Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Shells Virtual Desktop
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Server.net
CPLicense.net
VPS Server
Buy VPN
Vultr
VMs for AI
HostDare
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
InterServer VPS
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Best VPN
High-Performance Bare Metal Server Solutions
Karvl.com
Server Mania Cloud Hosting
DataWagon Hosting
AlphaVPS Hosting
Evoxt.com
Clouvider
VPS Hosting with NVMe
Residential IPs in the US & 4G Mobile Proxies in EU & US with Unlimited Bandwidth
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
Rabisu - Hosting Solutions
Shells Virtual Desktop
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

IONOS admits to capping "NVMe VPS" to 200MB/s (HDD speeds) via software limits

245

Comments

  • TufanTufan Member

    It is fascinating to watch how some individuals are desperately trying to derail this thread into completely irrelevant territories—checking my licenses, my signature, or my forum tags.

    It seems that exposing a major provider's deceptive practice is deeply bothering some of you.

    Let’s get one thing straight: You can attack me, audit my website, or question my account age. None of that changes the FACT visible in the screenshot above.

    The Fact: IONOS admitted in writing that they sell "High Performance NVMe" but intentionally throttle it to 200MB/s (HDD speeds) via software limits.

    If you are trying to bury this truth by creating noise about "WHMCS verification" or "signatures," you are just proving that you prefer protecting the status quo over honest hosting standards.

    Stop attacking the messenger and look at the message.

  • xHostsxHosts Member, Patron Provider

    @Tufan said:

    @xHosts said:

    @Tufan said:

    @xHosts said:

    @barbaros said:
    @Tufan just ask for refund for the remaining time on your account, state that specs weren't as advertised. I doubt they will question it, then move your data somewhere else.

    This is your first thread and post, and magically you have a link to a Turkish hosting provider in your signature.

    Perhaps you are using this thread to promote your own company?

    Maybe the WHMCS verify is playing up but the Turkish providers link seems to fail to verify too

    I have not removed my signature, nor will I. I stand behind my business and my claims.

    My website is live, active, and fully operational. If your automated verification tools are 'failing', it is likely because they are being blocked by our WAF/Cloudflare security rules designed to stop bots—not real users. Feel free to visit manually.

    But let's be real: You are grasping at straws.

    Even if my website were offline (which it isn't), how does that change the fact that IONOS admitted in writing to throttling NVMe drives to 200MB/s?

    Does a signature verification error somehow invalidate the screenshot in the OP? No.

    Stop trying to derail the thread with ad hominem attacks and address the actual issue: Deceptive Marketing by a market leader.

    That not how the WHMCS check tool works.

    WHMCS will verify your licence when you install and then do periodic calls to the licence server to check your licence is still valid.

    You may want to check it

    https://www.whmcs.com/members/verifydomain.php/verifydomain.php

    I checked both your main and sub domain for the verifcation

    Are you a WHMCS sales rep? Or are you just blind to the topic at hand?

    Is the subject of this thread the IONOS Deceptive Marketing scandal, or are you trying to audit my software stack?

    If you are trying to sell WHMCS licenses, this is definitely the wrong place.

    If you have nothing valuable to add regarding the NVMe throttling issue, stop hijacking the thread with off-topic noise.

    • Are you a WHMCS sales rep? Or are you just blind to the topic at hand?

    You seem a very rude little man, all you have done when people have not agreed with you is attack them

    • Is the subject of this thread the IONOS Deceptive Marketing scandal, or are you trying to audit my software stack?

    You seem to want everyone to have everything in order, but fail to do so yourself

    If you are trying to sell WHMCS licenses, this is definitely the wrong place.

    Have I or anyone mentioned trying to sell you anything ? No

    • If you have nothing valuable to add regarding the NVMe throttling issue, stop hijacking the thread with off-topic noise.

    In the hosting market, there are always limits in place, even more so with global providers because they do not have time to deal with rubbish like this.

    Thanked by 1Ballinwrld
  • TufanTufan Member
    edited January 10

    .

