Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Shells Virtual Desktop
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Server.net
CPLicense.net
VPS Server
Buy VPN
Vultr
VMs for AI
HostDare
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
InterServer VPS
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Best VPN
High-Performance Bare Metal Server Solutions
Karvl.com
Server Mania Cloud Hosting
DataWagon Hosting
AlphaVPS Hosting
Evoxt.com
Clouvider
VPS Hosting with NVMe
Residential IPs in the US & 4G Mobile Proxies in EU & US with Unlimited Bandwidth
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
Rabisu - Hosting Solutions
Shells Virtual Desktop
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

BF 25 deals in EU/US/APAC

1141517192023

Comments

  • ralfralf Member

    @noisycode said:
    Still waiting for a YABS for the HFC plan...

    Not sure how different this is to the current HFC, but here's a YABS from my HFC in SG bought a couple of years ago.

    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2025-04-20                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Thu Jan 15 14:07:07 UTC 2026
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Uptime     : 308 days, 16 hours, 18 minutes
    Processor  : AMD EPYC 7513 32-Core Processor
    CPU cores  : 3 @ 2595.124 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
    RAM        : 12.1 GiB
    Swap       : 0.0 KiB
    Disk       : 137.5 GiB
    Distro     : Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm)
    Kernel     : 6.1.0-31-amd64
    VM Type    : KVM
    IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ✔ Online
    
    IPv6 Network Information:
    ---------------------------------
    ISP        : HostHatch
    ASN        : AS63473 HostHatch, LLC
    Host       : HostHatch, LLC
    Location   : Singapore, North West (03)
    Country    : Singapore
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/vda1):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 156.04 MB/s  (39.0k) | 1.75 GB/s    (27.4k)
    Write      | 156.45 MB/s  (39.1k) | 1.76 GB/s    (27.6k)
    Total      | 312.49 MB/s  (78.1k) | 3.52 GB/s    (55.0k)
               |                      |
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 2.41 GB/s     (4.7k) | 2.42 GB/s     (2.3k)
    Write      | 2.54 GB/s     (4.9k) | 2.58 GB/s     (2.5k)
    Total      | 4.96 GB/s     (9.6k) | 5.01 GB/s     (4.8k)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 969 Mbits/sec   | 1.11 Gbits/sec  | 151 ms
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 975 Mbits/sec   | 1.08 Gbits/sec  | 153 ms
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 1.12 Gbits/sec  | 1.11 Gbits/sec  | 123 ms
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 7.72 Gbits/sec  | 5.84 Gbits/sec  | 2.51 ms
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 764 Mbits/sec   | 702 Mbits/sec   | 167 ms
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 634 Mbits/sec   | 696 Mbits/sec   | 210 ms
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 392 Mbits/sec   | 518 Mbits/sec   | 336 ms
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 969 Mbits/sec   | 1.14 Gbits/sec  | 153 ms
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 969 Mbits/sec   | 1.13 Gbits/sec  | 153 ms
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 1.31 Gbits/sec  | 1.45 Gbits/sec  | 122 ms
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 7.54 Gbits/sec  | 5.65 Gbits/sec  | 3.63 ms
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 795 Mbits/sec   | 711 Mbits/sec   | 165 ms
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 678 Mbits/sec   | 747 Mbits/sec   | 210 ms
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | busy            | 425 Mbits/sec   | 336 ms
    
    Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value
                    |
    Single Core     | 1345
    Multi Core      | 3078
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/16098752
    
    YABS completed in 14 min 51 sec
    

    This isn't entirely idle as I have several nested VMs on this, my top looks like this:

    top - 14:29:01 up 308 days, 16:40,  2 users,  load average: 0.29, 0.54, 0.62
    Tasks: 158 total,   1 running, 157 sleeping,   0 stopped,   0 zombie
    %Cpu(s):  5.0 us,  8.8 sy,  0.0 ni, 82.5 id,  0.1 wa,  0.0 hi,  0.1 si,  0.0 st
    MiB Mem :  12432.9 total,   2634.1 free,   6960.9 used,   3160.4 buff/cache
    MiB Swap:      0.0 total,      0.0 free,      0.0 used.   5472.1 avail Mem
    

    The GB6 score has dropped a bit since when I first got it, I guess the node is a bit busier now. When first set up (Sun Oct 15 21:01:41 UTC 2023):

    Single Core     | 1717
    Multi Core      | 4509
    YABS completed in 13 min 49 sec
    
    Thanked by 1noisycode
  • yoursunnyyoursunny Member, IPv6 Advocate

    @hosthatch said:
    They will be available on https://cloud.hosthatch.com/sale/current-promotions in the next 30 minutes.

