L-O-W-E-S-T PRICES EVER down to $0.49/month eff. WITH IPv4 + HIGH AVAILABILITY + LIFETIME BONUS

k5920 · December 2025

Order Number:2371855631

Please extend my vps for 4th year and price locking.
Thanks.

k5920 · December 2025

Order Number:2371855631

k5920 · December 2025

Dear MassiveGRID Upgrades Team,

I previously commented on December 9th with my order number 2371855631, requesting the application of the free 4th year extension and price locking as per the promotion.

I see your instruction to comment again. Could you please check my existing comment and process the upgrade for Order #2371855631 within the promised 1 business day?

Thank you.

k5920 · December 2025

Hi,

Order Number is:2371855631

Please extend my VPS for 4th year and price locking.

NanoNerd · December 2025

Order Number: 4861093280
Invoice #1988808
Please extend my vps for 4th year and price locking.
Thanks.

k5920 · December 2025

Order Number is:1993706

Please extend my VPS for 4th year and price locking.

k5920 · December 2025

Order Number: 2371855631
Invoice:1993706
Request: Please extend my VPS for the 4th year (3-year renewal) and lock in the current price.

Thank you for your assistance!

q81801 · December 2025

@MassiveGRID said: MassiveGRID Member, Patron Provider

October 2024 FlagThanks
@reepje123 said:
Order Number: 9531408436

Will these services also get an IPv6 subnet (for free) once you start supporting it?

Thank you. Our team will extend your service to 4 years for free and price lock for life your service. We'll let you know here once it happens (1 business day).

And yes, Q1 2025 IPv6 will be available for all existing servers and added for free.

Thanked by 6reepje123ntn888sucre13GreyhoundJohnnySacLiquiDuck

supporting it?

warmus · December 2025

Hi,

My Order Number is: 8114509084
Please extend my vps for 4th year and price locking.

Thanks.

Gearsome · December 2025

@MassiveGRID

Packet loss is back. Please, fix the UDP ports. TY

Gearsome · December 2025

What's this? Is it a joke? There's no room for anyone else. It's already oversold.
Man, this is bad. Money for nothing.

8 vCores (supposedly)

Geekbench 4.3.3 test.
https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/19253913

bahoiz · December 2025

@bahoiz said:
Order Number: 1381447281
extend and lock please.

Am I forgotten? my reply was on June 1. still no action.

flyrr · December 2025

Hi,
My Order Number is: 9388836046
Please extend my vps for 4th year and price locking.
Thanks.

Gearsome · December 2025

@bahoiz said:
@bahoiz said:
Order Number: 1381447281
extend and lock please.

Am I forgotten? my reply was on June 1. still no action.

Because this offer ended in March or April 2025 I think I remember.

SoClear · January 7

Hi,

Order Number: 9975951237

Hope I'm not too late

Thanks.

nax4u2k3kec · January 7

Hi,

Order Number is: 9640376495
Please extend my vps for 4th year and price locking.

Thanks.

miskty · January 8

Please extend my vps for 4th year and price locking
Order Number:5730860189
Invoice:1996554

miskty · January 8

Please extend my vps for 4th year and price locking
Order Number:5730860189
Invoice:1996554

wangzai123q · January 12

Please extend my vps for 4th year and price locking
Order Number is: 6860276948
Invoice #1996923

voldan · January 15

Howdy! Is still available? )

voldan · January 15

Please extend my vps for 4th year and price locking
Order Number is: 4053683614
Invoice #1997198

Gearsome · January 15

@gbzret4d said:
@MassiveGRID When will the performance be increased as promised, especially the speed of the hard disks?

# ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
#              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
#                     v2025-01-01                    #
# https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
# ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #

Fri Mar  7 11:17:43 AM UTC 2025

Basic System Information:
---------------------------------
Uptime     : 0 days, 22 hours, 41 minutes
Processor  : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2683 v4 @ 2.10GHz
CPU cores  : 1 @ 2099.998 MHz
AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
RAM        : 1.9 GiB
Swap       : 4.0 GiB
Disk       : 27.4 GiB
Distro     : Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm)
Kernel     : 6.1.0-31-amd64
VM Type    : KVM
IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ❌ Offline