  • TufanTufan Member

    @xHosts said:

    @Tufan said:

    @xHosts said:

    @Tufan said:

    @xHosts said:

    @barbaros said:
    @Tufan just ask for refund for the remaining time on your account, state that specs weren't as advertised. I doubt they will question it, then move your data somewhere else.

    This is your first thread and post, and magically you have a link to a Turkish hosting provider in your signature.

    Perhaps you are using this thread to promote your own company?

    Maybe the WHMCS verify is playing up but the Turkish providers link seems to fail to verify too

    I have not removed my signature, nor will I. I stand behind my business and my claims.

    My website is live, active, and fully operational. If your automated verification tools are 'failing', it is likely because they are being blocked by our WAF/Cloudflare security rules designed to stop bots—not real users. Feel free to visit manually.

    But let's be real: You are grasping at straws.

    Even if my website were offline (which it isn't), how does that change the fact that IONOS admitted in writing to throttling NVMe drives to 200MB/s?

    Does a signature verification error somehow invalidate the screenshot in the OP? No.

    Stop trying to derail the thread with ad hominem attacks and address the actual issue: Deceptive Marketing by a market leader.

    That not how the WHMCS check tool works.

    WHMCS will verify your licence when you install and then do periodic calls to the licence server to check your licence is still valid.

    You may want to check it

    https://www.whmcs.com/members/verifydomain.php/verifydomain.php

    I checked both your main and sub domain for the verifcation

    Are you a WHMCS sales rep? Or are you just blind to the topic at hand?

    Is the subject of this thread the IONOS Deceptive Marketing scandal, or are you trying to audit my software stack?

    If you are trying to sell WHMCS licenses, this is definitely the wrong place.

    If you have nothing valuable to add regarding the NVMe throttling issue, stop hijacking the thread with off-topic noise.

    • Are you a WHMCS sales rep? Or are you just blind to the topic at hand?

    You seem a very rude little man, all you have done when people have not agreed with you is attack them

    • Is the subject of this thread the IONOS Deceptive Marketing scandal, or are you trying to audit my software stack?

    You seem to want everyone to have everything in order, but fail to do so yourself

    If you are trying to sell WHMCS licenses, this is definitely the wrong place.

    Have I or anyone mentioned trying to sell you anything ? No

    • If you have nothing valuable to add regarding the NVMe throttling issue, stop hijacking the thread with off-topic noise.

    In the hosting market, there are always limits in place, even more so with global providers because they do not have time to deal with rubbish like this.

    Calling me names like 'little man' only shows your own lack of professionalism.

    But the most revealing part of your comment is the end: '...because they do not have time to deal with rubbish like this.'

    So, asking for the NVMe speed we paid for is 'rubbish' to you? Holding a provider accountable for deceptive descriptions is 'rubbish'?

    Thank you for showing everyone exactly how you view customer rights. I think we are done here.

  • @Tufan said:
    It is fascinating to watch how some individuals are desperately trying to derail this thread into completely irrelevant territories—checking my licenses, my signature, or my forum tags.

    No one is derailing anything.

    It seems that exposing a major provider's deceptive practice is deeply bothering some of you.

    No one gives a fuck. IONOS doesn't have a rep here (at least not active) and no one would bother or care about defending IONOS

    Let’s get one thing straight: You can attack me, audit my website, or question my account age. None of that changes the FACT visible in the screenshot above.

    The Fact: IONOS admitted in writing that they sell "High Performance NVMe" but intentionally throttle it to 200MB/s (HDD speeds) via software limits.

    If you are trying to bury this truth by creating noise about "WHMCS verification" or "signatures," you are just proving that you prefer protecting the status quo over honest hosting standards.

    Stop attacking the messenger and look at the message.

    You just kept saying that your aim is trying to show deceptive actions of IONOS. Well OK, what do you expect us to do? Give you a medal?

    You posted your findings, people commented about it. No one seems surprised. And it's over. If you want to sue them, sure go sue them.

    The forum you are posting has rules, like what you can add to your signature, how to promote your services, and if you are a provider you are expected to have valid WHMCS license (I am not saying you have it or not)

    What you are doing here is, joining to a community, without reading community rules. Then having arguements with people posting here regularly. That's not a best way to enter into a community.

