Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Shells Virtual Desktop
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Server.net
CPLicense.net
VPS Server
Buy VPN
Vultr
VMs for AI
HostDare
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
InterServer VPS
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Best VPN
High-Performance Bare Metal Server Solutions
Karvl.com
Server Mania Cloud Hosting
DataWagon Hosting
AlphaVPS Hosting
Evoxt.com
Clouvider
VPS Hosting with NVMe
Residential IPs in the US & 4G Mobile Proxies in EU & US with Unlimited Bandwidth
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
Rabisu - Hosting Solutions
Shells Virtual Desktop
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Bing blackholed Neocities

https://blog.neocities.org/blog/2026/01/27/bing-block

Might not be too devastating if its only bing alone but ddg etc pulled from bing too.

Comments

  • Prefer using Google rather than Bing, it helps a lot!

  • jsgjsg Member, Resident Benchmarker

    What's "Neocities"?

  • @jsg said: What's "Neocities"?

    they offered free/paid site hosting and site builder on subdomain of neocities, just like wordpress.com

  • @blip1945 said: Might not be too devastating if its only bing alone but ddg etc pulled from bing too.

    Also, bing pulled the plug on Cloudflare pages.
    site:pages.dev
    on bing serves zero results. There were like 100,000+ domains earlier indexed.

    Thanked by 2BasToTheMax jcn50
  • @JasonM said:
    they offered free/paid site hosting and site builder on subdomain of neocities, just like wordpress.com

    I'd say they're more of "smallweb" rather than traditional hosting. Most if not all of sites there gave vibes of the 90s, plain ol' html, minimal css, absurd amount of animated gif.

    neocities.org/browse is a rabbithole.

    Thanked by 1sillycat
  • @blip1945 said: I'd say they're more of "smallweb" rather than traditional hosting. Most if not all of sites there gave vibes of the 90s, plain ol' html, minimal css, absurd amount of animated gif.

    yup. its feels like Geocities era.
    it might be some sites were used for phishing or some abuse that's why Bing removed it?

    theres another service like neocities.. its Nekoweb.org

  • @JasonM said
    it might be some sites were used for phishing or some abuse that's why Bing removed it?

    Don't think so. If that blogpost to be believed, they say they react quickly to abuse but microsoft just outright delisted them and being radio silence.

  • @blip1945 said: Don't think so. If that blogpost to be believed, they say they react quickly to abuse but microsoft just outright delisted them and being radio silence.

    yeah.. it read the blog post.
    similar fate happened with pages.dev domain for cloudflare. totally delisted. it had tons of phishing subdomains. I think cloudflare is quite prompt in removing/disabling those. But still bing removed ALL.

    I've a fun site with neocities. hope it gets back in bing.

    Thanked by 1BasToTheMax
  • @jsg said:
    What's "Neocities"?

    a fork of the yahoo geocities which stopped long time ago after the dotcom bubble popped.

    Thanked by 1jsg
  • Neocities? Bing? How the fuck did I go to sleep in 2026 and wake up 15 years ago?

    Thanked by 1oloke
  • zedzed Member

    If it's in response to overwhelming abuse it's probably a good thing for the general public but.. I don't really want the search engine deciding what I'm allowed to see, slippery slope etc.

    Thanked by 2bikegremlin forest
  • rustelekomrustelekom Member, Patron Provider

    @zed said:
    If it's in response to overwhelming abuse it's probably a good thing for the general public but.. I don't really want the search engine deciding what I'm allowed to see, slippery slope etc.

    This is not an easy case. How many similar situations are simply unknown to us? Technically, Bing is a product of a private company, and as a private company, they can block, pessimize any of the sources they don't like. But what about global human rights on guaranteed access to information? You can't make decisions if you don't know some or all of the information, or if you only have some of the information. Just remember what happened during COVID19. We still don't know how many violations of access to information have been committed.

  • rpqurpqu Member
    edited January 28

    @rustelekom said:

    @zed said:
    If it's in response to overwhelming abuse it's probably a good thing for the general public but.. I don't really want the search engine deciding what I'm allowed to see, slippery slope etc.

    Just remember what happened during COVID19.

    Politician and health authorities had no grip with the reality, because they went to far with censoring non-approved talking point through private companies

  • zedzed Member

    @rpqu said:

    @rustelekom said:

    @zed said:
    If it's in response to overwhelming abuse it's probably a good thing for the general public but.. I don't really want the search engine deciding what I'm allowed to see, slippery slope etc.

    Just remember what happened during COVID19.

    Politician and health authorities had no grip with the reality, because they went to far with censoring non-approved talking point through private companies

    Well it was more about managing the narrative than lack of reality grip. Look at the bobblehead in charge of health in the USA for example.