IPv4 Network Information:
---------------------------------
ISP        : Massivegrid LTD
ASN        : AS49683 MASSIVEGRID LTD
Host       : MassiveGRID
Location   : Frankfurt am Main, Hesse (HE)
Country    : Germany

fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/sda3):
---------------------------------
Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
Read       | 3.88 MB/s      (970) | 63.04 MB/s     (985)
Write      | 3.89 MB/s      (974) | 63.46 MB/s     (991)
Total      | 7.77 MB/s     (1.9k) | 126.51 MB/s   (1.9k)
           |                      |
Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
Read       | 147.04 MB/s    (287) | 145.71 MB/s    (142)
Write      | 154.85 MB/s    (302) | 155.42 MB/s    (151)
Total      | 301.89 MB/s    (589) | 301.14 MB/s    (293)

iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
---------------------------------
Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
-----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 1.01 Gbits/sec  | 985 Mbits/sec   | 14.4 ms
Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 994 Mbits/sec   | 77.3 Mbits/sec  | 7.95 ms
Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | busy            | 494 Mbits/sec   | 102 ms
Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 380 Mbits/sec   | 351 Mbits/sec   | 327 ms
Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 442 Mbits/sec   | 467 Mbits/sec   | 149 ms
Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 402 Mbits/sec   | 195 Mbits/sec   | 83.6 ms
Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 238 Mbits/sec   | 436 Mbits/sec   | 205 ms

Geekbench 4 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test            | Value
                |
Single Core     | 2411
Multi Core      | 2307
Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/18583300

Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test            | Value
                |
Single Core     | 457
Multi Core      | 450
Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/23388562

Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test            | Value
                |
Single Core     | 531
Multi Core      | 506

Full Test | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/10904232

I'd like to know why I'm getting almost the same and pathetic performance with 8 vcores! ... can anyone explain this trick? It's as if they only function at 11~15% of their capacity regardless of how many cores are active at the time of the test. It's all too obvious that the hypervisor is throttling by client, not by actual scaling. Upgrading for more vcores is pointless. More cores are useless. Just a waste of money.
It's worse than a damn ATOM C2750.

In my opinion I suppose that since the deadline for filing a claim with PayPal has passed, it's time to reduce the performance of the VPSs that were provided... Apparently, the first few months were a "trial" period to gain our trust. Now it's disgusting.
Very clever.

https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/19307333

gbzret4d · January 16

@Gearsome said:

@gbzret4d said:
@MassiveGRID When will the performance be increased as promised, especially the speed of the hard disks?

# ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
#              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
#                     v2025-01-01                    #
# https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
# ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #

Fri Mar  7 11:17:43 AM UTC 2025

Basic System Information:
---------------------------------
Uptime     : 0 days, 22 hours, 41 minutes
Processor  : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2683 v4 @ 2.10GHz
CPU cores  : 1 @ 2099.998 MHz
AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
RAM        : 1.9 GiB
Swap       : 4.0 GiB
Disk       : 27.4 GiB
Distro     : Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm)
Kernel     : 6.1.0-31-amd64
VM Type    : KVM
IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ❌ Offline

IPv4 Network Information:
---------------------------------
ISP        : Massivegrid LTD
ASN        : AS49683 MASSIVEGRID LTD
Host       : MassiveGRID
Location   : Frankfurt am Main, Hesse (HE)
Country    : Germany

fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/sda3):
---------------------------------
Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
Read       | 3.88 MB/s      (970) | 63.04 MB/s     (985)
Write      | 3.89 MB/s      (974) | 63.46 MB/s     (991)
Total      | 7.77 MB/s     (1.9k) | 126.51 MB/s   (1.9k)
           |                      |
Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
Read       | 147.04 MB/s    (287) | 145.71 MB/s    (142)
Write      | 154.85 MB/s    (302) | 155.42 MB/s    (151)
Total      | 301.89 MB/s    (589) | 301.14 MB/s    (293)

iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
---------------------------------
Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
-----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 1.01 Gbits/sec  | 985 Mbits/sec   | 14.4 ms
Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 994 Mbits/sec   | 77.3 Mbits/sec  | 7.95 ms
Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | busy            | 494 Mbits/sec   | 102 ms
Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 380 Mbits/sec   | 351 Mbits/sec   | 327 ms
Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 442 Mbits/sec   | 467 Mbits/sec   | 149 ms
Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 402 Mbits/sec   | 195 Mbits/sec   | 83.6 ms
Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 238 Mbits/sec   | 436 Mbits/sec   | 205 ms