    It's basically the same Black Friday plans, but with a 10-30% markup (depending on the location), and some locations are not available (Stockholm, Zurich, Sydney).

    $100 becomes $120 in Seoul (formerly known as Unknown).
    No reason to buy now.
    Just travel back in time and buy on Cyber Monday.

  • ralfralf Member

    @yoursunny said:

    @hosthatch said:
    They will be available on https://cloud.hosthatch.com/sale/current-promotions in the next 30 minutes.

    It's basically the same Black Friday plans, but with a 10-30% markup (depending on the location), and some locations are not available (Stockholm, Zurich, Sydney).

    $100 becomes $120 in Seoul (formerly known as Unknown).
    No reason to buy now.

    Hehe, I was still considering another one - when we bought ours we had no idea if the network would be good or not, now we do, so there's less risk in the purchase!

    Annoyed I didn't get the storage VPS I wanted back on CM though. I was so excited about ordering Seoul, I completely forgot about my storage needs!

    Thanked by 1Hitori0221
  • @funeego said:
    Invoice 588421
    pls double.

  • Thanks @hosthatch for offering your wares to us LET heathens.

  • @ralf said:

    @noisycode said:
    Still waiting for a YABS for the HFC plan...

    Not sure how different this is to the current HFC, but here's a YABS from my HFC in SG bought a couple of years ago.

    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    # Yet-Another-Bench-Script #
    # v2025-04-20 #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #

    Thu Jan 15 14:07:07 UTC 2026

    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Uptime : 308 days, 16 hours, 18 minutes
    Processor : AMD EPYC 7513 32-Core Processor
    CPU cores : 3 @ 2595.124 MHz
    AES-NI : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
    RAM : 12.1 GiB
    Swap : 0.0 KiB
    Disk : 137.5 GiB
    Distro : Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm)
    Kernel : 6.1.0-31-amd64
    VM Type : KVM
    IPv4/IPv6 : ✔ Online / ✔ Online

    IPv6 Network Information:
    ---------------------------------
    ISP : HostHatch
    ASN : AS63473 HostHatch, LLC
    Host : HostHatch, LLC
    Location : Singapore, North West (03)
    Country : Singapore

    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/vda1):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k (IOPS) | 64k (IOPS)
    ------ | --- ---- | ---- ----
    Read | 156.04 MB/s (39.0k) | 1.75 GB/s (27.4k)
    Write | 156.45 MB/s (39.1k) | 1.76 GB/s (27.6k)
    Total | 312.49 MB/s (78.1k) | 3.52 GB/s (55.0k)
    | |
    Block Size | 512k (IOPS) | 1m (IOPS)
    ------ | --- ---- | ---- ----
    Read | 2.41 GB/s (4.7k) | 2.42 GB/s (2.3k)
    Write | 2.54 GB/s (4.9k) | 2.58 GB/s (2.5k)
    Total | 4.96 GB/s (9.6k) | 5.01 GB/s (4.8k)

    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider | Location (Link) | Send Speed | Recv Speed | Ping
    ----- | ----- | ---- | ---- | ----
    Clouvider | London, UK (10G) | 969 Mbits/sec | 1.11 Gbits/sec | 151 ms
    Eranium | Amsterdam, NL (100G) | 975 Mbits/sec | 1.08 Gbits/sec | 153 ms
    Uztelecom | Tashkent, UZ (10G) | 1.12 Gbits/sec | 1.11 Gbits/sec | 123 ms
    Leaseweb | Singapore, SG (10G) | 7.72 Gbits/sec | 5.84 Gbits/sec | 2.51 ms
    Clouvider | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 764 Mbits/sec | 702 Mbits/sec | 167 ms
    Leaseweb | NYC, NY, US (10G) | 634 Mbits/sec | 696 Mbits/sec | 210 ms
    Edgoo | Sao Paulo, BR (1G) | 392 Mbits/sec | 518 Mbits/sec | 336 ms

