Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Shells Virtual Desktop
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Server.net
CPLicense.net
VPS Server
Buy VPN
Vultr
VMs for AI
HostDare
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
InterServer VPS
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Best VPN
High-Performance Bare Metal Server Solutions
Karvl.com
Server Mania Cloud Hosting
DataWagon Hosting
AlphaVPS Hosting
Evoxt.com
Clouvider
VPS Hosting with NVMe
Residential IPs in the US & 4G Mobile Proxies in EU & US with Unlimited Bandwidth
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
Rabisu - Hosting Solutions
Shells Virtual Desktop
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

India court system utilized by dmca moguls

LeviLevi Member

First time India law system used to enforce global blockade of so called “pirate websites”.

https://torrentfreak.com/disney-netflix-crunchyroll-try-to-take-pirate-sites-down-globally-through-indian-court/

What is going on in India? Is it Italy #2?

«1

Comments

  • rpqurpqu Member

    Pirate websites > scam operations

  • @Levi said: so called “pirate websites”

    Here's a full list in case you'd like some movie this evening:

    https://torrentfreak.com/images/high_court_order-8.pdf

    @rpqu said:
    Pirate websites > scam operations

    Any financial operations make the "money wheel" spinning. Hence "quite OK".

    "Pirate websites" don't. Hence "not OK at all!". Must stop, send FBI!

  • JencyJency Member

    India isn’t becoming Italy; it’s becoming a strategic legal hub for rights‑holders who want fast, sweeping, and potentially global‑impact blocking orders. It’s a test case to see how far national courts can reach in the fight against piracy.

  • I don't know why, but for some reason I had greater expectations of indians in resisting this.

  • xvpsxvps Member

    @DataRecovery said:

    @Levi said: so called “pirate websites”

    Here's a full list in case you'd like some movie this evening:

    https://torrentfreak.com/images/high_court_order-8.pdf

    99% of them used CloudFlare to hide their IP addresses. :D

  • LeviLevi Member
    edited January 12

    @Jency said:
    India isn’t becoming Italy; it’s becoming a strategic legal hub for rights‑holders who want fast, sweeping, and potentially global‑impact blocking orders. It’s a test case to see how far national courts can reach in the fight against piracy.

    Why anyone outside India want to abide to India court order?

    That's very dangerous precedent as "rights‑holders" not always correct/accurate for their "fast, sweeping, and potentially global‑impact blocking orders". Which leads to overblocking. Italy precedence shows that exact problem emphasized (cloudflare case) as profits prioritized vs anything, common sense including.

  • JabJabJabJab Member
    edited January 12

    This includes domains that are linked to Namecheap, Tucows, GoDaddy, NameSilo, Dynadot, OVH and others. The government of the Kingdom of Tonga did not comply with the Indian court order either.

    --

    As far as we can see, domains linked to the American registrar Porkbun, the UK-based WHG Hosting services, and the Lithuanian registrar Hostinger were fully suspended. Registrar.eu also put some domains on clientHold, and the one that remains accessible (animesuge.bz) is linked to Namecheap now.

    Some names to avoid if you guys don't accept the fact that Indian court can order your domains to shutdown globally.

    Thanked by 2default tentor
  • rpqurpqu Member
    edited January 12

    @Levi said:

    @Jency said:
    India isn’t becoming Italy; it’s becoming a strategic legal hub for rights‑holders who want fast, sweeping, and potentially global‑impact blocking orders. It’s a test case to see how far national courts can reach in the fight against piracy.

    Why anyone outside India want to abide to India court order?

    That's very dangerous precedent as "rights‑holders" not always correct/accurate for their "fast, sweeping, and potentially global‑impact blocking orders". Which leads to overblocking. Italy precedence shows that exact problem emphasized (cloudflare case) as profits prioritized vs anything, common sense including.

    Multinational corporation has the soft spot for "world's largest nation". I won't be surprised if the court were bought by the copyright holders. Also, consider thu ubiquity of ethnicities of Indian origin in IT.

