New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Comments
The argument that '$13.99 isn't worth it' misses the entire point of consumer rights. If we define 'right' and 'wrong' based on the dollar amount, we are essentially giving businesses a license to scan and defraud as long as they keep the theft small. A formal written commitment (Ticket #9348203) is a contract, not a suggestion. Whether it's $0.37 or $13,000, a breach of promise is a breach of promise. I’m not here for the lunch money; I’m here to hold a dishonest business accountable to its own word.
1.Consumer rights are not measured in dollars and cents. What is at stake is not $13.99, but the basic trust between businesses and consumers. To ignore a small breach is to normalize dishonesty.
2.Every broken promise, no matter how small the amount, erodes public confidence in fair commerce. If businesses can cheat customers for pennies with impunity, they will feel emboldened to cheat on a larger scale tomorrow.
3.This is not about compensation. It is about upholding the principle that a company’s word is binding, and that consumers have the right to expect honesty, transparency, and accountability—regardless of the transaction size.
4.When we accept small-scale fraud as “not worth fighting over,” we surrender our consumer protections entirely. Fair treatment is not a privilege reserved for expensive purchases; it is a fundamental right for every customer.
@Listrock I agree that it's important to fight on principle, but from what I can see, you completely jumped the gun with filing a BBB report which, understandably, disrupts things. For such a small refund amount, it's natural that a fast response may not be prioritized. You could have waited or even posted here like you did, but instead you filed a report over... a late refund.
If anything, we should be commending CloudCone for offering you a refund despite the service being explicitly marked as non-refundable! They literally went out of their way to offer you something they did not need to offer, but it didn't come fast enough and now you're accusing them of fraud.
this is CloudCone
I really hate this overwrought style of AI writing that's everywhere now, everything is a major injustice to our friend Claude
Hi @CloudCone, I’m extremely disappointed with the current handling of my case.
I was promised a compensatory upgrade (SC2 plan) at $13.99/year to resolve a 30-day pending refund issue. However, after I tentatively agreed, your billing department (Sabry A) issued an invoice for $24.11/year—a direct breach of the original agreement.
Meanwhile, your support staff is using intimidation tactics, claiming that my BBB complaint will "delay the refund." This is classic bait-and-switch.
I have already updated my BBB Case #24646998 with evidence of these fraudulent billing practices. I am no longer interested in any "upgrades." I demand a full refund to my original payment method immediately.
https://i.imgur.com/CI7wlQl
https://i.imgur.com/skCippe
https://imgur.com/a/pLaWDt1
Even the person with a grudge sounds boring with the slop, I used to love reading these threads