer.
The lack of limited liability with the e.K. status sounds a bit odd at face value but from what you've said, I gather that the purpose of e.K. is to enforce stricter accountancy for small businesses that have grown past a certain threshold, which is understandable.
Otherwise it's good to know that everything else is pretty much business as usual, including GDPR requirements. So long as small providers that operate as sole traders, whether e.K. or not, run their business competently I'm happy to support them.