    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider | Location (Link) | Send Speed | Recv Speed | Ping
    ----- | ----- | ---- | ---- | ----
    Clouvider | London, UK (10G) | 969 Mbits/sec | 1.14 Gbits/sec | 153 ms
    Eranium | Amsterdam, NL (100G) | 969 Mbits/sec | 1.13 Gbits/sec | 153 ms
    Uztelecom | Tashkent, UZ (10G) | 1.31 Gbits/sec | 1.45 Gbits/sec | 122 ms
    Leaseweb | Singapore, SG (10G) | 7.54 Gbits/sec | 5.65 Gbits/sec | 3.63 ms
    Clouvider | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 795 Mbits/sec | 711 Mbits/sec | 165 ms
    Leaseweb | NYC, NY, US (10G) | 678 Mbits/sec | 747 Mbits/sec | 210 ms
    Edgoo | Sao Paulo, BR (1G) | busy | 425 Mbits/sec | 336 ms

    Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test | Value
    |
    Single Core | 1345
    Multi Core | 3078
    Full Test | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/16098752

    YABS completed in 14 min 51 sec

    This isn't entirely idle as I have several nested VMs on this, my top looks like this:

    top - 14:29:01 up 308 days, 16:40,  2 users,  load average: 0.29, 0.54, 0.62
    Tasks: 158 total,   1 running, 157 sleeping,   0 stopped,   0 zombie
    %Cpu(s):  5.0 us,  8.8 sy,  0.0 ni, 82.5 id,  0.1 wa,  0.0 hi,  0.1 si,  0.0 st
    MiB Mem :  12432.9 total,   2634.1 free,   6960.9 used,   3160.4 buff/cache
    MiB Swap:      0.0 total,      0.0 free,      0.0 used.   5472.1 avail Mem
    

    The GB6 score has dropped a bit since when I first got it, I guess the node is a bit busier now. When first set up (Sun Oct 15 21:01:41 UTC 2023):

    Single Core     | 1717
    Multi Core      | 4509
    YABS completed in 13 min 49 sec
    
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2025-04-20                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Thu Jan 15 20:50:35 IST 2026
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Uptime     : 27 days, 20 hours, 27 minutes
    Processor  : AMD EPYC 7763 64-Core Processor
    CPU cores  : 2 @ 2449.996 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
    RAM        : 3.8 GiB
    Swap       : 0.0 KiB
    Disk       : 45.0 GiB
    Distro     : Ubuntu 24.04 LTS
    Kernel     : 6.8.0-31-generic
    VM Type    : KVM
    IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ✔ Online
    
    IPv6 Network Information:
    ---------------------------------
    ISP        : HostHatch
    ASN        : AS63473 HostHatch, LLC
    Host       : HostHatch, LLC
    Location   : Chiyoda City, Tokyo (13)
    Country    : Japan
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/vda1):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 108.55 MB/s  (27.1k) | 903.91 MB/s  (14.1k)
    Write      | 108.84 MB/s  (27.2k) | 908.66 MB/s  (14.1k)
    Total      | 217.39 MB/s  (54.3k) | 1.81 GB/s    (28.3k)
               |                      |
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 1.16 GB/s     (2.2k) | 1.21 GB/s     (1.1k)
    Write      | 1.22 GB/s     (2.3k) | 1.29 GB/s     (1.2k)
    Total      | 2.38 GB/s     (4.6k) | 2.51 GB/s     (2.4k)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 699 Mbits/sec   | 878 Mbits/sec   | 204 ms
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 674 Mbits/sec   | 983 Mbits/sec   | 221 ms
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 775 Mbits/sec   | 1.09 Gbits/sec  | 215 ms
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 2.57 Gbits/sec  | 3.00 Gbits/sec  | 67.5 ms
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 1.20 Gbits/sec  | 1.27 Gbits/sec  | 107 ms
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 1.09 Gbits/sec  | 1.55 Gbits/sec  | 144 ms
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 419 Mbits/sec   | 636 Mbits/sec   | 255 ms
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 700 Mbits/sec   | 739 Mbits/sec   | 204 ms
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 674 Mbits/sec   | 993 Mbits/sec   | 224 ms
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 621 Mbits/sec   | 842 Mbits/sec   | 215 ms
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 2.55 Gbits/sec  | 2.89 Gbits/sec  | 67.7 ms
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 1.18 Gbits/sec  | 2.04 Gbits/sec  | 98.5 ms
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 1.09 Gbits/sec  | 1.55 Gbits/sec  | 143 ms
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 512 Mbits/sec   | 748 Mbits/sec   | 262 ms
    
    Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value
                    |
    Single Core     | 938
    Multi Core      | 1550
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/16099673
    
    YABS completed in 17 min 59 sec
    

    HH Japan. With 7763 I expected to be lower than yours but 938 seems a bit too low.

    But running some low memory, low cpu hungry apps so more than enough for me now.

    It was $35 per annum I think.

  • ralfralf Member
    edited January 15

    @itachikonoha said:

    HH Japan. With 7763 I expected to be lower than yours but 938 seems a bit too low.

    But running some low memory, low cpu hungry apps so more than enough for me now.

    It was $35 per annum I think.

    The main difference is that you just have 2 fair-share cores, the next one up has 1 dedicated + 2 fair-share cores.

    You still might not get 100% of the dedicated as it's a thread not a core, but it'll certainly help.

    Just noticed the $35. You just have the lowest spec NVMe one, mine is the higher spec HFC one. Mine was $150/2yr (massive discount when they were first added to the lineup), which is now $255/2y two years later.

  • @ralf said:

    @itachikonoha said:

    HH Japan. With 7763 I expected to be lower than yours but 938 seems a bit too low.

    But running some low memory, low cpu hungry apps so more than enough for me now.

    It was $35 per annum I think.

    The main difference is that you just have 2 fair-share cores, the next one up has 1 dedicated + 2 fair-share cores.

    You still might not get 100% of the dedicated as it's a thread not a core, but it'll certainly help.

    Understood.

    But can you explain what is 0.5 dedicated core? How can it be half of a vcore which is dedicated?

  • ralfralf Member
    edited January 15

    @itachikonoha said:

    @ralf said:

    @itachikonoha said:

    HH Japan. With 7763 I expected to be lower than yours but 938 seems a bit too low.

    But running some low memory, low cpu hungry apps so more than enough for me now.

    It was $35 per annum I think.

    The main difference is that you just have 2 fair-share cores, the next one up has 1 dedicated + 2 fair-share cores.

    You still might not get 100% of the dedicated as it's a thread not a core, but it'll certainly help.

    Understood.

    But can you explain what is 0.5 dedicated core? How can it be half of a vcore which is dedicated?

    There's a few ways of doing dedicated vcores, basically because there are 2 threads to a core.

    • Lock customer vcore to a thread on the host that nothing else uses. Can burst up to 100% of the core but if you have a noisy neighbour, you could sometimes get less than 50% of the core. You'll be stuck with the same neighbour too.
    • Limit the CPU time on each thread to 50%. You max single-core will be lower, but it's guaranteed you'll get the 50%. There will be lots of wasted performance on the CPU
    • If you have say 4 customers each with a dedicated vcore, pin one CPU in each VM to a pool containing 4 threads that nobody else touches. Like the first solution, but you dynamically change neighbour, and so you will usually get 100% if you try unless everyone on that host is maxing their dedicated vcore. The other vcores come from a different pool that's oversold, so less likely you'll get 100%.
    • One I personally like if you get 2 dedicated vcores is having them pinned to the same CPU on the host. You won't get max 100% on both, but it's more like a real CPU. You can always max one of them guaranteed.

    If you have 0.5 dedicated, then you can either do like the 2nd, but limit CPU time even lower. Or you do like 3 but put those people in a pool with half the dedicated resources compared to users.

    So, e.g. you are selling 1 dedicated + 2 fair use. On a 64 core machine, you might have 32 VMs, a pool of 32 that each VM gets 1 from, and a pool of 31 that each VM gets 2 vcores from. They should get close to 100% from their dedicated CPU unless the host is extremely busy. They will probably get 50% from their fair-use unless the host is quite quiet.

    Not sure the degree things are oversold. This example might be more like 40 VMs and 40+23 split or as extreme as 48+15 depending how mean the provider is.

