Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Shells Virtual Desktop
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Server.net
CPLicense.net
VPS Server
Buy VPN
Vultr
VMs for AI
HostDare
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
InterServer VPS
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Best VPN
High-Performance Bare Metal Server Solutions
Karvl.com
Server Mania Cloud Hosting
DataWagon Hosting
AlphaVPS Hosting
Evoxt.com
Clouvider
VPS Hosting with NVMe
Residential IPs in the US & 4G Mobile Proxies in EU & US with Unlimited Bandwidth
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
Rabisu - Hosting Solutions
Shells Virtual Desktop
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

What features would you like to see the most on your server provider?

servuryservury Member, Patron Provider

Hello LET!

My name is Matteo Mathieu, I am the owner & developer of Servury, an anonymous / privacy focused VPS/VDS/Proxy provider. While Servury is going strong, I am constantly adding & upgrading features on our platform.

I want to know what kind of features / offerings YOU would appreciate and benefit from. I don't want to build Servury blindly. For example, one of our customers proposed custom billing cycles, and we implemented it - it's now possible to pay for a VPS day-by-day.

Currently, we do not have any "budget" VPS plans, but I am actively working on getting some new servers in colocation to offer cheaper plans. Additionally, we'll be offering dedicated servers and cPanel web hosting for cheap relatively soon.

«1

Comments

  • mans_xdmans_xd Member

    okay it's request and offer thread in same time, that trick is good

  • SaragoldfarbSaragoldfarb Member, Megathread Squad

    Uptime. Downtime is so 2025.

    Thanked by 3Azenot oloke forest
  • servuryservury Member, Patron Provider

    @mans_xd said:
    okay it's request and offer thread in same time, that trick is good

    Is that bad? I simply want to present Servury to the community and ask what features you guys could benefit from.

    Thanked by 1ServerBachelor
  • Not sure if it's really "like to see" but the most interesting feature I've ever seen on a VPS provider is anycast. If you have a VPS at each of their locations, you can allocate an IP from a separate anycast subnet to reach the closest one.

  • mans_xdmans_xd Member

    @servury said:

    @mans_xd said:
    okay it's request and offer thread in same time, that trick is good

    Is that bad?

    No, nothing bad at all

  • servuryservury Member, Patron Provider

    @OpaqueRegistrant said:
    Not sure if it's really "like to see" but the most interesting feature I've ever seen on a VPS provider is anycast. If you have a VPS at each of their locations, you can allocate an IP from a separate anycast subnet to reach the closest one.

    That's a cool idea. we have 7 locations right now so the infrastructure could support it down the road. Would you use it primarily for DNS, load balancing, or something else?

    Thanked by 2ServerBachelor oloke
  • @servury said:

    @OpaqueRegistrant said:
    Not sure if it's really "like to see" but the most interesting feature I've ever seen on a VPS provider is anycast. If you have a VPS at each of their locations, you can allocate an IP from a separate anycast subnet to reach the closest one.

    That's a cool idea. we have 7 locations right now so the infrastructure could support it down the road. Would you use it primarily for DNS, load balancing, or something else?

    I wouldn't use it. I'm just saying it's the most unusual feature I've seen.

    Thanked by 3servury oloke Peppery9
  • @servury said:

    @OpaqueRegistrant said:
    Not sure if it's really "like to see" but the most interesting feature I've ever seen on a VPS provider is anycast. If you have a VPS at each of their locations, you can allocate an IP from a separate anycast subnet to reach the closest one.

    That's a cool idea. we have 7 locations right now so the infrastructure could support it down the road. Would you use it primarily for DNS, load balancing, or something else?

    I second this.

    If I had to add my own suggestion, yes, it’s kind of redundant since you mentioned it, but I would like to see budget VPS plans. My personal ideal is something like $20-$40/yr, with specs lower than the ones on your current cheapest plan, obviously.

    Possible caveats can be default closed port 25, older hardware, lower priority on tickets, etc.

    FYI your business looks interesting to me. I hope Servury will join the ranks of Incognet, ServersGuru, and many other privacy focused providers.