Geekbench 4 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test            | Value
                |
Single Core     | 2411
Multi Core      | 2307
Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/18583300

Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test            | Value
                |
Single Core     | 457
Multi Core      | 450
Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/23388562

Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test            | Value
                |
Single Core     | 531
Multi Core      | 506

Full Test | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/10904232

I'd like to know why I'm getting almost the same and pathetic performance with 8 vcores! ... can anyone explain this trick? It's as if they only function at 11~15% of their capacity regardless of how many cores are active at the time of the test. It's all too obvious that the hypervisor is throttling by client, not by actual scaling. Upgrading for more vcores is pointless. More cores are useless. Just a waste of money.
It's worse than a damn ATOM C2750.

In my opinion I suppose that since the deadline for filing a claim with PayPal has passed, it's time to reduce the performance of the VPSs that were provided... Apparently, the first few months were a "trial" period to gain our trust. Now it's disgusting.
Very clever.

https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/19307333

Have you opened a ticket, maybe a wrong setting on their end but the nodes are pretty oversold imo.

Gearsome · January 16

Have you opened a ticket, maybe a wrong setting on their end but the nodes are pretty oversold imo.

Yes, there're a few support tickets, but no solution for the 8 rented vcores... As I've already said, the time for filing a complaint with PayPal about poor service or a broken promise has likely passed. Now I have to swallow years of broken promises.

WHY THIS OFFER IS UNMISSABLE

Unmatched High Availability: Downtime? What's that? Our H/A is enabled automatically to keep your services running smoothly 24/7.

H/A Clusters of Enterprise Grade Hardware with Intel® Xeon® Gold 6130 Processor or Intel® Xeon® Processor E5-2683v4, ECC Registered RAM and Triple replicated H/A SSD CEPH Storage.

Custom VPS configuration: Order your H/A Cloud VPS with the exact specs you need. Don't waste money on plans unfit to your needs!

Instant Scaling: Upgrade or downgrade any resource independently, anytime. Your server, your rules.

You get the LOWEST prices ever starting at $0.49/month for a triennial plan and an additional full year on us!

HAHA!!

My message.

Can you please stop constantly suggesting the upgrade?

You offered a promotion that you're not honoring because the maximum performance is around 2-3 vcores. Beyond that, acquiring any additional cores is a waste, like a complete scam.

So I express my complete dissatisfaction with the VPS service I rented, specifically regarding the CPU resources advertised and delivered.

I purchased a VPS plan legally advertised and i upgraded to "8 vcores", expecting a proportional increase in computational performance or, at the very least, A REALISTIC LEVEL OF SCALABILITY, A REALISTIC LEVEL! However, real-world performance has consistently demonstrated that the VPS never exceeds the equivalent of 2–3 physical CPU cores, and in many cases performs significantly below that level.

This behavior is NOT occasional nor related to short-term load fluctuations; it's a hard performance CEILING that the VPS never surpasses. As a result, the additional vcores I paid for are effectively NON-functional and USELESS.

Under these conditions, promoting CPU “scalability” is fundamentally MISLEADING. If a strict per-VPS CPU quota exists, preventing any VPS from exceeding a fixed performance threshold regardless of the number of vcores purchased, then increasing vcore count provides no real performance benefit whatsoever. Customers are therefore paying more money for specifications that CANNOT be utilized in practice.

This means that, regardless of whether one purchases 2 vcores, 4 vcores, or 8 vcores, the sustained performance remains essentially the same. Such a model CANNOT reasonably be described as scalable and gives the clear impression of FALSE or DECEPTIVE advertising.

I feel seriously misled by this representation and consider the service delivered to be inconsistent with what was advertised and sold. This situation is unacceptable and damages trust in your platform.

I request a clear explanation of the enforced CPU limits per VPS, as well as an appropriate resolution to this matter. At minimum, the way CPU resources are marketed should transparently reflect the actual performance limitations imposed on each VPS.

Theirs.