    But anyway, somebody needs to protect the old folks like my parents from what pops up in search engines. Some of us don't need it though, and don't trust private corps to make decisions like that.

    I dunno what the solution is, if there is one. I run a personal instance of SearXNG, so.

    Thanked by 1bikegremlin
  • emghemgh Member, Megathread Squad

    Wow the vibe here is almost worse than in the Ukraine thread can we improve thanks

    Thanked by 2oloke sillycat
  • rpqurpqu Member

    @zed said:

    @rpqu said:

    @rustelekom said:

    @zed said:
    If it's in response to overwhelming abuse it's probably a good thing for the general public but.. I don't really want the search engine deciding what I'm allowed to see, slippery slope etc.

    Just remember what happened during COVID19.

    Politician and health authorities had no grip with the reality, because they went to far with censoring non-approved talking point through private companies

    Well it was more about managing the narrative than lack of reality grip. Look at the bobblehead in charge of health in the USA for example.

    I could agree with holding the narrative is one of the factor.
    However, when communal knowledge interacts with something that undoubtedly true through self-observation (and can't be discounted as mere coincidence), and it invalidates previously held belief. Non-delusional people would change their opinion, instead of rejecting the synthesis.

    But anyway, somebody needs to protect the old folks like my parents from what pops up in search engines. Some of us don't need it though, and don't trust private corps to make decisions like that.

    I dunno what the solution is, if there is one. I run a personal instance of SearXNG, so.

    I appreciate your contribution. And I recommend you to attest whether the decision other people made for yourself or your parents are right or wrong in greater frequency.
    Just looked into instance list and found @oloke 's instance

  • olokeoloke Member, Host Rep

    @rpqu said:

    @zed said:

    @rpqu said:

    @rustelekom said:

    @zed said:
    If it's in response to overwhelming abuse it's probably a good thing for the general public but.. I don't really want the search engine deciding what I'm allowed to see, slippery slope etc.

    Just remember what happened during COVID19.

    Politician and health authorities had no grip with the reality, because they went to far with censoring non-approved talking point through private companies

    Well it was more about managing the narrative than lack of reality grip. Look at the bobblehead in charge of health in the USA for example.

    I could agree with holding the narrative is one of the factor.
    However, when communal knowledge interacts with something that undoubtedly true through self-observation (and can't be discounted as mere coincidence), and it invalidates previously held belief. Non-delusional people would change their opinion, instead of rejecting the synthesis.

    But anyway, somebody needs to protect the old folks like my parents from what pops up in search engines. Some of us don't need it though, and don't trust private corps to make decisions like that.

    I dunno what the solution is, if there is one. I run a personal instance of SearXNG, so.

    I appreciate your contribution. And I recommend you to attest whether the decision other people made for yourself or your parents are right or wrong in greater frequency.
    Just looked into instance list and found @oloke 's instance

    Yes, that's my instance :)

    SearXNG had problems with Google for some time now so I switched to 4get since. But my instance remains operational and I think even Google should work there now.

  • rpqurpqu Member
    edited January 28

    @oloke said:

    @rpqu said:

    @zed said:

    @rpqu said:

    @rustelekom said:

    @zed said:
    If it's in response to overwhelming abuse it's probably a good thing for the general public but.. I don't really want the search engine deciding what I'm allowed to see, slippery slope etc.

    Just remember what happened during COVID19.

    Politician and health authorities had no grip with the reality, because they went to far with censoring non-approved talking point through private companies

    Well it was more about managing the narrative than lack of reality grip. Look at the bobblehead in charge of health in the USA for example.

    I could agree with holding the narrative is one of the factor.
    However, when communal knowledge interacts with something that undoubtedly true through self-observation (and can't be discounted as mere coincidence), and it invalidates previously held belief. Non-delusional people would change their opinion, instead of rejecting the synthesis.

    But anyway, somebody needs to protect the old folks like my parents from what pops up in search engines. Some of us don't need it though, and don't trust private corps to make decisions like that.

    I dunno what the solution is, if there is one. I run a personal instance of SearXNG, so.

    I appreciate your contribution. And I recommend you to attest whether the decision other people made for yourself or your parents are right or wrong in greater frequency.
    Just looked into instance list and found @oloke 's instance

    Yes, that's my instance :)

    SearXNG had problems with Google for some time now so I switched to 4get since. But my instance remains operational and I think even Google should work there now.

    Right, sometime I had to open a dozen or so instances to find working one.
    Very glad to meet you. But, I won't deny looking at the list reminds me of other friends whose instance missing. Afterall, it has been almost 7 years

    Thanked by 1oloke
Sign In or Register to comment.