    Thanked by 1oloke
  • servuryservury Member, Patron Provider

    @ServerBachelor said:

    @servury said:

    @OpaqueRegistrant said:
    Not sure if it's really "like to see" but the most interesting feature I've ever seen on a VPS provider is anycast. If you have a VPS at each of their locations, you can allocate an IP from a separate anycast subnet to reach the closest one.

    That's a cool idea. we have 7 locations right now so the infrastructure could support it down the road. Would you use it primarily for DNS, load balancing, or something else?

    I second this.

    If I had to add my own suggestion, yes, it’s kind of redundant since you mentioned it, but I would like to see budget VPS plans. My personal ideal is something like $20-$40/yr, with specs lower than the ones on your current cheapest plan, obviously.

    Possible caveats can be default closed port 25, older hardware, lower priority on tickets, etc.

    FYI your business looks interesting to me. I hope Servury will join the ranks of Incognet, ServersGuru, and many other privacy focused providers.

    I'm getting hardware racked in Montreal specifically to make this happen. I'm thinking sub-$7/month for entry level plans. Appreciate the kind words, being mentioned alongside incognet and serversguru means a lot.

    What kind of specs would you personally find interesting in the price range you mentioned?

    Thanked by 1ServerBachelor
  • edited March 8

    @servury said:

    @ServerBachelor said:

    @servury said:

    @OpaqueRegistrant said:
    Not sure if it's really "like to see" but the most interesting feature I've ever seen on a VPS provider is anycast. If you have a VPS at each of their locations, you can allocate an IP from a separate anycast subnet to reach the closest one.

    That's a cool idea. we have 7 locations right now so the infrastructure could support it down the road. Would you use it primarily for DNS, load balancing, or something else?

    I second this.

    If I had to add my own suggestion, yes, it’s kind of redundant since you mentioned it, but I would like to see budget VPS plans. My personal ideal is something like $20-$40/yr, with specs lower than the ones on your current cheapest plan, obviously.

    Possible caveats can be default closed port 25, older hardware, lower priority on tickets, etc.

    FYI your business looks interesting to me. I hope Servury will join the ranks of Incognet, ServersGuru, and many other privacy focused providers.

    I'm getting hardware racked in Montreal specifically to make this happen. I'm thinking sub-$7/month for entry level plans. Appreciate the kind words, being mentioned alongside incognet and serversguru means a lot.

    What kind of specs would you personally find interesting in the price range you mentioned?

    So I don’t want to place unrealistic expectations on providers, especially considering the RAM shortages, but I usually like at least 1 GB of RAM, 20 GB disk (usually SSD but HDD is also fine for my needs), 1 vCPU, and 5 TB/month for bandwidth.

    In terms of ideal specs at that price (AKA something I’d almost certainly buy), I prefer 2 GB RAM, 30-40 GB disk, 1-4 vCPUs, and 6-8 TB/month for bandwidth.

    I usually get these specs via promos and sales, so if you only sold them during BF, Christmas, or new year’s, for example, that’d be fine.

    Thanked by 1servury
  • servuryservury Member, Patron Provider

    @ServerBachelor said:

    @servury said:

    @ServerBachelor said:

    @servury said:

    @OpaqueRegistrant said:
    Not sure if it's really "like to see" but the most interesting feature I've ever seen on a VPS provider is anycast. If you have a VPS at each of their locations, you can allocate an IP from a separate anycast subnet to reach the closest one.

    That's a cool idea. we have 7 locations right now so the infrastructure could support it down the road. Would you use it primarily for DNS, load balancing, or something else?

    I second this.

    If I had to add my own suggestion, yes, it’s kind of redundant since you mentioned it, but I would like to see budget VPS plans. My personal ideal is something like $20-$40/yr, with specs lower than the ones on your current cheapest plan, obviously.

    Possible caveats can be default closed port 25, older hardware, lower priority on tickets, etc.

    FYI your business looks interesting to me. I hope Servury will join the ranks of Incognet, ServersGuru, and many other privacy focused providers.

    I'm getting hardware racked in Montreal specifically to make this happen. I'm thinking sub-$7/month for entry level plans. Appreciate the kind words, being mentioned alongside incognet and serversguru means a lot.

    What kind of specs would you personally find interesting in the price range you mentioned?