  • @JabJab said:

    This includes domains that are linked to Namecheap, Tucows, GoDaddy, NameSilo, Dynadot, OVH and others. The government of the Kingdom of Tonga did not comply with the Indian court order either.

    --

    As far as we can see, domains linked to the American registrar Porkbun, the UK-based WHG Hosting services, and the Lithuanian registrar Hostinger were fully suspended. Registrar.eu also put some domains on clientHold, and the one that remains accessible (animesuge.bz) is linked to Namecheap now.

    Some names to avoid if you guys don't accept the fact that Indian court can order your domains to shutdown globally.

    Sad. Porkbun's name in another drama.

  • VoidVoid Member

    All shit sites none knew or cared if they existed. Indian courts are being used as garbage cleaners.

  • Porkbun, Openprovider and Hostinger complied. Disappointed to see OP on the list.

  • @xvps said:

    @DataRecovery said:

    @Levi said: so called “pirate websites”

    Here's a full list in case you'd like some movie this evening:

    https://torrentfreak.com/images/high_court_order-8.pdf

    99% of them used CloudFlare to hide their IP addresses. :D

    Cloudflare used to effectively directly distribute the media of 99% of piracy streaming sites, since they were kind enough to cache HLS segments on the edge.

    These days they block video streaming over their regular CDN and instead display a warning/blocking message in place of the video when someone tries to do so.

    So for the media servers streaming sites don't really use Cloudflare anymore.

    It's still pretty crazy Cloudflare gets away with their whole argument of being a neutral gateway, when they knowingly cache/host some pretty bad sites. It's probably because they're a US intelligence asset.

  • rpqurpqu Member

    @matey0 said:

    @xvps said:

    @DataRecovery said:

    @Levi said: so called “pirate websites”

    Here's a full list in case you'd like some movie this evening:

    https://torrentfreak.com/images/high_court_order-8.pdf

    99% of them used CloudFlare to hide their IP addresses. :D

    It's still pretty crazy Cloudflare gets away with their whole argument of being a neutral gateway, when they knowingly cache/host some pretty bad sites. It's probably because they're a US intelligence asset.

    It's because one day, prince woke up and decide to be less neutral.

    Thanked by 1forest
  • LeviLevi Member

    @matey0 said:

    @xvps said:

    @DataRecovery said:

    @Levi said: so called “pirate websites”

    Here's a full list in case you'd like some movie this evening:

    https://torrentfreak.com/images/high_court_order-8.pdf

    99% of them used CloudFlare to hide their IP addresses. :D

    Cloudflare used to effectively directly distribute the media of 99% of piracy streaming sites, since they were kind enough to cache HLS segments on the edge.

    These days they block video streaming over their regular CDN and instead display a warning/blocking message in place of the video when someone tries to do so.

    So for the media servers streaming sites don't really use Cloudflare anymore.

    It's still pretty crazy Cloudflare gets away with their whole argument of being a neutral gateway, when they knowingly cache/host some pretty bad sites. It's probably because they're a US intelligence asset.

    What’s the point for usa inteligence service from pirate content cache? There is people in inteligence service which analyzes cloudflare cached data and get paid for doing that?

  • matey0matey0 Member
    edited January 12

    @Levi said:

    @matey0 said:

    @xvps said:

    @DataRecovery said:

    @Levi said: so called “pirate websites”

    Here's a full list in case you'd like some movie this evening:

    https://torrentfreak.com/images/high_court_order-8.pdf

    99% of them used CloudFlare to hide their IP addresses. :D

    Cloudflare used to effectively directly distribute the media of 99% of piracy streaming sites, since they were kind enough to cache HLS segments on the edge.

    These days they block video streaming over their regular CDN and instead display a warning/blocking message in place of the video when someone tries to do so.

    So for the media servers streaming sites don't really use Cloudflare anymore.

    It's still pretty crazy Cloudflare gets away with their whole argument of being a neutral gateway, when they knowingly cache/host some pretty bad sites. It's probably because they're a US intelligence asset.