    Especially, if you are planning to sell hosting here.

    If you are not happy with people knit picking your details, you can kindly piss off. And stop with the drama of 'oh they are trying to twist the truth, trying to surpress me from telling the truth'. No one is doing that.

    Thanked by 1tentor
  • Thanked by 1JasonM
  • TufanTufan Member

    @barbaros said:

    @Tufan said:
    It is fascinating to watch how some individuals are desperately trying to derail this thread into completely irrelevant territories—checking my licenses, my signature, or my forum tags.

    No one is derailing anything.

    It seems that exposing a major provider's deceptive practice is deeply bothering some of you.

    No one gives a fuck. IONOS doesn't have a rep here (at least not active) and no one would bother or care about defending IONOS

    Let’s get one thing straight: You can attack me, audit my website, or question my account age. None of that changes the FACT visible in the screenshot above.

    The Fact: IONOS admitted in writing that they sell "High Performance NVMe" but intentionally throttle it to 200MB/s (HDD speeds) via software limits.

    If you are trying to bury this truth by creating noise about "WHMCS verification" or "signatures," you are just proving that you prefer protecting the status quo over honest hosting standards.

    Stop attacking the messenger and look at the message.

    You just kept saying that your aim is trying to show deceptive actions of IONOS. Well OK, what do you expect us to do? Give you a medal?

    You posted your findings, people commented about it. No one seems surprised. And it's over. If you want to sue them, sure go sue them.

    The forum you are posting has rules, like what you can add to your signature, how to promote your services, and if you are a provider you are expected to have valid WHMCS license (I am not saying you have it or not)

    What you are doing here is, joining to a community, without reading community rules. Then having arguements with people posting here regularly. That's not a best way to enter into a community.

    Especially, if you are planning to sell hosting here.

    If you are not happy with people knit picking your details, you can kindly piss off. And stop with the drama of 'oh they are trying to twist the truth, trying to surpress me from telling the truth'. No one is doing that.

    You just summed up your entire mentality in one sentence: 'No one gives a fuck.'

    You are openly saying that fraud and deceptive marketing in the hosting industry don't matter to you. That explains everything.

    Fortunately, looking at the views and supportive comments in this thread (and Trustpilot), many people DO give a fuck about getting what they paid for.

    Since you resorted to telling me to 'piss off', it's clear you have run out of logical arguments. I won't lower myself to that level.

    Discussion closed.

  • Sorry mate, the problem is, some turkish hosts aren't that big in business than their dreams want to be and try to avoid mistakes, but it always turn around.

    Back to IONOS. Everyone can use them, because they have cheap options. We allready found many years ago, that 1y for €12 offers are limited to a year or otherwise you pay much more. There are just some limits with them.
    Move on and go to another host, that fits your needs. Serververify will help you.

  • xHostsxHosts Member, Patron Provider

    @Tufan said:
    It is fascinating to watch how some individuals are desperately trying to derail this thread into completely irrelevant territories—checking my licenses, my signature, or my forum tags.

    It seems that exposing a major provider's deceptive practice is deeply bothering some of you.

    Let’s get one thing straight: You can attack me, audit my website, or question my account age. None of that changes the FACT visible in the screenshot above.

    The Fact: IONOS admitted in writing that they sell "High Performance NVMe" but intentionally throttle it to 200MB/s (HDD speeds) via software limits.

    If you are trying to bury this truth by creating noise about "WHMCS verification" or "signatures," you are just proving that you prefer protecting the status quo over honest hosting standards.

    Stop attacking the messenger and look at the message.> @xHosts said:

    @Tufan said:

    @xHosts said:

    @Tufan said:

    @xHosts said:

    @barbaros said:
    @Tufan just ask for refund for the remaining time on your account, state that specs weren't as advertised. I doubt they will question it, then move your data somewhere else.

    This is your first thread and post, and magically you have a link to a Turkish hosting provider in your signature.

    Perhaps you are using this thread to promote your own company?

    Maybe the WHMCS verify is playing up but the Turkish providers link seems to fail to verify too

    I have not removed my signature, nor will I. I stand behind my business and my claims.