    Thanked by 1yoursunny
  • NekooNekoo Member

    Invoice #588346 Plz double, and Why did I pay more than the posted price? Did I miss a coupon? I was charged $330, but the post says $300.

  • ralfralf Member

    @Nekoo said:
    Invoice #588346 Plz double, and Why did I pay more than the posted price? Did I miss a coupon? I was charged $330, but the post says $300.

    Because you didn't read:

    @hosthatch said:
    It's basically the same Black Friday plans, but with a 10-30% markup (depending on the location), and some locations are not available (Stockholm, Zurich, Sydney).

    and no need to request the double.

  • plumbergplumberg Veteran, Megathread Squad

    @Nekoo said:
    Invoice #588346 Plz double, and Why did I pay more than the posted price? Did I miss a coupon? I was charged $330, but the post says $300.

    https://lowendtalk.com/discussion/comment/4714926/#Comment_4714926

    It lists the new markup

  • @itachikonoha said: But can you explain what is 0.5 dedicated core? How can it be half of a vcore which is dedicated?

    I believe that they just want to say to keep your average CPU usage at or below 25% (in the case of 0.5 dedicated core, 1.5 fairly shared cores, because 0.5 / 2 = 0.25 = 25%).

    @hosthatch can confirm it, but I'd be surprised if it's anything else.

  • NekooNekoo Member

    @ralf said:

    @Nekoo said:
    Invoice #588346 Plz double, and Why did I pay more than the posted price? Did I miss a coupon? I was charged $330, but the post says $300.

    Because you didn't read:

    @hosthatch said:
    It's basically the same Black Friday plans, but with a 10-30% markup (depending on the location), and some locations are not available (Stockholm, Zurich, Sydney).

    and no need to request the double.

    @plumberg said:

    @Nekoo said:
    Invoice #588346 Plz double, and Why did I pay more than the posted price? Did I miss a coupon? I was charged $330, but the post says $300.

    https://lowendtalk.com/discussion/comment/4714926/#Comment_4714926

    It lists the new markup

    Thank you guys

  • yoursunnyyoursunny Member, IPv6 Advocate

    @ralf said:
    I was still considering another one

    when we bought ours we had no idea if the network would be good or not, now we do

    Still undecided on whether to identify as "I" or "we"?

  • ralfralf Member
    edited January 15

    @yoursunny said:

    @ralf said:
    I was still considering another one

    when we bought ours we had no idea if the network would be good or not, now we do

    Still undecided on whether to identify as "I" or "we"?

    No.

    "when we bought ours" means me, you and whoever also pre-ordered Seoul with zero idea whether the network would be any good or not.

    PS I know you know but 咱们 us.

    Thanked by 1Hitori0221
  • wnjuwnju Member

    Invoice #588674
    Please double

  • @wnju said:
    Invoice #588674
    Please double

    Your bandwidth has been halved.

  • s0n1cs0n1c Member

    @TimboJones said:

    @wnju said:
    Invoice #588674
    Please double

    Your bandwidth has been halved.

    just curious, did u finally snatch the flash sale after missing the one on BF? i remember seeing you comment a few weeks ago

    Thanked by 1TimboJones
  • @s0n1c said:

    @TimboJones said:

    @wnju said:
    Invoice #588674
    Please double

    Your bandwidth has been halved.

    just curious, did u finally snatch the flash sale after missing the one on BF? i remember seeing you comment a few weeks ago

    I thought I posted a comment last night saying I did and was going to bed, but when I replied above, it looks like I didn't submit properly and it was still in draft. Then I just deleted it for being 22 hours late.

    Paid $30 more than if I bought it on BF, but I thought I could run some shit on an existing 2GB RAM and turned out I was very mistaken. So took this opportunity to get in on a 16GB before prices get even worse.

    I bought 4-5 Intel 265k setups just because of BF deals but two of them likely going to do nothing until I stumble into more DDR5. I didn't stock up enough right as prices started going up just after the last Amazon Prime sale.