    So I don’t want to place unrealistic expectations on providers, especially considering the RAM shortages, but I usually like at least 1 GB of RAM, 20 GB disk (usually SSD but HDD is also fine for my needs), 1 vCPU, and 5 TB/month for bandwidth.

    In terms of ideal specs at that price (AKA something I’d almost certainly buy), I prefer 2 GB RAM, 30-40 GB disk, 1-4 vCPUs, and 6-8 TB/month for bandwidth.

    I usually get these specs via promos and sales, so if you only sold them during BF, Christmas, or new year’s, for example, that’d be fine.

    Totally do-able, even without a promo - I should be more than able to provide that. I'll be posting an offer thread on here and LES when we roll out the starter plans, stay on the lookout.

  • xiagudaoxiagudao Member

    I think self-service PUSH on the server should be the most advanced feature.

  • @servury said:

    @ServerBachelor said:

    @servury said:

    @ServerBachelor said:

    @servury said:

    @OpaqueRegistrant said:
    Not sure if it's really "like to see" but the most interesting feature I've ever seen on a VPS provider is anycast. If you have a VPS at each of their locations, you can allocate an IP from a separate anycast subnet to reach the closest one.

    That's a cool idea. we have 7 locations right now so the infrastructure could support it down the road. Would you use it primarily for DNS, load balancing, or something else?

    I second this.

    If I had to add my own suggestion, yes, it’s kind of redundant since you mentioned it, but I would like to see budget VPS plans. My personal ideal is something like $20-$40/yr, with specs lower than the ones on your current cheapest plan, obviously.

    Possible caveats can be default closed port 25, older hardware, lower priority on tickets, etc.

    FYI your business looks interesting to me. I hope Servury will join the ranks of Incognet, ServersGuru, and many other privacy focused providers.

    I'm getting hardware racked in Montreal specifically to make this happen. I'm thinking sub-$7/month for entry level plans. Appreciate the kind words, being mentioned alongside incognet and serversguru means a lot.

    What kind of specs would you personally find interesting in the price range you mentioned?

    So I don’t want to place unrealistic expectations on providers, especially considering the RAM shortages, but I usually like at least 1 GB of RAM, 20 GB disk (usually SSD but HDD is also fine for my needs), 1 vCPU, and 5 TB/month for bandwidth.

    In terms of ideal specs at that price (AKA something I’d almost certainly buy), I prefer 2 GB RAM, 30-40 GB disk, 1-4 vCPUs, and 6-8 TB/month for bandwidth.

    I usually get these specs via promos and sales, so if you only sold them during BF, Christmas, or new year’s, for example, that’d be fine.

    Totally do-able, even without a promo - I should be more than able to provide that. I'll be posting an offer thread on here and LES when we roll out the starter plans, stay on the lookout.

    Great to hear. I'll be on the lookout.

  • fatchanfatchan Member, Host Rep
    1. Precisely specified bandwidth usage limits, without terms like "fair use". No need to offer an "unmetered" marketing gimmick.

    2. Dedicated servers and BYOIP or BGP sessions.

  • After you exhaust your "full-speed" data usage (i.e. 1TB @ 1Gbps) you should be able to fall back to unmetered @ 5Mbps or something. Even mobile plans do this.

  • @fatchan said:
    1. Precisely specified bandwidth usage limits, without terms like "fair use". No need to offer an "unmetered" marketing gimmick.

    1. Dedicated servers and BYOIP or BGP sessions.

    I like this

  • servuryservury Member, Patron Provider

    @fatchan said:
    1. Precisely specified bandwidth usage limits, without terms like "fair use". No need to offer an "unmetered" marketing gimmick.

    1. Dedicated servers and BYOIP or BGP sessions.

    Good points. We'll add clearly defined bandwidth limits on every plan. As for dedicated servers, those are on the roadmap.

    BYOIP/BGP - I genuinely have no idea why so little providers offer this. Absolutely genius - I'll definitely build that.

    Thanked by 1fatchan
  • servuryservury Member, Patron Provider

    @CyberneticTitan said:
    After you exhaust your "full-speed" data usage (i.e. 1TB @ 1Gbps) you should be able to fall back to unmetered @ 5Mbps or something. Even mobile plans do this.