    My website is live, active, and fully operational. If your automated verification tools are 'failing', it is likely because they are being blocked by our WAF/Cloudflare security rules designed to stop bots—not real users. Feel free to visit manually.

    But let's be real: You are grasping at straws.

    Even if my website were offline (which it isn't), how does that change the fact that IONOS admitted in writing to throttling NVMe drives to 200MB/s?

    Does a signature verification error somehow invalidate the screenshot in the OP? No.

    Stop trying to derail the thread with ad hominem attacks and address the actual issue: Deceptive Marketing by a market leader.

    That not how the WHMCS check tool works.

    WHMCS will verify your licence when you install and then do periodic calls to the licence server to check your licence is still valid.

    You may want to check it

    https://www.whmcs.com/members/verifydomain.php/verifydomain.php

    I checked both your main and sub domain for the verifcation

    Are you a WHMCS sales rep? Or are you just blind to the topic at hand?

    Is the subject of this thread the IONOS Deceptive Marketing scandal, or are you trying to audit my software stack?

    If you are trying to sell WHMCS licenses, this is definitely the wrong place.

    If you have nothing valuable to add regarding the NVMe throttling issue, stop hijacking the thread with off-topic noise.

    • Are you a WHMCS sales rep? Or are you just blind to the topic at hand?

    You seem a very rude little man, all you have done when people have not agreed with you is attack them

    • Is the subject of this thread the IONOS Deceptive Marketing scandal, or are you trying to audit my software stack?

    You seem to want everyone to have everything in order, but fail to do so yourself

    If you are trying to sell WHMCS licenses, this is definitely the wrong place.

    Have I or anyone mentioned trying to sell you anything ? No

    • If you have nothing valuable to add regarding the NVMe throttling issue, stop hijacking the thread with off-topic noise.

    In the hosting market, there are always limits in place, even more so with global providers because they do not have time to deal with rubbish like this.

    Calling me names like 'little man' only shows your own lack of professionalism.

    But the most revealing part of your comment is the end: '...because they do not have time to deal with rubbish like this.'

    So, asking for the NVMe speed we paid for is 'rubbish' to you? Holding a provider accountable for deceptive descriptions is 'rubbish'?

    Thank you for showing everyone exactly how you view customer rights. I think we are done here.

    Life lesson, respect is earned not just given. Your very first thread, people comment you attack them. Not a great start.

    You cannot simply attack someone if they have different opinion than you do. That is why these are called "discussions" not dictator statements

    It seems more that when someone states a fact, maybe hits a raw nerve you get angry have a breakdown over it.

  • @Tufan said:

    @barbaros said:

    @Tufan said:
    It is fascinating to watch how some individuals are desperately trying to derail this thread into completely irrelevant territories—checking my licenses, my signature, or my forum tags.

    No one is derailing anything.

    It seems that exposing a major provider's deceptive practice is deeply bothering some of you.

    No one gives a fuck. IONOS doesn't have a rep here (at least not active) and no one would bother or care about defending IONOS

    Let’s get one thing straight: You can attack me, audit my website, or question my account age. None of that changes the FACT visible in the screenshot above.

    The Fact: IONOS admitted in writing that they sell "High Performance NVMe" but intentionally throttle it to 200MB/s (HDD speeds) via software limits.

    If you are trying to bury this truth by creating noise about "WHMCS verification" or "signatures," you are just proving that you prefer protecting the status quo over honest hosting standards.

    Stop attacking the messenger and look at the message.

    You just kept saying that your aim is trying to show deceptive actions of IONOS. Well OK, what do you expect us to do? Give you a medal?

    You posted your findings, people commented about it. No one seems surprised. And it's over. If you want to sue them, sure go sue them.

    The forum you are posting has rules, like what you can add to your signature, how to promote your services, and if you are a provider you are expected to have valid WHMCS license (I am not saying you have it or not)

    What you are doing here is, joining to a community, without reading community rules. Then having arguements with people posting here regularly. That's not a best way to enter into a community.

    Especially, if you are planning to sell hosting here.

    If you are not happy with people knit picking your details, you can kindly piss off. And stop with the drama of 'oh they are trying to twist the truth, trying to surpress me from telling the truth'. No one is doing that.