    What’s the point for usa inteligence service from pirate content cache? There is people in inteligence service which analyzes cloudflare cached data and get paid for doing that?

    They stopped caching media because it's expensive and not useful.
    But cloudflare is 100% interested in continuing to host things like hacking forums, illegal drug stores, etc.

    Intelligence agencies hate crypto. Then a US company emerged with unbeatable pricing and free tiers that ended up terminating TLS for 25% of web traffic and close to 100% of shady websites. You do the maths.

    Thanked by 2tentor nikio
  • LeviLevi Member

    @matey0 said:

    @Levi said:

    @matey0 said:

    @xvps said:

    @DataRecovery said:

    @Levi said: so called “pirate websites”

    Here's a full list in case you'd like some movie this evening:

    https://torrentfreak.com/images/high_court_order-8.pdf

    99% of them used CloudFlare to hide their IP addresses. :D

    Cloudflare used to effectively directly distribute the media of 99% of piracy streaming sites, since they were kind enough to cache HLS segments on the edge.

    These days they block video streaming over their regular CDN and instead display a warning/blocking message in place of the video when someone tries to do so.

    So for the media servers streaming sites don't really use Cloudflare anymore.

    It's still pretty crazy Cloudflare gets away with their whole argument of being a neutral gateway, when they knowingly cache/host some pretty bad sites. It's probably because they're a US intelligence asset.

    What’s the point for usa inteligence service from pirate content cache? There is people in inteligence service which analyzes cloudflare cached data and get paid for doing that?

    They stopped caching media because it's expensive and not useful.
    But cloudflare is 100% interested in continuing to host things like hacking forums, illegal drug stores, etc.

    Intelligence agencies hate crypto. Then a US company emerged with unbeatable pricing and free tiers that ended up terminating TLS for 25% of web traffic and close to 100% of shady websites. You do the maths.

    Trump has crypto. There is no hate for money, but it should be in the right pocket.

    I think this is flat earth type theory. Cf hunts profit above all else, as business should do.

  • rpqurpqu Member

    @Levi said:

    @matey0 said:

    @Levi said:

    @matey0 said:

    @xvps said:

    @DataRecovery said:

    @Levi said: so called “pirate websites”

    Here's a full list in case you'd like some movie this evening:

    https://torrentfreak.com/images/high_court_order-8.pdf

    99% of them used CloudFlare to hide their IP addresses. :D

    Cloudflare used to effectively directly distribute the media of 99% of piracy streaming sites, since they were kind enough to cache HLS segments on the edge.

    These days they block video streaming over their regular CDN and instead display a warning/blocking message in place of the video when someone tries to do so.

    So for the media servers streaming sites don't really use Cloudflare anymore.

    It's still pretty crazy Cloudflare gets away with their whole argument of being a neutral gateway, when they knowingly cache/host some pretty bad sites. It's probably because they're a US intelligence asset.

    What’s the point for usa inteligence service from pirate content cache? There is people in inteligence service which analyzes cloudflare cached data and get paid for doing that?

    They stopped caching media because it's expensive and not useful.
    But cloudflare is 100% interested in continuing to host things like hacking forums, illegal drug stores, etc.

    Intelligence agencies hate crypto. Then a US company emerged with unbeatable pricing and free tiers that ended up terminating TLS for 25% of web traffic and close to 100% of shady websites. You do the maths.

    Trump has crypto. There is no hate for money, but it should be in the right pocket.

    I think this is flat earth type theory. Cf hunts profit above all else, as business should do.

    crypto as in cryptography, diffie-hellman, PKI

    Thanked by 2tentor forest
  • LeviLevi Member

    @rpqu said:

    @Levi said:

    @matey0 said:

    @Levi said:

    @matey0 said:

    @xvps said:

    @DataRecovery said:

    @Levi said: so called “pirate websites”

    Here's a full list in case you'd like some movie this evening:

    https://torrentfreak.com/images/high_court_order-8.pdf

    99% of them used CloudFlare to hide their IP addresses. :D

    Cloudflare used to effectively directly distribute the media of 99% of piracy streaming sites, since they were kind enough to cache HLS segments on the edge.