Thank you for your message.
Your VPS is operating as designed for a shared-resource virtualized environment. The assigned vCPU count defines the maximum level of parallel execution available to your system, not a guarantee of linear or sustained CPU performance under continuous full-load benchmarking.
In shared VPS infrastructures, CPU resources are scheduled using fair-share mechanisms across multiple customers. Under sustained, CPU-saturating workloads, performance may reach a plateau where adding more threads does not increase total throughput. This behavior is expected and normal for shared VPS services and does not indicate misconfiguration, hidden throttling, or non-functional vCPUs.
Your server is correctly provisioned according to the plan specifications, and no issue has been identified at the VM or host configuration level.
If your workload requires guaranteed, predictable CPU performance under sustained load, a service with dedicated compute resources is required, as shared VPS plans are not designed to provide fixed physical CPU throughput.

And in their policies.

Question : What is the difference between Cloud and Dedicated Servers ?

Answer: Cloud Server: A typically low-cost and low-resource server with shared resources among numerous tenants in a node. Great for startups and new projects or testing, since it is scalable and provides increased flexibility at a good value-for-money. However, established businesses should not expect to run on low-cost cloud servers since “busy neighbor” problems and limited resources can harm them. MassiveGRID’s High Availability Cloud Servers provide the industry’s best value-for-money,** since we do not oversell our servers so there’s hardly any busy neighbor problems, while enjoying maximum flexibility at a low cost.**

Cloud Dedicated Server: Increased resources, increased security and reliability. It is similar to a bare-metal server, only virtual. In a large deployed node, resources are segmented according to tenants’ needs and they remain dedicated to each tenant. In addition, they remain reliable thanks to their virtual flexibility. Providers large enough benefit from economies of scale and deploy large nodes that they can split up in numerous virtualized dedicated servers. MassiveGRID offers High Availability Cloud Dedicated Servers that offer ultimate reliability thanks to KVM virtualization; uptime is not even affected by hardware, network or power problems thanks to the near-instant re-deployment of servers on healthy nodes, when needed. IT engineers are then able to work on troubleshooting without the pressure of the clients’ downtime. This allows MassiveGRID to resolve any potential issues in the best possible way, instead of coming up with “quick n’ dirty” solutions of high risk and low efficiency. Cloud dedicated servers are ideal for established businesses and business-critical projects that need increased reliability.

Quite yellow there...
Scalability performance -> Manually imposed throttling.

I'm really fed up with this situation.
The reality of this service isn't so great. I wish I had never met them. It was like buying a fake USB drive on AliExpress...

Latest test.

https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/19308898

In short, 1 vcore VPS: 2411/2307 points VS 8 vcores VPS: 2004/3480 points (Same Region: Frankfurt)
+12 eur/extra vcore for extra 167.5 points -> 7 extra vcores * 12 eur = 1170 extra points.
Great scalability!! Great purchase!!!

It's impossible to be satisfied with this.

zhiyuancli · January 18

Order Number: 1309120145
Please extend my vps for 4th year and price locking.
Thanks.

madmalkav · January 19

The “everything is ok” message they sent you is a template, I just received the same one becuase my VPS has become unuseable

Gearsome · January 19

@madmalkav said:
The “everything is ok” message they sent you is a template, I just received the same one becuase my VPS has become unuseable

Oversold and unusable. The performance promises are completely FAKE.
Surprise!! Once the time for claiming a refund has passed, the real "performance" begins. They call this "shared-resource". I call it a "manually limited resource" which is not scalable.
You can rent as many vcores as you want (that's useless), but you won't get the unrestricted performance of scalability, just a sense that someone is manually managing your limit.
With each passing day, I have more yellow in my htop... It's about to die, and it has 8 rented vcores...

I feel cheated.

zhou120 · January 21

Order Number: 6034622224
Invoice #1997700
Please extend my vps for 4th year and price locking.

belltolls · January 23

Hi,
My Invoice #1997898
Order Number: 6359268944
Please extend my vps for 4th year and price locking.

Gearsome · January 24

When an user performs almost the same score with 8 vcores as with 1 vcore, that service is...

a. a strong hook to sell you other things.
b. a problem
c. a scam
d. all of them

Howdy, Stranger!

Categories

In this Discussion

L-O-W-E-S-T PRICES EVER down to $0.49/month eff. WITH IPv4 + HIGH AVAILABILITY + LIFETIME BONUS

Comments

Howdy, Stranger!

Quick Links

Categories

In this Discussion

L-O-W-E-S-T PRICES EVER down to $0.49/month eff. WITH IPv4 + HIGH AVAILABILITY + LIFETIME BONUS

Comments