    You just summed up your entire mentality in one sentence: 'No one gives a fuck.'

    You are openly saying that fraud and deceptive marketing in the hosting industry don't matter to you. That explains everything.

    Fortunately, looking at the views and supportive comments in this thread (and Trustpilot), many people DO give a fuck about getting what they paid for.

    Since you resorted to telling me to 'piss off', it's clear you have run out of logical arguments. I won't lower myself to that level.

    Discussion closed.

    Okay little man, if you say so

    Welcome to LET btw.

    Thanked by 2tentor forest
  • @ascicode said:
    Back to IONOS. Everyone can use them, because they have cheap options. We allready found many years ago, that 1y for €12 offers are limited to a year or otherwise you pay much more. There are just some limits with them.
    Move on and go to another host, that fits your needs. Serververify will help you.

    Unfortunately, words doesn't work for him. He is expecting some medal or nobel prize for his work of saving everyone from the trouble.

  • jarjar Patron Provider, Top Host, Veteran
    edited January 10

    It's high performance because they don't let one user burst 100% of the pipeline resulting in increased reliability and consistency, and 200MB/s is a ridiculously high number. I hate you for making me think IONOS did something intelligent.

  • MainfrezzerMainfrezzer Member
    edited January 10

    @jar said:
    It's high performance because they don't let one user burst 100% of the pipeline resulting in increased reliability and consistency, and 200MB/s is a ridiculously high number. I hate you for making me think IONOS did something intelligent.

    Advertising nvmes and capping out at spinning rust is not what one would call high performance, let's be real.

    And I still fail to see that this is inherently the issue, the issue was the lack of disclosure of that fact, let alone that anywhere is stated that this happens nor what some minimum guaranteed specs are.

    *Edit: nobody would give a shit on the 1€ plan, that's clear, but the higher tiers...

  • jarjar Patron Provider, Top Host, Veteran
    edited January 10

    @Mainfrezzer said: not what one would call high performance

    Yes 200MB/s is high performance. You are retarded. I can't believe you people are making me stand up for IONOS. They suck, you guys just suck more.

    Thanked by 2skorous tentor
  • @jar said:

    @Mainfrezzer said: not what one would call high performance

    Yes 200MB/s is high performance. You are retarded.

    I'm amused, I like you. You might accomplish something one day

    Thanked by 1jar
  • zedzed Member

    Just bad timing. Everybody's dick is still up but @VeloxMedia got banned so there's nobody to rage at anymore and you walked in @Tufan

  • s0n1cs0n1c Member

    my dick is down

    Thanked by 1Mainfrezzer
  • FalzoFalzo Member

    And here I thought the bigger advantage of the invention of ssd/nvme is high (random) IOps...

    How large is the storage of that VM and what is the "app" doing that needs to fill this poor disk sequentially in seconds?

    Did I miss some new crypto game?

    Thanked by 3jar skorous tentor
  • WhiteRoseGWhiteRoseG Member
    edited January 11
    `# ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2025-04-20                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Sun Jan 11 19:18:16 UTC 2026
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Uptime     : 0 days, 1 hours, 39 minutes
    Processor  : AMD EPYC-Milan Processor
    CPU cores  : 6 @ 2596.444 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
    RAM        : 7.7 GiB
    Swap       : 0.0 KiB
    Disk       : 236.1 GiB
    Distro     : Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm)
    Kernel     : 6.1.0-42-amd64
    VM Type    : KVM
    IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ✔ Online
    