    Thanked by 1s0n1c
  • s0n1cs0n1c Member

    @TimboJones said:

    @s0n1c said:

    @TimboJones said:

    @wnju said:
    Invoice #588674
    Please double

    Your bandwidth has been halved.

    just curious, did u finally snatch the flash sale after missing the one on BF? i remember seeing you comment a few weeks ago

    I thought I posted a comment last night saying I did and was going to bed, but when I replied above, it looks like I didn't submit properly and it was still in draft. Then I just deleted it for being 22 hours late.

    Paid $30 more than if I bought it on BF, but I thought I could run some shit on an existing 2GB RAM and turned out I was very mistaken. So took this opportunity to get in on a 16GB before prices get even worse.

    I bought 4-5 Intel 265k setups just because of BF deals but two of them likely going to do nothing until I stumble into more DDR5. I didn't stock up enough right as prices started going up just after the last Amazon Prime sale.

    i see. i think i got the same one as you. i wish i bought it on bf cause i’d only have to pay $150. but oh well.
    hopefully my vps unpends soon 😩

  • hosthatchhosthatch Patron Provider, Top Host, Veteran

    @ralf said:

    @noisycode said:
    Still waiting for a YABS for the HFC plan...

    Not sure how different this is to the current HFC, but here's a YABS from my HFC in SG bought a couple of years ago.

    HFC is the latest series of plans that we offer, that are based on AMD 9950X CPUs (the first time we offered them was on BF 25).

    Thanked by 1ralf
  • ralfralf Member
    edited January 16

    @hosthatch said:

    @ralf said:

    @noisycode said:
    Still waiting for a YABS for the HFC plan...

    Not sure how different this is to the current HFC, but here's a YABS from my HFC in SG bought a couple of years ago.

    HFC is the latest series of plans that we offer, that are based on AMD 9950X CPUs (the first time we offered them was on BF 25).

    Ah, good to know, and sorry for spreading wrong information. The one I have is from https://lowendtalk.com/discussion/189358/us-eu-and-apac-deals-october-2023/p1

    Is that equivalent to the current NVMe range then, or just a one off?

  • Seems the offer is over. @hosthatch Thank you.

  • Hello, I have a Hong Kong server account with a plan of $35 per year. If I upgrade it to a three-year plan via a support ticket, will its memory and bandwidth double? Will the price be $103? Looking forward to your reply.

  • ralfralf Member

    @lxz7758521 said:
    Hello, I have a Hong Kong server account with a plan of $35 per year. If I upgrade it to a three-year plan via a support ticket, will its memory and bandwidth double? Will the price be $103? Looking forward to your reply.

    The sale has already ended. Also, the offer clearly states that offers can't be changed at all after sale.

  • I want to inform you that the IP range of your servers that I am currently using is completely inaccessible in mainland China via China Unicom due to timeouts. This happened suddenly, but it works fine with China Telecom and China Mobile. Currently, I know of IP addresses starting with 161, 188, and 151, which are located in Japan and Hong Kong, respectively. I tested other IPs starting with 161, and the problem persists. What could be the reason for this? My business is being affected as a result.

  • My Hong Kong server isn't deployed yet; you guys are too slow.

  • s0n1cs0n1c Member

    @lxz7758521 said:
    I want to inform you that the IP range of your servers that I am currently using is completely inaccessible in mainland China via China Unicom due to timeouts. This happened suddenly, but it works fine with China Telecom and China Mobile. Currently, I know of IP addresses starting with 161, 188, and 151, which are located in Japan and Hong Kong, respectively. I tested other IPs starting with 161, and the problem persists. What could be the reason for this? My business is being affected as a result.

    oh no, are you losing millions of dollars a day sir?

  • yoursunnyyoursunny Member, IPv6 Advocate

    @lxz7758521 said:
    I want to inform you that the IP range of your servers that I am currently using is completely inaccessible in mainland China via China Unicom due to timeouts. This happened suddenly, but it works fine with China Telecom and China Mobile.

    Indeed. Per ping.pe probe from China Unicom:

    • 194.29.100.* in Sydney: 100% loss
    • 151.245.106.* in Seoul: 20% loss with >400ms RTT

    This appears to be network instability rather than GFW blockage.

    I know of IP addresses starting with 161, 188, and 151, which are located in Japan and Hong Kong, respectively.

    You need to specify the /24 subnet, which matches the BGP announcements.
    Giving only the first octet means nothing.

This discussion has been closed.