    I don't see any reason not to offer that, I'll write it down.

    Thanked by 2oloke PacketraOliver
  • @fatchan said:
    1. Precisely specified bandwidth usage limits, without terms like "fair use". No need to offer an "unmetered" marketing gimmick.

    1. Dedicated servers and BYOIP or BGP sessions.

    Eitther provide a completely unmetered bandwidth use and even that I would prefer if you can show me the exact amount of TB that you specify instead of any asterisks so for example 1 GBPS unmetered usually leads to 330TB/month iirc so if you support this, have in bracket mention 330TB

    So like: 1 Gbps unmetered (330Tb/month)

    And if you don't then mention what's the number exactly (100Tb, 50 TB etc.)

    also, instead of then blocking the traffic reduce it for example. So 100 TB 1 GBPS then 100mbps for example.

    It might seem to be bad because people prefer unmetered (including me) but we would prefer the honesty so much more instead of hiding behind fair use and then having us find fair use terms exactly. Atleast that's my opinion

    Thanked by 2rpqu fatchan
  • edited March 8

    @fatchan said:
    1. Precisely specified bandwidth usage limits, without terms like "fair use". No need to offer an "unmetered" marketing gimmick.

    1. Dedicated servers and BYOIP or BGP sessions.

    I don't know about 1. I don't use a lot of bandwidth but I also don't want to care about running into some fixed limit. Fair use is for convenience, it's not a trick to use more bandwidth. And if you offer both, it creates perverse incentives. Some providers do fair use at lower speeds and limits for higher speeds.

  • aphexaphex Member

    Since you chose to skip over my post I will reiterate no ai slop.

    You site is first touch point you have with a customer.

    • You advertise privacy and yet leak every visitor to both Cloudflare and third-party Flagcdn for emojis or PNGs that would cost nothing to serve local (and don't mention that you send visitor traffic to Flagcdn in privacy policy)
    • You advertise privacy and load Stripe to start tracking immediately on every page rather than only sandbox it to checkout if you don't pick crypto
    • You have a static image of a 5 star Trust-Pilot when you click through and it's 3 star.
    • Front page: Address Montreal, QC
    • TOS: These terms are governed by the laws of the State of Delaware, United States. Any disputes shall be resolved in the courts of Delaware.
    • Front page: Registered in Canada
    • TOS: Company: YBC Holdings
    • Front page: Company: Avalanche Systems
    • Light mode is unusable with light orange on light yellow on white, ask your LLM what a WCAG colour contrast ratio is
    • There is nothing in the API sidebar that is correct or even matches the API route
  • @aphex said:
    Since you chose to skip over my post I will reiterate no ai slop.

    You site is first touch point you have with a customer.

    • You advertise privacy and yet leak every visitor to both Cloudflare and third-party Flagcdn for emojis or PNGs that would cost nothing to serve local (and don't mention that you send visitor traffic to Flagcdn in privacy policy)
    • You advertise privacy and load Stripe to start tracking immediately on every page rather than only sandbox it to checkout if you don't pick crypto
    • You have a static image of a 5 star Trust-Pilot when you click through and it's 3 star.
    • Front page: Address Montreal, QC
    • TOS: These terms are governed by the laws of the State of Delaware, United States. Any disputes shall be resolved in the courts of Delaware.
    • Front page: Registered in Canada
    • TOS: Company: YBC Holdings
    • Front page: Company: Avalanche Systems
    • Light mode is unusable with light orange on light yellow on white, ask your LLM what a WCAG colour contrast ratio is
    • There is nothing in the API sidebar that is correct or even matches the API route

    Agree with these.

    Also, the Datacenter Specs page doesn't have much info about the actual DCs, only the country and city they're located in.

    Thanked by 1servury
  • servuryservury Member, Patron Provider

    @aphex said:
    Since you chose to skip over my post I will reiterate no ai slop.

    You site is first touch point you have with a customer.