    IPv6 Network Information:
    ---------------------------------
    ISP        : IONOS SE ber.de
    ASN        : AS8560 IONOS SE
    Host       : Strato AG
    Location   : Berlin, State of Berlin (BE)
    Country    : Germany
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/vda1):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 80.08 MB/s   (20.0k) | 497.18 MB/s   (7.7k)
    Write      | 80.29 MB/s   (20.0k) | 499.79 MB/s   (7.8k)
    Total      | 160.37 MB/s  (40.0k) | 996.98 MB/s  (15.5k)
               |                      |
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 474.42 MB/s    (926) | 468.50 MB/s    (457)
    Write      | 499.63 MB/s    (975) | 499.70 MB/s    (487)
    Total      | 974.05 MB/s   (1.9k) | 968.21 MB/s    (944)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 5.89 Gbits/sec  | 8.59 Gbits/sec  | 20.8 ms
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 5.86 Gbits/sec  | 6.98 Gbits/sec  | 29.2 ms
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 1.87 Gbits/sec  | 1.73 Gbits/sec  | 93.7 ms
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 1.03 Gbits/sec  | 1.01 Gbits/sec  | 173 ms
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 993 Mbits/sec   | 1.01 Gbits/sec  | 167 ms
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 2.26 Gbits/sec  | 2.07 Gbits/sec  | 90.2 ms
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 874 Mbits/sec   | 902 Mbits/sec   | 219 ms
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 5.89 Gbits/sec  | 7.98 Gbits/sec  | 20.7 ms
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 5.87 Gbits/sec  | 6.94 Gbits/sec  | 28.8 ms
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 1.87 Gbits/sec  | 1.73 Gbits/sec  | 93.3 ms
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 1.06 Gbits/sec  | 294 Mbits/sec   | --
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 991 Mbits/sec   | 154 Mbits/sec   | 167 ms
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 2.18 Gbits/sec  | 118 Mbits/sec   | 89.9 ms
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 808 Mbits/sec   | 162 Mbits/sec   | 219 ms
    
    Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value
                    |
    Single Core     | 2582
    Multi Core      | 10959
    `
    
    Thanked by 1CYOP
  • LeviLevi Member

    To be fair:

    While paying:

    Nothing else matters ya know...

  • # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2025-04-20                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Wed Oct 29 21:12:04 UTC 2025
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Uptime     : 62 days, 12 hours, 19 minutes
    Processor  : AMD EPYC-Milan Processor
    CPU cores  : 6 @ 1996.249 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
    RAM        : 7.7 GiB
    Swap       : 0.0 KiB
    Disk       : 236.1 GiB
    Distro     : Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm)
    Kernel     : 6.1.0-38-amd64
    VM Type    : MICROSOFT
    IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ✔ Online
    
    IPv6 Network Information:
    ---------------------------------
    ISP        : IONOS SE
    ASN        : AS8560 IONOS SE
    Host       : Strato GmbH
    Location   : Berlin, State of Berlin (BE)
    Country    : Germany
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/vda1):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 80.06 MB/s   (20.0k) | 497.18 MB/s   (7.7k)
    Write      | 80.27 MB/s   (20.0k) | 499.79 MB/s   (7.8k)
    Total      | 160.33 MB/s  (40.0k) | 996.98 MB/s  (15.5k)
               |                      |
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 474.09 MB/s    (925) | 468.50 MB/s    (457)
    Write      | 499.28 MB/s    (975) | 499.70 MB/s    (487)
    Total      | 973.38 MB/s   (1.9k) | 968.21 MB/s    (944)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 1.79 Gbits/sec  | 4.84 Gbits/sec  | 20.4 ms
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 1.82 Gbits/sec  | 3.49 Gbits/sec  | 29.3 ms
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 1.53 Gbits/sec  | 166 Mbits/sec   | 107 ms
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 1.27 Gbits/sec  | 803 Mbits/sec   | 163 ms
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 993 Mbits/sec   | 983 Mbits/sec   | 170 ms
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 1.65 Gbits/sec  | 2.06 Gbits/sec  | 90.1 ms
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 484 Mbits/sec   | 905 Mbits/sec   | 221 ms
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 1.84 Gbits/sec  | 4.67 Gbits/sec  | 20.4 ms
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 1.84 Gbits/sec  | 6.12 Gbits/sec  | 29.3 ms
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 1.73 Gbits/sec  | 1.77 Gbits/sec  | 95.0 ms
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 1.27 Gbits/sec  | 971 Mbits/sec   | 163 ms
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 933 Mbits/sec   | 186 Mbits/sec   | 170 ms
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 1.71 Gbits/sec  | 407 Mbits/sec   | 90.1 ms
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 882 Mbits/sec   | 745 Mbits/sec   | 221 ms
    
    Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value
                    |
    Single Core     | 1314
    Multi Core      | 4864
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/14738894
    
    Thanked by 1CYOP
  • BallinwrldBallinwrld Barred
    edited January 12

    Maybe you just abused their disk previously, like there's much YABS results indicating 900+ MB/s.