    These days they block video streaming over their regular CDN and instead display a warning/blocking message in place of the video when someone tries to do so.

    So for the media servers streaming sites don't really use Cloudflare anymore.

    It's still pretty crazy Cloudflare gets away with their whole argument of being a neutral gateway, when they knowingly cache/host some pretty bad sites. It's probably because they're a US intelligence asset.

    What’s the point for usa inteligence service from pirate content cache? There is people in inteligence service which analyzes cloudflare cached data and get paid for doing that?

    They stopped caching media because it's expensive and not useful.
    But cloudflare is 100% interested in continuing to host things like hacking forums, illegal drug stores, etc.

    Intelligence agencies hate crypto. Then a US company emerged with unbeatable pricing and free tiers that ended up terminating TLS for 25% of web traffic and close to 100% of shady websites. You do the maths.

    Trump has crypto. There is no hate for money, but it should be in the right pocket.

    I think this is flat earth type theory. Cf hunts profit above all else, as business should do.

    crypto as in cryptography, diffie-hellman, PKI

    Good catch! They have all the keys from all doors. You should be pretty annoying cocroach to get attention, though.

  • seenuseenu Member

    because of that, many people came to know about these sites and use them heavily from now onward :D

    honestly its becoming shit here..... u be close with govt, get anything like this done.
    is it effective, thats a different story.

  • @Levi said:

    @rpqu said:

    @Levi said:

    @matey0 said:

    @Levi said:

    @matey0 said:

    @xvps said:

    @DataRecovery said:

    @Levi said: so called “pirate websites”

    Here's a full list in case you'd like some movie this evening:

    https://torrentfreak.com/images/high_court_order-8.pdf

    99% of them used CloudFlare to hide their IP addresses. :D

    Cloudflare used to effectively directly distribute the media of 99% of piracy streaming sites, since they were kind enough to cache HLS segments on the edge.

    These days they block video streaming over their regular CDN and instead display a warning/blocking message in place of the video when someone tries to do so.

    So for the media servers streaming sites don't really use Cloudflare anymore.

    It's still pretty crazy Cloudflare gets away with their whole argument of being a neutral gateway, when they knowingly cache/host some pretty bad sites. It's probably because they're a US intelligence asset.

    What’s the point for usa inteligence service from pirate content cache? There is people in inteligence service which analyzes cloudflare cached data and get paid for doing that?

    They stopped caching media because it's expensive and not useful.
    But cloudflare is 100% interested in continuing to host things like hacking forums, illegal drug stores, etc.

    Intelligence agencies hate crypto. Then a US company emerged with unbeatable pricing and free tiers that ended up terminating TLS for 25% of web traffic and close to 100% of shady websites. You do the maths.

    Trump has crypto. There is no hate for money, but it should be in the right pocket.

    I think this is flat earth type theory. Cf hunts profit above all else, as business should do.

    crypto as in cryptography, diffie-hellman, PKI

    Good catch! They have all the keys from all doors. You should be pretty annoying cocroach to get attention, though.

    Wild how you would think crypto would refer to cryptocurrency in this context.

    Snowden leaks showed how the NSA enjoyed collecting, classifying and analyzing all internet traffic before widespread encryption. Cloudflare brings them back to the good old days.

    Will you ever notice that you’re being spied on? Likely not, unless you’re a target for them. But privacy is a human right.

    You also wouldn’t notice if they had CCTV feeds all across your house, or if they were recording your screen and webcam at all times. Doesn’t mean that you would like that.

    Thanked by 2tentor forest
  • rpqurpqu Member

    @matey0 said:

    @Levi said:

    @rpqu said:

    @Levi said:

    @matey0 said:

    @Levi said:

    @matey0 said:

    @xvps said:

    @DataRecovery said:

    @Levi said: so called “pirate websites”

    Here's a full list in case you'd like some movie this evening:

    https://torrentfreak.com/images/high_court_order-8.pdf

    99% of them used CloudFlare to hide their IP addresses. :D

    Cloudflare used to effectively directly distribute the media of 99% of piracy streaming sites, since they were kind enough to cache HLS segments on the edge.