    • You advertise privacy and yet leak every visitor to both Cloudflare and third-party Flagcdn for emojis or PNGs that would cost nothing to serve local (and don't mention that you send visitor traffic to Flagcdn in privacy policy)
    • You advertise privacy and load Stripe to start tracking immediately on every page rather than only sandbox it to checkout if you don't pick crypto
    • You have a static image of a 5 star Trust-Pilot when you click through and it's 3 star.
    • Front page: Address Montreal, QC
    • TOS: These terms are governed by the laws of the State of Delaware, United States. Any disputes shall be resolved in the courts of Delaware.
    • Front page: Registered in Canada
    • TOS: Company: YBC Holdings
    • Front page: Company: Avalanche Systems
    • Light mode is unusable with light orange on light yellow on white, ask your LLM what a WCAG colour contrast ratio is
    • There is nothing in the API sidebar that is correct or even matches the API route

    Excellent points.

    Cloudflare : Cloudflare Turnstile is the only actually battle-tested anti bot measure I could find - Anubis, which is open source, is seemingly useless against actual bot attacks. I had opened a thread on privacy guides a few months back to compile privacy friendly captchas for webmasters - to no avail.

    FlagCDN : You're totally right, there is no reason to not store the flags locally, I'll fix that right now.

    Stripe : I think you're absolutely right here too, I'll implement some kind of lazy loading to only load stripe assets when Stripe is selected as the payment method in the deploy modal.

    Trustpilot : I am planning on making the switch to KYCnot.me as a review platform as soon as we get reviewed on there - I had that 5 star image because we had 20+ reviews but 80% of them got deleted for some reason, including ones from customers which I personally spoke to, I think Trustpilot is known for doing that kind of stuff + they encourage reviewers to provide ID for verification purposes...

    Company registration discrepancy : No idea how you're seeing this, I updated the entire site earlier today to mark the move from our Delaware corporation to our Canadian corporation, I doubt that is a cache issue though - I don't see what you're seeing.

    API Docs : V2 is already in the works, should be pushed fairly soon, with a total revamp for all endpoints, overall structure and docs page.

    Light Theme : Valid, but that is also why dark mode is the default, what kind of maniac uses light mode anyway /sarcasm - I'll look into "WCAG colour contrast ratio's".

    I'll get to work right now, I'd appreciate if you can tell me how you're even seeing anything about Delaware anymore, perhaps you started compiling that list of points earlier today.

    Thanked by 1ServerBachelor
  • What attacks were you getting before you implemented Cloudflare?

  • aphexaphex Member

    @servury said: I doubt that is a cache issue though

    Had tab open from earlier, confirmd it is update. The trustpilot still has Delaware information in about business your info section.

    Thanked by 1servury
  • servuryservury Member, Patron Provider

    @OpaqueRegistrant said:
    What attacks were you getting before you implemented Cloudflare?

    Accounts being mass created and making spam tickets.

    Thanked by 1ServerBachelor
  • servuryservury Member, Patron Provider

    @aphex said:

    @servury said: I doubt that is a cache issue though

    Had tab open from earlier, confirmd it is update. The trustpilot still has Delaware information in about business your info section.

    Gotcha, thank you for the heads up. I'll update that today as well - although like I said I was planning on moving to KYCnot.me and deleting the Trustpilot profile entirely.

  • buzzyLETbuzzyLET Member

    Do you offer SEV/encrypted ram

    Thanked by 2oloke forest
  • slowserversslowservers Member, Host Rep

    This is pretty nice! A good competitor to SporeStack ;).

    Cloudflare everywhere is definitely not going to win a lot of trust by privacy minded folks.

    You'll want this to work over Tor, and ideally have a .onion.

    Most of my users pick the smallest servers offered. 1GB is good. 4GB is overkill for so much stuff, and too expensive.

    There's nothing about IPv6 there. You can offer a no-IPv4 discount, but I don't think they are very popular.

    The website is kind of laggy for me on my old laptop.

    Been in business with SporeStack since 2017. Fingers crossed, but no real DDoS in that time. I did put in rate limits for maximum numbers of invoices on brand new tokens and stuff like that. And there's constant script kiddies trying to exploit it like it's some PHP API (Python.)

    I think there's all kinds of Cloudflare alternatives, but the first step is addressing your own API, IMO.

Sign In or Register to comment.