  • @Levi said:
    To be fair:

    While paying:

    Nothing else matters ya know...

    I know right best deal ever

  • 4kvps4kvps Barred

    @Levi said:
    To be fair:

    While paying:

    Nothing else matters ya know...

    Hello .
    Thats so good. How can you buy that VPS?

  • TufanTufan Member

    @wingmanDE said:

    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2025-04-20                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Wed Oct 29 21:12:04 UTC 2025
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Uptime     : 62 days, 12 hours, 19 minutes
    Processor  : AMD EPYC-Milan Processor
    CPU cores  : 6 @ 1996.249 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
    RAM        : 7.7 GiB
    Swap       : 0.0 KiB
    Disk       : 236.1 GiB
    Distro     : Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm)
    Kernel     : 6.1.0-38-amd64
    VM Type    : MICROSOFT
    IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ✔ Online
    
    IPv6 Network Information:
    ---------------------------------
    ISP        : IONOS SE
    ASN        : AS8560 IONOS SE
    Host       : Strato GmbH
    Location   : Berlin, State of Berlin (BE)
    Country    : Germany
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/vda1):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 80.06 MB/s   (20.0k) | 497.18 MB/s   (7.7k)
    Write      | 80.27 MB/s   (20.0k) | 499.79 MB/s   (7.8k)
    Total      | 160.33 MB/s  (40.0k) | 996.98 MB/s  (15.5k)
               |                      |
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 474.09 MB/s    (925) | 468.50 MB/s    (457)
    Write      | 499.28 MB/s    (975) | 499.70 MB/s    (487)
    Total      | 973.38 MB/s   (1.9k) | 968.21 MB/s    (944)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 1.79 Gbits/sec  | 4.84 Gbits/sec  | 20.4 ms
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 1.82 Gbits/sec  | 3.49 Gbits/sec  | 29.3 ms
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 1.53 Gbits/sec  | 166 Mbits/sec   | 107 ms
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 1.27 Gbits/sec  | 803 Mbits/sec   | 163 ms
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 993 Mbits/sec   | 983 Mbits/sec   | 170 ms
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 1.65 Gbits/sec  | 2.06 Gbits/sec  | 90.1 ms
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 484 Mbits/sec   | 905 Mbits/sec   | 221 ms
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 1.84 Gbits/sec  | 4.67 Gbits/sec  | 20.4 ms
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 1.84 Gbits/sec  | 6.12 Gbits/sec  | 29.3 ms
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 1.73 Gbits/sec  | 1.77 Gbits/sec  | 95.0 ms
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 1.27 Gbits/sec  | 971 Mbits/sec   | 163 ms
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 933 Mbits/sec   | 186 Mbits/sec   | 170 ms
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 1.71 Gbits/sec  | 407 Mbits/sec   | 90.1 ms
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 882 Mbits/sec   | 745 Mbits/sec   | 221 ms
    
    Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value
                    |
    Single Core     | 1314
    Multi Core      | 4864
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/14738894
    

    Thanks for sharing the data.

    What you are seeing there is the 'Best Case Scenario' (likely an empty node or inactive neighbors). That is the Burst capacity.

    The issue I exposed—and that IONOS Executive Support admitted to in writing—is about the Guaranteed Floor and the QoS Logic.

    They explicitly stated that this is a 'Mass Market' product designed to throttle users via software limits to preserve stability when the node gets busy. Right now, you might be enjoying the honeymoon phase of a quiet node. But the moment your 'neighbors' start working, that software limit admitted by their Back Office will kick in, clamping you down to ~200 MB/s.

    Enterprise hosting is about consistency, not just getting lucky with a quiet node until the QoS hammer drops. I'd rather have a transparent limit than a hidden trap.

  • TufanTufan Member

    It is genuinely baffling to watch this discussion.