    These days they block video streaming over their regular CDN and instead display a warning/blocking message in place of the video when someone tries to do so.

    So for the media servers streaming sites don't really use Cloudflare anymore.

    It's still pretty crazy Cloudflare gets away with their whole argument of being a neutral gateway, when they knowingly cache/host some pretty bad sites. It's probably because they're a US intelligence asset.

    What’s the point for usa inteligence service from pirate content cache? There is people in inteligence service which analyzes cloudflare cached data and get paid for doing that?

    They stopped caching media because it's expensive and not useful.
    But cloudflare is 100% interested in continuing to host things like hacking forums, illegal drug stores, etc.

    Intelligence agencies hate crypto. Then a US company emerged with unbeatable pricing and free tiers that ended up terminating TLS for 25% of web traffic and close to 100% of shady websites. You do the maths.

    Trump has crypto. There is no hate for money, but it should be in the right pocket.

    I think this is flat earth type theory. Cf hunts profit above all else, as business should do.

    crypto as in cryptography, diffie-hellman, PKI

    Good catch! They have all the keys from all doors. You should be pretty annoying cocroach to get attention, though.

    Wild how you would think crypto would refer to cryptocurrency in this context.

    Snowden leaks showed how the NSA enjoyed collecting, classifying and analyzing all internet traffic before widespread encryption. Cloudflare brings them back to the good old days.

    Will you ever notice that you’re being spied on? Likely not, unless you’re a target for them. But privacy is a human right.

    You also wouldn’t notice if they had CCTV feeds all across your house, or if they were recording your screen and webcam at all times. Doesn’t mean that you would like that.

    Ironically, LET is on cf

  • @rpqu said:

    @matey0 said:

    @Levi said:

    @rpqu said:

    @Levi said:

    @matey0 said:

    @Levi said:

    @matey0 said:

    @xvps said:

    @DataRecovery said:

    @Levi said: so called “pirate websites”

    Here's a full list in case you'd like some movie this evening:

    https://torrentfreak.com/images/high_court_order-8.pdf

    99% of them used CloudFlare to hide their IP addresses. :D

    Cloudflare used to effectively directly distribute the media of 99% of piracy streaming sites, since they were kind enough to cache HLS segments on the edge.

    These days they block video streaming over their regular CDN and instead display a warning/blocking message in place of the video when someone tries to do so.

    So for the media servers streaming sites don't really use Cloudflare anymore.

    It's still pretty crazy Cloudflare gets away with their whole argument of being a neutral gateway, when they knowingly cache/host some pretty bad sites. It's probably because they're a US intelligence asset.

    What’s the point for usa inteligence service from pirate content cache? There is people in inteligence service which analyzes cloudflare cached data and get paid for doing that?

    They stopped caching media because it's expensive and not useful.
    But cloudflare is 100% interested in continuing to host things like hacking forums, illegal drug stores, etc.

    Intelligence agencies hate crypto. Then a US company emerged with unbeatable pricing and free tiers that ended up terminating TLS for 25% of web traffic and close to 100% of shady websites. You do the maths.

    Trump has crypto. There is no hate for money, but it should be in the right pocket.

    I think this is flat earth type theory. Cf hunts profit above all else, as business should do.

    crypto as in cryptography, diffie-hellman, PKI

    Good catch! They have all the keys from all doors. You should be pretty annoying cocroach to get attention, though.

    Wild how you would think crypto would refer to cryptocurrency in this context.

    Snowden leaks showed how the NSA enjoyed collecting, classifying and analyzing all internet traffic before widespread encryption. Cloudflare brings them back to the good old days.

    Will you ever notice that you’re being spied on? Likely not, unless you’re a target for them. But privacy is a human right.

    You also wouldn’t notice if they had CCTV feeds all across your house, or if they were recording your screen and webcam at all times. Doesn’t mean that you would like that.