    Let's get technical for a second: A real NVMe drive should comfortably sustain 1GB/s to 3GB/s.

    Yet, people see a burst speed of ~500 MB/s (which is basically standard SATA SSD speed) and think: "Oh great, I have NVMe!"

    No, you don't. You have a throttled drive labeled as NVMe.

    If you run a sustained fio test—not just a quick script—you will see the I/O bottleneck (iowait) spiking to 93%+ as soon as the QoS limit kicks in. That is exactly where the illusion breaks.

    The strangest part is: The IONOS Back Office Team explicitly admitted this. They sent me an email stating: "Yes, we limit it for mass market stability."

    They confessed to the throttling. The "murderer" admitted the crime in writing, yet some users are still acting as the defense attorney trying to prove there is no crime.

    Ignorance is bliss, I suppose. :)

  • TufanTufan Member

    @Tufan said:
    It is genuinely baffling to watch this discussion.

    Let's get technical for a second: A real NVMe drive should comfortably sustain 1GB/s to 3GB/s.

    Yet, people see a burst speed of ~500 MB/s (which is basically standard SATA SSD speed) and think: "Oh great, I have NVMe!"

    No, you don't. You have a throttled drive labeled as NVMe.

    If you run a sustained fio test—not just a quick script—you will see the I/O bottleneck (iowait) spiking to 93%+ as soon as the QoS limit kicks in. That is exactly where the illusion breaks.

    The strangest part is: The IONOS Back Office Team explicitly admitted this. They sent me an email stating: "Yes, we limit it for mass market stability."

    They confessed to the throttling. The "murderer" admitted the crime in writing, yet some users are still acting as the defense attorney trying to prove there is no crime.

    Ignorance is bliss, I suppose. :)

    +
    Just a word of caution to those celebrating their temporary benchmark scores:

    You might be losing exactly when you think you are winning.

    Thinking you have "won" because you hit a lucky, empty node today is a dangerous illusion. You are paying for consistency, but receiving luck. When the "Mass Market" reality hits and that hidden limit kicks in, you'll realize the game was rigged from the start.

    Don't let the temporary silence of the noisy neighbors fool you into thinking the walls are soundproof.

  • Everyone uses the same disks on this vps. If they not limit them, you can't use your vps then.

    If you constantly have issues with this thematic, get a dedi, and forget ionos.

    Thanked by 1tentor
  • @Tufan said:

    @Tufan said:
    It is genuinely baffling to watch this discussion.

    Let's get technical for a second: A real NVMe drive should comfortably sustain 1GB/s to 3GB/s.

    Yet, people see a burst speed of ~500 MB/s (which is basically standard SATA SSD speed) and think: "Oh great, I have NVMe!"

    No, you don't. You have a throttled drive labeled as NVMe.

    If you run a sustained fio test—not just a quick script—you will see the I/O bottleneck (iowait) spiking to 93%+ as soon as the QoS limit kicks in. That is exactly where the illusion breaks.

    The strangest part is: The IONOS Back Office Team explicitly admitted this. They sent me an email stating: "Yes, we limit it for mass market stability."

    They confessed to the throttling. The "murderer" admitted the crime in writing, yet some users are still acting as the defense attorney trying to prove there is no crime.

    Ignorance is bliss, I suppose. :)

    +
    Just a word of caution to those celebrating their temporary benchmark scores:

    You might be losing exactly when you think you are winning.

    Thinking you have "won" because you hit a lucky, empty node today is a dangerous illusion. You are paying for consistency, but receiving luck. When the "Mass Market" reality hits and that hidden limit kicks in, you'll realize the game was rigged from the start.

    Don't let the temporary silence of the noisy neighbors fool you into thinking the walls are soundproof.

    How does it make a difference to be on an empty node if they are enforcing a soft limit across the board? Your argument doesn’t make sense to me.

    Thanked by 2wingmanDE forest
  • zedzed Member

    Sounds like it's just not consistently enforced.. Maybe they enable it when a node becomes loaded beyond x amount or perhaps it's per (heavy) user.

    Anyway it's good info to have, I'm not sure why so much hostility but it's the internet fuck your mom or whatever.

Sign In or Register to comment.