    Ironically, LET is on cf

    Yeah, feels like literally the entire web is. Really that 25% figure is quite an understatement, when you remove things like Netflix, YouTube, Instagram, etc. which don’t use CF but also are not particularly interesting for intelligence agencies (because it’s just tons of harmless media and companies which cooperate with them independently anyways).

    Your actual day-to-day web browsing is effectively almost entirely plain-text for these entities.

    Thanked by 2tentor rpqu
  • rpqurpqu Member

    @matey0 said:

    @rpqu said:

    @matey0 said:

    @Levi said:

    @rpqu said:

    @Levi said:

    @matey0 said:

    @Levi said:

    @matey0 said:

    @xvps said:

    @DataRecovery said:

    @Levi said: so called “pirate websites”

    Here's a full list in case you'd like some movie this evening:

    https://torrentfreak.com/images/high_court_order-8.pdf

    99% of them used CloudFlare to hide their IP addresses. :D

    Cloudflare used to effectively directly distribute the media of 99% of piracy streaming sites, since they were kind enough to cache HLS segments on the edge.

    These days they block video streaming over their regular CDN and instead display a warning/blocking message in place of the video when someone tries to do so.

    So for the media servers streaming sites don't really use Cloudflare anymore.

    It's still pretty crazy Cloudflare gets away with their whole argument of being a neutral gateway, when they knowingly cache/host some pretty bad sites. It's probably because they're a US intelligence asset.

    What’s the point for usa inteligence service from pirate content cache? There is people in inteligence service which analyzes cloudflare cached data and get paid for doing that?

    They stopped caching media because it's expensive and not useful.
    But cloudflare is 100% interested in continuing to host things like hacking forums, illegal drug stores, etc.

    Intelligence agencies hate crypto. Then a US company emerged with unbeatable pricing and free tiers that ended up terminating TLS for 25% of web traffic and close to 100% of shady websites. You do the maths.

    Trump has crypto. There is no hate for money, but it should be in the right pocket.

    I think this is flat earth type theory. Cf hunts profit above all else, as business should do.

    crypto as in cryptography, diffie-hellman, PKI

    Good catch! They have all the keys from all doors. You should be pretty annoying cocroach to get attention, though.

    Wild how you would think crypto would refer to cryptocurrency in this context.

    Snowden leaks showed how the NSA enjoyed collecting, classifying and analyzing all internet traffic before widespread encryption. Cloudflare brings them back to the good old days.

    Will you ever notice that you’re being spied on? Likely not, unless you’re a target for them. But privacy is a human right.

    You also wouldn’t notice if they had CCTV feeds all across your house, or if they were recording your screen and webcam at all times. Doesn’t mean that you would like that.

    Ironically, LET is on cf

    Yeah, feels like literally the entire web is. Really that 25% figure is quite an understatement, when you remove things like Netflix, YouTube, Instagram, etc. which don’t use CF but also are not particularly interesting for intelligence agencies (because it’s just tons of harmless media and companies which cooperate with them independently anyways).

    Your actual day-to-day web browsing is effectively almost entirely plain-text for these entities.

    FOSS community is the last bastion.
    Hopefully hosts on LET one day could offer web reverse proxying. @tentor

  • tentortentor Member, Host Rep

    @rpqu said:
    Hopefully hosts on LET one day could offer web reverse proxying. @tentor

    As in Cloudflare CDN/WAF but MITMed by LET host instead? I am not sure how much value such service would bring tbh. But I could have misunderstood you.

    Thanked by 1rpqu
  • BlaZeBlaZe Member, Host Rep

    Sadly, when you hire people not based on merit, you have donkeys leading the crowd.

    In India, we give important positions to idiots with no/less merit just because they belong to some specific religion/caste.

    I'm pretty sure the folks at the helm, do not have an iota of understanding how all this works and have just blatantly given the ruling.

  • rpqurpqu Member
    edited January 12

    @tentor said:

    @rpqu said:
    Hopefully hosts on LET one day could offer web reverse proxying. @tentor

    As in Cloudflare CDN/WAF but MITMed by LET host instead? I am not sure how much value such service would bring tbh. But I could have misunderstood you.

    Yes. Because having A record directly pointing to the server is uncomfortable. People would probe your ports
    I don't know whether this has been proposed
    But, let's say:
    1. Skhron offer web reverse proxy for flat fee of €1/month/instance with API support. (adds up to the instance bandwidth usage)
    2. Assume there's private address 10.0.0.0/8, fc00::/7 or public ipv6 space e.g /64 on both the reverse proxy and the client server
    3. http server will be configured to listen at private address and/or public ipv6 /128 with optional ip whitelist e.g the reverse proxying server

    The value? Let's say cloudflare got global hiccup. Assuming the registrar isn't CF, default it to the registrar NS, then add the reverse proxying servers. The downtime is limited to dns propagation.
    Even without CF, we could eliminate the downside of vps compared to shared hosting.

    Thanked by 2tentor JasonM
  • tentortentor Member, Host Rep

    If the only concern is reveal of an IP address of the customer VPS, I think it could be implemented without decrypting TLS at all. SNI field could be used to route requests to the expected backend.

    Not sure if I am ready to invest my time into that, but it is definitely something I could add to roadmap. However, I am not yet sure how popular it would be.

    Thanked by 1rpqu
  • rpqurpqu Member

    I think it could work. If you're not sure, perhaps you could make a poll. It could double as load balancer too

    Thanked by 1tentor
  • TrKTrK Member

    @sillycat said:

    Porkbun, Openprovider and Hostinger complied. Disappointed to see OP on the list.

    Openprovider has legal presence in india they can't ignore any official order. I am looking to not renew my membership this year and maybe find something reliable soon.

    Thanked by 1sillycat
  • @matey0 said:

    @Levi said:

    @rpqu said:

    @Levi said:

    @matey0 said:

    @Levi said:

    @matey0 said:

    @xvps said:

    @DataRecovery said:

    @Levi said: so called “pirate websites”

    Here's a full list in case you'd like some movie this evening:

    https://torrentfreak.com/images/high_court_order-8.pdf

    99% of them used CloudFlare to hide their IP addresses. :D

    Cloudflare used to effectively directly distribute the media of 99% of piracy streaming sites, since they were kind enough to cache HLS segments on the edge.

    These days they block video streaming over their regular CDN and instead display a warning/blocking message in place of the video when someone tries to do so.

    So for the media servers streaming sites don't really use Cloudflare anymore.

    It's still pretty crazy Cloudflare gets away with their whole argument of being a neutral gateway, when they knowingly cache/host some pretty bad sites. It's probably because they're a US intelligence asset.

    What’s the point for usa inteligence service from pirate content cache? There is people in inteligence service which analyzes cloudflare cached data and get paid for doing that?

    They stopped caching media because it's expensive and not useful.
    But cloudflare is 100% interested in continuing to host things like hacking forums, illegal drug stores, etc.

    Intelligence agencies hate crypto. Then a US company emerged with unbeatable pricing and free tiers that ended up terminating TLS for 25% of web traffic and close to 100% of shady websites. You do the maths.

    Trump has crypto. There is no hate for money, but it should be in the right pocket.

    I think this is flat earth type theory. Cf hunts profit above all else, as business should do.

    crypto as in cryptography, diffie-hellman, PKI

    Good catch! They have all the keys from all doors. You should be pretty annoying cocroach to get attention, though.

    Wild how you would think crypto would refer to cryptocurrency in this context.

    It's wild you did instead of the actually used cryptography.

    Snowden leaks showed how the NSA enjoyed collecting, classifying and analyzing all internet traffic before widespread encryption. Cloudflare brings them back to the good old days.

    Will you ever notice that you’re being spied on? Likely not, unless you’re a target for them. But privacy is a human right.

    You also wouldn’t notice if they had CCTV feeds all across your house, or if they were recording your screen and webcam at all times. Doesn’t mean that you would like that.

    Are you fucking blind? That's fucking silly.

Sign In or Register to comment.